Korean Journal of Agricultural Science (농업과학연구)

Institute of Agricultural Science, CNU (충남대학교 농업과학연구소)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring consumer awareness and attitudes towards eco-friendly packaging among undergraduate students in Korea

  • Quedahm Chin (Department of Agricultural Economics, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Seungjee Hong (Department of Agricultural Economics, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2023.09.05
  • Accepted : 2023.10.06
  • Published : 2023.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The global waste crisis has been escalating and its consequent impact on soil, water, air pollution, and eventually climate change acceleration has shed light on the importance of reducing waste. Amidst COVID-19 and the following surge in single-use plastics for food delivery, waste generation is on the incline. Companies and governments have embarked on developing various eco-friendly packaging technologies, but their effectiveness on the consumers is vague as definitions of eco-friendly packaging are vague, and research on its link to purchase intention remains scarce. Thus, the adoption of eco-friendly packaging has been slow. To address this issue, this study analyzes the awareness and purchase intention of four visual attributes of eco-friendly packaging-material, verbal statement, eco-label, and color-along with the environmental consciousness among undergraduate university students in Korea through online surveys and the ordered logit regression model. The study distinguished the attributes into evidence-based and conjectural categories. The findings revealed that eco-friendly visual attributes had a positive effect on purchase intention amongst undergraduate students in Korea; however the level of environmental consciousness had marginal effect on the purchase intention of eco-friendly visual attributes. The level of effectiveness also varied with each visual element. Analyses revealed that visual attributes to eco-friendly material had marginal effect on purchase intention; color was deemed not an "Eco-friendly attribute" by most students, and although eco-friendly labels were deemed as an eco-friendly attribute, trust in the labels varied according to environmental consciousness. These findings have implications for businesses and policymakers aiming to promote eco-friendly consumption within packaged food products.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

저자들은 본 연구에서 원고 교정, 데이터 코딩, 그리고 그림 작성 등 도움을 준 Aleksandra Wisniewska에 감사를 표한다.

References

  1. Abalansa S, El Mahrad B, Icely J, Newton A. 2021. Electronic waste, an environmental problem exported to developing countries: The good, the bad and the ugly. Sustainability 13:5302.
  2. Cho JH, Lee HS, Lee SH, Kim TK, Hong NK. 2012. Consumers' purchasing behavior and preference for small packaged apple. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 39:151-159. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.7744/CNUJAS.2012.39.1.151
  3. Ertz M, Francois J, Durif F. 2017. How consumers react to environmental information: An experimental study. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 29:162-178.
  4. Herbes C, Beuthner C, Ramme I. 2020. How green is your packaging-A comparative international study of cues consumers use to recognize environmentally friendly packaging. International Journal of Consumer Studies 44:258-271.
  5. Jang YC, Lee G, Kwon Y, Lim JH, Jeong JH. 2020. Recycling and management practices of plastic packaging waste towards a circular economy in South Korea. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 158:104798.
  6. Kang SE, Hwang J. 2019. The effects of sustainable packaging attributes on consumers' perceived benefits. Journal of Product Research 37:207-219. [in Korean]
  7. Ketelsen M, Janssen M, Hamm U. 2020. Consumers' response to environmentally-friendly food packaging-A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production 254:120123.
  8. Kim BJ, Hwang JH. 2021. Impact of external eco-friendly cues in food product package on perceived consumption value: The moderating effect of product type and environmental concern. Korean Journal of Hospitality and Tourism 30:75-93. [in Korean]
  9. Kim H. 2014. Segmentation of green consumers and willingness to purchase green products of university students. Korean Journal of Environmental Education 27:51-68. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.17965/KJEE.2014.27.1.51
  10. Kim M, Lee K. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and activities through eco-friendly packaging. Korean Journal of Packaging Science and Technology 20:51-57. [in Korean]
  11. Kim N, Lee K. 2023. Environmental consciousness, purchase intention, and actual purchase behavior of eco-friendly products: The moderating impact of situational context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20:5312.
  12. KITA (Korea International Trade Association). 2022. Leading destinations of plastic waste exported from South Korea in 2021, based on export volume (in tons). Statista. Accessed in https://www.statista.com/statistics/1098279/south-korea-plastic-waste-export-destinations/ on 2 June 2023.
  13. Magnier L, Crie D. 2015. Communicating packaging eco-friendliness: An exploration of consumers' perceptions of eco-designed packaging. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 43:350-366.
  14. Magnier L, Schoormans J. 2017. How do packaging material, colour, and environmental claim influence package, brand, and product evaluations? Packaging Technology and Science 30:735-751.
  15. ME (Ministry of Environment). 2023. Amount of waste generated. National indicator system. Accessed in https://www.index.go.kr/unify/idx-info.do?idxCd=4278 on 7 June 2023. [in Korean]
  16. Molloy S, Varkey P, Walker TR. 2022. Opportunities for single-use plastic reduction in the food service sector during COVID-19. Sustainable Production and Consumption 30:1082-1094.
  17. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2022. Plastic pollution is growing relentlessly as waste management and recycling fall short, says OECD. Accessed in https://www.oecd.org/environment/plastic-pollution-is-growing-relentlessly-as-waste-management-and-recycling-fall-short.htm on 2 June 2023.
  18. Orzan G, Cruceru AF, Balaceanu CT, Chivu RG. 2018. Consumers' behavior concerning sustainable packaging: An exploratory study on Romanian consumers. Sustainability 10:1787.
  19. Park H, Yang JS, Jeong HM, Jeon M. 2022. A study on the perception of consumers in their 20s on eco-friendly food packaging policy: Focusing on environmental perceptions. Culinary Science & Hospitality Research 28:40-51. [in Korean]
  20. Park SI. 2022. Eco-friendly packaging design guidelines. Sustainable packaging forum for packaging materials reduction and recycling. Accessed in https://pkg.yonsei.ac.kr/pkg/notice/news.do?mode=view&articleNo=48635&attachNo=28637 on 2 June 2023. [in Korean]
  21. Samdahl DM, Robertson R. 1989. Social determinants of environmental concern: Specification and test of the model. Environment and Behavior 21:57-81.
  22. Scott L, Vigar-Ellis D. 2014. Consumer understanding, perceptions and behaviours with regard to environmentally friendly packaging in a developing nation. International Journal of Consumer Studies 38:642-649.
  23. Segran E. 2021. H&M is one of fashion's biggest polluters. Now its foundation is on a $100 million quest to save the planet. Fast Company. Accessed in https://www.fastcompany.com/90596456/hm-is-one-of-fashions-biggest-polluters-now-its-on-a-100-million-quest-to-save-the-planet on 3 June 2023.
  24. Steenis ND, van der Lans IA, van Herpen E, van Trijp HCM. 2018. Effects of sustainable design strategies on consumer preferences for redesigned packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production 205:854-865.
  25. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2022. How disposable tech is feeding an e-waste crisis. United Nations. Accessed in https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/how-disposable-tech-feeding-e-waste-crisis on 2 June 2023.
  26. Yea MY, Lee SJ. 2022. Environment-conscious consumer: Goodwill and profit growth. Journal of the Korean Production and Operations Management Society 33:587-610. [in Korean]
  27. Yeom JY, Lee HL, An SE. 2022. 2021 National environment awareness survey. KEI Focus 83:1-19. [in Korean]