DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Characteristics of Learning Organizations in Public Libraries

공공도서관의 학습조직 특성 연구

  • 송현경 (내일신문, 명지대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2023.11.21
  • Accepted : 2023.12.11
  • Published : 2023.12.30

Abstract

This study analyzed the characteristics of the learning organization according to its characteristics, the operation method and size of each public library. In addition, the service quality of public libraries was investigated so that it was also analyzed the correlation between the characteristics of the learning organization and the quality of the service. To achieve the research objectives, 83 librarians and 343 users across seven public libraries in South Korea's metropolitan areas were surveyed. The investigation covered various dimensions of learning organizations: creating continuous learning opportunities, promoting inquiry and dialogue, encouraging collaboration and team learning, creating systems to capture and share learning, empowering people toward a collective vision, connecting the organization to its environment, and providing strategic leadership for learning. Also it was investigated aspects of service quality: affect of service, information control, and library as place. As a result of the study, for the learning organization characteristics, more than 3.4 out of 5 were qualified to have foundation of learning organizations. One attempted to categorize according to its operational method and size and compare learning organization differences between public libraries, however it was not easy to see the clear differences. Therefore it was judged that there might be another unidentified factor which gives an affect on learning organization. Furthermore, it was found that there was a positive correlation between learning organization traits and service quality. This study might signify by looking into how the learning organization, which is one of the post-bureaucratic organizational traits, appears in public libraries.

본 연구는 공공도서관별 학습조직 특성과 운영방식 및 규모에 따른 학습조직 특성을 분석하였다. 또 공공도서관의 서비스 품질을 조사하였으며 학습조직 특성과 서비스 품질 간 상관관계를 분석하였다. 이를 위하여 본 연구는 한국의 수도권에 위치한 공공도서관 7곳의 사서 83명, 이용자 343명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하여 학습조직 특성인 학습기회 창출, 탐구 및 대화 촉진, 협력 및 팀 학습 독려, 학습 체계 구축, 권한 위임, 조직과 환경의 연계, 학습 전략적 리더십과 서비스 품질 차원인 서비스의 감성적 차원, 정보통제 차원, 도서관 장소 차원을 조사하였다. 연구 결과, 학습조직 각 요인들은 5점 만점에 3.4점 이상으로 공공도서관들은 대체로 학습조직 기반을 갖춘 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 공공도서관 별 학습조직 차이를 운영방식 및 규모에 따라 집단화하여 비교하고자 하였으나 이는 쉽지 않았다. 이에 따라 학습조직에 영향을 주는 다른 요인이 있을 것으로 판단되었다. 이에 더하여 학습조직 특성과 서비스 품질은 정적(+) 상관관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 탈관료제 조직 특성 중 하나인 학습조직 특성이 공공도서관에서 어떻게 나타나는지 살펴보았다는 데 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, Eul Kyoo, Kim, Mi Seon, & Kim, Dae Young (2011). The effect of learning organization readiness on organizational commitment in public libraries. Journal of Korean HRD Research, 6(3), 1-22.
  2. Choi, Hyunji & Park, Sunhyung (2022). An analysis of the research trends in learning organization in the Field of Education in South Korea. The Korea Educational Review, 28(4), 321-352. https://doi.org/10.29318/KER.28.4.13
  3. Choi, Young-Am (2014). Moderating Effects of Perceived Organizational Support and Self-Efficacy in The Relationship of Continuous Learning Activities and Organizational Effectiveness: Centered on Medical Institutions. Doctorial dissertation, Daejeon University, Korea.
  4. Kim, MyoungSeob, Seo, SookYoung, & Choi, MyoungSook (2021). Human resource development by exploring domestic organizational learning and learning organization research trends. Korean Journal of Human Resource Development, 24(3), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.24991/KJHRD.2021.09.24.3.1
  5. Kim, Pyongsoo & Cho, Cheolkyu (2018). The effects of organizational learning on the organizational citizenship behavior and service quality of special security guards. The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 21, 9(5), 767-776. https://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.9.5.54
  6. Kim, Pyong Soo, Lee, Kwang Ryeol, & Lee, Young Suk (2005). Influences of security oractitioners' organizational learning on organizational performances. Korean Security Journal, 10, 79-102.
  7. National Library Statistics system (2023). Public library statistical data final in 2023 (2022 performance). Available: https://www.libsta.go.kr/statistics/public/stat
  8. Park, Hyemin (2008). A Study on the Relation of Organization culture Organizational learning and Knowledge Service Quality: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Service Industry. Master's thesis, Yonsei University, Korea.
  9. Association of Research Libraries (ARL). (2021). LibQUAL+ 2021 Survey. Libqual+. Libqual+. Available: https://www.libqual.org/documents/LibQual/notebooks/287_6.pdf
  10. Association of Research Libraries (ARL). (2023). Survey FAQs. Libqual+. Available: https://www.libqual.org/about/faq_survey
  11. Ellinger, A. E., Ellinger, A. D., & Keller, S. B. (2002). Logistics managers' learning environments and firm performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 23(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2002.tb00014.x
  12. Ellinger, A. D., Ellinger, A. E., Yang, B., & Howton, S. W. (2002). The relationship between the learning organization concept and firms' financial performance: an empirical assessment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1010
  13. Evans, G. E. & Alire, C. A. (2013). Management Basics for Information Professionals. (3rd ed.). Chicago: Neal-Schuman.
  14. Goh, S. C., Chan, C., & Kuziemsky, C. (2013), Teamwork, organizational learning, patient safety and job outcomes. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 26(5), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2011-0032
  15. Griffin, R. W. (2017). Management (12th ed.). Ohio: Cengage Learning.
  16. Haley, Q. K. (2010). The Relationship between Learning Organization Dimensions and Library Performance. Doctorial dissertation, Department of Counseling, Northern Illinois University, United States.
  17. Gibson, J. L. (2009). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes (13th ed.). Messachusettes: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
  18. Kyrillidou, M. (2009). Item Sampling in Service Quality Assessment Surveys to Improve Response Rates and Reduce Respondent Burden: The "LibQUAL+® Lite" Randomized Control Trial (RCT). Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Illinois, United States.
  19. Marsick, V. J. (2013). The dimensions of a learning organization questionnaire (DLOQ). Advances in Developing Human Resources, 15(2), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422313475984
  20. Marsick, V. J. & Watkins, K. E. (1999). Facilitating Learning Organizations: Making Learning Count. Hampshire: Gower.
  21. Marsick, V. J. & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization's learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422303005002002
  22. Moran, B. B. & Morner, C. J. (2018). Library and Information Center Management (9th ed.). California: Libraries Unlimited.
  23. Oh, S. (2015). How learning atmosphere is connected to quality practices: a case study of a Korean service firm. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 83-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.341
  24. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298504900403
  25. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
  26. Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J., & Boydell, T. (1997). The Learning Company: A Strategy for Sustainable Development (2nd ed.). London: McGraw-Hill.
  27. Peng, J., Xie, L., Zhou, L., & Huan, T. (2022). Linking team learning climate to service performance: The role of individual- and team-level adaptive behaviors in travel services. Tourism Management, 91, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104481
  28. Robbins, S. P., Coulter, M., & DeCenzo, D. A. (2017). Fundamentals of Management (10th ed.). Messachusettes: Pearson.
  29. Rowley, J. (1997). The library as a learning organization. Library Management, 18(2), 88-91. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435129710157707
  30. Senge, P. M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (2nd ed.). New York: Doubleday/Currency.
  31. Soltani, E., Chau, V. S., & Liao, Y. Y. (2012). A learning organization perspective of service quality operations in the IT industry. Strategic Change, 21(5-6), 275-284. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.1909
  32. Tsai, Y., Wu, W., & Chung, H. (2010). How learning organisation influences staff members' service quality. 7th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, Tokyo, Japan, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2010.5530134
  33. Thorpe, C. (2021). Transforming a university library into a learning organisation. Library Management, 42(6/7), 436-447. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-01-2021-0003
  34. Watkins, K. E. & Marsick, V. J. (1993). Sculpting the Learning Organization: Lessons in the Art and Science of Systemic Change. California: Jossey Bass.
  35. Yu, T. & Chen, C. (2015). The relationship of learning culture, learning method, and organizational performance in the university and college libraries in Taiwan. Libri, 65(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2014-1032