DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

방목생태축산의 흑자수익 구조를 위한 경영관리모델별 경영자 선발과 업적평가에 대한 연구

A Study on the Selection of Manager and Performance Evaluation in Management Models for Profitable Structure of Eco Pastoral System in Alpine Grassland

  • 최인호 (강원대학교, 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 최재성 (강원대학교, 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 김지융 (캔자스 주립대학교, 농학과) ;
  • 성경일 (강원대학교, 동물생명과학대학) ;
  • 김병완 (강원대학교, 동물생명과학대학)
  • In Ho Choi (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Jae Seong Choi (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Ji Yung Kim (Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University) ;
  • Kyung Il Sung (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Byong Wan Kim (College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.12.22
  • 심사 : 2023.12.28
  • 발행 : 2023.12.29

초록

방목생태축산 활성화 방안으로는 정부 소유의 미 이용 초지를 규모화한 공공목장의 형태로 하고 소유와 운영에 따라 1) 정부가 소유하고 운영하되 수입과 지출이 균형을 이루는 경영, 2) 정부가 소유하고 운영하되 수익을 창출하는 경영, 3) 정부가 소유하되 민간(외부 채용 전문경영자)이 운영하는 경영 및 4) 소유와 운영을 개인(민간)에게 모두 이양하여 경영하는 4개의 경영관리모델을 상정하였다. 이상에서 본 연구는 방목생태축산의 활성화를 위해, 4개의 경영관리모델을 제시하고 흑자수익 구조를 위한 경영자의 선발과 업무평가 방안을 제시하였다. 또한 방목생태축산 산지생태계 보전을 위한 관리 방안을 제시하고 있다. 특히 경영관리모델의 시스템관리 중 경영자의 선발 및 업무성과에 대한 평가는 우리나라 기업에서 사용하는 방법을 이용하여 방목생태축산의 특성에 맞도록 변형하여 시도했다는 면에서 의의가 크며 수익구조 개선에도 기여할 것으로 판단된다. 향후 연구에서는 경영자 선발채용과 업적평가에서 미래 환경에 따라 변화하는 축산 조건에 맞춰 평가관리 항목의 변경과 배점의 연구가 필요할 것으로 보인다.

As a means to activate eco pastoral system in alpine grassland, the government can consider public pastures, which are currently unused, to scale them up into public ranches. Depending on ownership and operation, four management models proposed as follows: 1) Government-Owned and Operated with Balanced Profit and Loss 2) Government-Owned and Operated with Revenue Generation 3) Government-Owned but Privately Operated by Outsourced to Professional Manager 4) Full Privatization (Ownership and Operation by Private Individuals). The study outlined above proposes four management models for the activation of eco pastoral system in alpine grassland. It also suggests methods for the selection and performance evaluation of manager to establish a profitable structure. Additionally, the research provides management methods for the conservation of grazing ecology in pastoral ecosystems. Particularly, the adaptation of tools commonly used in South Korean business sector for the selection and performance evaluation of manager within the system of the proposed management models. This aspect is deemed valuable as it aligns these tools with the specific characteristics of eco pastoral system in alpine grassland, contributing not only to the effective implementation of the models but also to the enhancement of the revenue structure.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho, S.J. 1997. A study on the necessity and feasibility of public pasture. Korean Association of Livestock Management. 13(1):3-20. 
  2. Choi, W.G. 1995. Case studies of public breeding ranches in Japan. Korea Dairy & Beef Farmers Association. p. 78. 
  3. Ecolivestock. 2022. Korea eco-friendly livestock association, status of designation of 51 grazing eco-farms. 
  4. Forest Basic Act. 2023. Article 11: Formulation and implementation of forest basic plans. 
  5. Kim, K.W. 2023. Korea Nongeomin Newspaper. Seoul. https://www.agrinet.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=316843 
  6. Kim, Y.H. 2021. Financial News. Seoul. https://www.fnnews.com/news/202102171013330970. 
  7. Kwon, C.H., Goh, Y.G., Moon, S.H. and Sung, K.I. 2016. Research on the Standard Model of Korean eco-pastroal system in alpine grassland. Kyungpook National University Industry-Academia Cooperation Division, Sangju. pp. 95-120. 
  8. Lee, B.O. 2013. Mountain ecological animal husbandry and public pastures. KREI, Naju. 
  9. Lee, H.W. and The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 2015. Mountain ecological animal husbandry. Korea National Open University Press. pp. 164-186. 
  10. NIAS. 2023. Smart livestock statistics. Livestock Management Information. 
  11. Samsung Group. 2015. The evaluation method for executives. 
  12. Shin, G.J. 2023. Easily passing job interviews. Hackers. pp. 324-325. 
  13. Statistics Korea. 2023. Investigation of agricultural livestock production costs, Profitability per unit. 
  14. Sung, K.I., Lee, B.O. and Kim, J.H. 2006. Ecological beef cattle farm development plan(Taebaek Area). p. 1. 
  15. The Forest Recreation Act. 2023b. Natural recreation forests, healing forests, and other forest welfare facilities. 
  16. The Forestry Resources Act. 2023a. Article 13: Formulation and approval of forestry management plans, Chapter 6: Penalties. 
  17. The Pasture Act. 2023. Article 21: Restrictions on activities in pastures. 
  18. The Plant Variety Protection Act. 2023. Article 137(1): Criteria for imposing administrative fines according to the attached table. 
  19. The Water Resources Act. 2023. Article 4: Principles of water resource management.