Journal of Korean Physical Therapy Science (대한물리치료과학회지)

Korean Physical Therapy Science (대한물리치료과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and usability test of transfer device with customized sling lifts

  • SeYeon Jeong (Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School of Kyungnam University) ;
  • KiHun Cho (Department of Physical Therapy, Korea National University of Transportation) ;
  • SoungKyun Hong (Department of Physical Therapy, Woosuk University) ;
  • WonJae Choi (Department of Physical Therapy, Joongbu University) ;
  • Kwangkook Lee (Department of Naval Architecture and Ocean System Engineering, Kyungnam University) ;
  • Kyeongbong Lee (Department of Physical Therapy, Kangwon National University) ;
  • GyuChang Lee (Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungnam University)
  • Received : 2023.02.10
  • Accepted : 2023.04.05
  • Published : 2023.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Bedridden patients and disabled persons need help from a guardian or caregiver even in performing simple activities of daily living. In particular, for body transfer of them, the use of a transfer lift has been recommended. However, the devices currently in use have limitations in terms of support according to the individual's characteristics. This study aimed to develop a transfer lift device utilizing the patients' body-fitting sling equipped with an air tube inside the sling. In addition, we have conducted usability tests to examine the safety, effectiveness, and satisfaction with this device. Design: This study conducted usability tests with 10 healthy adults. Methods: Customized sling lifts are generally floor-based devices that consisted of a sling that holds the patient's body and a lift that moves the sling to the desired position. One characteristic feature of the device is an air tube, which is used on the sling to allow the patient's body can be adjusted. A usability test was performed in terms of the operators, who operated the device to transfer the patients. Ten operators tried the device and tested its usability. Results: The mean of 10 question for Questions was 4.18. Conclusion: The device can be useful in the advance- ment and commercialization of customized sling lifts, to ensure the safe and efficient transfer of persons with disabilities.

Keywords

References

  1. Andersen, Lars L, et al. Patient transfers and assistive devices: prospective cohort study on the risk for occupational back injury among healthcare workers. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health. 2014:40(1)74-81. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3382
  2. Cho DY, Chun KJ, Ko CW. Study on Development of a Senior-Friendly Multi-purpose Swivel Type Lift for Indoor Movements. In: Proceedings of KSPE 2011 Autumn Conference. 2011. p.663-4.
  3. Gomaa AE, Tapp LC, Luckhaupt SE, et al. Occupational traumatic injuries among workers in health care facilities-United States, 2012-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(15):405-10.
  4. Jung KT, Shin DJ, Kim KH, et al. Market survey and user analysis of mobile lift for older people. In: Proceedings of 2010 Spring Conference of Ergonomics Society of Korea. 2010. p.123-7
  5. Kim ST, Kim YS, Lim DY, et al. Pilot Study for Development of Multi-Functional Power Lift. In: Proceedings of KSPE 2009 Autumn Conference. 2009. p.615-6.
  6. Marras WS, Knapik GG, Ferguson S. Lumbar spine forces during manoeuvring of ceiling-based and floor-based patient transfer devices. Ergon. 2009;52(3):384-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802376075
  7. Prohaska TR, Anderson LA, Hooker SP, et al. Mobility and aging: transference to transportation. J Aging Res. 2011;2011:392751.
  8. Rice MS, Woolley SM, Waters TR. Comparison of required operating forces between floor-based and overhead-mounted patient lifting devices. Ergon. 2009;52(1):112-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130802481123
  9. Silvia CE, Bloswick DS, Lillquist D, Wallace D, Perkins MS.et al. An ergonomic comparison between mechanical and manual patient transfer techniques. Work. 2002;19(1):19-34.
  10. SinHo Ha, SeYeon Jeong, SoungKyun Hong, et.al. Development and feasibility test of sit to stand transfer assistive device. Journal of Korean Physical Therapy Science. 2022;29(1): 41-46. https://doi.org/10.26862/jkpts.2022.03.29.1.41
  11. Turner CW, Lewis JR, Nielsen J. Determining usability test sample size. In: Karwowski W, editors. International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2006. p.2132-3136.
  12. Waters TR, Dick R, Lowe B, et al. Ergonomic assessment of floor-based and overhead lifts. Am J Safe Patient Handl Mov. 2012;2(4):119-113.
  13. Zhuang Z, Stobbe TJ, Hsiao H, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of assistive devices for transferring residents. Appl Ergon. 1999;30(4):285-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00035-0