해양환경안전학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety)

  • 제29권7호
  • /
  • Pages.794-801
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1229-3431(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3341(eISSN)
해양환경안전학회 (The Korean Society of Marine Environment and safety)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

조건부 가치측정법을 이용한 공해상 해양생명자원 확보의 경제적 가치 추정

Estimating the Economic Value of Securing the High Seas Marine Biological Resources Using the Contingent Valuation Method

  • 진세준 (한국해양과학기술원 해양정책연구센터) ;
  • 권영주 (한국해양과학기술원 해양정책연구센터 ) ;
  • 최은철 (고려대학교 정책대학원)
  • Se-Jun Jin (Ocean Policy Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology) ;
  • Young-Ju Kwon (Ocean Policy Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology) ;
  • Eun-Chul Choi (Graduate School of Policy Studies, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 2023.11.20
  • 심사 : 2023.12.29
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

전 세계 해양의 대부분을 차지하는 공해는 해양바이오산업 성장에 필수적인 귀중한 해양 자원을 보유하고 있다. 이러한 글로벌 노력의 최전선에는 한국의 공해 자원 확보 및 기초효능(기초물질) 탐사사업이 있다. 이 연구는 대중의 인식을 측정하고 프로젝트의 이점을 정량화하여 향후 정책 결정에 대한 통찰력을 제공하고자 했다. 결과에 따르면, 연평균 지불의사액(WTP)은 3,778.8원으로, 전체 국민으로 확장하면 약 815.4억 원에 해당하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 의미는 두 가지이다. WTP를 기반으로 공해상 해양생명자원 확보의 경제적 가치는 연간 약 815억 원에 달할 정도로 상당하다. 이는 투자에 대한 WTP를 고려할 때 향후 정책 수립을 위한 중요한 참고 자료로 제공 가능하다. 해양생물자원에 대한 관심이 높아지고 있는 반면, 대중의 인식은 상대적으로 낮은 편이다. 그러나 본 사업은 해양바이오산업에 필수적인 데이터베이스를 구축하고 국제 해양생물자원을 확보하는데 있어서 중요한 역할을 하고 있다. 대중의 관심과 지속적인 지원은 이 사업 뿐만 아니라 향후 정책 구현에도 매우 중요하다. 대중의 인식을 높이는 전략은 필수적이며, 연구 결과는 향후 정책 결정에 귀중한 의견을 제공한다.

The high seas, covering the majority of the world's oceans, hold invaluable marine resources crucial for the growth of the marine bio-industry. The High seas bioresources program of South Korea is at the forefront of these global efforts. This study aims to gauge public awareness and quantify the project benefits, offering insights for future policy decisions. The results revealed that the estimated annual average willingness to pay (WTP) was 3,778.8 KRW, equating to approximately 81.54 billion KRW when extrapolated to the entire national population. The implications of the study are twofold: The project benefits, based on WTP, are substantial, amounting to approximately 81.5 billion KRW annually. This provides critical reference material for future policy formulation, given the considerable WTP in comparison to the current investment. Although interest in international sea marine biological resources is growing, public awareness remains relatively low. However, the project plays a crucial role in building essential databases for the marine bio-industry and securing international sea marine biological resources. Public interest and sustained support are pivotal, not only for this project but also for future policy implementation. Strategies to enhance public awareness are essential, and the study results offer valuable input for future policy decisions.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2023년도 해양수산부 재원으로 해양수산과학기술진흥원의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구이다(KIMST-20210646, 공해상 생명자원확보 및 활용기반 구축).

참고문헌

  1. Boyle, K. J.(2017), Contingent valuation in practice, in: Champ, P. A., Boyle, K. J., Brown, T. C. (Eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation, 2nd eds. Springer, Dordrecht. 
  2. Carson, R. T.(2012), Contingent Valuation: A Practical Alternative When Prices Aren't Available, Journal of Economic Perspective, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 27-42.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.27
  3. Choi, K. R., J. H. Kim, and S. H. Yoo(2022), Public Willingness to Pay for the Preservation of Marine Protected Species Zostera marina: A Contingent Valuation Study, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 681-691.  https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2022.28.5.681
  4. Cooper, J. C., M. Hanemann, and G. Signorello(2002), One-and-One-Half-Bound Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 84, No. 4, pp. 742-750.  https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302760556549
  5. Haab, T., L. Y. Lewis, and J. Whitehead(2020), State of the Art of Contingent Valuation, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science, New York (NY): Oxford University Press. 
  6. Hanemann, W. M.(1984), Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 332-341.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
  7. Jiang, Z., H. Mou, Y. Kumagai, and H. Kishimura(2022), Application of biotechnology on the high-value development of marine bioresource. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Vol. 10, 1037283. 
  8. Krinsky, I. and A. L. Robb(1986), On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 68, No. 4, pp. 715-719.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1924536
  9. Kristrom, B.(1997), Spike Models in Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 1013-1023.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1244440
  10. Kwon, Y. J., S. Y. Lim, and S. H. Yoo(2014), Economic Feasibility Analysis of Marine Genome Project for Next Generation, Korea Innovation Studies, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 117-138. 
  11. Langlet, A. and A. B. M. Vadrot(2023), Not 'undermining' who? Unpacking the emerging BBNJ regime complex, Marine Policy, Vol. 147, 105372. 
  12. Lee, J. S. and S. H. Yoo(2014), Economic Value Analysis of the Changgyeonggung (palace) - Jongmyo Shrine Severed Road Restoration Project, Seoul Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 17-28.  https://doi.org/10.23129/SEOULS.15.2.201406.17
  13. Lim, S. Y., M. S. Kim, I. Y. Cho, C. S. Lee, S. J. Kwon, and S. H. Yoo(2017), Measurement of the Public Value of Conserving Green Turtles, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 177-186.  https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2017.23.2.177
  14. Mitchell, R. C. and R. T. Carson(1989), Using Surveys to Value Public goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Washiongton, D.C., Resources for the Future. 
  15. Moh, Y. D. and C. Y. Lee(2020), A Study on the Relationship between the Principle of the Freedom of the High Seas and the Principle of the Common Heritage of Mankind - focused on the BBNJ Negotiations, Korea International Law Review, Vol. 57, pp. 91-114.  https://doi.org/10.25197/kilr.2020.57.91
  16. Park, S. W.(2020), A Study on the Regime of the Marine Environmental Protection for Development of the Mineral Resources in the Area, Ocean Policy Research, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 1-25.  https://doi.org/10.35372/KMIOPR.2020.35.1.001
  17. Park, S. W.(2022), Area-based Management Tools including Marine Protected Areas under the BBNJ Negotiations, Environmental Law Review, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 225-268. 
  18. Park, S. Y., S. J. Jin, and S. H. Yoo(2018), The Restoration Value of Coral Communities in Korea, Journal of the Korean Society for Marine Environment & Energy, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 149-156.  https://doi.org/10.7846/JKOSMEE.2018.21.3.149
  19. Rotter, A., M. Barbier, F. Bertoni, A. M. Bones, M. L. Cancela, J. Carlsson, ... and M. I. Vasquez(2021), The essentials of marine biotechnology. Frontiers In marine science, Vol. 8, 629629. 
  20. So, B. C.(2022), EIA in BBNJ Agreement and its implication to Marine Environment Impact Assessment Act in Korea, Environmental Law and Policy, Vol. 29, pp. 113-148.  https://doi.org/10.18215/elvlp.29..202206.113
  21. Yoo, S. H. and S. J. Kwon(2012), Non-market Benefits of Building the Large Oceanographic Research Ship, Ocean and Polar Research, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 175-183.