Animal Bioscience

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mineral composition and phosphorus digestibility in feed phosphates fed to pigs and poultry

  • Su A, Lee (Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois) ;
  • Diego A., Lopez (Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois) ;
  • Hans H., Stein (Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois)
  • Received : 2022.08.23
  • Accepted : 2022.10.12
  • Published : 2023.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is a macro mineral needed for bone mineralization and cell membrane structure and P is also involved in several fundamental pathways of metabolism in the body. Because of the low concentration and digestibility of P in plant ingredients that are the main components of diets for poultry and pigs, feed phosphates are usually included in diets in addition to the P contributed by plant ingredients. The most widely used feed phosphates in poultry and swine diets are dicalcium phosphate (DCP) and monocalcium phosphate (MCP), but tricalcium phosphate (TCP), monosodium phosphate (MSP), and magnesium phosphate (MgP) may be used as well. Because feed phosphates are mostly produced from rock phosphate, feed phosphates have impurities that contain minerals other than P. Concentrations of P in feed phosphates range from 14.8% (MgP) to 25.7% (MSP). The standardized total tract digestibility (STTD) of P in pigs ranges from 71% (TCP) to 95% (MSP). The STTD of Ca and the standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of P and Ca in feed phosphates fed to pigs and poultry have been determined only in a few experiments. Available data indicate that the STTD of Ca and SID of P in MCP are greater than in DCP in both poultry and pigs, but the SID of Ca is similar between DCP and MCP fed to broilers. Information on mineral concentrations and digestibility values in feed phosphates is needed in diet formulation for pigs and poultry, but if diets are formulated to contain equal concentrations of digestible P and Ca, it is unlikely that animal performance will be impacted by the source of feed phosphates used in the diet.

Keywords

References

  1. Kiarie E, Nyachoti CM. Bioavailability of calcium and phosphorus in feedstuffs for farm animals. In: Vitti DM, Kebreab E, editors. Phosphorus and calcium utilization and requirements in farm animals. London, UK: CAB International 2010. p. 76-93. 
  2. Stein HH, Lagos LV, Casas GA. Nutritional value of feed ingredients of plant origin fed to pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016;218:33-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.05.003 
  3. NRC. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th rev. ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2012. 
  4. Lee SA, Stein HH. Analyzed values for P and phytate in feed ingredients. Stein Nutrition Newsletter. June, [Internet]. Urbana, IL, USA c2021 [cited 2022, Oct]. Available from: https://nutrition.ansci.illinois.edu/node/1753 
  5. Zhai H, Adeola O, Liu J. Phosphorus nutrition of growing pigs. Anim Nutr 2022;9:127-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2022.01.010 
  6. Papp M, Sommerfeld V, Schollenberger M, Avenhaus U, Rodehutscord M. Phytate degradation and phosphorus utilisation by broiler chickens fed diets containing wheat with increased phytase activity. Br Poult Sci 2022;63:375-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2021.1966756 
  7. Kim H, Lee SH, Kim BG. Effects of dietary spray-dried plasma protein on nutrient digestibility and growth performance in nursery pigs. J Anim Sci 2021;100:skab351. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab351 
  8. Kong C, Kim KH, Ji SY, Kim BG. Energy concentration and phosphorus digestibility in meat meal, fish meal, and soybean meal fed to pigs. Anim Biosci 2021;34:1822-8. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0102 
  9. Zanu HK, Keerqin C, Kheravii SK, et al. Influence of meat and bone meal, phytase, and antibiotics on broiler chickens challenged with subclinical necrotic enteritis: 1. Growth performance, intestinal pH, apparent ileal digestibility, cecal microbiota, and tibial mineralization. Poult Sci 2020;99:1540-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.11.021 
  10. Jongbloed AW, Everts H, Kemme PA. Phosphorus availability and requirements in pigs. In: Haresign W, Cole DJA, editors. Recent advances in animal nutrition. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1991. p. 65-80. 
  11. Petersen GI, Pedersen C, Lindemann MD, Stein HH. Relative bioavailability of phosphorus in inorganic phosphorus sources fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2011;89:460-6. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2161 
  12. Lima FR, Fernandes JIM, Oliveira E, Fronzaglia GC, Kahn H. Laboratory evaluations of feed-grade and agricultural-grade phosphates. Poult Sci 1999;78:1717-28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/78.12.1717 
  13. O'Connor AM, Beede DK, Wilcox CJ. Lactational responses to dietary magnesium, potassium, and sodium during winter in Florida. J Dairy Sci 1988;71:971-81. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79643-5 
  14. Cromwell GL, Stahly TS, Coffey RD, Monegue HJ, Randolph JH. Efficacy of phytase in improving the bioavailability of phosphorus in soybean meal and corn-soybean meal diets for pigs. J Anim Sci 1993;71:1831-40. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.7171831x 
  15. Lima FR, Mendonca CX, Alvarez JC, et al. Chemical and physical evaluations of commercial dicalcium phosphates as sources of phosphorus in animal nutrition. Poult Sci 1995;74:1659-70. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0741659 
  16. Leikam DF, Achorn FP. Phosphate fertilizers: Production, characteristics, and technologies. In: Sims JT, Sharpley AN, editors. Phosphorus: agriculture and the environment. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America; 2005. p. 23-50. 
  17. Stewart WM, Hammond LL, Kauwenbergh SJV. Phosphorus as a natural resource. In: Sims JT, Sharpley AN, editors. Phosphorus: Agriculture and the environment. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America; 2005. p. 3-22. 
  18. Speight JG. Industrial inorganic chemistry. In: Speight JG, editor. Environmental inorganic chemistry for engineers. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2017. p. 111-69. 
  19. Baker DH. Phosphorus sources for poultry. Multi-State Poult. Newsl; 1989;1:5-6. 
  20. Gard DR. Phosphoric acids and phosphates. Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2005. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471238961.1608151907011804.a01.pub2 
  21. Petersen GI, Stein HH. Novel procedure for estimating endogenous losses and measurement of apparent and true digestibility of phosphorus by growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2006;84:2126-32. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-479 
  22. Schrodter K, Bettermann G, Staffel T, et al. Phosphoric acid and phosphates. In: Ley C, editor. Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2008. 
  23. Rey C, Combes C, Drouet C, Grossin D. 1.111 - Bioactive ceramics: physical chemistry. In: Ducheyne P, editor. Comprehensive biomaterials. Oxford, UK: Elsevier; 2011. p. 187-221. 
  24. Butt CA. Manufacture of defluorinated tricalcium phosphate. Lake Forest, IL, USA: International Minerals and Chemical Corp; 1948. 
  25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Acid digestion of sediments, sludges, and soils [cited 2022, Aug]. Washington, DC, USA: US EPA; 1996. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/3050b.pdf 
  26. Spencer JD, Allee GL, Sauber TE. Phosphorus bioavailability and digestibility of normal and genetically modified low-phytate corn for pigs. J Anim Sci 2000;78:675-81. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.783675x 
  27. Weremko D, Fandrejewski H, Zebrowska T, et al. Bioavailability of phosphorus in feeds of plant origin for pigs-Review-. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 1997;10:551-66. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1997.551 
  28. McGlone JJ, Pond WG. Pig production: Biological principles and applications. Independence, KY, USA: Delmar Learning, Thomson Learning; 2003. 
  29. Cromwell GL, Hays VW, Scherer CW, Overfield JR. Effects of dietary calcium and phosphorus on performance and carcass, metacarpal and turbinate characteristics of swine. J Anim Sci 1972;34:746-51. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1972.345746x 
  30. NRC. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th rev. ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 1998. 
  31. Ajakaiye A, Fan MZ, Archbold T, et al. Determination of true digestive utilization of phosphorus and the endogenous phosphorus outputs associated with soybean meal for growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2003;81:2766-75. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81112766x 
  32. Bohlke RA, Thaler RC, Stein HH. Calcium, phosphorus, and amino acid digestibility in low-phytate corn, normal corn, and soybean meal by growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2005;83:2396-403. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.83102396x 
  33. Zhang F, Ragland D, Adeola O. Comparison of apparent ileal and total tract digestibility of calcium in calcium sources for pigs. Can J Anim Sci 2016;96:563-9. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2016-0043 
  34. Dilger RN, Adeola O. Estimation of true phosphorus digestibility and endogenous phosphorus loss in growing pigs fed conventional and low-phytate soybean meals. J Anim Sci 2006;84:627-34. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.843627x 
  35. Fan MZ, Archbold T, Sauer WC, et al. Novel methodology allows simultaneous measurement of true phosphorus digestibility and the gastrointestinal endogenous phosphorus outputs in studies with pigs. J Nutr 2001;131:2388-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/131.9.2388 
  36. Shen Y, Fan MZ, Ajakaiye A, Archbold T. Use of the regression analysis technique to determine the true phosphorus digestibility and the endogenous phosphorus output associated with corn in growing pigs. J Nutr 2002;132:1199-206. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.6.1199 
  37. Kim BG, Lee JW, Stein HH. Energy concentration and phosphorus digestibility in whey powder, whey permeate, and low-ash whey permeate fed to weanling pigs. J Anim Sci 2012;90:289-95. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4145 
  38. Kwon WB, Park SK, Kim BG. Determination of additivity of apparent and standardized total tract digestibility of phosphorus in mixed diet fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2015;93(E-Suppl. s3):75 (Abstr.). 
  39. She Y, Wang QY, Stein HH, Liu L, Li D, Zhang S. Additivity of values for phosphorus digestibility in corn, soybean meal, and canola meal in diets fed to growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018;31:1301-7. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0547 
  40. Rodehutscord M, Dieckmann A, Witzig M, Shastak Y. A note on sampling digesta from the ileum of broilers in phosphorus digestibility studies. Poult Sci 2012;91:965-71. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01943 
  41. Babatunde OO, Osho SO, Park CS, Adeola O. Additivity of apparent and standardized ileal digestibility of phosphorus in mixed diets containing corn and soybean meal fed to broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2020;99:6907-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.022 
  42. An SH, Sung JY, Kong C. Ileal digestibility and total tract retention of phosphorus in inorganic phosphates fed to broiler chickens using the direct method. Animals 2020;10:2167. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112167 
  43. Lee SA, Lagos LV, Bedford MR, Stein HH. Increasing calcium from deficient to adequate concentration in diets for gestating sows decreases digestibility of phosphorus and reduces serum concentration of a bone resorption biomarker. J Anim Sci 2020;98:skaa076. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa076 
  44. Stein HH, Adeola O, Cromwell GL, Kim SW, Mahan DC, Miller PS. Concentration of dietary calcium supplied by calcium carbonate does not affect the apparent total tract digestibility of calcium, but decreases digestibility of phosphorus by growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2011;89:2139-44. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3522 
  45. Grimbergen AHM, Cornelissen JP, Stappers HP. The relative availability of phosphorus in inorganic feed phosphates for young turkeys and pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1985;13:117-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(85)90047-1
  46. Eeckhout W, de Paepe M. The digestibility of three calcium phosphates for pigs as measured by difference and by slope-ratio assay. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 1997;77:53-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.1997.tb00737.x 
  47. Shastak Y, Witzig M, Hartung K, Rodehutscord M. Comparison of retention and prececal digestibility measurements in evaluating mineral phosphorus sources in broilers. Poult Sci 2012;91:2201-9. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-02063 
  48. Kwon WB, Kim BG. Standardized total tract digestibility of phosphorus in various inorganic phosphates fed to growing pigs. Anim Sci J 2017;88:918-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12785 
  49. Lopez DAL. Composition and digestibility of different sources of feed phosphates by growing pigs [M. S. Thesis]. Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; 2020. 
  50. Zhang F, Adeola O. True is more additive than apparent total tract digestibility of calcium in limestone and dicalcium phosphate for twenty-kilogram pigs fed semipurified diets. J Anim Sci 2017;95:5466-73. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2017.1849 
  51. Gonzalez-Vega JC, Walk CL, Stein HH. Effects of microbial phytase on apparent and standardized total tract digestibility of calcium in calcium supplements fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2015;93:2255-64. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8215 
  52. Lee SA, Lagos LV, Walk CL, Stein HH. Standardized total tract digestibility of calcium varies among sources of calcium carbonate, but not among sources of dicalcium phosphate, but microbial phytase increases calcium digestibility in calcium carbonate. J Anim Sci 2019;97:3440-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz176 
  53. Walk CL, Romero LF, Cowieson AJ. Towards a digestible calcium system for broiler chicken nutrition: A review and recommendations for the future. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2021;276:114930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.114930 
  54. Baker SR, Kim BG, Stein HH. Comparison of values for standardized total tract digestibility and relative bioavailability of phosphorus in dicalcium phosphate and distillers dried grains with solubles fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2013;91:203-10. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3776