Korean Journal of Veterinary Service (한국동물위생학회지)

The Korean Society of Veterinary Service (한국동물위생학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the protective efficacy of trivalent Salmonella inactivated vaccine including Chlorhexidine-inactivated Salmonella Enteritidis, S. Typhimurium and S. Gallinarum in poultry

산란계에서 Chlorhexidine-inactivated Salmonella Enteritidis, S. Typhimurium 및 S. Gallinarum 3가 백신의 효능평가

  • Yeong Ju Yu (Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicinee, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Jeong Hee Yu (Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicinee, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Jin Hur (Department of Veterinary Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicinee, Jeonbuk National University)
  • 유영주 (전북대학교 수의과대학 수의공중보건학실) ;
  • 유정희 (전북대학교 수의과대학 수의공중보건학실) ;
  • 허진 (전북대학교 수의과대학 수의공중보건학실)
  • Received : 2023.11.28
  • Accepted : 2023.12.07
  • Published : 2023.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Protective efficacy of trivalent Salmonella inactivated vaccine containing Chlorhexidine-inactivated S. Enterltidis (SE), S. Typhimurium (ST), and S. Gallinarum (SG) strains, was evaluated in this study. A total of 70 brown nick layers were divided into 7 groups, A to G, containing 10 hens per group. All hens in groups B to D were intramuscularly immunized with approximately 7×108 cells (3×108 cells of SE+1×108 SE+1×108 cells of ST+3×108 cells of SG) of the trivalent vaccine in 0.5 mL of PBS. All chickens in groups E to G were injected with sterile PBS. All hens of groups B and E, groups C and F, and groups D and G were orally challenged with approximately 2 ×109 CFU of wild-type SE, ST, and SG, respectively. Serum IgG titers and CD3+CD4+ T-cells, and CD3+CD8+ T-cells levels of groups B to D significantly higher than those of group A. In addition, all animals in groups A to C, E and F showed no clinical symptoms and survived after the virulent challenges, whereas one chicken in group D died and all chickens in group G died following the challenge. The protection against wild-type SE and ST in liver, spleen, cecum, and cloaca of groups B and C chickens was significant effective as compared with those in groups E and F. These indicate that the trivalent inactivated vaccine can be an effective tool for prevention of Salmonella infections by inducing robustly protective immune responses and cellular immune response in chickens.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 정부의 재원으로 농림식품기술기획평가원(Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry, IPET)의 지원을 받아 연구되었습니다(No. 122007-2).

References

  1. Alvarez J, Sota M, Vivanco AB, Perales I, Cisterna R, Rementeria A, Garaizar J. 2004. Development of a multiplex PCR technique for detection and epidemiological typing of Salmonella in human clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 42: 1734-1738. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.4.1734-1738.2004
  2. Barbezange C, Ermel G, Ragimbeau C, Humbert F, Salvat G. 2000. Some safety aspects of Salmonella vaccines for poultry: in vivo study of the genetic stability of three Salmonella Typhimurium live vaccines. FEMS Microbiol Lett 192: 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09366.x
  3. Bouzoubaa K, Nagaraja KV, Kabbai FZ, Newman JA, Pomeroy BS. 1989. Feasibility of using proteins from Salmonella Gallinarum vs. 9R live vaccine for the prevention of fowl typhoid in chickens. Avian Dis 33: 385-391. https://doi.org/10.2307/1591094
  4. Brumme S, Arnold T, Sigmarsson H, Lehmann J, Scholz HC, Hardt WD, Roesler U. 2007. Impact of Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 virulence factors invC and sseD on the onset, clinical course, colonization patterns and immune response of porcine salmonellosis. Vet Microbiol 124: 274-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.04.032
  5. Clifton-Hadley FA, Breslin M, Venables LM, Sprigings KA, Cooles SW, Houghton S, Woodward MJ. 2002. A laboratory study of an inactivated bivalent iron restricted Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium dual vaccine against Typhimurium challenge in chickens. Vet Microbiol 89: 167-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00169-4
  6. Desin TS, Koster W, Potter AA. 2013. Salmonella vaccines in poultry: past, present and future. Expert Rev Vaccines 12: 87-96. https://doi.org/10.1586/erv.12.138
  7. Feng P, Wilson QM, Meissler Jr, JJ, Adler MW, Eisenstein TK. 2005. Increased sensitivity to Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection in mice undergoing withdrawal from morphine is associated with suppression of interleukin-12. Infect Immun 73: 7953-7959. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.73.12.7953-7959.2005
  8. Galanis E, Wong DMLF, Patrick ME, Binsztein N, Cieslik A, Chalermchaikit, T, Wegener HC. 2006. Web-based surveillance and global Salmonella distribution, 2000-2002. Emerg Infect Dis 12: 381-388. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1205.050854
  9. Garmory HS, Brown KA, Titball RW. 2002. Salmonella vaccines for use in humans: present and future perspectives. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26: 339-353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00619.x
  10. Gast RK, Stone HD, Holt PS. 1993. Evaluation of the efficacy of oil-emulsion bacterins for reducing fecal shedding of Salmonella Enteritidis by laying hens. Avian Dis 37: 1085-1091. https://doi.org/10.2307/1591918
  11. Gast RK, Stone, HD, Holt PS, Beard CW. 1992. Evaluation of the efficacy of an oil-emulsion bacterin for protecting chickens against Salmonella Enteritidis. Avian Dis 36: 992-9. https://doi.org/10.2307/1591560
  12. Helms M, Ethelberg S, Molbak K, DT104 Study Group. 2005. International Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 infections, 1992-2001. Emerg Infect Dis 11: 859-67. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1106.041017
  13. Hur J, Kim MY, Lee JH. 2011. Evaluation of efficacy of a new live Salmonella Typhimurium vaccine candidate in a murine model. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 34: 171-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2010.11.001
  14. Jang HJ, Ha YK, YU SN, Kim SY, Um JY, Ha GJ, Kim DS, Lee SY, Ahn SC. 2023. Molecular Epidemiological Analysis of Food Poisoning Caused by Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis in Gyeongnam Province of Korea. J Life Sci 33: 56-63.
  15. Jawale CV, Lee JH. 2014. A novel approach for the generation of Salmonella Gallinarum ghosts and evaluation of their vaccine potential using a primebooster immunization strategy. Vaccine 32: 6776-6782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.012
  16. Jawale CV, Lee JH. 2014. An immunogenic Salmonella ghost confers protection against internal organ colonization and egg contamination. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 15;162(1-2): 41-50.
  17. Jawale CV, Lee JH. 2014. Comparative evaluation of Salmonella Enteritidis ghost vaccines with a commercial vaccine for protection against internal egg contamination with Salmonella. Vaccine 32: 5925-5930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.072
  18. Jawale CV, Lee JH. 2016. Evaluation of immunogenicity and protective efficacy of adjuvanted Salmonella Typhimurium ghost vaccine against salmonellosis in chickens. Vet Q 36: 130-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2016.1138248
  19. Kang MS, Kwon YK, Jung BY, Kim A, Lee KM, An BK, Chung GS. 2011. Differential identification of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Gallinarum biovars Gallinarum and Pullorum based on polymorphic regions of glgC and speC genes. Vet microbiol 147: 181-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.05.039
  20. Kang ZW, Jung JH, Kim SH, Lee BK, Lee DY, Kim YJ, Hahn TW. 2009. Genotypic and phenotypic diversity of Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from chickens and humans in Korea. J Vet Med Sci 71: 1433-1438. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.001433
  21. Kim S, Chun SG, Lim OY, Park MS, Kang YH, Park YH, Lee BK. 2004. Genomic relationship of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 isolates from Korea and the United States. J Microbiol 42: 14-19.
  22. Kim SH, Kim SH, Chun SG, Choi ES, Lee BK. 2006. Prevalence of Salmonella Serovars Isolated from Domestic Residents and Overseas Travelers in Korea, 2004~2005. J Bacteriol Virol 36: 69-72. https://doi.org/10.4167/jbv.2006.36.2.69
  23. Kim SJ, Kim JH, Jun SY, Paik HR, Han JH. 2014. Protective effect of bacteriophages against Salmonella Typhimurium infection in weaned piglets. Korean J Vet Serv 37: 35-43. https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2014.37.1.35
  24. Kim WK, Moon JY, Cho JS, Ochirkhuyag E, Akanda MR., Park BY, Hur J. 2019. Protective efficacy of an inactivated Brucella abortus vaccine candidate lysed by GI24 against brucellosis in Korean black goats. Can J Vet Res 83: 68-74.
  25. Lillehoj EP, Yun CH, Lillehoj HS. 2000. Vaccines against the avian enteropathogens Eimeria, Cryptosporidium and Salmonella. Anim Health Res Rev 1: 47-65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252300000050
  26. Mailson ST, Lages DH., Alves VV, Martins NR, Freitas OC. 2022. Assessment of maternal immunity against Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg in progeny of broiler breeders vaccinated with different formulations of bacterins. Avian Pathol 51: 197-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2022.2039592
  27. Mastroeni P, Chabalgoity JA, Dunstan SJ, Maskell DJ, Dougan G. 2001. Salmonella: immune responses and vaccines. Vet J 161: 132-164. https://doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2000.0502
  28. McSorley SJ, Cookson BT, Jenkins MK. 2000. Characterization of CD4+ T cell responses during natural infection with Salmonella typhimurium. J Immunol 164: 986-993. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.2.986
  29. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, Korea. Food safety Korea, Food poisoning statistics. October, 2022.
  30. Mittrucker HW, Kaufmann SH. 2000. Immune response to infection with Salmonella Typhimurium in mice. J Leukoc Biol 67: 457-463. https://doi.org/10.1002/jlb.67.4.457
  31. Mittrucker HW, Kohler A, Kaufmann SH. 2002. Characterization of the murine T-lymphocyte response to Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection. Infect Immun 70: 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.70.1.199-203.2002
  32. Mittrucker HW, Raupach B, Kohler A, Kaufmann SH. 2000. Cutting edge: role of B lymphocytes in protective immunity against Salmonella Typhimurium infection. J Immunol 164: 1648-1652. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.164.4.1648
  33. Moon JY, Ochirkhuyag E, Kim WK, Lee JW, Jo YG, Kwak KH, Hur J. 2020. Comparative evaluation to select optimal adjuvant of novel type Salmonella Typhimurium inactivated bacteria for protecting Salmonella infections in a murine model. Korean J Vet Serv 43: 89-97.
  34. Muotiala A, Hovi, M, Makela PH. 1989. Protective immunity in mouse salmonellosis: comparison of smooth and rough live and killed vaccines. Microb Pathog 6: 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0882-4010(89)90007-7
  35. Nandre RM1, ChaudhariAA, Matsuda K, Lee JH. 2011. Immunogenicity of a Salmonella Enteritidis mutant as vaccinecandidate and its protective efficacy against salmonellosis in chickens. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 144: 299-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2011.08.015
  36. Nauciel C. 1990. Role of CD4+ T cells and T-independent mechanisms in acquired resistance to Salmonella Typhimurium infection. J Immunol 145: 1265-1269. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.145.4.1265
  37. Nicholas RA, Andrew SJ. 1991. Detection of antibody to Salmonella Enteritidis and S Typhimurium in the yolk of hens' eggs. Vet Rec 128: 98-100. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.128.5.98
  38. Norimatsu M, Chance V, Dougan G, Howard CJ, Villarreal-Ramos B. 2004. Live Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) elicit dendritic cell responses that differ from those induced by killed S. Typhimurium. Vet immunol Immunopathol 98: 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2003.12.008
  39. Pascual DW, Trunkle T, Sura J. 2002. Fimbriated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium abates initial inflammatory responses by macrophages. Infect immun 70: 4273-4281. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.70.8.4273-4281.2002
  40. Roesler U, Heller P, Waldmann KH, Truyen U, Hensel A. 2006. Immunization of sows in an integrated pig-breeding herd using a homologous inactivated Salmonella vaccine decreases the prevalence of Salmonella Typhimurium infection in the offspring. J Vet Medi B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 53: 224-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.00951.x
  41. Senevirathne A, Hewawaduge C, Lee JH. 2021. Immunization of chicken with flagellin adjuvanted Salmonella Enteritidis bacterial ghosts confers complete protection against chicken salmonellosis. Poult Sci 100: 101205.
  42. Senevirathne A, Hewawaduge C, Lee JH. 2022. Immunization of chickens with Salmonella Gallinarium ghosts expressing Salmonella Enteritidis NFliC-FimAC and CD40LC fusion antigen enhances cellmediated immune responses and protects against wild-type challenges with both species. Dev Comp Immunol 126: 104265.
  43. Stenger S, Hanson DA, Teitelbaum R, Dewan P, Niazi KR, Froelich CJ, Modlin RL. 1998. An antimicrobial activity of cytolytic T cells mediated by granulysin. Science 282: 121-125. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5386.121
  44. Won GY, Chaudhari AA, Lee JH. 2016. Protective efficacy and immune responses by homologous prime-booster immunizations of a novel inactivated Salmonella Gallinarum vaccine candidate. Clin Exp Vaccine Res 5: 148-158. https://doi.org/10.7774/cevr.2016.5.2.148
  45. Won GY, Eo SK, Park SY, Hur J, Lee JH. 2018. A Salmonella Typhi ghost induced by the E gene of phage ϕX174 stimulates dendritic cells and efficiently activates the adaptive immune response. J Vet Sci 19: 536-542. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2018.19.4.536
  46. Woo YK, Kim BH. 1998. Comparison of diseases resistance between white and brown layer lines to experimental infection of Salmonella Gallinarum. Korean J Vet Res 38: 784-792.
  47. Yang SY, Hong YH, Lee HJ, Song CS. 2010. Hygienic management for Salmonella-free chicken meat production. Korean J Poul Sci 37: 289-295. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2010.37.3.289