Korean Journal of Veterinary Service (한국동물위생학회지)

The Korean Society of Veterinary Service (한국동물위생학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Decadal analysis of livestock tuberculosis in Korea (2013~2022): Epidemiological patterns and trends

  • Yeonsu Oh (College of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Dongseob Tark (Korea Zoonosis Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Gwang-Seon Ryoo (Jeollanamdo Veterinary Service Laboratory) ;
  • Dae-Sung Yoo (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Woo, H. Kim (College of Veterinary Medicine & Institute of Animal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Won-Il Kim (College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-Safety Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University) ;
  • Choi-Kyu Park (College of Veterinary Medicine & Institute for Veterinary Biomedical Science, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Won-Keun Kim (Department of Microbiology and Institute of Medical Science, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Ho-Seong Cho (College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio-Safety Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2023.12.09
  • Accepted : 2023.12.11
  • Published : 2023.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the epidemiological trends and challenges in managing tuberculosis (TB) in livestock in Korea from 2013 to 2022. Tuberculosis, caused by the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, is a significant zoonotic disease affecting cattle, deer, and other domesticated animals. Despite the initiation of a test-and-slaughter eradication policy in 1964, TB has continued to persist in Korean livestock, particularly in cattle and deer. This study used data from the Korea Animal Health Integrated System and provincial animal health laboratories to analyze TB incidence in various livestock including different cattle breeds and deer species. The results from 2013 to 2022 showed a peak in TB cases in 2019 with a subsequent decline by 2022. The study highlighted a significant incidence of TB in Korean native cattle and the need for amore inclusive approach towards TB testing and control in different cattle breeds. Additionally, the study underscored the importance of addressing TB in other animals such as goats, wildlife, and companion animals for a holistic approach to TB eradication in Korea. The findings suggest that while the test-and-slaughter strategy has been historically effective, there is a need for adaptation to the current challenges, and learning from successful eradiation stories on other countries like Australia. A collaborative effort involving an expanded surveillance system, active private sector participation, and robust government support essential for the efficient eradication of TB in livestock in Korea.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs Convergence Technologies Program for Educating Creative Global Leader, funded by Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (320005-04).

References

  1. Barasona JA, Latham MC, Acevedo P, Armenteros JA, Latham ADM, Gortazar C, Carro F, Soriguer RC, Vicente J. 2014. Spatiotemporal interactions between wild boar and cattle: implications for cross-species disease transmission. Vet Res 45: 122. 
  2. Cho HS, Choi US, Oh Y. 2022. Isolation of multidrugresistant (MDR) Mycobacterium bovis from a dog in Korea. J Vet Med Sci 84: 1358-1362.  https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.21-0347
  3. Essey MA, Koller MA. 1994. Status of bovine tuberculosis in North America. Vet Microbiol 40: 15-22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1135(94)90043-4
  4. FAO. 2022. Zoonotic tuberculosis (TB) (fao.org). https://www.fao.org/3/i6789e/i6789e.pdf [accessed on May 31, 2022].
  5. Fitzgerald SD, Kaneene JB. 2013. Wildlife reservoirs of bovine tuberculosis worldwide: hosts, pathology, surveillance, and control. Vet Pathol 50: 488-499.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985812467472
  6. KAHIS. 2023. Korea Animal Health Integrated System. https://home.kahis.go.kr. 
  7. Lee H, Kim JM, Jang Y, Lee K, Baek K, Lee B, Kim HY, Lee MH, Ryoo S, Bae YC, Choi EJ, So B. 2015. Bovine tuberculosis in an Asian small-clawed otter (Aonyx cinerea) in the Republic of Korea. J Vet Diagn Invest 27: 651-655.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638715600198
  8. Lehane R. 1996. Beating the odds in a big country. The eradication of bovine brucellosis and tuberculosis in Australia. Clayton South, Australia: CSIRO Publishing; pp. 113-138. 
  9. MAFRA. 2023. 2022 Other livestock statistics. https://www.mafra.go.kr/sn3hcv_v2023/skin/doc.html?fn=BA0885B6-F1A1-8CAA-13AA668D7B26D419.pdf&rs=/sn3hcv_v2023/atchmnfl/bbs/202312/ 
  10. Munroe FA, Dohoo IR, Mcnab WB. 2000. Estimates of within-herd incidence rates of Mycobacterium bovis in Canadian cattle and cervids between 1985 and 1994. Prev Vet Med 45: 247-256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00126-4
  11. Nam HM, Yoon H, Kim CH, Wee SH. 2012. Epidemiological characteristics of bovine tuberculosis in the Republic of Korea, 2000-2004. Journal of Preventive Veterinary Medicine 36: 11-17. 
  12. Naranjo, V., C. Gortazar, J. Vicente, and J. de la Fuente. 2008. Evidence of the role of European wild boar as a reservoir of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Vet Microbiol 127: 1-9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.10.002
  13. O'Brien DJ, Thacker TC, Salvador LCM, Duffiney AG, Robbe-Austerman S, Camacho MS, Lombard JE, Palmer MV. 2023. The devil you know and the devil you don't: current status and challenges of bovine tuberculosis eradication in the United States. Ir Vet J. 76(Suppl 1): 16. 
  14. OIE. 2022. Old Classification of Diseases Notifiable to the OIE-List B-OIE-World Organization for Animal Health for Animal Health. https://www.oie.int/en/what-we-do/animal-health-and-welfare/animaldiseases/old-classification-of-diseases-notifiableto-the-oie-list-b/ [accessed on May 31, 2022]. 
  15. Palmer MV. 2013. Mycobacterium bovis: characteristics of wildlife reservoir hosts. Transbound Emerg Dis 60 Suppl 1: 1-13.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12115
  16. Pesciaroli M, Alvarez J, Boniotti MB, Cagiola M, Di Marco V, Marianelli C, Pacciarini M, Pasquali P. 2014. Tuberculosis in domestic animal species. Res Vet Sci 97 Suppl: S78-S85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.05.015
  17. Radunz B. 2006. Surveillance and risk management during the latter stages of eradication: Experiences from Australia. Vet Microbiol 112: 283-290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.11.017
  18. Santos N, Correia-Neves M, Ghebremichael S, Kallenius G, Svenson SB, Almeida V. 2009. Epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wild boar (Sus scrofa) from Portugal. J Wildl Dis 45: 1048-1061.  https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-45.4.1048
  19. Suruiballi OP, Romanowska A, Sugden EA, Turcotte C, Jolley ME. 2002. A fluorescence polarization assay for the detection of antibodies to Mycobacterium bovis in cattle sera. Vet Microbiol 87: 149-157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00044-5
  20. WOAH, 2022. Terrestrial Manual 2022. Chapter 3.1.13. -Mammalian tuberculosis (infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex). 
  21. World Health Organization (WHO) 2020. Global tuberculosis report 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240013131 [accessed on April 10, 2021]. 
  22. Yoon H, Chung BH, Yoon CS, Lee JH, Moon OK, Park SY, Lee WC, Kim TJ. 2008. Prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in dairy cattle in Korea from 1961 to 2004. Korean J Vet Res 48: 49-51.