DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중소규모 공동주택의 건축심의 한계점 분석

Analysis on Limitations of Municipal Architectural Review Procedure for Small and Medium-sized Apartments

  • Ahn, Jiho (Housing Business Department, Hyundai Engineering & Construction) ;
  • Gu, Bongil (Department of Architectural Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ryu, Jongwoo (Division of Architecture, Taeyoung Engineering & Construction) ;
  • Huh, Youngki (Department of Architectural Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.08.25
  • 심사 : 2022.09.22
  • 발행 : 2022.11.30

초록

국내 1인 가구 수가 2000년대 이후로 증가함에 따라, 건축심의 대상인 중소규모 신축 공동주택 사업도 함께 증가세를 보이고 있다. 더불어, 건축심의제도 도입이후 최근까지도 건축심의제도의 한계점에 대한 많은 의견이 연구를 통해 지속적으로 제기되어 왔다. 이에 본 연구는 두 집단의 전문가를 대상으로 종합적 설문조사 및 인터뷰를 진행하였고, 해당 결과를 통해 B도시의 건축심의의 한계점에 대한 AHP 분석을 진행하였다. 총 27개 응답으로 구성된 설문결과는 '건축심의 제도의 한계', '심의위원의 한계' 및 '건축심의 행정절차의 불합리함' 의 순서로 심각성이 크다고 분석되었다. 또한, 건축직 공무원과 건축사의 그룹별 응답결과 항목별 중요도에 대한 인식에 차이가 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 이러한 연구결과는 건축행정 절차 중 심의제도 개선에 대한 초기연구자료로서 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

A single-person-house-holder has been increased since 2000s in South Korea, which led to high demands for small and medium-sized new houses requiring municipal architectural review committee consideration. And it has been argued recently that there are many limitations in the review system. Comprehensive expert surveys and interviews were conducted and the results were analyzed using the AHP to explore limitations in B city. The analysis with the data of 27 survey responds found that 'Related ordinance itself', 'Committee members limitation', and 'Absurdity on administrative procedure' are problematic in order of priority. It is also revealed that architects and administrative officials have different thoughts on the seriousness of those. The results of this study are expected to be used as basic data on studies for improving the system.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 2021년도 교육부의 재원으로 한국연구재단 기초 연구 사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임.(과제번호 No. 2021R1A2C10119851262182065300102)

참고문헌

  1. Lee, Y.S. (2012). "Trend and Characteristics of Single Person Housdholds." Korean Social Trends 2012, Statistical Research Institute, pp. 68-76.
  2. Park, G.S., and Hwang. E.G. (2009). "A Study on the Restructing Scheme of Role Building Sub-Regulations to Abbreviate the Building Administration Process." Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction, AIK, 29(1), pp. 261-264.
  3. Kang, I.H. (2012). "A Study on the Characteristics of Design Council Criteria of Housing - Focused on Metropolitan Cities -" Journal of The Korean Housing Association, The Korean Housing Association, 23(1), pp. 97-105. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2012.23.1.097
  4. Yu, K.H., and Lim, Y.K. (2015). A study on the regulatory reform of building code, Architecture & Urban Research Institute (AURI) Research Brief No. 5.
  5. Kim. S.H., and Lee. Y.K. (2016). Proposing Policies for Efficient Architectural Administration, Architecture & Urban Research Institute (AURI) Research Brief No. 18,
  6. Kim, M.J., Ryu, S.Y., Cho, Y.J., and Yu, K.H. (2017). "A Study on the Improvement of Building Administration by Local Government." Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 33(12), pp. 3-11.