Animal Bioscience

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of feeding fermented soybean meal on broiler chickens' performance: a meta-analysis

  • Received : 2021.12.11
  • Accepted : 2022.05.03
  • Published : 2022.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to quantify the effects of fermented soybean meal (FSBM) on broiler chickens' performance by employing a meta-analysis approach. Methods: A total of 16 studies were included in the database after being systematically selected using a PRISMA protocol. Hedges' g effect size was used to quantify pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) using random-effects models at 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Publication bias among studies was computed with Egger's test and visualized using funnel plots. Results: Results indicated that dietary FSBM inclusion increased final body weight (BW) (SMD = 0.586, 95% CI: 0.221 to 0.951, p = 0.002) of broiler chickens, particularly in starter period (SMD = 0.691, 95% CL: 0.149 to 1.233, p = 0.013) while in the finisher period, the effect was weaker (SMD = 0.509, 95% CI: 0.015 to 1.004, p = 0.043). Average daily gain (ADG), feed intake (FI), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were not affected with FSBM inclusion when compared to control. Subgroup analysis revealed that FI increased in starter period (SMD = 0.582, 95% CI: 0.037 to 1.128, p = 0.036). When considering types of microorganism as moderating variables in the subgroup analysis, we found that Aspergillus oryzae, mixed probiotics+bromelain protease, Bacillus subtilis, and Lactobacillus bacteria significantly increased ADG and FI (p<0.01). Additionally, either Bacillus subtilis+protease or Bacillus subtilis alone decreased FCR (p<0.001). However, meta-regression analysis showed that levels of FSBM inclusion had no effects on final BW (p = 0.502), ADG (p = 0.588), FI (p = 0.861), and FCR (p = 0.462). Conclusion: Substituting SBM in broiler chickens' diet with FSBM improved BW of broiler chickens, especially in the starter period whereas the effects on ADG, FI, and FCR were mostly dependent on microbial strains used for fermentation.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors thank the Institute of Research and Community Service of Universitas Sebelas Maret (LPPM UNS) for the financial support through the excellence applied research scheme (PUT-UNS; contract no. 254/UN27.22/PT.01.03/2022) of 2021-2022 fiscal year.

References

  1. Ravindran V, Abdollahi MR, Bootwalla SM. Nutrient analysis, metabolizable energy, and digestible amino acids of soybean meals of different origins for broilers. Poult Sci 2014;93:2567-77. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04068
  2. Wang JP, Liu N, Song MY, Qin CL, Ma CS. Effect of enzymolytic soybean meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and immune function of growing broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011;169:224-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.06.012
  3. Qaisrani SN, Van Krimpen MM, Kwakkel RP, Verstegen MWA, Hendriks WH. Dietary factors affecting hindgut protein fermentation in broilers: a review. Worlds Poult Sci J 2015;71:139-60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933915000124
  4. Bryan DDLS, Abbott DA, Classen HL. The influence of indigestible protein on the performance and meat quality of broilers vaccinated for coccidiosis. Poult Sci 2019;98:4815-28. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez216
  5. Rodgers NJ, Swick RA, Geier MS, Moore RJ, Choct M, Wu SB. A multifactorial analysis of the extent to which eimeria and fishmeal predispose broiler chickens to necrotic enteritis. Avian Dis 2015;59:38-45. https://doi.org/10.1637/10774-011614-Reg.1
  6. Li Y, Guo B, Wu Z, et al. Effects of fermented soybean meal supplementation on the growth performance and cecal microbiota. Animals 2020;10:1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10061098
  7. Wu P, Golly MK, Guo Y, et al. Effect of partial replacement of soybean meal with high-temperature fermented soybean meal in antibiotic-growth-promoter-free diets on growth performance, organ weights, serum indexes, intestinal flora and histomorphology of broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2020;269:114616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114616
  8. Mathivanan R, Selvaraj P, Nanjappan K. Feeding of fermented soybean meal on broiler performance. Int J Poult Sci 2006;5:868-72. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.868.872
  9. Feng J, Liu X, Xu ZR, Liu YY, Lu YP. Effects of Aspergillus oryzae 3.042 fermented soybean meal on growth performance and plasma biochemical parameters in broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2007;134:235-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.08.018
  10. Kim SK, Kim TH, Lee SK, et al. The use of fermented soybean meals during early phase affects subsequent growth and physiological response in broiler chicks. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2016;29:1287-93. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0653
  11. Soumeh EA, Mohebodini H, Toghyani M, Shabani A, Ashayerizadeh A, Jazi V. Synergistic effects of fermented soybean meal and mannan-oligosaccharide on growth performance, digestive functions, and hepatic gene expression in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2019;98:6797-807. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez409
  12. Shi C, Zhang Y, Lu Z, Wang Y. Solid-state fermentation of corn-soybean meal mixed feed with Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecium for degrading antinutritional factors and enhancing nutritional value. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2017;8:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-017-0184-2
  13. Wang LC, Wen C, Jiang ZY, Zhou YM. Evaluation of the partial replacement of high-protein feedstuff with fermented soybean meal in broiler diets. J Appl Poult Res 2012;21:849-55. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2012-00563
  14. Chachaj R, Sembratowicz I, Krauze M, Ognik K. The effect of partial replacement of soybean meal with fermented soybean meal on chicken performance and immune status. J Anim Feed Sci 2019;28:263-71. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/110777/2019
  15. Jazi V, Mohebodini H, Ashayerizadeh A, Shabani A, Barekatain R. Fermented soybean meal ameliorates Salmonella Typhimurium infection in young broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2019; 98:5648-60. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez338
  16. Li CY, Lu JJ, Wu CP, Lien TF. Effects of probiotics and bremelain fermented soybean meal replacing fish meal on growth performance, nutrient retention and carcass traits of broilers. Livest Sci 2014;163:94-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.02.005
  17. Guo S, Zhang Y, Cheng Q, et al. Partial substitution of fermented soybean meal for soybean meal influences the carcass traits and meat quality of broiler chickens. Animals 2020;10:225. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10020225
  18. Sauvant D, Schmidely P, Daudin JJ, St-Pierre NR. Meta-analyses of experimental data in animal nutrition. Animal 2008;2:1203-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1751731108002280
  19. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100
  20. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, et al. The cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011;343:d5928. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928
  21. Xu B, Li Z, Wang C, et al. Effects of fermented feed supplementation on pig growth performance: a meta-analysis. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2020;259:114315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114315
  22. Feng J, Liu X, Xu ZR, Wang YZ, Liu JX. Effects of fermented soybean meal on digestive enzyme activities and intestinal morphology in broilers. Poult Sci 2007;86:1149-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.6.1149
  23. Cheng YH, Hsiao FSH, Wen CM, Wu CY, Dybus A, Yu YH. Mixed fermentation of soybean meal by protease and probiotics and its effects on the growth performance and immune response in broilers. J Appl Anim Res. 2019;47:339-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2019.1637344
  24. Tsai CF, Lin LJ, Wang CH, Tsai CS, Chang SC, Lee TT. Assessment of intestinal immunity and permeability of broilers on partial replacement diets of two-stage fermented soybean meal by bacillus velezensis and lactobacillus brevis ATCC 367. Animals 2021;11:2336. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082336
  25. Premathilaka KT, Nawarathne SR, Nambapana MN, et al. Partial or complete replacement of fishmeal with fermented soybean meal on growth performance, fecal composition, and meat quality in broilers. J Anim Sci Technol 2020;62:824-39. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.6.824
  26. Harrer M, Cuijpers P, Furukawa TA, Ebert DD. Doing metaanalysis in R: a hands-on guide. London, UK: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 2019.
  27. Galkanda-Arachchige HSC, Wilson AE, Davis DA. Success of fishmeal replacement through poultry by-product meal in aquaculture feed formulations: a meta-analysis. Rev Aquac 2020;12:1624-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12401
  28. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  29. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in metaanalysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315: 629. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
  30. Nakagawa S, Noble DWA, Senior AM, Lagisz M. Meta-evaluation of meta-analysis: Ten appraisal questions for biologists. BMC Biol 2017;15:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0357-7
  31. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th rev. ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 1994.
  32. Wang JP, Liu N, Song MY, Qin CL, Ma CS. Effect of enzymolytic soybean meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and immune function of growing broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011;169:224-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.06.012
  33. Pacheco WJ, Stark CR, Ferket PR, Brake J. Effects of trypsin inhibitor and particle size of expeller-extracted soybean meal on broiler live performance and weight of gizzard and pancreas. Poult Sci 2014;93:2245-52. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-03986
  34. Barekatain MR, Swick RA. Composition of more specialised pre-starter and starter diets for young broiler chickens: a review. Anim Prod Sci 2016;56:1239-47. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15333
  35. Noy Y, Uni Z. Early nutritional strategies. Worlds Poult Sci J 2010;66:639-46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933910000620
  36. Leeson S. Predictions for commercial poultry nutrition. J Appl Poult Res 2008;17:315-22. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2007-00101
  37. Bi H, Zhao H, Lu F, Zhang C, Bie X, Lu Z. Improvement of the Nutritional Quality and Fibrinolytic Enzyme Activity of Soybean Meal by Fermentation of Bacillus subtilis. J Food Process Preserv 2015;39:1235-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12340
  38. Zambonino Infante JL, Cahu CL, Peres A. Partial substitution of di- and tripeptides for native proteins in sea bass diet improves Dicentrarchus labrax larval development. J Nutr 1997;127:608-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/127.4.608
  39. Crisol-Martinez E, Stanley D, Geier MS, Hughes RJ, Moore RJ. Understanding the mechanisms of zinc bacitracin and avilamycin on animal production: linking gut microbiota and growth performance in chickens. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2017;101:4547-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8193-9
  40. Singh KM, Shah T, Deshpande S, et al. High through put 16S rRNA gene-based pyrosequencing analysis of the fecal microbiota of high FCR and low FCR broiler growers. Mol Biol Rep 2012;39:10595-602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-1947-7
  41. Ali Tauqir N. Absorption and transportation of amino acids in animals: a review. J Environ Agric Sci 2016;9:96-109.