International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security

국제컴퓨터통신보호논문지학회 (International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ensuring the Quality of Higher Education in the United Kingdom Using Informatization

  • Andreikova, Iryna (Foreign Languages Department, Odessa Polytechnic National University) ;
  • Moiseienko, Natalia (Department of English Grammar, Odesa I. I. Mechnokov National University) ;
  • Boichuk, Petro (Municipal Higher Educational Institution "Lutsk Pedagogical College" of the Volyn Regional Council) ;
  • Iliichuk, Liubomyra (Department of Primary Education Pedagogy, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University) ;
  • Fedchenko, Karina (Department of Social Work and Rehabilitation, National University of Life and Environmental Scienсes of Ukraine) ;
  • Bezliudnyi, Oleksandr (English Language and Methods of Teaching Department, Rector of Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University) ;
  • Sopivnyk, Ruslan (Department of Pedagogy, National University of Life and Environmental Scienсes of Ukraine)
  • 투고 : 2022.11.05
  • 발행 : 2022.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The United Kingdom is known for the quality of its qualifications. There is a strict quality system with reputable bodies responsible for ensuring that high quality standards are met. In order for new qualifications to be accredited, they must meet all the requirements set out in the regulations for the quality and informatization of Education. The crucial role of the Agency for Quality Assurance of Higher Education (QAA) in the UK for creating high-quality management of higher education institutions is revealed, the influence of informatization tools on its effective mechanism as an independent entity is shown, and positive experience for the educational sector is highlighted. While the universities themselves are responsible for reviewing educational programs at the subject level, the QAA review focuses on verifying internal quality assurance, as well as systems and improvement strategies. The QAA uses a peer review process in which teams mostly consist of academic staff from other institutions to assess the quality of the institution's education. In Scotland, the team also includes an international reviewer. The student is also a member of the Scottish teams. In the UK, attention is paid to providing a cohort of experienced reviewers who can conduct high-quality monitoring and help with advice on improving education. All reviewers must complete training and have permission to participate in the review of educational programs. There are selected committees that are members of the QAA council, each of which is headed by a member of the Council or an independent person approved by the Council. Attention is drawn to the main areas of the QAA's work in the framework of environmental, social and corporate governance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allen, W. R. & Bonous-Hammarth, M., (2006). Higher education in a global society: achieving diversity, equity and excellence. London: ELSEVIER Ltd.
  2. Alvesson, M. (2011). Classics in Critical Management Studies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
  3. Brown, S., & Jones, E., (2007). Internationalizing higher education. NY: Routledge.
  4. Bryan C. & Clegg K. (Eds.), 2020 Innovative Assessment in Higher Education: A Handbook for Academic Practitioners. London: Routledge". 276.
  5. Cooper, C.L. (2011). Management research in the UK: a personal view. British Journal of Management. 22(3). 343-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00768.x
  6. Dmitrenko G.A. (1999) Strategic management in the education system: Textbook. allowance. K.: MAUP. 176.
  7. Enders, J., & Fulton, O. (2002). Higher education in a globalizing world: international trends and mutual Observations. MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  8. Gyrylovskaya I.V. (2020) Theory and practice of monitoring the quality of vocational training of future skilled workers: a monograph. Kamianets-Podilskyi: Publisher Zvoleiko D.G. 304.
  9. HEFCE has developed a policy for addressing unsatisfactory quality. URL: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/circlets/ 2008/cl21_08/
  10. Howlett, R. J. (2010). Innovation Through Knowledge Transfer. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelburg.
  11. Kotiash, I., Shevchuk, I., Borysonok, M., Matviienko, I., Popov, M., Terekhov, V., Kuchai O. (2022). Possibilities of Using Multimedia Technologies in Education. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(6), 727-732.
  12. Kuchai, O., Skyba, K., Demchenko, A., Savchenko, N, Necheporuk, Y., & Rezvan, O. (2022). The Importance of Multimedia Education in the Informatization of Society. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(4), 797-803.
  13. Monitoring of objects in conditions of a priori uncertainty of information sources / Bobalo Y.Ya., Danyk Y.G., Komarova L.O. etc. Monograph. Lviv National University "Lviv Polytechnic". 2015. 360.
  14. Perriton, L., & M. Reynolds. (2004). Critical management education. From pedagogy of possibility to pedagogy of refusal? Management Learning 35 (1). 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507604041165
  15. Porter, C. (2009). Management of Higher Education in the UK. ADEPT, Journal of Higher Education Academy. 3, 26-32.
  16. QA higher education. URL: https://qahighereducation.com/about-us/
  17. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (QAA). URL: documents:www.qaa.ac.uk
  18. Shunkov, V., Shevtsova, O., Koval, V., Grygorenko, T., Yefymenko, L., Smolianko, Y., Kuchai, O. (2022). Prospective Directions of Using Multimedia Technologies in the Training of Future Specialists. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(6), 739-746.
  19. Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area, European Association for Quality in Higher Education (ENQA) (2005).
  20. Tavlui I.P. (2011) Features of the application of a systematic approach to management in the development and implementation of a quality management system of higher education. Bulletin of Lviv Polytechnic National University. 695. 26-32.
  21. The National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (1997). Chapter 10 Qualifications and standards. Higher Education in the learning society: Main Report. Her Majesty's Stationery Office
  22. The report of the ENQA Review Panel will be considered by the ENQA Board in November 2008 and the result published. URL: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/learning/qual/review.asp
  23. Vorotnikova I. P. (2018) Using ICT for monitoring and evaluating knowledge in e-learning. Web of Scholar. 6(24). 36-39.
  24. Wilson, D. & McKiernan P. (2011). 'Global mimicry; puttingstrategic choice back on the business school agenda ,British Journal of Management. 22. 457-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00765.x
  25. Wilson, J. & Thomson A. (2006).The Making of ModernManagement: British Management in Historical Perspective.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Witzel, M. (2009).Management History: Texts and Cases.London: Routledge.