The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implant-supported fixed prosthesis in patient with severe defects using staged GBR via 2-step augmentations: A case report

심한 결손부의 단계적 골증대술을 통한 임플란트 지지 고정성 보철 수복 증례 보고

  • Oh, SaeEun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jun, Ji Hoon (Department of Prosthodontics, Aeromedical Squadron, Republic of Korea Air Force 8th Fighter Wing) ;
  • Park, YoungBum (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 오세은 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 전지훈 (대한민국 공군 제8전투비행단 항공의무대대 치과보철과) ;
  • 박영범 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2022.08.10
  • Accepted : 2022.09.19
  • Published : 2022.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The treatment of patients with severe periodontitis should be proceeded step-bystep through an accurate diagnosis of each patients' individual tooth and with a strategic treatment plan. Implant-supported fixed prosthetic restoration has the advantage of high patient satisfaction and stable vertical dimension compared to the removable partial denture. However, multiple teeth defect areas lacking hard tissue may be disadvantageous in aesthetic failure and longer treatment time. In addition, it takes a certain period of time to manufacture and install a conventional fixed prosthesis, and during this process, the provisional prosthesis must satisfy the mechanical, biological, and aesthetic requirements of teeth. The purpose of this article is to describe the fabrication of implant-supported fixed prosthesis through a step-by-step approach in a partially edentulous patient.

심한 치주염을 가진 환자의 치료는 환자의 개개 치아의 정확한 진단과 전략적인 치료 계획을 통해 단계적으로 진행되어야 한다. 임플란트 지지 고정성 보철 수복은 국소의치에 비해 환자의 만족도가 높고, 안정적인 수직 고경을 유지할 수 있는 장점이 있지만, 경조직이 부족한 다수 치아 결손 부위에서는 심미적인 측면의 실패와 치료 기간이 길어진다는 점의 단점이 있을 수 있다. 또한 통상의 고정성 보철물을 제작하고 장착하는 데에는 일정 기간이 소요되는데, 이 기간 동안 임시 보철물은 치아의 기계적, 생물학적, 심미적 요구 조건을 만족시켜야 한다. 이번 증례 보고에서는 상악과 하악의 부분 무치악 환자에서 단계적인 접근을 통한 임플란트 고정성 보철물을 수복한 증례를 보고하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:188-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70155-1
  2. Ali Z, Baker SR, Shahrbaf S, Martin N, Vettore MV. Oral health-related quality of life after prosthodontic treatment for patients with partial edentulism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.003
  3. Garber DA, Belser UC. Restoration-driven implant placement with restoration-generated site development. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1995;16:796, 798-802, 804.
  4. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:43-61.
  5. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:113-9.
  6. Funato A, Salama MA, Ishikawa T, Garber DA, Salama H. Timing, positioning, and sequential staging in esthetic implant therapy: a four-dimensional perspective. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007;27:313-23.
  7. Amirul Islam, M.A.Hossain, Jang YM. Interference mitigation technique for Time-of-Flight (ToF) camera. In: 2016 Eighth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN). IEEE 2016;134-9.
  8. Lepidi L, Galli M, Mastrangelo F, Venezia P, Joda T, Wang HL, Li J. Virtual articulators and virtual mounting procedures: where do we stand? J Prosthodont 2021;30:24-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13240
  9. Quirynen M, Herrera D, Teughels W, Sanz M. Implant therapy: 40 years of experience. Periodontol 2000 2014;66:7-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12060
  10. Lekovic V, Kenney EB, Weinlaender M, Han T, Klokkevold P, Nedic M, Orsini M. A bone regenerative approach to alveolar ridge maintenance following tooth extraction. Report of 10 cases. J Periodontol 1997;68:563-70. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1997.68.6.563
  11. Tolman DE. Reconstructive procedures with endosseous implants in grafted bone: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:275-94.
  12. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P, Marinello CP. Long-term results of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:355-66.
  13. Rangert BR, Sullivan RM, Jemt TM. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:360-70.
  14. Misch CE. Occlusal considerations for implant supported prostheses. In: Comtemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. p. 609-28.
  15. Rieder CE. Use of provisional restorations to develop and achieve esthetic expectations. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 1989;9:122-39.
  16. Dawood A, Marti Marti B, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A. 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J 2015;219:521-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.914
  17. Park C. Application of ARCUS digma I, II systems for full mouth reconstruction: a case report. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2016;32:345-50. https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2016.32.4.345
  18. Hong YT, Koak JY, Kim SK, Heo SJ. Digital duplication of provisional prosthesis to fabricate definitive prosthesis for full mouth rehabilitation using double scan technique. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2021;59:63-70. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2021.59.1.63
  19. Zhang S, Liu X, He K, Wu L, Chen J. Function oriented oral rehabilitation with implants by full digital flow technology-a case report. Chinese J Oral Implantol 2021;26:102-8.