Factors and Elements for Cross-border Entrepreneurial Migration: An Exploratory Study of Global Startups in South Korea

델파이 기법과 AHP를 이용한 글로벌 창업이주 요인 탐색 연구: 국내 인바운드 사례를 중심으로

  • 최화준 (연세대학교 기술경영학협동과정) ;
  • 김태용 (연세대학교 기술경영학협동과정) ;
  • 이정우 (연세대학교 정보대학원)
  • Received : 2022.07.11
  • Accepted : 2022.08.27
  • Published : 2022.08.30

Abstract

Startups are recognized as the vitality of the economy, and countries are competing to attract competitive overseas entrepreneurs and startups to their own startup ecosystem. In this global trend, entrepreneurs cross the border without hesitation, expecting abundant available resources and a startup friendly environment. Despite the increasing frequency of start-up migration between countries, studies related to this are very rare. Therefore, this study has chosen the cross-border migration of startups between countries as a research topic, and those who have been involved in the cross-border entrepreneurial migration to South Korea as a research sample. This study consists of two stages. The first research stage hires a Delphi method to collect expert opinions and find major factors related to the global startup migration. Drawing on the prior literature on the regional startup ecosystem at the national level, this stage is to conduct expert interviews in order to discover underlying factors and subfactors important for global migration of startups. The second stage measures the importance of the factors and subfactors using the AHP model. The priorities of factors and factors were identified hiring the overseas entrepreneurs who moved to Korea as the AHP survey samples. The results of this study suggest some interesting implications. First, a group of entrepreneurs with nomadic tendencies was found in the trend of global migration of entrepreneurs. They had already started their own businesses with the same business ideas in multiple countries before settling down in Korea. Second, important unique factors and subfactors in the context of global start-up migration were identified. A good example is the government's support package, including start-up visas. Third, it was possible to know the priority of the factors and subfactors that influence the global migration of startups This study is meaningful in that it preemptively conducted exploratory research focusing on a relatively new phenomenon of global startup migration, which recently catches attention in the global startup ecosystem. At the same time, it has a limitation in that it is difficult to generalize the meanings found in this study because the research was conducted based on the case of South Korea

스타트업이 경제의 활력을 불어넣는 중요한 요소로 인식되며 각국은 경쟁력 있는 해외창업가와 스타트업을 자국 창업생태계에 유치하기 위해 치열하게 경쟁하고 있다. 이에 부응하듯 창업가들은 풍부한 가용 자원 및 창업 친화적인 환경을 따라 태어난 국가에 연연하지 않고 새로운 사업을 개척하기 위해 주저 없이 국경을 넘고 있는 현실이다. 이처럼 국가 간 창업 이주가 점차 빈번해지고 있음에도 불구하고, 이와 관련된 연구는 매우 드문 실정이다. 이러한 현실과 이론 연구의 간극을 보완하기 위해 본 연구는 스타트업의 국가 간 창업이주를 연구주제로 삼았다. 그리고 한국으로의 글로벌 창업 이주를 연구대상으로 선정하여 탐색적 연구를 진행하고 도출된 결과를 바탕으로 사회적 함의를 모색하고자 한다. 본 연구는 두 단계의 개별적 연구로 구성되어 있다. 첫 번째 단계는 글로벌 창업이주와 관련된 전문가의 의견을 수집하고 이주의 주요 요인을 찾기 위한 델파이 기법의 적용이다. 이는 국가 차원의 지역 창업생태계에 대한 선행 문헌조사를 바탕으로 전문가 인터뷰를 진행하고, 이를 통해 글로벌 기업 이주에 중요한 고유요인과 하위요인, 즉 창업이주의 요소를 도출하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 두 번째 단계는 AHP 모델을 이용한 중요도 측정이다. 중요도 측정은 한국으로 이주한 해외 창업가를 연구 표본으로 사용하여 글로벌 창업이주의 요인과 요소의 우선순위를 확인하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 몇 가지 흥미로운 사회적 함의를 제시한다. 첫째, 창업가의 글로벌 이주의 흐름 속에 유목민적 성향을 가진 창업자 집단이 발견되었다. 이들은 국내에 정착하기 전 이미 여러 다수의 국가에서 동일한 아이템으로 창업을 한 경험이 있다. 둘째, 글로벌 창업 이주의 맥락에서 중요한 고유요인과 요소가 존재했다. 창업 비자를 포함한 정부의 글로벌 창업 이주 지원정책 패키지가 좋은 예시이다. 셋째, 글로벌 창업자들이 국내로 창업이주를 결정할 때 영향을 미치는 요인들의 우선순위를 알 수 있었다. 본 연구는 최근 글로벌 창업생태계에서 주목을 받고있는 글로벌 창업이주라는 비교적 새로운 사회 현상을 중심으로 하여 선제적인 탐색 연구를 진행하였다는 점에서 의의를 찾을 수 있다. 하지만 국내로 이주한 글로벌 창업자들을 한정된 샘플로 이용하여 연구를 진행하였기에 본 연구를 통해 도출된 함의가 넓은 범위에서의 일반화가 어렵다는 한계점을 동시에 지니고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Amit, R., & Muller, E.(1995). "Push" and "pull" entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 12(4), 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.1995.10600505
  2. Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S(2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business venturing, 18(1), 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00068-4
  3. Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M(2013). The missing pillar: The creativity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small business economics, 41(4), 819-836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9508-6
  4. Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., & Desai, S.(2015). Entrepreneurship and economic development in cities. The Annals of Regional Science, 55(1), 33-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0685-x
  5. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E.(2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research policy, 34(8), 1191-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.012
  6. Belitski, M., & Desai, S.(2016). Creativity, entrepreneurship and economic development: city-level evidence on creativity spillover of entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1354-1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9446-3
  7. Blank, S., & Dorf, B.(2020). The startup owner's manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company: John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Bryan, K., & Guzman, J.(2021). Entrepreneurial Migration. Available at SSRN.
  9. Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R.(2010). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 557-594): Springer.
  10. Choi, H. J.(2022) Cross-Border Migration of Startups: An Empirical Study of Factors Involved among Global Startups in South Korea. Doctoral Dissertation, Yonsei University, Korea.
  11. Cohen, B.(2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.428
  12. Conti, A., & Guzman, J. A.(2021). What is the US comparative advantage in entrepreneurship? Evidence from Israeli migration to the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1-45.
  13. Crowne, M.(2002). Why software product startups fail and what to do about it. Evolution of software product development in startup companies. Paper presented at the IEEE International Engineering Management Conference.
  14. Cukier, D., Kon, F., & Lyons, T. S.(2016). Software startup ecosystems evolution: The New York City case study. Paper presented at the 2016 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/IEEE lnternational Technology Management Conference (ICE/ITMC).
  15. Drucker, P.(2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship, London; Routledge.
  16. Eckhardt, J., & Shane, S.(2003). The individual-opportunity nexus: A new perspective on entrepreneurship in Handbook of Entrepreneurship, Z. Acs and D. Audretsch. In: Boston, MA: Kluwer.
  17. Foster, G., Shimizu, C., Ciesinski, S., Davila, A., Hassan, S., Jia, N., & Morris, R. (2013). Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and company growth dynamics. In World Economic Forum (Vol. 11, pp. 1-36). Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
  18. Guzman, J.(2019). Go west young firm: agglomeration and embeddedness in startup migrations to Silicon Valley. Columbia Business School Research Paper(18-49).
  19. Hills, G. E., Shrader, R. C., & Lumpkin, G. T.(1999). Opportunity recognition as a creative process. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 19(19), 216-227.
  20. Huggins, R., & Thompson, P.(2015). Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: a network theory. Small business economics, 45(1), 103-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9643-3
  21. Isenberg, D.(2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs, 1(781), 1-13.
  22. Ives, A. R., & Carpenter, S. R.(2007). Stability and diversity of ecosystems. science, 317(5834), 58-62. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133258
  23. Kane, T. J.(2010). The importance of startups in job creation and job destruction. Available at SSRN 1646934.
  24. Kim. Y. H.(2021). Development of Korea's Start-up Ecosystem through Benchmarking of Foreign Countries. Korean Academic Society Of Business Administration Convergence Conference. 2967-2990.
  25. Klotins, E., Unterkalmsteiner, M., & Gorschek, T.(2015). Software engineering knowledge areas in startup companies: a mapping study. Paper presented at the International Conference of Software Business.
  26. Larson, A.(1991). Partner networks: Leveraging external ties to improve entrepreneurial performance. Journal of Business venturing, 6(3), 173-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(91)90008-2
  27. Lee, M., Lee, M., & Kim, J. (2017). A dynamic approach to the start-up business ecosystem: A cross-comparison of korea, china, and japan. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 22(2), 157-184. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2017.22.2.6
  28. Lee. W. J., Oh M. H., Kim D. H., Kim J. S. & Kim G. Y.(2020). Developing Measurement Model and Indicatorsfor Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Focusing onRegional E-Ecosystem Indicator via Delphi Analys Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 15(4), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.15.1.202002.1
  29. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M.(1975). The delphi method: Addison-Wesley Reading, MA.
  30. Makinen, S. J., & Dedehayir, O.(2012). Business ecosystem evolution and strategic considerations: A literature review. Paper presented at the 2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation.
  31. Moore, J. F.(1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard business review, 71(3), 75-86.
  32. Moore, J. F.(1996). The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems: HarperCollins.
  33. Moss, I.(2011). "Start-up nation: An innovation story." Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. The OECD Obererver(285): 33.
  34. Nathan, M., & Lee, N.(2013). Cultural Diversity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship: Firm-level Evidence from L ondon. Economic geography, 89(4), 367-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12016
  35. Ostergaard, C. R., Timmermans, B., & Kristinsson, K.(2011). Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation. Research policy, 40(3), 500-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.004
  36. Paternoster, N., Giardino, C., Unterkalmsteiner, M., Gorschek, T., & Abrahamsson, P.(2014). Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 56(10), 1200-1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2014.04.014
  37. Read, S., & Sarasvathy, S. D.(2005). Knowing what to do and doing what you know: Effectuation as a form of entrepreneurial expertise. The journal of private equity, 9(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2005.605370
  38. Read, S., Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S. D., Song, M., & Wiltbank, R.(2009). Marketing under uncertainty: The logic of an effectual approach. Journal of marketing, 73(3), 1-18.
  39. Reis, E.(2011). The lean startup. New York: Crown Business, 27, 2016-2020.
  40. Rothschild, M.(2004). Bionomics: Economy as business ecosystem: Beard Books.
  41. Saaty, T. L.(1989). Group decision making and the AHP. In The analytic hierarchy process (pp. 59-67): Springer.
  42. Saaty, T. L., & Kearns, K. P.(2014). Analytical planning: The organization of system (Vol. 7): Elsevier.
  43. Sarasvathy, S. D.(2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of management Review, 26(2), 243-263 https://doi.org/10.2307/259121
  44. Startup Blink.(2019). Startup ecosystem rankings report 2019. Online report available at: https://www.startupblink.com/
  45. Startup Genome.(2020). The Global Startup Ecosystem Report, GSER 2020-The New Normal for the Global Startup Economy and the Impact of COVID-19. Startup Genome.
  46. Shane, S.(2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization science, 11(4), 448-469. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.448.14602
  47. Stam, E., & Van de Ven, A.(2021). Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small business economics, 56(2), 809-832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6
  48. Thai, M. T. T., & Turkina, E.(2013). Entrepreneurial migration: characteristics, causes and effects. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy.
  49. Tripathi, N., Seppanen, P., Boominathan, G., Oivo, M., & Liukkunen, K.(2019). Insights into startup ecosystems through exploration of multi-vocal literature.
  50. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., Wright, M., & Binks, M.(2003). Does entrepreneurial experience influence opportunity identification? The journal of private equity, 7(1), 7-14. Information and Software Technology, 105, 56-77.
  51. Van der Zwan, P., Thurik, R., Verheul, I., & Hessels, J.(2016). Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. Eurasian Business Review, 6(3), 273-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-016-0065-1
  52. Venkataraman, S.(2019). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In Seminal ideas for the next twenty-five years of advances: Emerald Publishing Limited.
  53. Williams, P. L., & Webb, C.(1994). The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion. Journal of advanced nursing, 19(1), 180-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01066.x
  54. Zahra, S. A.(2007). Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business venturing, 22(3), 443-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.04.007
  55. Zahra, S. A., & Nambisan, S.(2012). Entrepreneurship and strategic thinking in business ecosystems. Business horizons, 55(3), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.12.004