DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sensitivity of SNF transport cask response to uncertainty in properties of wood inside the impact limiter under drop accident conditions

  • Lee, Eun-ho (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Ra, ChiWoong (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Roh, Hyungyu (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Jeong (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, No-Choel (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • 투고 : 2022.04.07
  • 심사 : 2022.05.27
  • 발행 : 2022.10.25

초록

It is essential to ensure the safety of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) transport cask in drop situation that is included in transport accident scenarios. The safety of the drop situation is affected by the impact absorption performance of impact limiters. Therefore, when designing an impact limiter, the uncertainty in the material properties that affect the impact absorption performance must be considered. In this study, the material properties of the wood inside the impact limiter were selected as the variables for a parametric study. The sensitivity analysis of the drop response of the SNF transport cask with impact limiter was performed. The minimum wood strength required to prevent a direct collision between the cask and floor was derived from the analysis results. In addition, the plastic strain response was analyzed and strain-based evaluation was performed. Based on this result, the critical values of wood properties that change the impact dynamic characteristics were investigated. Finally, the optimal material properties of wood were obtained to secure the structural safety of the SNF transport cask. The results of this study can contribute to the development of SNF transport cask, thereby ensuring safety in transport accident conditions.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2019M2D2A2048296).

참고문헌

  1. IAEA, IAEA Safety Standards Series (No, SSR-6), Rev. 1, Regulations for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material, 2018.
  2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, RG 7.6, Rev. 1, Design Criteria for the Structural Analysis of Shipping Cask Containment Vessels, 1978.
  3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, RG 7.8, Rev. 1, Load Combinations for the Structural Analysis of Shipping Casks for Radioactive Material, 1989.
  4. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG-2215, Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities, 2020.
  5. B.E. Lampinen, R.A. Jeryan, Effectiveness of polyurethane foam in energy absorbing structures, SAE Trans. 91 (1982) 2059. e2076.
  6. K.R.F. Andrews, G.L. England, E. Ghani, Classification of the axial collapse of cylindrical tubes under quasi-static loading, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 25 (1983) 687-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(83)90076-0
  7. ASME B&PV Code Committee, ASME B&PV Code, Sec. II, Materials, Part D, Properties, 2019.
  8. S.P. Kim, J.H. Kim, D.S. Sohn, H.J. Kwon, M.S. Shin, Stress-based vs. strain-based safety evaluations of spent nuclear fuel transport casks in energy-limited events, Nucl. Eng. Des. 355 (2019), 110324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110324
  9. Y.S. Lee, C.H. Ryu, H.S. Kim, Y. Choi, A study on the free drop impact of a cask using commercial FEA codes, Nucl. Eng. Des. 235 (2005) 2219-2226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.03.009
  10. K. Sharma, D.N. Pawaskar, A. Guha, R.K. Singh, Optimization of cask for transport of radioactive material under impact loading, Nucl. Eng. Des. 273 (2014) 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.03.021
  11. D.H. Kim, K.S. Seo, J.C. Lee, K.S. Bang, C.H. Cho, S.J. Lee, C.Y. Baeg, Finite element analyses and verifying tests for a shock-absorbing effect of a pad in a spent fuel storage cask, Ann. Nucl. Energy 34 (2007) 871-882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2007.04.012
  12. K.S. Kim, J.S. Kim, K.S. Choi, T.M. Shin, H.D. Yun, Dynamic impact characteristics of KN-18 SNF transport cask e Part 1: an advanced numerical simulation and validation technique, Ann. Nucl. Energy 37 (2010) 546-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.12.023
  13. K.S. Kim, J.S. Kim, K.S. Choi, T.M. Shin, H.-D. Yun, Dynamic impact characteristics of KN-18 SNF transport cask e Part 2: sensitivity analysis of modeling and design parameters, Ann. Nucl. Energy 37 (2010) 560-571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2009.12.024
  14. J.E. Jeon, S.H. Han, W.S. Choi, S.H. Lee, K.S. Seo, Drop weight device fabrication and tests for a dynamic material property of shock-absorbing material and structure in transportation package, in: Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting, Jeju, Korea, May 22, 2009.
  15. J. Wu, J.L. Gorczyca, D.R. Leduc, J.L. England, Dynamic analysis of Hanford Unirradiated Fuel Package subjected to sequential lateral loads in hypothetical accident conditions, in: ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 2008. Chicago, Illinois, July 27-31.
  16. W.S. Choi, K.S. Seo, A simple sizing optimization technique for an impact limiter based on dynamic material properties, Nucl. Eng. Des. 240 (2010) 925-932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.12.008
  17. S.Y. Zhang, Wood specific gravity-mechanical property relationship at species level, Wood Sci. Technol. 31 (1997) 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705884
  18. R.F. Luxford, L.J. Markwardt, The Strength and Related Properties of Redwood, Forest Products Lab., 1932, pp. 1-48. Technical Bulletin No. 305.
  19. M. Verbist, J.M. Branco, L. Nunes, Characterization of the mechanical performance in compression perpendicular to the grain of insect-deteriorated timber, Buildings 10 (2020) 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10010014
  20. Ch. 5 D.E. Kretschmann, Mechanical Properties of Wood, Forest Product Lab., 2010, pp. 1-46. GTR-190.
  21. H.T. Kim, J.M. Seo, K.W. Seo, S.H. Yoon, Y.J. Kim, C.Y. Oh, Effect of material hardening model for canister on finite element cask drop simulation for strain-based acceptance evaluation, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 54 (2022) 1098-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.09.006
  22. J.H. Ko, J.H. Park, I.S. Jung, G.U. Lee, C.Y. Baeg, T.M. Kim, Shielding analysis of dual purpose casks for spent nuclear fuel under normal storage conditions, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 46 (2014) 547-556. https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.08.2013.039
  23. T.M. Kim, H.D. Dho, C.Y. Baeg, G.U. Lee, Preliminary safety analysis of criticality for dual-purpose metal cask under dry storage conditions in South Korea, Nucl. Eng. Des. 278 (2014) 414-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.08.008
  24. T. Borrvall, A heuristic attempt to reduce transverse shear locking in fully integrated hexahedra with poor aspect ratio, in: European LS-DYNA Conference, 2009. Salzburg, Austria, May 14-15.
  25. J.A. Nairn, Numerical simulations of transverse compression and densification in wood, Wood Fiber Sci. 38 (2006) 576-591.
  26. T. Tabarsa, Y.H. Chui, Stress-strain response of wood under radial compression. Part 1. Test method and influences of cellular properties, Wood Fiber Sci. 32 (2000) 144-152.
  27. S.M. Cramer, J.C. Hermanson, W.M. McMurty, Characterizing Large Strain Crush Response of Redwood, Sandia Natl. Lab., 1996, pp. 1-59. SAND96-2966.
  28. A.D. Silva, S. Kyriakides, Compressive response and failure of balsa wood, Int. J. Solid Struct. 44 (2007) 8685-8717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.07.003
  29. ASME B&PV Code Committee, ASME B&PV Code, Sec. III, Appendices, Nonmandatory Appendix F, Rules for Evaluation of Service Loadings with Level, D Service Limits, 2019.
  30. B. Yoo, J.H. Lee, G.H. Koo, H.Y. Lee, J.B. Kim, Seismic base isolation technologies for Korea advanced liquid metal reactor, Nucl. Eng. Des. 199 (2000) 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00062-X
  31. J.B. Park, S.J. Lee, E.H. Lee, N.C. Park, Y.B. Kim, Seismic responses of nuclear reactor vessel internals considering coolant flow under operating conditions, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 51 (2019) 1658-1668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.04.013
  32. S.J. Lee, E.H. Lee, C.K. Lee, N.C. Park, Y.I. Choi, Investigation of seismic responses of reactor vessel and internals for beyond-design basis earthquake using elastoplastic time history analysis, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 (2021) 988-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.08.011
  33. ASME B&PV Code Committee, ASME B&PV Code, Sec. III, Appendices, Nonmandatory Appendix FF, Strain-Based Acceptance Criteria for EnergyLimited Events, 2019.
  34. S.D. Snow, D.K. Morton, E.L. Pleins, R. Keating, Strain-based acceptance criteria for energy-limited events, in: ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 2009, pp. 26-30. Prague, Czech Republic, July.
  35. J.M. Seo, H.T. Kim, Y.J. Kim, H. Yamada, T. Kumagai, H. Tokunaga, N. Miura, Effect of strain rate and stress triaxiality on fracture strain of 304 stainless steels for canister impact simulation, Nucl. Eng. Technol. (2022). In Press.
  36. H. Tlilan, M. Gharaibeh, M. Mustafa, A. Jawarneh, Effect of stress triaxiality on the strain concentration factor, Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 8 (2020) 3468-3474.