Journal of Practical Engineering Education (실천공학교육논문지)

Korean Institute for Pratical Engineering Education (한국실천공학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Teaching Competency Scales: Focused on CTL Teaching Program

대학 CTL 교수지원프로그램 맞춤형 교수역량진단도구 개발

  • 강대식 (남서울대학교 교양대학)
  • Received : 2022.03.29
  • Accepted : 2022.04.22
  • Published : 2022.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to develop a teaching competency scales customized for teaching programs conducted by Center for Teaching & Learning at A University. To achieve this purpose, a preliminary study was set up, which consists of three competency groups (basic competency, practice competency, innovation competency) and 26 learning competency factors through a review of previous studies. In order to verify the reliability and validity of the provisional teaching competency scales, an online survey was conducted on A university teachers in September 2020, The collected questionnaire data were organized and exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted. As a result of exploratory factor analysis, 26 teaching competency was reduced to 17. As a result of the confirmatory factor analysis, the model was found to be good, Also, as a result of analyzing the construct reliability and AVE of the confirmed teaching competency factors, all 17 factors showed a good level of .7 or more. The teaching competency scales developed through this study can be used as basic data for performance evaluation and development of new programs of CTL teaching program.

본 연구는 A대학 교수학습센터(Center for Teaching & Learning)의 교수지원 프로그램 특성에 부합하는 교수역량 진단도구를 개발하고자 수행되었다. 이러한 연구목적을 달성하기 위해 선행연구 검토를 통해 3개 역량군(기본역량, 실천역량, 혁신역량)과 13개 교수역량, 26개 하위역량 요인으로 구성된 잠정적 교수역량 진단도구를 설정하였다. 잠정적 교수역량 진단도구의 신뢰도 및 타당도 검증을 위해 2020년 11월에 A대학교 교수자를 대상으로 온라인 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 설문 데이터를 정리하여 탐색적 요인분석과 확인적 요인분석을 수행하였다. 탐색적 요인분석 결과, 기본역량, 실천역량, 혁신역량 3개 역량군에 포함되는 26개 하위역량이 17개로 축소되었다. 확인적 요인분석을 실시한 결과, 모형의 적합도가 양호한 것으로 나타나 CTL 맞춤형 교수역량(하위역량) 17개 영역, 79개 문항을 최종 확정하였다. 또한 확정된 교수역량 요인의 개념신뢰도와 분산추출지수, 판별타당도를 분석한 결과 양호한 수준을 보였다. 본 연구를 통해 개발된 교수역량 진단도구는 CTL 교수지원 프로그램의 효과성 평가와 신규 프로그램 개발의 근거자료로 활용될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. O. S. Ha, "University professor's teaching competency factor derivation from the learner's perspective and analysis of difference in lecture level," The Journal of Educational Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1-26, 2017.
  2. K. Kang and S. H. Park, "Development and application of teaching competency tool of university teachers," The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 88-98, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.09.088
  3. W. Lim and Y. Kim, "Analysis of the professor's core lecture competency," The Journal of Educational Administration, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 413-434, 2007.
  4. H. Roh and Choi, M, "The development of the teaching competency model for HRD," Journal of Vocational Education & Training. vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1-28, 2004.
  5. S. Han & K. Y. Lim, "Teaching competency modeling for instructors in cyber university," The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 837- 862, 2012. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2012.24.4.837
  6. H. Hong and J. Lee, "Identifying teaching competencies blended learning in university," Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 391-425, 2016. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.32.2.391
  7. H. Y. Lee, Y. S. Kim, and H. O. Heo, "The development of a inventory for teaching competency in colleges of engineering," Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 439-469, 2012. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.28.3.439
  8. K. H. Kang and S. H. Park, "Development and application of teaching competency tool of university teachers," The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 88-98, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2017.17.09.088
  9. D. Kim, H. Park, and Y. Lee, "Development of faculty competency model and analyze the educational needs of competencies based on life cycle," Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 133-163, 2018. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.34.1.133
  10. E. H. Im, Y. N. Kim, S. Y. Kim, and K. Bo, "The development and validation of a teaching competency scale in a university environment," Journal of Educational Studies, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 1-23, 2019.
  11. M. H. Kim, "A study on the inhibition factors and improvement of teaching ability," Journal of Korean Education Proceeding, pp. 113-116, 2007.
  12. D. Kim, H. Park, and Y. Lee, "Development of faculty competency model and analyze the educational needs of competencies based on life cycle," Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 133-163, 2018. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.34.1.133
  13. H. Y. Lee, Y. S. Kim, and H. O. Heo, "The Development of a Inventory for Teaching Competency in colleges of engineering," Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 439-469, 2012. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.28.3.439
  14. E. H. Yang, "Development of a diagnostic inventory for teaching competency," Ph. D. dissertation, Ewha University, 2010.
  15. Y. O. Song and H. L. Roh, "Analysis of improvement needs in university faculty's teaching competency and lecture inhibiting factors," Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 229-251, 2016. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.32.1.229
  16. G. R. Kang, "Study on the analysis of the direction of university education and the teaching capacity of professor in the fourth industrial revolution era," Journal of Education & Culture, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 49-82, 2019.
  17. M. J. Kim, "Development of instructional systems to enhance university professor's teaching competency," The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 289-317, 2018. https://doi.org/10.24211/TJKTE.2018.35.2.289