한국자원식물학회지 (Korean Journal of Plant Resources)

  • 제35권5호
  • /
  • Pages.675-685
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1226-3591(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-8203(eISSN)
한국자원식물학회 (The Plant Resources Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

화훼작물이 재배된 온실 또는 노지재배지의 토양 화학성 비교

Comparison of Soil Chemical Properties in Greenhouse or Open Field Where Flower Crops were Cultivated from 2018 to 2020

  • 권혜숙 (공주대학교 원예학과) ;
  • 허성 (공주대학교 원예학과)
  • Kwon, Hye Sook (Department of Horticulture, Kongju National University) ;
  • Heo, Seong (Department of Horticulture, Kongju National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.05.11
  • 심사 : 2022.06.29
  • 발행 : 2022.10.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

2018년부터 2020년까지 화훼작물의 시설 및 노지재배지의 토양 화학성을 비교 분석하였다. 시설재배지 토양의 pH는 3년간 적정 범위 유지되었고, 노지토양도 적정 범위로 유지되었다. 유기물 함량은 두 토양에서 모두 적정 범위로 유지되었고, EC의 경우 시설토양은 적정 기준보다 높았으나, 노지토양에서는 적정 기준 범위로 유지되었다. 유효인산은 시설토양에서 2018년에 560 mg/kg가장 높았으나 매해 낮아져 2020년에 적정 기준 범위로 낮아졌고, 노지재배지 토양은 매해 적정 범위에 유지되었다. 치환성 양이온은 시설재배지 토양에서 3년간 표준 범위보다 높게 유지되어 영양 불균형이 극심하였고, 특히 치환성 칼슘과 마그네슘의 유의성이 높았다. 그러나 노지재배지 토양에서는 치환성 칼슘과 마그네슘이 적정 범위보다 약간 높은 수준이었다. 주성분 분석을 통해서 시설재배지 토양의 치환성 양이온을 비롯해 유효인산, EC가 높은 문제점이 드러났으며, 노지재배지는 시설재배지보다는 상대적으로 낮은 값의 유효인산, EC, 치환성 양이온 분포를 보였다. 그러나 노지재배지 토양의 pH는 변동성이 너무 크고 pH가 높은 토양의 비율이 시설재배지보다 높았다. 또한, 노지재배지 토양은 시설재배지보다 유기물 함량이 낮으므로 유기물 시용에 더욱 적극적으로 노력해야 할 것으로 판단되었다.

A comparative analysis was performed on the soil chemical properties of greenhouse or open field where flower crops were grown from 2018 to 2020. The pH of greenhouse soils was kept slightly higher than the optimum range suggested by Rural Development Administration and that of open field soils was maintained within the optimum range for three years. The contents of organic matter (OM) were within the optimum range without significant change every year in both soils. Available phosphate (Av. P2O5) of greenhouse soils was the highest at 560 mg/kg in 2018, but it decreased every year and fell within the appropriate range in 2020. The concentration of Av. P2O5 in open field soils have fluctuated for three years, not showing a significant difference. Electrical conductivity (EC) of greenhouse soils was higher every year than the standard, 2.0 dS/m, but EC of open field soils remained below the standard. The contents of exchangeable cations were higher than the standard, showing significant differences among the years in greenhouse soils. In open field soils, other cations except exchangeable K+ were maintained higher than the optimal level and only Ca2+ showed a significant difference among the years. In Pearson correlation matrices, the value of exchangeable Ca2+ had a significantly positive correlation with exchangeable Mg2+ content at both greenhouse and open field soils. Based on principal component analysis, the soils of greenhouse were distributed within the range of high concentrations of Av. P2O5, EC and exchangeable cations, while the soils of open field were characterized by low contents of OM and exchangeable cations. Therefore, it is essential to lower the concentration of exchangeable cations in greenhouse soils. It is common for the soils of open field to have a low OM content, so that organic fertilizers should be more actively applied to the soils in open field.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abreu Jr., C.H., T. Muraoka and A.F. Lavorante. 2003. Relationship between acidity and chemical properties of Brazilians soils. Sci. Agric. 60:337-343. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162003000200019
  2. Ahn, B.K., D.Y. Ko, H.J. Choi and H.G. Chon. 2020. Distribution of water-soluble nutrients and physico-chemical properties of upland and orchard field soils in Jeonbuk province. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 53:375-381 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2020.53.3.375
  3. Behera, S.K. and A.K. Shukla. 2014. Total and extractable manganese and iron in some cultivated acid soils of India: status, distribution and relationship with some soil properties. Pedosphere 24:196-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(14)60006-0
  4. Choi, H., S.K. Park, D.S. Kim and M.H. Kim. 2010. Risk assessment of arsenic in agricultural products. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 29:266-272 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2010.29.3.266
  5. Gao, X., T. Meng and X. Zhao. 2017. Variations of soil organic carbon following land use change on deep-loess hillsopes in China. Land Degrad. Dev. 28:1902-1912. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2693
  6. Guo, J.H., X.J. Liu, Y. Zhang, J.L. Shen, W.X. Han, W.F. Zhang, P. Christie, K.W.T. Goulding, P.M. Vitousek and F.S. Zhang. 2010. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science 327:1008-1010. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182570
  7. Hwang, K.S. and Q.S. Ho. 2000. Chemical properties of the greenhouse soil and nutrient contents in leaves and stems of carnation, lily, and rose. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 19:247-251 (in Korean).
  8. Hwang, K.S., D.G. No and G.S. Ho. 1998. Survey on the greenhouse flower soil chemicophysical properties and amount of fertilizers and soil amendment applications. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 17:132-135 (in Korean).
  9. Jeong, D.H., K.Y. Kim, H.W. Park, C.R. Jung, H.J. Kim and K.S. Jeon. 2021. Growth characteristics of ligusticum chuanxing hort. According to soil and meteorological environment by each cultivation. Korean J. Plant Res. 34:64-72 (in Korean).
  10. Jung, H.H., S.J. Kim, K.R. Yang and B.S. Yoo. 2020. Changes of flower festivals and plants usage for scenery by period and region in Korea. Flower Res. J. 28:321-330 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.11623/frj.2020.28.4.11
  11. Jung, Y.M. 2015. The Function of Nutrient. In the Prevention and Minerals for Korea Agriculture in the Future. Gomundang Publishing Co., Daegu, Korea. pp. 101-117 (in Korean).
  12. Kang, S.W., S.H. Kim, J.H. Park, D.C. Seo and J.S. Cho. 2017. Selection of optimal application condition of corn waste biochar for improvement of corn growth and soil fertility. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 50:452-461 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2017.50.5.452
  13. KASS. 2020. The status of flower crop cultivation in Korea. Korea Agricultural Statistics Service. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Available at: https://kass.mafra.go.kr (accessed 1 November 2021).
  14. Kim, H.N. and J.H. Park. 2021. Research trends using soil sensors for precise nutrient and water management in soil for smart farm. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 54:366-382 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2021.54.3.366
  15. Kim, K.H., G.Y. Kim, J.G. Kim, D.M. Sa, J.S. Seo, B.K. Son, J.E. Yang, K.C. Um, S.E. Lee, K.Y. Jeong, D.Y. Jeong, Y.T. Jeong, J.B. Jeong and H.N. Hyeon. 2009. Soil Science. Hyangmoonsa Publishing Co., Seoul, Korea. pp. 306-310 (in Korean).
  16. Kim, Y.H., M.S. Kong, E.J. Lee, T.G. Lee and G.B. Jung. 2019. Status and changes in chemical properties of upland soil from 2001 to 2017 in Korea. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 38: 213-218 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2019.38.3.28
  17. KOSIS. 2021. Agricultural statistics. Korean Statistical Information Service. Available at: https://kosis.kr/index (accessed 1 November 2021).
  18. Lee, J.S., C.H. Park, J.G. Seo, J.H. Jeong, B.R. Jeong, Y.A. Kim and G.W. Kim. 2005a. Flower Quality Maintenance and Management Theory. Wizvalley Publishing Co., Seoul, Korea. p. 51, p. 64 (in Korean).
  19. Lee, J.S., E.Y. Kim, K.C. Son, B.J. Choi, M.S. Jo, J.S. Kim and K.W. Kim. 2005b. Flower Distribution and Management Theory. Wizvalley Publishing Co., Seoul, Korea. pp. 5-27 (in Korean).
  20. Lee, S.W., K.C. Park, S.H. Lee, J.M. Park, I.B. Jang and K.H. Kim. 2013. Soil chemical property and leaf mineral nutrient of ginseng cultivated in paddy field occurring leaf discoloration. Korean J. Med. Crop. Sci. 21:289-295 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2013.21.4.289
  21. Lee, Y.H., S.T. Lee, E.S. Kim, W.D. Song and C.W. Noh. 2010. Soil management of facility horticultural crops and preventive measures against continuous cultivation disorder. Preceedings of Fall Conference. October, 2010. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. pp. 69-86.
  22. Lee, Y.J., S.B. Lee and J.K. Sung. 2021. Optimal fertigation guide for greenhouse strawberry: Development and validation. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 54:322-330 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2021.54.3.322
  23. Miao, Y., B.A. Stewart and F. Zhang. 2011. Long-term experiments for sustainable nutrient management in China: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 31:397-414. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2010034
  24. Miyamoto, T., K. Kameyama and Y. Iwata. 2015. Monitoring electrical conductivity and nitrate concentrations in an andosol field using time domain reflectometry. Jpn. Agric. Res. Q. 49:261-267. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.49.261
  25. NAS. 2017. Fertilizer Application Recommendations for Crop Plants. National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration. Wanju, Korea (in Korean).
  26. Park, S.J., J.H. Park, J.G. Won, D.H. Seo and S.H. Lee. 2017. Assessing changes in selected soil chemical properties of rice paddy fields in Gyeongbuk province. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 50:150-161 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2017.50.3.150
  27. RDA. 2014a. Returning to the Farm, Agricultural Technology Guide. Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, Korea. pp. 95-96 (in Korean).
  28. RDA. 2014b. Facility Gardening Soil Management, Agricultural Technology Guide. Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, Korea. p. 41 (in Korean).
  29. RDA. 2017. Cultivation, The Harmony of Soil and Nutrition, Interrobang, National Institute of Agricultural Science. Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, Korea (in Korean).
  30. RDA. 2018. Smart Greenhouse, Agricultural Technology Guide. Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, Korea. pp. 211-224 (in Korean).
  31. RDA. 2019. Farmland Soil Management Technology, Agricultural Technology Guide. Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, Korea. pp. 180-181 (in Korean).
  32. Rukshana, F., C.R. Butterly, J.A. Baldock, J.M. Xu and C. Tang. 2012. Model organic compounds differ in priming effects on alkalinity release in soils through carbon and nitrogen mineralization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 51:35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.022
  33. So, J. and J.H. Lim. 2020. Comparison of growth conditions of cut spray chrysanthemum in smart farm and greenhouse. Flower Res. J. 28:305-314 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.11623/frj.2020.28.4.09