Journal of Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회논문집)

Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on prediction method for flood risk using LENS and flood risk matrix

국지 앙상블자료와 홍수위험매트릭스를 이용한 홍수위험도 예측 방법 연구

  • Choi, Cheonkyu (Department of Hydro Science and Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Kim, Kyungtak (Department of Hydro Science and Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Choi, Yunseok (Department of Hydro Science and Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology)
  • 최천규 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원하천연구본부) ;
  • 김경탁 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원하천연구본부) ;
  • 최윤석 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원하천연구본부)
  • Received : 2022.07.15
  • Accepted : 2022.08.29
  • Published : 2022.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With the occurrence of localized heavy rain while river flow has increased, both flow and rainfall cause riverside flood damages. As the degree of damage varies according to the level of social and economic impact, it is required to secure sufficient forecast lead time for flood response in areas with high population and asset density. In this study, the author established a flood risk matrix using ensemble rainfall runoff modeling and evaluated its applicability in order to increase the damage reduction effect by securing the time required for flood response. The flood risk matrix constructs the flood damage impact level (X-axis) using flood damage data and predicts the likelihood of flood occurrence (Y-axis) according to the result of ensemble rainfall runoff modeling using LENS rainfall data and as well as probabilistic forecasting. Therefore, the author introduced a method for determining the impact level of flood damage using historical flood damage data and quantitative flood damage assessment methods. It was compared with the existing flood warning data and the damage situation at the flood warning points in the Taehwa River Basin and the Hyeongsan River Basin in the Nakdong River Region. As a result, the analysis showed that it was possible to predict the time and degree of flood risk from up to three days in advance. Hence, it will be helpful for damage reduction activities by securing the lead time for flood response.

하천 유량이 증가된 상태에서 집중호우의 발생은 유량과 강우량 모두 하천변 홍수피해에 영향을 미치게 된다. 또한, 하천변 사회·경제적 영향 수준에 따라 피해정도에 차이를 보이게 되며, 특히, 인구 및 자산 밀집도가 높은 경우 홍수대응에 필요한 충분한 예보 선행시간의 확보가 요구된다. 본 연구에서는 홍수대응에 필요한 시간적 여유의 확보를 통한 피해저감 효과를 증대하기 위해 앙상블 강우유출모델링을 활용한 홍수위험매트릭스를 구축하고, 그 적용성을 판단하고자 한다. 홍수위험매트릭스는 홍수피해 자료를 활용한 홍수피해 영향수준(X축)을 구성하고, 기상청 LENS 강우자료를 이용한 앙상블 강우유출모델링의 결과로 위험 홍수량의 발생 가능성을 예측(Y축)하여 확률예보에 기반한 예측이 가능하다. 이를 위해 과거 홍수피해 자료 및 정량적 홍수피해 평가방법을 이용한 홍수피해 영향수준 결정 방법을 제시하였다. 낙동강권역의 태화강유역 및 형산강유역의 홍수특보지점에 대하여 기존 홍수특보 자료 그리고 피해 발생 상황과 비교하였다. 그 결과 최대 3일전부터 홍수위험 발생시간 및 정도에 대한 예측이 가능한 것으로 분석되었다. 따라서 홍수대응에 필요한 예보 선행시간 확보를 통한 피해저감 활동에 도움이 되리라 판단된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 환경부의 재원으로 한국환경산업기술원의 물관리연구사업의 지원을 받아 연구되었습니다[2019002640014].

References

  1. Cheung, K.K. (2001). "A review of ensemble forecasting techniques with a focus on tropical cyclone forecasting." Meteorological Applications, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 315-332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482701003073
  2. Choi, C,K., and Kim, K.T. (2020). " A study on the development of rainfall risk information considering local characteristics." Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 237-245. https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2020.20.3.237
  3. Choi, S.A., Yi, C.S., Shim, M.P., and Kim, H.S. (2006). "Multidimensional flood damage analysis (I): principle and procedure." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.1.001
  4. Choi, Y.J., and Yi, J.E. (2019). "Research on flood risk forecast method using weather ensemble prediction system in urban region." Journal of Korea Water Resource Association, Vol. 52, No. 10, pp. 753-761. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2019.52.10.753
  5. Choi, Y.S., Kim, K.T., Lee, J.H., and Kim, B.S. (2014). "Physicallybased one-dimensional distributed rainfall-runoff model using the finite volume method and grid network flow analysis." Terrestrial, Atmodpheric and Oveanic Sciences, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 869-880. https://doi.org/10.3319/TAO.2014.06.26.01(Hy)
  6. Chung, K.Y. (2016). "Vision and direction of impact forecasting." Meteorological Technology & Policy, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 6-22.
  7. Hammond, M.J., Chen, A.S., Djordjevic, S., Butler, D., and Mark, O. (2015). "Urban flood impact assessment: A state-of-the-art review." Urban Water Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 14-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2013.857421
  8. Jung, S.K., and Kim, B.S. (2019). "A Study on the development of a heavy rainfall risk impact evaluation matrix." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 125-132. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2019.52.2.125
  9. Kim, K.T., and Choi, Y.S. (2022). Grid based Rainfall-Runoff Model (GRM), accessed 4 July 2022, .
  10. Kim, K.T., and Kim, G.H. (2022). Korean-Flood Risk assessment Model (K-FRM), accessed 4 July 2022, .
  11. Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and building Technology (KICT) (2015). Development of direct damage assessment method and damage function for private assets. MOIS-재난-2015-05.
  12. Korea Meteorological Administration Republic of Korea (KMA) (2016). Joint WMO technical progress report on the global data processing and forecasting system and numerical weather prediction research activities for 2016.
  13. Lee, B.J. (2017). "Anlaysis on inundation characteristics for flood impact forecasting in Gangnam drainage basin, atmosphere." Korean Meteorological Society, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 189-197.
  14. Lee, S.H., Seong, Y.J., Kim, K.T., and Jung, Y.H. (2020). "Appraisal of spatial characteristics and applicability of the predicted ensemble rainfall data." Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, Vol. 55, No. 11, pp. 1025-1037.
  15. Messner, S., Moran L., Reub G., and Campbell, J. (2013). "Climate change and sea level rise impacts at Ports and a consistent methodology to evaluate vulnerability and risk." WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 169, pp. 141-153.
  16. Ministry of Environment (ME) (2018). Enforcement regulations of the act on the survey and planning of water resources.
  17. Pilling, C. (2016). "New developments at the flood forecasting centre: operations and flood risk guidance." WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, Vol. 165, pp. 237-248. https://doi.org/10.2495/UW160211
  18. Song, Y.S., Lee, H.S., Lee, J.M., and Park, M.J. (2018). "Characteristics of flood damage considering design frequency of rainfall intensity by dration." Journal of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 369-377. https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2018.18.2.369
  19. Van Westen, C.J., and Greiving S. (2017). "Multi-hazard risk assessment and decision making." Environmental hazards methodologies for risk assessment and management, IWA Publishing, UK, pp.31-94.
  20. Waghwala, R.K., and Agnihotri, P.G. (2019). "Flood risk assessment and resilience strategies for flood risk management: A case study of Surat City." International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 40, 101155.
  21. World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (2015). Guideline on multi-hazard impact-based forecast and warning system, WMO-No. 1150, Geneva, Switzerland.