한국정보통신학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering)

  • 제26권9호
  • /
  • Pages.1412-1422
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2234-4772(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4165(eISSN)
한국정보통신학회 (The Korea Institute of Information and Commucation Engineering)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국 지휘통제 정보교환모델 개발 방법론 연구

The Development Methodology of Korea Command and Control Information Exchange Model

  • Park, Gyudong (Command and Control Systems PMO, Agency for Defense Development) ;
  • Kim, Kunyoung (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Jongmo (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Jeon, Hocheol (Command and Control Systems PMO, Agency for Defense Development)
  • 투고 : 2022.05.23
  • 심사 : 2022.08.18
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

무기체계 간 상호운용성의 중요성이 점점 커지고 있다. 체계 간 상호운용성은 주로 자료 연동을 통해 구현된다. 그런데 체계 간 정보 이질성 해소 비용으로 인해 전군 차원의 자료 연동 효율과 품질이 저하되고 있다. 다른 선진국들은 정보교환모델을 공통 적용함으로써 자료 연동 구현의 효율과 품질을 높이고 있지만 한국군은 아직 그에 대한 중요성과 필요성을 충분히 인식하지 못하고 있다. 이 연구는 한국 지휘통제 정보교환모델(KC2IEM)의 개발과 적용의 필요성을 설명하고, 그에 필요한 개발 방법론을 제시하고 프로토타입 모델 개발을 통해 검증하고 개선한다. 정보교환모델의 완성은 학술연구 수준에서는 제한되며, 이 연구는 후속 연구 및 개발을 위한 계기와 발판으로서 기여한다.

The importance of interoperability between weapon systems is continuously increasing. Usually it is implemented by data exchange. The existence of information heterogeneities between systems decreases the efficiency and quality of the implementations enterprise-widely. Many other developed countries increase the efficiency and quality of the implementations by using information exchange model commonly. However, Korean military is still not aware of the importance and necessity of the model. This study explains the necessity of development and adaptation of the Korea command and control information exchange model(KC2IEM), and presents the methodology for the development of the model, and verifies and improves it through a prototype model development. The completion of the information exchange model could not be possible by academic research, therefore this study contributes as a motivation and a stepping stone for the following developments.

키워드

과제정보

This paper is the result of a research conducted with 2022 government funding.

참고문헌

  1. Department of Defence Instruction, No. 8330.01, Interoperability of Information Technology (IT), Including National Security Systems (NSS), DoDI, 2014.
  2. IEEE Std. 610, Computer Dictionary: A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries, IEEE, 1991.
  3. M. Singh, W. Wu, S. Rizou, and E. Vakaj, "Data Information Interoperability Model for IoT-enabled Smart Water Networks," in Proceedings of 2022 IEEE 16th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), Laguna Hills: CA, USA, pp. 179-186, 2022.
  4. K. H. Kim and S. J. Kang, "A Study on Improvement Method of Interoperability Test & Evaluation Approach for the C4I Systems in NCW Environment," Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 786-801, Dec. 2012. https://doi.org/10.9766/KIMST.2012.15.6.786
  5. K. Han, K. Jung, S. Hwang, Y. Lee, L. Yoo, and K. Min, "A Study on Defense Interoperability Master Plan," Security Management Institute (SMI), Technical Report 11-1290000-000581-12, 2016.
  6. I. B. Tolga, "Whole-of-Government Cyber Information Sharing," NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE), 2019
  7. National Information Exchange Model: Home | NIEM [Internet]. Available : https://www.niem.gov/.
  8. M. Gerz and O. Meyer, "Defining C2 semantics by a platform-independent JC3IEDM," International Journal of Intelligent Defence Support Systems, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 263-285, Oct. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIDSS.2011.043358
  9. M. Gerz and N. Bau, "MIP Information Model 4.0: Semantic Interoperability in Multinational Missions," in Proceedings of 21th International Commadn and Control Research and Technology Symposium, London, UK, pp. 1-17, 2016.
  10. S. Lampert and K. Thompson, "The Importance of Sharing Information: Using NIEM to Improve Governance in Developing Countries," in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance(ICEGOV 2010), Beijing, China, pp. 137-142, 2010.
  11. G. J. Christman and B. D. Fila, "Civil Information Integration and Interoperability: Pilot Research Utilizing the National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) in the US Department of Defense (DoD)," in Proceedings of IEEE 2014 Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, San Jose: CA, USA, pp. 408-411, 2014.
  12. M. Gerz, M. Mulikita, N. Bau, and F. Gokgoz, "The MIP Information Model - A Semantic Reference for Command & Control," in Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Military Communications and Information Systems (ICMCIS), Cracow, Poland, pp. 1-11, 2015.
  13. Governance Process Plan, "NIEM Biometrics Domain Governance Process Plan," Department of Homeland Security, Feb. 2021.
  14. M. B. Mukasey, M. R. Filip, K. O'Connor, J. L. Sedgwick, and D. S. Herraiz, "National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) User Guide," Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), May. 2008.
  15. Analysts International Corporation (AIC), Effective and Interoperable Implementation of NIEM, AIC, White Paper.
  16. P. Rai, S. Kumar, and D. K. Verma, "Prediction of effort required to design software for smart city applications," Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Goa, India, vol. 1714, p. 012033, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1714/1/012033
  17. K. Baclawski, M. Bennett, L. Dickerson, T. Schneider, S. Seppala, R. D. Sharma, A. Westerinen, G. Berg-Cross, and R. Sharma, "Ontology Summit 2021 Communique: Ontology Generation and Harmonization," Applied Ontology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 233-248, Mar. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-220266
  18. B. Jerman, N. Matskanis, and R. Bojanc, "Semantic Ontology Design for a Multi-Cooperative First Responder Interoperable Platform," Computing and Informatics, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1249-1276, Jan. 2016.
  19. F. J. Perez, M. Zambrano, M. Esteve, and C. Palau, "A Solution for Interoperability in Crisis Management," International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, vol. 12, no. 4, Aug. 2017
  20. J. Klein, P. Donohoe, P. Bianco, H. Levinson, R. Little, and J. Popowski, "Architecture Evaluation for Universal Command and Control, Software Engineering Institute," Carnegie Mellon University, White Paper, Jun. 2020
  21. A. Oliveira and N. Figueira, "An Application of Command, Control, Computing, Communication, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Systems in the Protection of the Amazon Rainforest," in Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET), Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 1-5, Dec. 2021.
  22. S. Renner, "National Information Exchange Model (NIEM): DoD Adoption and Implications for C2," in Presented at 19th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (ICCRTS), Alexandria: VA, USA, 2014.
  23. Y. Wang, G. Shi, and X. Zhang, "Information Exchange in Public-Culture Service Domain Bason on CIEM," in ACM TURC'20: Proceedings of the ACM Turing Celebration Conference, Hefei, China, pp. 45-49, May. 2020.
  24. H. Lee, W. Kim, and J. Lim, "Proposal of the development plan for the ROK military data strategy and shared data model through the US military case study," Journal of the Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 757-765, Jun. 2021. https://doi.org/10.6109/JKIICE.2021.25.6.757
  25. US Army, The Army Cloud Plan, 2020.
  26. J. Muvuna, T. Boutaleb, K. J. Baker, and S. B. Mickovski, "A Methodology to Model Integrated Smart City System from the Information Perspective," Smart Cities, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 496-511, Nov. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities2040030
  27. J. Brunet, H. Sohier, M. Yagoubi, M. Bisquay, P. Lamothe, and P. Menegazzi, "Simulation Architecture Definition for Complex Systems Design: A Tooled Methodology," in Proceedings of Complex Systems Design & Management, Paris, France, pp. 153-163, 2020.