Journal of Korean society of Dental Hygiene (한국치위생학회지)

Korean Society of Dental Hygiene (한국치위생학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Patient satisfaction survey for implant surgical guides in some areas of Jeollanam-do

전남 일부 지역 임플란트 수술용 가이드 이용 환자 만족도 조사

  • Yoon, So-Ra (Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Choi, Choong-Ho (Department of Preventive and Public Health Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 윤소라 (전남대학교 보건학협동과정) ;
  • 최충호 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 예방치과학교실)
  • Received : 2022.07.11
  • Accepted : 2022.08.09
  • Published : 2022.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study, investigated the satisfaction of patients who received the procedure using an implant guide to identify factors affecting satisfaction in dental hospitals and clinics in Jeollanam-do. Methods: From December 2021 to February 2022, questionnaires randomly were collected from 128 patients aged 20 to 90 years visiting dental hospitals and clinics using surgical guides in some areas of Jeollanam-do. Results: There was a negative correlation between the overall satisfaction average and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain level (r=-0.414, p<0.001), and a negative correlation between VAS pain level and VAS satisfaction (r=-0.273, p<0.05), As subjective pain decreased, subjective satisfaction increased, and as subjective pain increased, the overall satisfaction average also decreased, showing an inverse correlation. Factors affecting satisfaction with the guide for implant surgery were whether you would like to recommend it to people around you (β=0.556), whether you would like to explain the guide (β=0.194), and whether you thought it was good to receive the guide (β=0.199). Conclusions: Therefore, in order to increase the satisfaction of the implant surgical guide procedure, it is considered important to perform a sufficient explanation of the implant surgical guide before the procedure.

Keywords

References

  1. Jensen PM, Saunders RL, Thierer T, Friedman B. Factors associated with oral health - related quality of life in com - munity - dwelling elderly persons with disabilities. Am Geriatrics Soc 2008;56(4):711-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01631.x
  2. PanchdhaiAS. Oral health care needs in the dependant elderly in India. Indian J Palliat Care 2012;18(1):19-26. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.97344
  3. Laguna L, Sarkar A, Artigas G, Chen J. A quantitative assessment of the eating capability in the elderly in the elderly individuals. Physiol Behav 2018;147(1):274-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.04.052
  4. Chen J. Food oral processing: mechanisms and implications of food oral destruction. Trends Food Sci Tech 2015;45(2):222-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.06.012
  5. Han JH, Kim KE. Comparison of expectation and satisfaction of implant patients in pre - post implant therapy. J Dent Hyg Sci 2011;11(2):121-7.
  6. Hong SJ, Paik JW, Kim CS, Choi SH, Lee KW, Chai JK, et al. The study of implant patient's type and implant distribution. J Korean Acad Periodontal 2002;32(3):539-54. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2002.32.3.539
  7. Baek JW. Dental implant. Engineering Education and Technical Journal 2002;9(4):87-90.
  8. Park JM, Kim JY, Shim JS. Review of computer - assisted implant surgeries: navigation surgery system vs. computer - guided implant template vs. robot. J Implantol Applied Sci 2018;22(1):50-8. https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180005
  9. D'haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, Hultin M. Accuracy and complications using computer - designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14(3):321-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00275.x
  10. Kwon CR, Choi BH, Jeong SM, Joo SD. Evaluation of the accuracy of two different surgical guides in dental implantology: stereolithography fabricated vs. positioning device fabricated surgical guides. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2012;50(4):271-8. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2012.50.4.271
  11. Fortin T, Champleboux G, Bianchi S, Buatois H, Coudert JL. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone - beam CT - scan images through a robotic drilling machine. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13(6):651-6. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130612.x
  12. Youk SY. Survey on implant patients' satisfaction using the implant surgical guide[Master's thesis]. Seoul: Univ. of Ewha Womans, 2013.
  13. Kim YJ. Park SW. A study of the factors affecting on the successful aging of the rural elderly. HSS21 2018;9(1):23-36. https://doi.org/10.22143/HSS21.9.1.3
  14. Oh HY. Factors influencing treatment decisions for implant patients[Master's thesis]. Seoul: Univ. of Yonsei, 2008