DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of coat color inheritance and production performance for crossbreed from Chinese indigenous Chenghua pig crossbred with Berkshire

  • Li, Yujing (Department of Zoology, College of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University) ;
  • Yuan, Rong (Chengdu Livestock and Poultry Genetic Resources Protection Center) ;
  • Gong, Zhengyin (Department of Zoology, College of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University) ;
  • Zou, Qin (Department of Zoology, College of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University) ;
  • Wang, Yifei (Department of Zoology, College of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University) ;
  • Tang, Guoqing (Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University) ;
  • Zhu, Li (Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University) ;
  • Li, Xuewei (Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University) ;
  • Jiang, Yanzhi (Department of Zoology, College of Life Science, Sichuan Agricultural University)
  • Received : 2021.12.28
  • Accepted : 2022.03.02
  • Published : 2022.10.01

Abstract

Objective: This work was to determine coat inheritance and evaluate production performance for crossbred pigs from Berkshire×Chenghua (BC) compared with Chinese indigenous Chenghua (CH) pigs. Methods: The coat color phenotypes were recorded for more than 16,000 pigs, and the genotypes of melanocortin 1 receptor (MCIR) gene were identified by sequencing. The reproductive performance of 927 crossbred BC F4 gilts and 320 purebred CH gilts was recorded. Sixty pigs of each breed were randomly selected at approximately 60 days of age to determine growth performance during fattening period, which lasted for 150 days for BC pigs and 240 days for CH pigs. At the end of the fattening period, 30 pigs of each breed were slaughtered to determine carcass composition and meat quality. Results: The coat color of BC pigs exhibits a "dominant black" hereditary pattern, and all piglets derived from boars or sows genotyped ED1 ED1 homozygous for MC1R gene showed a uniform black coat phenotype. The BC F4 gilts displayed a good reproductive performance, showing a higher litter and tear size and were heavier at farrowing litter and at weaning litter than the CH gilts, but they reached puberty later than the CH gilts. BC F4 pigs exhibited improved growth and carcass characteristics with a higher average daily live weight gain, lower feed-to-gain ratio, and higher carcass lean meat rate than CH pigs. Like CH pigs, BC F4 pigs produced superior meat-quality characteristics, showing ideal pH and meat-color values, high intramuscular fat content and water-holding capacity, and acceptable muscle-fiber parameters. C18:1, C16:0, C18:0, and C18:2 were the main fatty acids in M. longissimus lumborum in the two breeds, and a remarkably high polyunsaturated/saturated fatty acid ratio of ~0.39 was observed in the BC F4 pigs. Conclusion: The BC F4 pigs exhibit a uniform black coat pattern and acceptable total production performance.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We thank the Qionglai Jialin Ecological Farm for animal experimental condition. This study was supported by the Key R&D Program of Sichuan Province (2020YFN0018) and Chengdu Local Good Varieties of Livestock and Poultry Resources Protection and Exploitation and Utilization of Construction Projects.

References

  1. Qiao XQ. Preliminary study on the production performance and utilization prospect of local pig breeds in Sichuan Province. Sichuan Anim Vet Sci 1994;2:2-4 (in Chinese).
  2. Tao X, Gu YR, Yang XM, et al. Study on the carcass performances of six local pig breeds of Sichuan Province. Swine Prod 2019;5:49-50 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.13257/j.cnki.21-1104/s.2019.05.018
  3. Jiang YZ, Zhu L, Li XW, Si T. Evaluation of the Chinese indigenous pig breed Dahe and crossbred Dawu for growth and carcass characteristics, organ weight, meat quality and intramuscular fatty acid and amino acid composition. Animal 2011;5:1485-92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111000425
  4. Franco D, Vazquez JA, Lorenzo JM. Growth performance, carcass and meat quality of the Celta pig crossbred with Duroc and Landrance genotypes. Meat Sci 2014;96:195-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.06.024
  5. Muhlisin, Panjono, Lee SJ, Lee JK, Lee SK. Effects of crossbreeding and gender on the carcass traits and meat quality of Korean native black pig and duroc crossbred. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014;27:1019-25. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13734
  6. Chen Y, Wei YY, Chen JN, et al. Growth, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Chinese indigenous Yanan pig crossbred with Duroc and Berkshire genotypes. Anim Prod Sci 2019; 59:1147-54. https://doi.org/10.1071/An17450
  7. Rutledge JJ. Greek temples, tropical kine and recombination load. Livest Prod Sci 2001;68:171-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00245-1
  8. Fernandez A, Toro M, Rodriguez C, Silio L. Heterosis and epistasis for teat number and fluctuating asymmetry in crosses between Jiaxing and Iberian pigs. Heredity 2004;93:222-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800498
  9. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of swine.11th edn. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2012.
  10. Yang H, Ma C, Qiao F, Song Y, Du M. Lipolysis in intramuscular lipids during processing of traditional Xuanwei ham. Meat Sci 2005;71:670-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.05.019
  11. Kijas JM, Wales R, Tornsten A, Chardon P, Moller M, Andersson L. Melanocortin receptor 1 (MC1R) mutations and coat color in pigs. Genetics 1998;150:1177-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/150.3.1177
  12. Legault C. Genetics of colour variation. In: Rothschild MF, Ruvinsky A, editros. The genetics of the pig. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 1998. pp. 51-69.
  13. Carr-Saunders AM. Note on inheritance in swine. Science 1922;55:19. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.55.1410.19
  14. Ollivier L, Sellier P. Pig genetics: a review. Ann Genet Sel Anim 1982;14:481. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-144-481
  15. Tess MW, Bennett GL, Dickerson GE. Simulation of genetic changes in life cycle efficiency of pork production, II. Effects of components on efficiency. J Anim Sci 1983;56:354-68. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1983.562354x
  16. Young LD. Reproduction of F1 Meishan, Fengjing, Minzhu, and Duroc gilts and sows. J Anim Sci 1995;73:711-21. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.733711x
  17. Christenson RK. Ovulation rate and embryo survival in Chinese Meishan and Occidental Crossbred females. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Chinese Pig Breeds. Harbin, China: Northeast Forestry University Press; 1992.
  18. Young L, Dickerson G, Leymaster K. Performance of eight purebred and two composite swine populations. In: McAlhany M, editor. Series analytic: Swine Research Progress Report No. 3. ARS-US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USA); 1989.
  19. Ruusunen M, Puolanne E, Sevon-Aimonen ML, Partanen K, Voutila L, Niemi J. Carcass and meat quality traits of four different pig crosses. Meat Sci 2012;90:543-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.09.010
  20. Sellier P. Genetics of meat and carcass traits. In: Rothschild MF, Ruvinsky A, editros. The genetics of the pig. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 1998. pp. 463-510.
  21. National Pork Produces Council (NPPC). Pork composition and quality assessment procedures. 1st edn. Des Moines, IA, USA: NPPC; 2000.
  22. Jones G. Genetic aspects of domestication, common breeds and their origin. In: Rothschild MF, Ruvinsky A, editros. The genetics of the pig. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 1998. pp. 17-50.
  23. Wood J, Enser M, Moncrieff C, Kempster A. Effects of carcass fatness and sex on the composition and quality of pig meat. In: 34th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology; 1988: Brisbane, Australia. pp. 562-4.
  24. Bejerholm C, Barton-Gade P. Effect of intramuscular fat level on eating quality of pig meat. In: Proceedings of the 32nd European meeting of meat research workers; 1986: Ghent, Belgium. pp. 389-91.
  25. DeVol DL, McKeith FK, Bechtel PJ, Novakofski J, Shanks RD, Carr TR. Variation in composition and palatability traits and relationships between muscle characteristics and palatability in a random sample of pork carcasses. J Anim Sci 1988;66:385-95. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1988.662385x
  26. Warnants N, Van Oeckel MJ, Boucque CV. Effect of incorporation of dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids in pork backfat on the quality of salami. Meat Sci 1998;49:435-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(98)00011-4
  27. Park SW, Seo SH, Chang MB, Shin IS, Paik IK. Evaluation of soybean oil as a lipid source for pig diets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2009;22:1311-9. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.90104
  28. Alonso V, Campo Mdel M, Provincial L, Roncales P, Beltran JA. Effect of protein level in commercial diets on pork meat quality. Meat Sci 2010;85:7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.11.015
  29. Wood JD, Brown SN, Nute GR, et al. Effects of breed, feed level and conditioning time on the tenderness of pork. Meat Sci 1996;44:105-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(96)00044-7
  30. Wood JD, Richardson RI, Nute GR, et al. Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: a review. Meat Sci 2004;66:21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00022-6
  31. Ellis M, Webb A, Avery P, Brown I. The influence of terminal sire genotype, sex, slaughter weight, feeding regime and slaughter-house on growth performance and carcass and meat quality in pigs and on the organoleptic properties of fresh pork. Anim Sci 1996;62:521-30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135772980001506X