Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT). (No. NRF-2019M2D2A1A03058371).
References
- J. Choe, et al., Verification and validation of STREAM/RAST-K for PWR analysis, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 51 (2) (2019) 356, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.10.004.
- N.N.T. Mai, et al., Extension of Monte Carlo code MCS to spent fuel cask shielding analysis, Int. J. Energy Res. 44 (10) (2020) 8089, https://doi.org/10.1002/er.5023.
- B. Ebiwonjumi, et al., Validation of lattice physics code STREAM for predicting pressurized water reactor spent nuclear fuel isotopic inventory, Ann. Nucl. Energy 120 (2018) 431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.06.002.
- B. Ebiwonjumi, et al., Verification and validation of radiation source term capabilities in STREAM, Ann. Nucl. Energy 124 (2019) 80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.09.034.
- B. Ebiwonjumi, et al., Uncertainty quantification of PWR spent fuel due to nuclear data and modeling parameters, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 53 (3) (2021) 715, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.07.012.
- H. Yun, et al., ' "an efficient evaluation of depletion uncertainty for a GBC-32 dry storage cask with PLUS7 fuel assemblies using the Monte Carlo uncertainty sampling method, Ann. Nucl. Energy 110 (2017) 679, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.07.020.
- I.C. Gauld, U. Mertyurek, Validation of BWR spent nuclear fuel isotopic predictions with applications to burnup credit, Nucl. Eng. Des. 345 (2019) 110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.01.026.
- M.I. Radaideh, D. Price, T. Kozlowski, On using computational versus datadriven methods for uncertainty propagation of isotopic uncertainties, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52 (6) (2020) 1148, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.11.029.
- J. Jang, et al., Uncertainties of PWR spent nuclear fuel isotope inventory for back-end cycle analysis with STREAM/RAST-K, Ann. Nucl. Energy 158 (2021) 108267, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108267.
- B.T. Rearden, et al., TSUNAMI Primer: A Primer for Sensitivity/Uncertainty Calculations with SCALE," ORNL/TM-2009/027, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2009.
- M. Williams, et al., A statistical sampling method for uncertainty analysis with SCALE and XSUSA, Nucl. Tech. 183 (3) (2013) 515, https://doi.org/10.13182/NT12-112.
- I.C. Gauld, et al., Isotopic depletion and decay methods and analysis capabilities in SCALE, Nucl. Tech. 174 (2) (2011) 169, https://doi.org/10.13182/NT11-3.
- S. Goluoglu, et al., Monte Carlo criticality methods and analysis capabilities in SCALE, Nucl. Tech. 174 (2) (2011) 214, https://doi.org/10.13182/NT10-124.
- T. Goorley, et al., Initial MCNP6 release overview, Nucl. Tech. 180 (3) (2012) 298, https://doi.org/10.13182/NT11-135.
- H. Lee, et al., MCS - a Monte Carlo particle transport code for large-scale power reactor analysis, Ann. Nucl. Energy 139 (2020) 107276, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.107276.
- A. Haghighat, J.C. Wagner, Monte Carlo variance reduction with deterministic importance functions, Prog. Nucl. Energy 42 (1) (2003) 25, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-1970(02)00002-1.
- J. Sweezy, et al., Automated variance reduction for MCNP using deterministic methods, Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 116 (2005) 508, https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nci257.
- D.E. Peplow, Monte Carlo shielding analysis capabilities with MAVRIC, Nucl. Tech. 174 (2) (2011) 289, https://doi.org/10.13182/NT174-289.
- J.H. Ko, et al., Shielding analysis of dual purpose casks for spent nuclear fuel under normal storage conditions, Nucl. Tech. 46 (4) (2014) 547, https://doi.org/10.5516/NET.08.2013.039.
- Y. Gao, et al., Radiation dose rate distributions of spent fuel dry casks estimated with MAVRIC based on detailed geometry and continuous-energy models, Ann. Nucl. Energy 117 (2018) 84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.03.015.
- Inc Transnuclear, TN-32 dry storage cask system safety evaluation report," United States nuclear regulatory commission. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0036/ML003696918.pdf. (Accessed 1 September 2021).
- U.S.NRC, Packaging and transportation of radioactive material, 10 CFR 72," United States nuclear regulatory commission. https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/cfr/part072/. (Accessed 1 September 2021).
- U.S.NRC, TN-32 generic technical specification," United States nuclear regulatory commission. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML0104/ML010460423.pdf. (Accessed 1 September 2021).
- A.B. Svensk Karnbranslehantering, Measurements of Decay Heat in Spent Nuclear Fuel at the Swedish Interim Storage Facility, CLAB," R-05-62, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co, 2006.
- G. Ilas, H. Liljenfeldt, Decay heat uncertainty for BWR used fuel due to modeling and nuclear data uncertainties, Nucl. Eng. Des. 319 (2017) 176, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.05.009.
- D. Rochman, et al., Best estimate plus uncertainty analysis for the 244Cm prediction in spent fuel characterization, in: Proc. ANS Best Estimate Plus Uncertainty International Conference (BEPU 2018), Real Collegio, Lucca, Italy, 2018, pp. 13-19. May.
- S. Choi, C. Lee, D. Lee, Resonance treatment using pin-based pointwise energy slowing-down method, J. Comput. Phys. 330 (2017) 134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2016.11.007.
- S. Choi, A. Khassenov, D. Lee, Resonance self-shielding method using resonance interference factor library for practical lattice physics computations of LWRs, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 53 (8) (2016) 1142, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2015.1095686.
- S. Choi, et al., Resonance self-shielding methodology of new neutron transport code STREAM, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 52 (9) (2015) 1133, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2014.993738.
- A. Yamamoto, et al., Uncertainty quantification of LWR core characteristics using random sampling method, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 181 (2) (2015) 160, https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE14-152.
- L. Fiorito, et al., Nuclear data uncertainty propagation to integral responses using SANDY, Ann. Nucl. Energy 101 (2017) 359, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.11.026.
- L. Fiorito, et al., Generation of fission yield covariances to correct discrepancies in the nuclear data libraries, Ann. Nucl. Energy 88 (2016) 12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.10.027.
- J. Jang, et al., Validation of UNIST Monte Carlo code MCS for criticality safety analysis of PWR spent fuel pool and storage cask, Ann. Nucl. Energy 114 (2018) 495, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.12.054.
- T. Nguyen, et al., Validation of UNIST Monte Carlo code MCS using VERA progression problems, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 52 (5) (2020) 878, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.10.023.
- M. Lemaire, et al., Verification of photon transport capability of UNIST Monte Carlo code MCS, Comput. Phys. Commun. 231 (2018) 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.05.008.
- H.H. Grady, An Electron/photon/relaxation Data Library for MCNP6," LA-UR-13-27377, Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2015.
- International Commission on Radiological Protection, Conversion coefficients for radiological protection quantities for external radiation exposures, Ann. ICRP, Publication 116 (2-5) (2010) 40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2011.10.001.
- International Commission on Radiological Protection, Corrigenda to ICRP publication 116: conversion coefficients for radiological protection quantities for external radiation exposures, Ann. ICRP, Publication 116 (2010) 40, https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645315577925, 2-5.
- M. Lemaire, H. Lee, D. Lee, Implementation of Tally Convergence Tests in UNIST Monte Carlo Code MCS, Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting, Yeosu, Korea, 2018, pp. 24-26. October.
- P. Zhang, et al., Development of a Variance Reduction Scheme in the MCS Monte Carlo Code, Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn Meeting, Yeosu, Korea, 2018, pp. 24-26. October.
- B. Foad, A. Yamamoto, T. Endo, Uncertainty and regression analysis of the MSLB accident in PWR based on unscented transformation and low rank approximation, Ann. Nucl. Energy 143 (2020) 107493, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107493.
- T. Endo, T. Watanabe, A. Yamamoto, Confidence interval estimation by bootstrap method for uncertainty quantification using random sampling method, J. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 52 (2015) 993, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2015.1034216.