Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology (한국환경생태학회지)

Korean Society of Environment and Ecology (한국환경생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Habitat Quality Analysis and an Evaluation of Gajisan Provincial Park Ecosystem Service Using InVEST Model

InVEST 모델을 이용한 가지산도립공원의 서식지질 분석과 생태계서비스평가

  • 권혜연 (부산대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 장정은 (부산대학교 응용생태연구실) ;
  • 신해선 (국립생태원 습지센터) ;
  • 유병혁 (국립공원공단 사회가치혁신실) ;
  • 이상철 (부산대학교 응용생태연구실) ;
  • 최송현 (부산대학교 조경학과)
  • Received : 2022.02.03
  • Accepted : 2022.05.11
  • Published : 2022.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) recommends that 17% of the land be designated as a protected area to counter global environmental problems. Korea also realized a need to designate protected areas according to the international level and explain the significance of designating protected areas. Accordingly, studies on ecosystem services are required. In Korea, the protected areas are designated as national parks, provincial parks, and county parks by hierarchy under the Natural Parks Act. However, as priority was on political and administrative aspects, research on ecosystem service value evaluation and habitat management were concentrated in national parks, and provincial and county parks were relatively neglected. Therefore, more studies on provincial and county parks are necessary. In this study, habitat quality for Gajisan Provincial Park, where there were few studies on habitat management and ecosystem service valuation, was evaluated using the InVEST Habitat Quality model among the InVEST models. The analysis results were compared with 16 mountainous national parks. The results showed that the habitat quality value of Gajisan Provincial Park was 0.83, higher than that of the surrounding areas. The analysis of habitat quality in three districts showed 0,84 for the Tongdosa and Naewonsa districts and 0.83 for the Seoknamsa district. By use district, the nature conservation district, the natural environment district, the cultural heritage district, and the park village district had the highest habitat quality value in that order. Compared with the existing habitat quality analysis results of national parks, Gajisan Provincial Park showed naturalness at the level of Mudeungsan National Park. These results can be used as objective data for establishing policies and management plans to preserve biodiversity and promote ecosystem services in provincial parks.

생물다양성협약(CBD)에서는 전 지구적으로 발생하는 환경문제의 대응방안으로 육상의 17%를 보호지역으로 지정하도록 할 것을 권고하고 있다. 우리나라도 국제적 수준에 맞춰 보호지역을 지정하고 보호지역 지정이 가지는 의미를 설명할 필요성이 생겼으며, 이에 따라 생태계서비스에 관한 연구의 필요성이 요구되고 있다. 우리나라는 보호지역 지정을 자연공원법에 의해 위계별로 국립공원, 도립공원, 군립공원으로 지정하고 있다. 그러나 정치, 행정적 측면이 우선시되면서 생태계서비스 가치평가 연구 및 서식지 관리가 국립공원에 편중되어 도립 및 군립공원은 다소 미비하여 연구의 필요성이 있다. 본 연구에서는 국립공원에 비해 서식지 관리 및 생태계서비스 가치평가 연구가 미비한 가지산도립공원을 대상으로 InVEST 모델 중 InVEST Habitat Quality 모델을 사용하여 서식지 질을 평가하고, 분석 결과를 16개의 산악형 국립공원과 비교하였다. 분석 결과 가지산도립공원의 서식지질 값은 0.83이었으며, 주변 지역에 비해 서식질 질이 높게 나타났다. 3개 지구별 서식지질 차이를 분석한 결과 통도사지구와 내원사지구가 0.84, 석남사지구가 0.83으로 나타났고 용도지구별로는 자연보존지구, 자연환경지구, 문화유산지구, 공원마을지구 순으로 서식지질 값이 높게 나타났다. 기존 국립공원 서식지질 분석 결과와 비교한 결과 가지산도립공원은 무등산국립공원 수준의 자연성을 나타내었다. 이러한 결과는 추후 도립공원의 생물다양성 보전 및 생태계서비스 증진을 위한 정책 수립과 관리방안 수립의 객관적인 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 부산대학교 기본연구지원사업(2년)에 의하여 연구되었음.

References

  1. Alkemade, R., M. Van Oorschot, L. Miles, C. Nellemann, M. Bakkenes and B.T. Brink(2009) GLOBIO3: A Framework to Investigate Options for Reducing Global Terrestrial Biodiversity Loss. Ecosystems 12: 374-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9229-5
  2. Bagstad, K.J., D.J. Semmens and R. Winthrop(2013) Comparing approaches to spatially explicit ecosystem service modeling: A case study from the San Pedro River, Arizona. Ecosystem Services 5: e40-e50.
  3. Bhagabati, N.K., T. Ricketts, T. Barano, S. Sulistyawan, M. Conte, D. Ennaanay, O. Hadian, E. McKenzie, N. Olwero, A. Rosenthal, H. Tallis and S. Wolny(2014) Ecosystem services reinforce Sumatran tiger conservation in land use plans. Biological Conservation 169: 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.010
  4. Choi, J.Y. and S.D. Lee(2018) Evaluation of Ecosystem Service for Distribution of Korean fir using InVEST Model. J. Environ Impact Assess. 27(2): 181-193. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.14249/EIA.2018.27.2.181
  5. Choi, J.Y., Y.S. Lee and S.D. Lee(2019) A Study on the Ecosystem Services Value Assessment According to City Development: In Case of the Busan Eco-Delta City Development. J. Environ. Impact Assess. 28(5): 427-439. (in Korean with English abstract)
  6. Chu, L., T. Sun, T. Wang, Z. Li and C. Cai(2018) Evolution and Prediction of Landscape Pattern and Habitat Quality Based on CA-Markov and InVEST Model in Hubei Section of Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA). Sustainability 10(11): 3854. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113854
  7. EPA(2016) A comparative analysis of ecosystem service valuation decision support tools for wetland restoration. 32pp.
  8. Gao, J., F. Li, H. Gao, C. Zhou and X. Zhang(2017) The impact of land-use change on water-related ecosystem services: A study of the Guishui River Basin, Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production 163: 148-155.
  9. Global Land Cover 2000(2021) https://forobs.jrc.ec.europa.eu/products/glc2000/glc2000.php
  10. Heo, H.Y.(2020) A Review on the International Trends for Establishing Post-2020 National Targets Relevant to Protected Areas. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 34(6): 601-609. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2020.34.6.601
  11. Jang, J., J.H. Park and K.W. Sim(2019) Valuation of Dadohaehaesang National Park's Ecosystem Services Using the Contingent Valuation Method(CVM). Journal of National Park Research 10(2): 266-271.
  12. Kim, T.Y., C.H. Song, W.K. Lee, M.I. Kim, C.H. Lim, S.W. Jeon and J.S. Kim(2015) Habitat Quality Valuation Using InVEST Model in Jeju Island. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 18(5): 1-11.
  13. KNPRI(Korea National Park Research Institute)(2017) Nature resource comprehensive survey of Gajisan Provincial Park. (in Korean)
  14. KNPRI(Korea National Park Research Institute)(2019) A Study on the Value Evaluation of Ecosystem Service in National Park: Seoraksan, Deogyusan, Mudeungsan, Byeonsanbando. 352pp. (in Korean)
  15. Korea Database on Protected Area(KDPA) http://kdpa.kr
  16. Lee, S.C., H.M. Kang, J.S. Kim, C.Y. Yu and S.H. Choi(2014) A Study on the Correlation between Plant Community and Environmental Factors of Tongdosa (Temple) Area, Gajisan(Mt.) Provincial Park. Kor. J. Env. Eco. 28(6): 715-724. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2014.28.6.715
  17. MA(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment)(1990) Ecosystems and Human Well-being Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washingtom D.C., 92pp.
  18. Nelson, E., G. Mendoza, J. Regetz, S. Polasky, H. Tallis, D. Cameron, K.M. Chan, G.C. Daily, J. Goldstein, P.M. Kareiva, E. Lonsdorf, R. Naidoo, T.H. Ricketts and M.R Shaw(2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity Conservation, Commodity Production, and Tradeoffs at landscape scales. Journal of Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(1): 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1890/080023
  19. Nelson, E.J. and G.C. Daily(2010) Modeling ecosystem services in terrestrial ecosystems. Faculty of 1000 Biology Reports 2: 53.
  20. Polasky, S., E. Nelson, D. Pennington and K.A. Johnson(2011) The Impact of Land-Use Change on Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Returns to Landowners: A Case Study in the State of Minnesota. Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics 48(2): 219-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9407-0
  21. Posner, S., G. Verutes, I. Koh, D. Denu and T. Ricketts(2016) Global use of ecosystem service models. Ecosystem Services 17: 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.003
  22. Sharp, R., H.T. Tallis, T. Ricketts, A.D. Guerry, S.A. Wood, R. Chaplin-Kramer and K. Vigersto(2014) InVEST user's guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford.
  23. Sung, W. and D.P. Kim(2015) A study on the management-maintenance system in provincial park. Proceeding of Kor. J. Env. Ecol. 25(2): 44-45. (in Korean)
  24. Terrado, M., S. Sabater, B.C. Kramer, L. Mandle, G. Ziv and V. Acuna(2016) Model development for the assessment of terrestrial and aquatic habitat quality in conservation planning. Science of the Total Environment 540: 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.064
  25. Vigerstol, K.L. and J.E. Aukema(2011) A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management 92: 2403-2409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.040
  26. World Heritage Tongdosa(2022) http://www.tongdosa.or.kr
  27. Xu, L., S.S. Chen, Y. Xu, G. Li and W. Su(2019) Impacts of Land-Use Change on Habitat Quality during 1985-2015 in the Taihu Lake Basin. Sustainability 11(13): 3513. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133513
  28. Zhong, L. and J. Wang(2017) Evaluation on effect of land consolidation on habitat quality based on InVEST model. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 33(1): 250-255.