Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Hydrogen production in the light of sustainability: A comparative study on the hydrogen production technologies using the sustainability index assessment method

  • Norouzi, Nima (Centre for Ecology, Environment and Sustainability, Bournemouth University)
  • Received : 2021.08.27
  • Accepted : 2021.09.28
  • Published : 2022.04.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Hydrogen as an environmentally friendly energy carrier has received special attention to solving uncertainty about the presence of renewable energy and its dependence on time and weather conditions. This material can be prepared from different sources and in various ways. In previous studies, fossil fuels have been used in hydrogen production, but due to several limitations, especially the limitation of the access to this material in the not-too-distant future and the great problem of greenhouse gas emissions during hydrogen production methods. New methods based on renewable and green energy sources as energy drivers of hydrogen production have been considered. In these methods, water or biomass materials are used as the raw material for hydrogen production. In this article, after a brief review of different hydrogen production methods concerning the required raw material, these methods are examined and ranked from different aspects of economic, social, environmental, and energy and exergy analysis sustainability. In the following, the current position of hydrogen production is discussed. Finally, according to the introduced methods, their advantages, and disadvantages, solar electrolysis as a method of hydrogen production on a small scale and hydrogen production by thermochemical method on a large scale are introduced as the preferred methods.

Keywords

References

  1. G. Aranda, A.J. Grootjes, C.M. Van der Meijden, A. Van der Drift, D.F. Gupta, R.R. Sonde, S. Poojari, C.B. Mitra, Conversion of high-ash coal under steam and CO2 gasification conditions, Fuel Process. Technol. 141 (2016) 16-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.06.006
  2. I. Dincer, Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 4 (2) (2000) 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-0321(99)00011-8
  3. I. Dincer, C. Acar, Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 40 (34) (2015) 11094-11111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.12.035
  4. I. Dincer, C. Zamfirescu, Sustainable hydrogen production options and the role of IAHE, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37 (21) (2012) 16266-16286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.133
  5. J. Uebbing, L.K. Rihko-Struckmann, K. Sundmacher, Exergetic assessment of CO2 methanation processes for the chemical storage of renewable energies, Appl. Energy 233 (2019) 271-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.014
  6. N. Norouzi, Assessment of technological path of hydrogen energy industry development: a review, Iranian (Iranica) Journal of Energy & Environment 12 (4) (2021) 273-284. https://doi.org/10.5829/IJEE.2021.12.04.01
  7. A. Haryanto, S. Fernando, N. Murali, S. Adhikari, Current status of hydrogen production techniques by steam reforming of ethanol: a review, Energy Fuel. 19 (5) (2005) 2098-2106. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0500538
  8. S. Heidenreich, P.U. Foscolo, New concepts in biomass gasification, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 46 (2015) 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2014.06.002
  9. C. Higman, S. Tam, Advances in coal gasification, hydrogenation, and gas treating for the production of chemicals and fuels, Chem. Rev. 114 (3) (2014) 1673-1708. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400202m
  10. R. Hino, Hydrogen production by thermochemical cycle using nuclear heat, Nippon Enerugi Gakkai-Shi 88 (5) (2009) 385-390.
  11. N. Norouzi, 4E analysis of a fuel cell and gas turbine hybrid energy system, Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 11 (2021) 7568-7579. https://doi.org/10.33263/briac111.75687579
  12. J.D. Holladay, J. Hu, D.L. King, Y. Wang, An overview of hydrogen production technologies, Catal. Today 139 (4) (2009) 244-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2008.08.039
  13. S.E. Hosseini, M.A. Wahid, Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: promising green energy carrier for clean development, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 57 (2016) 850-866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.112
  14. T. Kato, Present status of hydrogen production by electrolysis, Nihon Enerugi Gakkaishi J Jpn Inst Energy 88 (2009) 371-377.
  15. G. Nahar, V. Dupont, Recent advances in hydrogen production via autothermal reforming process (ATR): a review of patents and research articles, Recent Pat. Chem. Eng. 6 (1) (2013) 8-42. https://doi.org/10.2174/2211334711306010003
  16. N. Norouzi, Thermodynamic and irreversibility analysis of the use of hydrogen for the energy conversion of Fossil fuel in power plants, J. Appl. Dynamic Syst. Control 4 (1) (2021) 97-107.
  17. K. Nath, D. Das, Production and storage of hydrogen: present scenario and future perspective, J. Sci. Ind. Res. (India) 66 (9) (2007) 701-709.
  18. A. Ozbilen, I. Dincer, M.A. Rosen, A comparative life cycle analysis of hydrogen production via thermochemical water splitting using a CueCl cycle, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36 (17) (2011) 11321-11327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.035
  19. W. Wang, Y. Cao, Combined carbon dioxide reforming with steam reforming of ethanol for hydrogen production: Thermodynamic analysis, Int. J. Green Energy 9 (6) (2012) 503-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2011.622024
  20. S. Dunn, Hydrogen futures: toward a sustainable energy system, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 27 (3) (2002) 235-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(01)00131-8
  21. N. Norouzi, The Pahlev Reliability Index: a measurement for the resilience of power generation technologies versus climate change, Nuclear Eng. Technol. 53 (5) (2021) 1658-1663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.10.013
  22. A. Dadak, M. Aghbashlo, M. Tabatabaei, H. Younesi, G. Najafpour, Exergy-based sustainability assessment of continuous photobiological hydrogen production using anaerobic bacterium Rhodospirillum rubrum, J. Clean. Prod. 139 (2016) 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.020
  23. A. Abu-Rayash, I. Dincer, Development of integrated sustainability performance indicators for better management of smart cities, Sustain. Cities Soc. 67 (2021), 102704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102704
  24. A. Valente, D. Iribarren, J. Dufour, Comparative life cycle sustainability assessment of renewable and conventional hydrogen, Sci. Total Environ. 756 (2021), 144132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144132
  25. O. Sarkar, R. Katakojwala, S.V. Mohan, Low carbon hydrogen production from a waste-based biorefinery system and environmental sustainability assessment, Green Chem. 23 (1) (2021) 561-574. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0gc03063e
  26. W. Li, X. Ren, S. Ding, L. Dong, A multi-criterion decision making for sustainability assessment of hydrogen production technologies based on objective grey relational analysis, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45 (59) (2020) 34385-34395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.039
  27. X. Ren, W. Li, S. Ding, L. Dong, Sustainability assessment and decision making of hydrogen production technologies: a novel two-stage multi-criteria decision making method, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45 (59) (2020) 34371-34384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.134
  28. N. Norouzi, Technical and economic and exergy feasibility of combined production of electricity and Hydrogen using photovoltaic energy, J. Appl. Dynamic Sys. Control 4 (1) (2021) 79-88.
  29. H. Khajehpour, N. Norouzi, M. Fani, An exergetic model for the ambient air temperature impacts on the combined power plants and its management using the genetic algorithm, Int. J. Air-Condition. Refrig. 29 (1) (2021), 2150008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010132521500085
  30. A. Chen, C. Liu, Y. Liu, L. Zhang, Uranium thermochemical cycle used for hydrogen production, Nuclear Eng. Technol. 51 (1) (2019) 214-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2018.08.018
  31. S. Mandal, A.K. Jana, Simulating reactive distillation of HIx (HI-H2O-I2) system in Sulphur-Iodine cycle for hydrogen production, Nuclear Eng. Technol. 52 (2) (2020) 279-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.07.033
  32. L.C. Juarez-Martinez, G. Espinosa-Paredes, A. Vazquez-Rodriguez, H. Romero-Paredes, Energy optimization of a Sulfur-Iodine thermochemical nuclear hydrogen production cycle, Nuclear Eng. Technol. 53 (6) (2021) 2066-2073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2020.12.014