Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2021.09.035

Hydrogen production in the light of sustainability: A comparative study on the hydrogen production technologies using the sustainability index assessment method  

Norouzi, Nima (Centre for Ecology, Environment and Sustainability, Bournemouth University)
Publication Information
Nuclear Engineering and Technology / v.54, no.4, 2022 , pp. 1288-1294 More about this Journal
Abstract
Hydrogen as an environmentally friendly energy carrier has received special attention to solving uncertainty about the presence of renewable energy and its dependence on time and weather conditions. This material can be prepared from different sources and in various ways. In previous studies, fossil fuels have been used in hydrogen production, but due to several limitations, especially the limitation of the access to this material in the not-too-distant future and the great problem of greenhouse gas emissions during hydrogen production methods. New methods based on renewable and green energy sources as energy drivers of hydrogen production have been considered. In these methods, water or biomass materials are used as the raw material for hydrogen production. In this article, after a brief review of different hydrogen production methods concerning the required raw material, these methods are examined and ranked from different aspects of economic, social, environmental, and energy and exergy analysis sustainability. In the following, the current position of hydrogen production is discussed. Finally, according to the introduced methods, their advantages, and disadvantages, solar electrolysis as a method of hydrogen production on a small scale and hydrogen production by thermochemical method on a large scale are introduced as the preferred methods.
Keywords
Hydrogen production chain; Renewable energies; Fossil fuels; Sustainability analysis; Dincer sustainability index; Ecological analysis; Sustainable economy;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 N. Norouzi, Thermodynamic and irreversibility analysis of the use of hydrogen for the energy conversion of Fossil fuel in power plants, J. Appl. Dynamic Syst. Control 4 (1) (2021) 97-107.
2 S.E. Hosseini, M.A. Wahid, Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: promising green energy carrier for clean development, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 57 (2016) 850-866.   DOI
3 G. Nahar, V. Dupont, Recent advances in hydrogen production via autothermal reforming process (ATR): a review of patents and research articles, Recent Pat. Chem. Eng. 6 (1) (2013) 8-42.   DOI
4 A. Ozbilen, I. Dincer, M.A. Rosen, A comparative life cycle analysis of hydrogen production via thermochemical water splitting using a CueCl cycle, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 36 (17) (2011) 11321-11327.   DOI
5 W. Wang, Y. Cao, Combined carbon dioxide reforming with steam reforming of ethanol for hydrogen production: Thermodynamic analysis, Int. J. Green Energy 9 (6) (2012) 503-516.   DOI
6 N. Norouzi, The Pahlev Reliability Index: a measurement for the resilience of power generation technologies versus climate change, Nuclear Eng. Technol. 53 (5) (2021) 1658-1663.   DOI
7 I. Dincer, Renewable energy and sustainable development: a crucial review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 4 (2) (2000) 157-175.   DOI
8 A. Abu-Rayash, I. Dincer, Development of integrated sustainability performance indicators for better management of smart cities, Sustain. Cities Soc. 67 (2021), 102704.   DOI
9 L.C. Juarez-Martinez, G. Espinosa-Paredes, A. Vazquez-Rodriguez, H. Romero-Paredes, Energy optimization of a Sulfur-Iodine thermochemical nuclear hydrogen production cycle, Nuclear Eng. Technol. 53 (6) (2021) 2066-2073.   DOI
10 A. Dadak, M. Aghbashlo, M. Tabatabaei, H. Younesi, G. Najafpour, Exergy-based sustainability assessment of continuous photobiological hydrogen production using anaerobic bacterium Rhodospirillum rubrum, J. Clean. Prod. 139 (2016) 157-166.   DOI
11 J. Uebbing, L.K. Rihko-Struckmann, K. Sundmacher, Exergetic assessment of CO2 methanation processes for the chemical storage of renewable energies, Appl. Energy 233 (2019) 271-282.   DOI
12 S. Heidenreich, P.U. Foscolo, New concepts in biomass gasification, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 46 (2015) 72-95.   DOI
13 N. Norouzi, 4E analysis of a fuel cell and gas turbine hybrid energy system, Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 11 (2021) 7568-7579.   DOI
14 T. Kato, Present status of hydrogen production by electrolysis, Nihon Enerugi Gakkaishi J Jpn Inst Energy 88 (2009) 371-377.
15 N. Norouzi, Technical and economic and exergy feasibility of combined production of electricity and Hydrogen using photovoltaic energy, J. Appl. Dynamic Sys. Control 4 (1) (2021) 79-88.
16 A. Valente, D. Iribarren, J. Dufour, Comparative life cycle sustainability assessment of renewable and conventional hydrogen, Sci. Total Environ. 756 (2021), 144132.   DOI
17 O. Sarkar, R. Katakojwala, S.V. Mohan, Low carbon hydrogen production from a waste-based biorefinery system and environmental sustainability assessment, Green Chem. 23 (1) (2021) 561-574.   DOI
18 X. Ren, W. Li, S. Ding, L. Dong, Sustainability assessment and decision making of hydrogen production technologies: a novel two-stage multi-criteria decision making method, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45 (59) (2020) 34371-34384.   DOI
19 A. Chen, C. Liu, Y. Liu, L. Zhang, Uranium thermochemical cycle used for hydrogen production, Nuclear Eng. Technol. 51 (1) (2019) 214-220.   DOI
20 S. Mandal, A.K. Jana, Simulating reactive distillation of HIx (HI-H2O-I2) system in Sulphur-Iodine cycle for hydrogen production, Nuclear Eng. Technol. 52 (2) (2020) 279-286.   DOI
21 K. Nath, D. Das, Production and storage of hydrogen: present scenario and future perspective, J. Sci. Ind. Res. (India) 66 (9) (2007) 701-709.
22 S. Dunn, Hydrogen futures: toward a sustainable energy system, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 27 (3) (2002) 235-264.   DOI
23 W. Li, X. Ren, S. Ding, L. Dong, A multi-criterion decision making for sustainability assessment of hydrogen production technologies based on objective grey relational analysis, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 45 (59) (2020) 34385-34395.   DOI
24 A. Haryanto, S. Fernando, N. Murali, S. Adhikari, Current status of hydrogen production techniques by steam reforming of ethanol: a review, Energy Fuel. 19 (5) (2005) 2098-2106.   DOI
25 H. Khajehpour, N. Norouzi, M. Fani, An exergetic model for the ambient air temperature impacts on the combined power plants and its management using the genetic algorithm, Int. J. Air-Condition. Refrig. 29 (1) (2021), 2150008.   DOI
26 C. Higman, S. Tam, Advances in coal gasification, hydrogenation, and gas treating for the production of chemicals and fuels, Chem. Rev. 114 (3) (2014) 1673-1708.   DOI
27 G. Aranda, A.J. Grootjes, C.M. Van der Meijden, A. Van der Drift, D.F. Gupta, R.R. Sonde, S. Poojari, C.B. Mitra, Conversion of high-ash coal under steam and CO2 gasification conditions, Fuel Process. Technol. 141 (2016) 16-30.   DOI
28 I. Dincer, C. Acar, Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 40 (34) (2015) 11094-11111.   DOI
29 I. Dincer, C. Zamfirescu, Sustainable hydrogen production options and the role of IAHE, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37 (21) (2012) 16266-16286.   DOI
30 N. Norouzi, Assessment of technological path of hydrogen energy industry development: a review, Iranian (Iranica) Journal of Energy & Environment 12 (4) (2021) 273-284.   DOI
31 R. Hino, Hydrogen production by thermochemical cycle using nuclear heat, Nippon Enerugi Gakkai-Shi 88 (5) (2009) 385-390.
32 J.D. Holladay, J. Hu, D.L. King, Y. Wang, An overview of hydrogen production technologies, Catal. Today 139 (4) (2009) 244-260.   DOI