The Journal of the Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회논문지)

The Korea Contents Association (한국콘텐츠학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Expression of Authenticity in the Digital Content of Built Heritage with HBIM

건축유산정보모델(HBIM)을 활용한 건축문화유산 디지털 콘텐츠의 진정성 표현 연구

  • 김보람 (한국전통문화대학교 문화유산산업학과) ;
  • 이종욱 (한국전통문화대학교 문화유산산업학과)
  • Received : 2022.03.10
  • Accepted : 2022.04.26
  • Published : 2022.05.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since the 1990s, digital technology has been actively applied in the field of heritage, and this presents a new possibility of using cultural heritage as a way to utilize the original cultural data that was previously recorded and stored. Methods of interpreting cultural heritage have been particularly diversified due to various external circumstances such as COVID-19 and time constraints, and the use of contactless digital content has played a significant role in built heritage that cannot be moved. Building Information Modeling (BIM) technology is considered as a way to properly express the authenticity of built heritage, but simply creating built heritage content with BIM cannot express the authenticity of cultural heritage. Therefore, it is necessary to show the reliability of the process of content production through an authorized institution and to provide the information of members on the content. This study intends to contribute to the field of digital heritage by suggesting ways to improve reliability and express authenticity in the production of built heritage content.

1990년대 이후로 문화유산 분야에서도 디지털 기술의 적용이 활발히 진행되고 있으며, 이는 기존에 기록, 보관되고 있던 문화원형 데이터를 활용하는 방안으로 문화유산의 새로운 활용 가능성을 제시하였다. 특히, COVID-19, 시간적 제약과 같은 다양한 외부 상황으로 문화유산을 향유하는 방법이 다변화되었고, 건물 자체를 옮길 수 없는 건축문화유산에서 비대면 디지털 콘텐츠의 활용은 중요한 역할을 하게 되었다. 건축문화유산의 진정성을 올바르게 표현하는 방안으로 건축정보모델(BIM) 기술이 고려되지만, 단순히 BIM으로 건축문화유산 콘텐츠를 만드는 것으로는 문화유산의 진정성을 표현한다고 할 수 없다. 따라서 콘텐츠 제작 과정의 신뢰성을 인증된 기관을 통해 보여주며, 콘텐츠 상에서 부재의 정보 제공이 필요하다. 본 연구는 건축문화유산 콘텐츠 제작에서 신뢰성 확보와 진정성 표현을 위한 방안을 제시하여, 디지털 문화유산 분야에 기여하고자 한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 문화재청의 「역사문화환경 보존을 위한 H-BIM 지능형 목조 건축 모델링 기술 개발」사업으로부터 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (No. 2021A02P01-001)

References

  1. UNESCO, Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2021.
  2. B. V. Drosete and U. Bertilsson, Authenticity and World Heritage. In: KE. Larsen(ed.) The Nara Document on Authenticity, Nara Conference on Authenticity in relation to the World Heritage Convention, pp.3-15, 1995.
  3. B. Kim, Different Authenticity: A Critique of Authenticity in the Conservation of 20th-Century Buildings in England and South Korea, University of York, Unpublished MA dissertation, 2020.
  4. J. Sian, "Negotiating Authentic Objects and Authentic Selves: Beyond the Deconstruction of Authenticity," Journal of Material Culture, Vol.15, No.2, pp.181-203, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183510364074
  5. K. E. Larsen and N. Marstein, Conservation of Historic Timber Structures: An Ecological Approach, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000.
  6. J. Jokilehto, A History of Architectural Conservation, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002.
  7. J. Pendlebury, Conservation in the Age of Consensus, Routledge, 2009.
  8. UNESCO, The World's Heritage: the bestselling guide to the most extraordinary places, UNESCO Publishing, 2012.
  9. J. Ruskin, The Seven Lamps of Architecture, Smith, Elder & Co, 1849.
  10. Oxford Dictionaries, Oxford English Dictionary (3rd edition), Oxford University Press, 2022.
  11. https://stdict.korean.go.kr/main/main.do
  12. K. A. Burnett, Heritage, Authenticity and History. In: S. Drummond and I. Yeoman(eds) Quality Issues in Heritage Visitor Attractions, Butterworth-Heinemann, pp.39-53, 2001.
  13. W. Benjamin, he Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In: H Arendt(ed.) Illuminations, Schocken Books, pp.217-251, 1968.
  14. C. Holtorf and T. Schadla-Hall, "Age as Artefact: On archaeological authenticity," European Journal of Archaeology, Vol.2, No.2, pp.229-247, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1179/eja.1999.2.2.229
  15. H. Silverman, Heritage and Authenticity, In: E. Waterton and S. Watson(eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research, Palgrave Macmillan, pp.69-88, 2015.
  16. L. Smith and N. Akagawa, Intangible Heritage, Routledge, pp.1-9, 2009.
  17. 문화체육관광부, 2020 국민여행조사(분석편), 2020.
  18. 안재홍, 김충식, 디지털 유산: 문화유산의 3차원 기록과 활용, 시그마프레스, 2016.
  19. 한국전통문화대학교 산학협력단, 한국유교문화진흥원 비대면 융복합 콘텐츠 기본구상 학술용역, 충남역사문화연구원, 2021.
  20. H. Denard, London Charter for the Computer-Based Visualisation of Cultural Heritage(Draft 2.1), Ashgate, 2009.
  21. 박진호, 디지털 문화유산 유형 연구 : 석굴암 문화유산 원형을 중심으로, 상명대학교, 박사학위논문, 2021.
  22. Historic England, BIM for Heritage: Developing a Historic Building Information Model, 2017.
  23. Q. Wang, J. Guo, and M. Kim, "An Application Oriented Scan-to-BIM Framework," Remote Sensing, Vol.11, No.3, p.365, 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11030365
  24. AEC, AEC (UK) BIM Technology Protocol: Practical implementation of BIM for the UK Architectural, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry, 2015.
  25. 한국건설기술연구원 국가BIM센터, 건설산업 BIM 기본지침, 국토교통부, 2020.
  26. M. Murphy, E. McGovern, and S. Pavia, "Historic building information modelling (HBIM)," Structural Survey, Vol.27, No.4, pp.311-327. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800910985108
  27. M. Theodoridou, Y. Tzitzikas, M. Doerr, Y. Marketakis, and V. Melessanakis, "Modeling and querying provenance by extending CIDOC CRM," Distributed and Parallel Databases, Vol.27, pp.169-210, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10619-009-7059-2
  28. B. Kim and J. Lee, "A Study on the Necessity of Verifying Authenticity in the Production of Digital Content for Built Heritage," 한국콘텐츠학회 ICCC논문집, Vol.19, No.2, pp.13-14, 2021.
  29. C. Bekiari, G. Bruseker, M. Doerr, C. Ore, S. Stead, and A. Velios, Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model(version 7.1.1), The CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group, 2021.
  30. 제프리 포머란츠, 메타데이터, 한올, 2019.
  31. J. Lee, J. Kim, J. Ahn, and W. Woo, "Context-aware risk management for architectural heritage using historic building information modeling and virtual reality," Journal of Cultural Heritage, Vol.38, pp.242-252, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.12.010
  32. English Heritage, MIDAS Heritage - The UK Historic Environment Data Standard, 2012.
  33. 김보람, 이종욱, "디지털 문화유산 콘텐츠 제작에서 디지털 문화유산 진본성 검증의 필요성 연구," 한국콘텐츠학회 종합학술대회 논문집, Vol.19, No.1, pp.441-442. 2021.