Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2022.22.05.276

A Study on the Expression of Authenticity in the Digital Content of Built Heritage with HBIM  

Kim, Bo-Ram (한국전통문화대학교 문화유산산업학과)
Lee, Jong-Wook (한국전통문화대학교 문화유산산업학과)
Publication Information
The Journal of the Korea Contents Association / v.22, no.5, 2022 , pp. 276-287 More about this Journal
Abstract
Since the 1990s, digital technology has been actively applied in the field of heritage, and this presents a new possibility of using cultural heritage as a way to utilize the original cultural data that was previously recorded and stored. Methods of interpreting cultural heritage have been particularly diversified due to various external circumstances such as COVID-19 and time constraints, and the use of contactless digital content has played a significant role in built heritage that cannot be moved. Building Information Modeling (BIM) technology is considered as a way to properly express the authenticity of built heritage, but simply creating built heritage content with BIM cannot express the authenticity of cultural heritage. Therefore, it is necessary to show the reliability of the process of content production through an authorized institution and to provide the information of members on the content. This study intends to contribute to the field of digital heritage by suggesting ways to improve reliability and express authenticity in the production of built heritage content.
Keywords
Digital Heritage; Cultural Heritage; Authenticity; HBIM; Metadata; Contactless Content;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 UNESCO, Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention, UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2021.
2 B. V. Drosete and U. Bertilsson, Authenticity and World Heritage. In: KE. Larsen(ed.) The Nara Document on Authenticity, Nara Conference on Authenticity in relation to the World Heritage Convention, pp.3-15, 1995.
3 K. A. Burnett, Heritage, Authenticity and History. In: S. Drummond and I. Yeoman(eds) Quality Issues in Heritage Visitor Attractions, Butterworth-Heinemann, pp.39-53, 2001.
4 C. Holtorf and T. Schadla-Hall, "Age as Artefact: On archaeological authenticity," European Journal of Archaeology, Vol.2, No.2, pp.229-247, 1999.   DOI
5 H. Silverman, Heritage and Authenticity, In: E. Waterton and S. Watson(eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research, Palgrave Macmillan, pp.69-88, 2015.
6 L. Smith and N. Akagawa, Intangible Heritage, Routledge, pp.1-9, 2009.
7 문화체육관광부, 2020 국민여행조사(분석편), 2020.
8 안재홍, 김충식, 디지털 유산: 문화유산의 3차원 기록과 활용, 시그마프레스, 2016.
9 https://stdict.korean.go.kr/main/main.do
10 B. Kim, Different Authenticity: A Critique of Authenticity in the Conservation of 20th-Century Buildings in England and South Korea, University of York, Unpublished MA dissertation, 2020.
11 김보람, 이종욱, "디지털 문화유산 콘텐츠 제작에서 디지털 문화유산 진본성 검증의 필요성 연구," 한국콘텐츠학회 종합학술대회 논문집, Vol.19, No.1, pp.441-442. 2021.
12 W. Benjamin, he Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In: H Arendt(ed.) Illuminations, Schocken Books, pp.217-251, 1968.
13 한국전통문화대학교 산학협력단, 한국유교문화진흥원 비대면 융복합 콘텐츠 기본구상 학술용역, 충남역사문화연구원, 2021.
14 Q. Wang, J. Guo, and M. Kim, "An Application Oriented Scan-to-BIM Framework," Remote Sensing, Vol.11, No.3, p.365, 2019.   DOI
15 M. Murphy, E. McGovern, and S. Pavia, "Historic building information modelling (HBIM)," Structural Survey, Vol.27, No.4, pp.311-327. 2009.   DOI
16 Historic England, BIM for Heritage: Developing a Historic Building Information Model, 2017.
17 한국건설기술연구원 국가BIM센터, 건설산업 BIM 기본지침, 국토교통부, 2020.
18 M. Theodoridou, Y. Tzitzikas, M. Doerr, Y. Marketakis, and V. Melessanakis, "Modeling and querying provenance by extending CIDOC CRM," Distributed and Parallel Databases, Vol.27, pp.169-210, 2010.   DOI
19 J. Jokilehto, A History of Architectural Conservation, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002.
20 제프리 포머란츠, 메타데이터, 한올, 2019.
21 J. Pendlebury, Conservation in the Age of Consensus, Routledge, 2009.
22 AEC, AEC (UK) BIM Technology Protocol: Practical implementation of BIM for the UK Architectural, Engineering and Construction (AEC) industry, 2015.
23 B. Kim and J. Lee, "A Study on the Necessity of Verifying Authenticity in the Production of Digital Content for Built Heritage," 한국콘텐츠학회 ICCC논문집, Vol.19, No.2, pp.13-14, 2021.
24 C. Bekiari, G. Bruseker, M. Doerr, C. Ore, S. Stead, and A. Velios, Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model(version 7.1.1), The CIDOC CRM Special Interest Group, 2021.
25 J. Lee, J. Kim, J. Ahn, and W. Woo, "Context-aware risk management for architectural heritage using historic building information modeling and virtual reality," Journal of Cultural Heritage, Vol.38, pp.242-252, 2019.   DOI
26 English Heritage, MIDAS Heritage - The UK Historic Environment Data Standard, 2012.
27 H. Denard, London Charter for the Computer-Based Visualisation of Cultural Heritage(Draft 2.1), Ashgate, 2009.
28 박진호, 디지털 문화유산 유형 연구 : 석굴암 문화유산 원형을 중심으로, 상명대학교, 박사학위논문, 2021.
29 J. Sian, "Negotiating Authentic Objects and Authentic Selves: Beyond the Deconstruction of Authenticity," Journal of Material Culture, Vol.15, No.2, pp.181-203, 2010.   DOI
30 K. E. Larsen and N. Marstein, Conservation of Historic Timber Structures: An Ecological Approach, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000.
31 UNESCO, The World's Heritage: the bestselling guide to the most extraordinary places, UNESCO Publishing, 2012.
32 J. Ruskin, The Seven Lamps of Architecture, Smith, Elder & Co, 1849.
33 Oxford Dictionaries, Oxford English Dictionary (3rd edition), Oxford University Press, 2022.