DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Spatial Effect of Gated Communities and Improvement of Urban Publicness

게이티드 커뮤니티의 공간적 영향 분석 및 도시 공공성 개선방안

  • KIM, JiSook (Dept. of Urban Planning and Engineering, Dong-A University) ;
  • KIM, Ho-Yong (Dept. of Urban Planning and Engineering, Dong-A University)
  • Received : 2022.03.07
  • Accepted : 2022.03.23
  • Published : 2022.03.31

Abstract

Recently, the gated community has been increasing due to various reasons such as demand for differentiated areas and security, but various problems have been raised, including regional conflicts, traffic restrictions and disconnection of surrounding areas. Therefore, this study empirically considered what kind of spatial effect the gated community has on the surrounding area by analyzing the vitality using floating population big data and analyzing pedestrian accessibility using network analysis and social network analysis. As a result, it was found that the overall vitality in the study area was greatly affected by the land use and the building use. However, focusing on apartment complexes, even in the same land use, when the form of the complex is open to the outside, there is a lot of floating population, so the vitality is high. In terms of accessibility, assuming that the gated community is open, it was found that as the physical connectivity improved, there were more roads for pedestrians to choose from, and the accessibility improved as traffic and exchanges occurred in the disconnected space. The value of improving property rights and residential environment is also precious, but it is necessary to review how to reflect the improvement of local permeability in enhancing the publicness of cities and the value and direction of communities that can coexist with the region.

최근 차별화된 영역에 대한 요구와 보안 등의 다양한 원인으로 증가하고 있는 게이티드 커뮤니티는 지역사회에 위화감을 조성하고 통행제한과 주변지역 단절 등을 야기한다는 문제점도 제기되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 유동인구 빅데이터를 이용하여 활력도를 분석하고, 네트워크 분석 및 사회연결망분석을 이용하여 보행자의 접근성을 분석함으로써 게이티드 커뮤니티가 주변지역에 어떠한 공간적 영향을 미치는지 실증적으로 고찰하였다. 분석결과 대상 지역 내 전체적인 활력도는 용도지역과 건물 용도의 영향을 크게 받는 것으로 나타났으나, 아파트 단지에 초점을 맞추면 같은 용도지역이라도 단지의 형태가 외부에 개방적일 때 유동인구가 많아 활력도가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 접근성 측면에서 살펴보면 게이티드 커뮤니티의 개방을 가정했을 때, 물리적인 연결성이 개선됨에 따라 보행자가 선택할 수 있는 도로가 많아지고, 단절되었던 공간에 통행과 교류가 발생하면서 접근성이 향상될 수 있음을 확인하였다. 재산권 존중과 주거환경 개선의 가치도 소중하지만, 개선 가능한 지역의 투과성을 어떻게 도시 공공성 향상에 반영할 수 있을지에 대한 고민과 함께 지역사회와 공존할 수 있는 공동체의 가치와 방향에 대한 검토가 필요하다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 동아대학교 교내연구비 지원을 받아 수행되었습니다.

References

  1. Issacx, E.H. and M. Sivastava. 1989. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press, 146pp.
  2. Joo, S.M. and J.Y. Kim. 2019. A study on street vitality of two different types of superblocks: With a case of Yeoksam 2-dong, Seoul. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 35(10):71-82.
  3. Jung, H.M. 2012. A study on the spatial characteristics and the socio-cultural context of gated communities. Seoul Studies 13(1): 37-56. https://doi.org/10.23129/SEOULS.13.1.201203.37
  4. Kim, H.Y. 2010. A Study on the improvement of accuracy of photovoltaic facility location using the geostatistical analysis. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 13(2):146-156. https://doi.org/10.11108/KAGIS.2010.13.2.146
  5. Kim, H.Y. 2010. An Geostatistical approach for improved prediction of traffic volume in urban area. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 13(4):138-147. https://doi.org/10.11108/KAGIS.2010.13.4.138
  6. Kim J.E. and M.J. Choi. 2012. Empirical analysis of physical exclusiveness of multi-family housing estates in Seoul and its socioeconomic effects. Journal of the Korean Housing Association 23(5): 103-111. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2012.23.5.103
  7. Kim, K.R. and C.H. Kim. 2021. A study on the impact of gated communities on walking accessibility to elementary schools: Focusing on apartment complexes constructed in the urban renewal acceleration district of Seoul. Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design 22(2):79-98. https://doi.org/10.38195/judik.2021.04.22.2.79
  8. Kim, S.K. 2007. Architectural characteristics and residents'perceived and actual safety in gated communities. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 23(6):61-70.
  9. Lang, R.E. and K.A. Danielsen. 1997. Gated communities in America: Walling our the world? Housing Policy Debate 8(4):867- https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.1997.9521281
  10. Le Goix, R. 2005. Gated communities: Sprawl and social segregation in Southern California. Housing studies 20(2):323-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/026730303042000331808
  11. Lemanski, C. 2006. Spaces of exclusivity or connection? Linkages between a gated community and its poorer neighbour in a Cape Town master plan development. Urban studies 43(2):3979-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500495937
  12. Lim, H.J, E.J. Yang and H.Y. Kim. 2018. Evolution direction of superblock residential area in Seoul. The Seoul Institute. 1-133.
  13. Park, C.Y. and Y.S. Kwon. 2003. The measurement of pedestrian speed in central business district. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association 15(2):113-126.
  14. Park, S. 2009. Estimating air temperature over mountainous terrain by combining hypertemporal satellite LST data and multivariate geostatistical methods, Journal of the Korean Geographical Society 44(2):105-121.
  15. Park, Y.M. and J.G. Kim. 2021. The large apartment complexes and the residential segregation: Focused on Pusan. Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design 22(4):153-170. https://doi.org/10.38195/judik.2021.08.22.4.153
  16. Roitman, S. 2010. Gated communities: definitions, causes and consequences. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning 163(1):31-8. https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.2010.163.1.31
  17. Salcedo, R. and A. Torres. 2004. Gated communities in Santiago: wall or frontier? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28(1):27-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00501.x
  18. Sun, G., C. Webster, and A. Chiaradia. 2018. Ungating the city: A permeability perspective. Urban studies, 55(12):2586-2602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017733943