DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

피터 아이젠만과 발레리오 올지아티의 비교를 통한 자율적 건축에 관한 연구

A Study on Autonomous Architecture Through Comparing Peter Eisenman and Valerio Olgiati

  • Ma, Seung-Bum (Dept. of Interior Architecture, School of Architecture, Hongik University)
  • 투고 : 2021.12.27
  • 심사 : 2022.02.21
  • 발행 : 2022.03.30

초록

Autonomous architecture focuses on the system of formal elements that are essential in architecture. Both Peter Eisenman and Valerio Olgiati treat the physical and functional elements in architecture such as columns, slabs, walls as the basic materials in architectural design; the architectural idea, or internal logic of design, governs the shape and the arrangement of elements. Both architects refuse to adopt extra-architectural discourses as it relates to social, economic, and political approaches. Even if arguments in philosophy and art are accommodated, they are retranslated into architectural rhetoric where formal and spatial analysis override historical or theoretical ideas. Here are the differences between the two architects: Peter Eisenman pursues the completeness of the formalistic system of the project itself whereas the existential sense-making experience of the beholder that provokes the imagination and metaphysical thinking is of paramount importance to Valerio Olgiati. Peter Eisenman produces architectural meaning by adding or duplicating unfunctional, but still fundamental elements; and the axonometric format that shows the process of transformation of architectural elements is preferred. However, Valerio Olgiati designs buildings by dividing one entity with one idea, and the design process is concealed to intrigue the beholders. Plans, sections, and elevations stimulate the intellectual imagination, and realistic renderings with a poetic atmosphere are favored. Lastly, Peter Eisenman is relatively indifferent to physical buildings since his true architecture is already completed in the drawings. But Valerio Olgiati concentrates on the physicality and construction since it determines the success of the project. Their approaches of reserving the architectural territory by concentrating on the essential aspects of architecture makes one question the way of doing architecture in practice and within academia in today's ever-changing world.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2021학년도 홍익대학교 학술연구진흥비에 의하여 연구된 것임.

참고문헌

  1. Aureli, P. V. (2011). The Possibility of an Absolute Architecture, MA, The MIT Press
  2. Breitschmid, M. (2009). The Significance of the Idea in the Architecture of Valerio Olgiati, Zurich, Verlag Niggli, 65-71
  3. Caruso, A. (2009). Whatever Happened to Analogue Architecture, AA FIles, 59, 74-75
  4. Cecilia, F.M. (2011). Valerio Olgiati 1996-2011, Madrid, El Croquis Press
  5. Eisenman, P. (1970). Notes on Conceptual Architecture: Towards a Definition, Design Quarterly, 78-79, I-5
  6. Eisenman, P. (1976). Post-Functionalism, Oppositions, 6, MA, The MIT Press, i-iii
  7. Eisenman, P. (1980). Aspects of Modernism: Maison Dom-ino and the Self-Referential Sign, Oppositions, 15/16, 119-128
  8. Eisenman, P. (1982a). The Houses of Memory: The Texts of Analogy, Introduction to Aldo Rossi, The Architecture of the City, MA, The MIT Press, 3-12
  9. Eisenman, P. (1982b). The Representations of Doubt: At the Sign of the Sign, Rassegna, 9, 3-12
  10. Eisenman, P. (1984). The End of the Classical: The End of the Beginning, the End of the End, Perspecta, 21, 154-172 https://doi.org/10.2307/1567087
  11. Eisenman, P. (2015). Palladio Virtuel, Yale University Press, New Haven and London
  12. Eisenman, P., & Ansari, I. (2013, May). Interview: Peter Eisenman, The Architectural Review, 233, 80-89
  13. Eisenman, P., & Belogolovsky, V. (2016, April 11). Interview with Peter Eisenman:"I Am Not Convinced That I Have a Style". ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/785334/interview-with-peter-eisenman-i-am-not-convinced-that-i-have-a-style
  14. Greenberg, C. (1940). Towards a Newer Laocoon, Partisian Review 7, 296-310
  15. Hasegawa, G. (2020). Architecture That Stimulates Thought, Feature: Valerio Olgiati Non-Referential Architecture, Tokyo, A+U Publishing Co., 158
  16. Hays, K. M. (1984). Critical Architecture: Between Culture and Form, Perspecta, 21, 14-29 https://doi.org/10.2307/1567078
  17. Hays, K. M. (2009). Architecture's Desire, MA, The MIT Press, 62
  18. Johnson, P. (1950). The Architectural Review, Vol.108
  19. Jin, J. (2013). Western Art History by Jin. J.K. : Late-Modernism and Post-Modernism, Seoul, Humanist, 118-143
  20. Kaufmann, E. (1952). Three Revolutionary Architects, Boullee, Ledoux, and Lequeu, American Philosophical Society, 433-435
  21. Kim, S., & Yoo, J. (2010). A study on Peter Eisenman's 'Autonomous Architecture', Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 26(3), 121-130
  22. Lucan, J. (2018). On Valerio Olgiati, Valerio Olgiati Projects 2009-2017, Basel, Simonett & Baer, 3
  23. Ma, S. (2021). A study on the Non-Referential Architecture of Valerio Olgiati, Journal of Korean Institute of Culture Architecture, 73, 123-134
  24. Olgiati, V. (2007). Valerio Olgiati: Conversation with Students. Blacksburg, Virginia Tech Architecture Publications, 51-53
  25. Olgiati, V. (2013). The Images of Architects, Lucern, Quart Architektur
  26. Olgiati, V., & Breitschmid, M. (2019). Non-Referential Architecture, Zurich, Park Books
  27. Rowe, C. (1947). The mathematics of the Ideal Villa: Palladio and Le Corbusier compared, The Architectural Review, 101, 101-104
  28. Rowe, C. (1975). Introduction to Five Architects, NY, Oxford University Press, 3-7
  29. Vidler, A. (1987). Histories of the Immediate Present: Inventing Architectural Modernism, 1930-1975, MA, The MIT Press