DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Cultural Hegemony and Placeness Changes in the Area of Songhyeon-dong, Seoul

서울 송현동 일대의 문화 헤게모니와 장소성 변화 분석

  • Choe, Ji-Young (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Zoh, Kyung-Jin (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University)
  • 최지영 (서울대학교 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 조경진 (서울대학교 환경대학원)
  • Received : 2021.12.03
  • Accepted : 2022.01.15
  • Published : 2022.02.28

Abstract

The History and Culture Park and the Lee Kun-hee Donation Hall will be built in Songhyeon-dong, Seoul. Political games from the Joseon Dynasty to the present greatly influenced the historicity of Songhyeon-dong. However, place analysis was limited to changes in landowners and land uses rather than a historical context. Therefore, this study analyzed the context in which the placeness of Songhyeon-dong changed according to the emergence of cultural hegemony using the perspective of modern cultural geography and comparative history. As a result of the analysis, cultural hegemony in historical transitions, such as Sinocentrism, maritime expansion, civil revolutions, imperialism, nationalism, popular art, and neoliberalism, was found to have created new intellectuals in Bukchon, including Songhyeon-dong, and influenced social systems and spatial policies. In this social relations, the placeness of Songhyeon-dong changed as follows. First, the founding forces of Joseon created pine forests as Bibo Forests to invocate the permanence of the dynasty. In the late Joseon dynasty, it was an era of maritime expansion, and as Joseon's yeonhaeng increased, a garden for the Gyeonghwasejok, who enjoyed the culture of the Qing dynasty, was built. Although pine forests and gardens disappeared due to the development of housing complexes as the population soared during the Japanese colonial era, Cha Gyeong's landscape aesthetics, which harmonized artificial gardens and external nature, are worth reinterpreting in modern times. Second, the wave of modernization created a new school in Bukchon and a boarding house in Songhyeon-dong owned by a pro-Japanese faction. Angukdongcheon-gil, next to Songhyeon-dong, was where thinkers who promoted civil revolution and national self-determination exchanged ideas. Songhyeon-dong, the largest boarding house, served as a residence for students to participate in the March 1st Movement and was the cradle of the resulting culture of student movements. The appearance of the old road is preserved, so it is a significant part of the regeneration of walking in the historic city center, connecting Gwanghwamun-Bukchon-Insadong -Donhwamunro. Third, from the cultural rule of the Government General of Joseon to the Military Government, Songhyeon-dong acted as a passage to western culture with the Joseon Siksan Bank's cultural housing and staff accommodations at the U.S. Embassy. Ancient and contemporary art coexisted in the surrounding area, so the modern and contemporary art market was formed. The Lee Kun-hee Donation Hall is expected to form a cultural belt for citizens with the gallery, Bukchon Hanok Village, the Craft Museum, and the Modern Museum of Art. Discourses and challenges are needed to recreate the place in harmony with the forests, gardens, the street of citizens' birth, history and culture park, the art museum, and the surrounding walking network.

서울 송현동에 역사문화공원과 이건희 기증관이 조성될 예정이다. 송현동의 역사성은 조선 시대부터 현대까지 정치적 판도에 영향을 받은 시련의 땅으로 인식되었다. 하지만 장소성 분석은 역사적 맥락보다는 토지소유자와 용도 변화에 국한해서 다루어졌다. 그래서 본 연구는 현대문화지리학과 비교역사학 관점을 활용하여 송현동의 장소성이 문화 헤게모니에 따라 변화한 맥락을 분석하였다. 분석결과, 역사적 이행과정에서 나타나는 중화주의, 대항해, 시민혁명, 제국주의, 민족자결주의, 민족주의, 대중예술, 신자유주의 같은 범세계 차원의 문화 헤게모니는 송현동을 비롯한 북촌 일대에 새로운 지식인층을 만들어냈고, 사회제도와 공간정책에 영향을 미쳤다. 이러한 사회적 관계 속에서 송현동의 장소성은 다음과 같이 변화했다. 첫째, 송현의 소나무숲은 이상적인 유교 국가를 목표로 했던 조선 건국세력이 왕조의 영속을 기원하며 만든 비보숲이었고, 내사산의 지맥을 보호하는 사산금표제로 관리되었다. 세계적으로 대항해시대를 맞이한 조선 후기에는 연행이 늘며 청나라 문화를 향유하는 경화세족의 정원이 들어섰다. 일제 강점기에 인구가 급증하면서 주택단지개발로 소나무 숲과 정원은 사라졌지만, 인공적인 정원과 외부의 자연을 조화롭게 연결했던 차경의 경관적 미학은 현대적으로 재해석할 가치가 있다. 둘째, 세계의 근대화 물결은 북촌 일대에 신식학교를, 친일파 소유의 송현동에는 하숙집을 만들었다. 송현동 옆의 안국동천길은 시민혁명과 민족자결주의를 접한 사상가들이 교류했던 장소였고, 최대규모의 하숙집이었던 송현동은 학생들이 3.1운동에 참여하며 학생운동문화가 발아한 계기가 되었다. 안국동천길은 옛길의 모습이 보존되어 있어 광화문-북촌-인사동-돈화문로를 연결하는 역사 도심 보행 재생의 한 부분으로 의의를 지닌다. 셋째, 조선총독부의 문화 통치기부터 군사 정권기까지 송현동은 조선식산은행의 서구식 문화주택과 미국대사관 직원 숙소가 들어서며 서구문화의 통로였다. 주변 지역은 고미술과 현대미술이 공존하며 근현대 미술시장이 형성되었다. 이건희 기증관은 북촌한옥마을, 공예박물관, 현대미술관, 갤러리와 문화벨트를 이루며 시민의 공간으로 변모할 것으로 기대되고 있다. 이같이 장소를 이루었던 숲과 정원, 시민탄생의 거리, 근·현대 미술의 진원지로서 의미가 새롭게 조성될 역사문화공원과 미술관 그리고 주변 보행 네트워크와 조화롭게 재창조될 수 있도록 담론과 도전이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, D. H.(2004) The housing culture in the 18 19th century andtheimaginary garden. The Chin-Tan Hakpo 97: 111-138.
  2. An, S. T.(2015) A Study on the Prose of Nam Gong Cheol. Worin.
  3. Arendt, H.(2016) The Human Condition. Hangilsa.
  4. Assmann, A. (2011) Erinnerungsraume(Korean edition). Greenbee.
  5. Auge, M.(1995) Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropologyof Supermodernity (J.Howe, Trans.). London&New York.
  6. Baik, S. H.(2004) The introduction of art festivals in small cities andthe creation of placeness. The Journal of the Korean Geography Society 39(6): 888-906.
  7. Benedict, A.(2018) Imagined Communities: Reflection on the Originand Spread of Nationalism (Kerean edition). Ghil.
  8. CAS(2018) Visual Culture and Creation in Modern Gyeongseong. Center for Art Studies. Korea.
  9. Chang, K. S.(2003) Jong-ro as a nationalist movement space under theJapanese colonialism: Confrontation line between invastion andresistance. Journal of Korean Modern and Contemporary History 26:75-98.
  10. Choi, B. D.(2002) The loss and the restoration of placeness incapitalist society. Journal of Urban Studies 8: 253-278.
  11. Choi, C. J., W. S. Choi, D. H. Sung, D. H. Han and S. J. Kwon(1993)Feng Shui, the Geography of Life. Green Tree.
  12. Choi, E. H.(1991) Modern Korean Women's History:1905-1945 Until I found my country 2. Choi Eunhee Cultural Business Association.
  13. Choi, G. R.(2012) The direction of urban regeneration by creating a place focusing on the urban regeneration project in Busan. Journal of Environmental Studies 51: 19-36.
  14. Choi, M. J. and M. O. Kim(2001) Empirical analysis of components and economic values of the 'Placeness': The cases of Daehak and Rodeo streets in Seoul. Korea Planning Association 36(2): 153-162.
  15. Choi, W. S.(2018) Gyeomjae's Hanyang Jinkyung. Hyeonamsa.
  16. Choi, Y. H.(1988) The March 1st Independence Movement in Seoul-History of the Korean Independence Movement 3. National Institute of Korean History.
  17. Chung, J. N.(2011) A study on the urban changes of Hanseongbu through analysis on Kwangmu-Census. Journal of Architectural History 20(1): 7-22.
  18. Cresswell, T.(2004) Place: A Short Introduction. Blackwell Oxford.
  19. Dongyue(2013) Chaoxianfu(Kim. Y. K. Trans.). Simmian.
  20. Duncan, J.(1990) The City as Text: the Politics of Landscape Interpretation in the Kandyan Kingdom. Cambridge University Press.
  21. Graeme, E.(2003) Hard-branding the cultural city-from Prado to Prada. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27(2): 417-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00455
  22. Gramsci, A.(1978) Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci(The 5th edition). International Publishers.
  23. Hall, S.(2016) Cultural Studies 1983: A Theoretical History. Duke University Press.
  24. Hamel, H.(1668) The Journal of the Unfortunate Voyage of the Jaght the Sperwer. (Korean Trans. 2017. Starbooks.)
  25. Han, B. S., H. Y. Kim and S. H. Park(2008) Strengthening the placeness by networks of cultural tourism contents focused on the themed street. Seoul Studies 9(4): 3-22.
  26. Han, D. W.(1992) The location and function of Keumsan in Seoul of the early Choson dynasty. Journal of Geography 20: 17-31.
  27. Han, S. M.(2019) An analysis of sense of place as an externality in the literature works - Focused on Garibong-dong from 1970s to 2000s. The Journal of Seoul Studies 74: 81-111. https://doi.org/10.17647/jss.2019.02.74.81
  28. Han, S. Y. and K. J. Zoh(2010) Urban parks in Seoul as place representation. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 38(2): 37-52.
  29. Han, S. Y and K. J. Zoh(2010) Remixed sense of place in Deoksugung(Kyungungung). Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 28(2): 45-56.
  30. Harvey, D.(1995) From space to place and back again: Reflection on the condition of postmodernity(Y.M. Park trans.). Space and Environment 5: 32-71.
  31. Harvey, D.(2019) Pairs, Capital of Modernity(Korean trans.). Geulhangari Publishers.
  32. Heidegger, M.(2020) Holzwege(Korean edition). Nanam p. 77.
  33. Hong, H. J. (2013) Accumulation of Audio-Visual Information and Birth of Knowledge in the 19th Century; Jisuyeompil, Somyong.
  34. Huntington, S. P.(1997) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Simon & Schuster.
  35. Hwang, K. W. (2009) The Leisure and Outdoor Recreation Culture of Korea. Seoul National University Press.
  36. Ienaga, Y. (2013) A Study on Bukchon Hanok Village in Terms of Seoul Studies. Minsokwon.
  37. Im, S., Y. Kwon, Y. Jeong, Y. Hue, J. Byeon, and H. Choi(2014) Internal structure of the sense of place for parks that were aimed at reenacting the place memory. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 42(5): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.5.001
  38. Jackson, P.(1989) Maps of Meaning. Unwin Hyman.
  39. Jeon, J. H.(2009) Place memories of the urban backlane: In case of the Primat-gol of Jongno. Seoul. Jouranl of the Korean Geographical Society 44(6): 779-796.
  40. Jeon, J. S.(2015) Imaginary Athens, Berlin.Tokyo.Seoul. Imagine1000.
  41. Jeong, D. J.(2009) Sambong Collection. Korean Studies Information.
  42. Jeong, I. H., H. M. Bae, M. R. Cho, B. S. Min, J. H. Bae and K. J. Zoh(2011) Topography of Discourse: Architecture, Urbanismand Landscape Architecture.
  43. Joo, D. B.(2018) A generational analysis of the Kyongsong demonstrationat the beginning of the march 1st independence movement. The Journal of Korean Studies 184: 183-211.
  44. Jung, I. S.(2001) Fukuzawa Yukichi. Jisik.
  45. Jung, H. S.(2021) Trends in the perception of customs of the Qingdynasty recorded in Yeonhaengnok in the late Joseon dynasty. Theses on Korean Literature 87(1):35-68.
  46. Jung, K. H. (2011) A critical study on the place-industrial approachof urban conservation (regeneration) policy in traditional cultural district. Seoul Studies 42: 173-226.
  47. Kim, B. Y.(2009) Domination and Space. Moonji.
  48. Kim, B. Y.(2020) Japanese Colonial Tourismand Changes of Mt. Geumgang in 1930s. Critical Review of History p. 382-414.
  49. Kim, G. M. (2017) King of Architecture, Make Gyeongseong. Yima.
  50. Kim, H. B.(2012) The influence of landscape paintingin Joseondynasty on the styles of landscape garden. Journal of the KoreanInstitute of Landscape Architecture 40(2):49-63. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.2.049
  51. Kim, H. J. and M. J. Choi(2016) Characteristics of commercial gentrification and change in perception of placeness in cultural districts. Journal of Korea Planning Association 51(2): 97-112. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2016.06.51.3.97
  52. Kim, J. N., K. J. Zoh and H. S. Park(2017) Reconstruction the placeMemory of old town in Cheorwon. The Korea Spatial Planning Review p. 105-125.
  53. Kim, K. J. and Y. J. Heo(2001) Seoul, Twentieth Century: Growth& Change of the Last 100 Years, The Seoul Institute.
  54. Kim, M. J.(2010) Study on the mountains management of the capital city in the former Joseon dynasty. Keimyung Korean Studies Journal 40: 453-485.
  55. Kim, S. J.(2018) Rivalry for cultural supremacy: constructionof architectural space and its representation in 19th century Joseonsociety. Hangukmunhwa 81: 423-452.
  56. Kim, S. J.(2020) The meaning of conflict over development andthediscourse on cultural property protection surrounding the Sajik Danand Sajik park construction. The Korean Cultural Studies 38: 137-170. https://doi.org/10.17792/KCS.2020.38..137
  57. Kim, S. K.(1993) A study on the foreast land ownership in the late Choson dynasty. The Dong Bang Hak Chi 79: 497-535.
  58. Kim, S. P.(2016) The disputed point and implication of the Seosomunhistorical-cultural park project. Economy and Society 112: 174-207. https://doi.org/10.18207/criso.2016..112.174
  59. Kim, S. Y.(2015) Art Collectors. Dolbegae.
  60. Kim, Y. G., H. G. Kim and K. S. Choi(2009) An interpretation of theInsa-dong landscape from a social construction viewpoint. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 36(6): 91-101.
  61. Kim, Y. M.(1997) Private garden in Seoul.(Exploring Seoul's cultural heritage.). The Institue of Seoul Studies.
  62. Kim, Y.(2020) Moving Reflection, Korean Art Since 1945. Mijinsa.
  63. Kwon, B.(2019) The Night of March 1st. Dolbegae.
  64. Kwon, O. M., D. H. Lee, W. Y. Jeon, K. S. Chang, K. B. Nam, S. H. Kim, and K. J. Zoh(2002) Jongno: Time, Place, People. The Institueof Seoul Studies.
  65. Kwon, Y. D., J. S. Ko and Y. J. Park(2012) The issues and policies in urban planning of Seoul in the 1960s. Research Report to Seoul Institute p. 61-74.
  66. Ko, D. H.(2007) Seoul Metropolitan History of the Joseon Dynasty. Thaehaksa.
  67. Lee, D. M.(1792) A Poem for Seongsijeondo(Park, H. W.(2015) Seoul in the 18th Century, Reading as a Poem for Seongsijeondo, bogosa).
  68. Lee, H. J.(2020) Seo Jaepil's Critical Biography. Sinseowon.
  69. Lee, K. A.(2019) A Residential Area in Gyeongseong. Zip.
  70. Lee, K. B.(2017) The City of Kings, the Scenery of Seoul, and the Direction of Authority. Sapyoung p. 49-89.
  71. Lee, S. H. and K. W. Hwang(1997) The ambiguous concepts of place and placeness. Journal of Korea Planning Association 32(5): 169-184.
  72. Lee, Y. K.(2015) Hanseongbu's Small Japanese Jingogae or Bonjeong. Spacetime.
  73. Lee, Y. S.(2019) The historical and cultural meaning and placeness of Song-dong in Seoul in the late Chosun dynasty. The Journal of Seoul Studies (77): 79-110.
  74. Lefebvre, H.(2011) La Production de l'espace(Korean edition). Eco-Livres.
  75. Lim, H. J.(2014) Restoring Identity of Modern Hansung. Hanul.
  76. Massey, D.(1994) Space, Place, and Gender. University of Minnesota Press.
  77. Mitchell, D.(1994) Cultural Geography: A Critical Introduction. Blackwell.
  78. Na, P. S.(2017) The placeness of bukchon village based on waterway. The Journal of Korean Geography 6(1): 27-50.
  79. Na, P. S.(2019) The Interpretation of Bukchon's Placeness Based on Power Relation in Mordern Seoul. Kongju National University.
  80. National Institute of Korea History(2008) Art and City that Met Modern Times. Doosan Dong-A.
  81. Nora, P.(2010) Les Lieux de memoire (Korean edition). Nanam.
  82. Oh, M. S.(1998) Cultural policy and national culture discourse in the 1960s and 1970s. Institute of Cross-Cultural Studies (4): 121-152.
  83. Park, C. K.(2014) Reading Heidegger. Sechang Media.
  84. Park, H. S.(2015) The change and transformation of Namsan(Mt.) parks in early modern seoul. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 43(4): 124-139. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2015.43.4.124
  85. Park, K. H. and J. H. Pae(2013) Landscape as materialized discourse and capital. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 41(6): 117-128. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2013.41.6.117
  86. Park, S. G.(1995) Recent trends in cultural geography: focusing on new cultural geography. The Association Of Korean Cultural and Historical Geographer 7: 131-145.
  87. Plato, Kritias. Acanet. Lee, J. H. trans. pp. 34-35.
  88. Relph, E.(1976) Place and Placelessness. Pion.
  89. Schulz, C. N.(1984) Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. Rizzoli.
  90. Seo, J. P.(1938) In My Days in Korea: Reformers' Mistakes. The New Korea 21-22.
  91. Seong, H. (2016) Yongjae Chonghwa(Korean tran.). Dolbegae.
  92. Seoul Historiography Institute(2016) Gyeongseong Urban Planning Survey. 210-211.
  93. Seoul Metropolitan Government(2015) General Plan for the Historic City Center.
  94. Seoul Museum of History(2015) Voices from Tapgol: Winds of Change in 18th Century Seoul. Seoul Museum of History.
  95. Seoul Museum of History(2019) Bukchon 1863-1962. Seoul Museum of History.
  96. Seoul Museum of History(2019) The Memories of Eleven Families in Bukchon, Seoul Museum of History.
  97. Shin, C. H.(2016) A fierce battle between a dragon and dragons: theeffect of heliocentric theory. Gi-Byul Media.
  98. Shin, J. R. and C. G. Choi(2010) Impacts of human factors ontheplaceness in the Hongik University area. Journal of Korea PlanningAssociation 45(7): 5-20.
  99. The Association of Korean Cultural and Historical Geographers (2015)Understanding Modern Cultural Geography, Purungil.
  100. Tipton, E. and J. Clark(2000) Being Modern in Japan: Culture andSociety from the 1910s to the 1930s. University of Hawaii Press.
  101. Todd A. H.(2020) Assimilating Seoul: Japanese Rule and thePolitics of Public Space in Colonial Korea 1910-1945 (KoreanTrans,). Sanchurum.
  102. Tuan, Y.(2020) Space and Place(Korean edition). Sa-I.
  103. Uhr, J. Y. and H. K. Yuh (2010) A study on place value onthenotion place. Korea Planning Association 45(6): 21-34.
  104. Yeom, S. S.(1923) The 3rd Episode of Gongjinhoe. Room41.
  105. Yu, B. Y.(2020) HankyungJiRyeok.(Korean edition). Acanet.
  106. Yu, H.(2018) A study on urban regeneration as a placeness-making. Journal of The Korean Association of Regional Geographers 24(3):466-479. https://doi.org/10.26863/jkarg.2018.08.24.3.466
  107. Zoh, K. J. and Y. A. Seo(2008) A study on the garden meaningof pungryu through genre painting in Joseon dynasty. Journal of theKorean Institute of Landscape Architecture 36(5): 94-107.
  108. http://www.koreanhistory.or.kr/newsPaper.do?pageType=listRecords&year=1898&month=2&day=24 The Independent, Feb 24, 1898.
  109. https://www.hani.co.kr/arti/legacy/legacy_general/L425217.html Hankyoreh, Feb 13, 1996.
  110. http://news.kmib.co.kr/article/view.asp?arcid=0004368589 The Kookmin Ilbo, Nov 25, 2010.
  111. http://www.conslove.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=34871 The Korea Construction Shinmun, Jul 17, 2014.
  112. https://www.hankookilbo.com/News/Read/A2020100717450002915 The Hankook Ilbo, Oct 7, 2020.
  113. https://go.seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20131002012015 The Seoul Shinmun, Oct 2, 2013.
  114. https://www.seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20140111013001 The Seoul Shinmun, Jan 11, 2014.
  115. https://go.seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20190605016001 The Seoul Shinmun, Jun 4, 2019.
  116. https://www.seoul.co.kr/news/newsView.php?id=20210427500139 The Seoul Shinmun, Apr 27, 2021.
  117. https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/24047667#home The JoongAng Ilbo, Apr 30, 2021.
  118. https://donga.com, The Dong-a Ilbo.
  119. http://sillok.history.go.kr The Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty.
  120. https://weekly.donga.com, The Weekly Dong-a 321:46.
  121. https://www.galleryhyundai.com/about/fiftieth/view/2000000007650 Years of Gallery Hyundai, Apr 20, 2020.
  122. https://mvoting.seoul.go.kr/mvoting/voting/policyvote/selectPolicyvote.do?vote_no=49681 Mvoting Seoul.