DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Influencing the Continuance Intention of Public Data Services

공공데이터 서비스의 지속이용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구

  • 김영은 (연세대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 박지홍 (연세대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2022.01.22
  • Accepted : 2022.02.14
  • Published : 2022.02.28

Abstract

Despite the characteristics of public data with various potentials, few studies have been conducted on general users who lack an understanding of data as well as on expansion of the service uses. This study examined which digital-service-quality factors affect the intention to continue using public data services based on the expectation confirmation theory. As a result of the analysis, satisfaction partially mediated between expectation agreement and continued use intention for understandability and efficiency, which were combined as one factor, and completely mediated the relationship between perceived usefulness expectation agreement and continued use intention. It can be seen that the more the understanding and usefulness of the information provided by the service is satisfied, the higher the willingness to use it. Accordingly, it suggested adding an electronic bookmark function and the provision of online community for users to improve the overall quality of services. This study is significant in that it provided evidence on which part to focus on when designing electronic services from the point of view of general users.

다양한 잠재력을 지니고 있는 공공데이터의 특성에도 불구하고 서비스의 활용 확대를 위한 연구는 물론 데이터에 대한 이해가 부족한 일반 이용자를 대상으로 한 연구도 거의 이뤄지지 않았다. 본 연구는 기대일치이론에 기반하여 어떠한 전자서비스 품질 요인이 공공데이터 서비스의 지속이용의도에 영향을 미치는지 검증하였다. 분석 결과 만족도는 하나의 요인으로 합쳐진 이해가능성 및 효율성에 대한 기대 일치와 지속이용의도 간을 부분 매개하였으며, 지각된 유용성에 대한 기대 일치와 지속이용의도 간 관계는 완전 매개하였다. 서비스가 제공하는 정보에 대한 이해와 유용성이 충족될수록 이용 의지가 높아진다고 볼 수 있다. 이에 서비스의 질적 발전을 위해, 자신만의 정보 사전을 구축할 수 있는 전자 책갈피 기능과 서비스 이용자의 자유로운 커뮤니티 공간을 제언하였다. 더불어 일반 이용자 관점에서 전자서비스의 설계 시 어떤 부분에 집중해야 하는지 근거 자료를 제공하였다는 점에서 연구 의의를 지닌다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2021년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2019S1A5C2A03083499).

References

  1. Public Data Provision and Use Activation Act. Chapter 17344.
  2. Kim, Dan-Bi (2015). A Case Study for Effective Accessing in Open Data Portal. Master's thesis, Graduate School of University of Seoul.
  3. Kim, Min-Ho & Kim, Hyun-Kyung (2018). Review of legislative tasks for the introduction of the 'National Standard Information' system. SungKyunKwan Law Review, 30(3), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.17008/skklr.2018.30.3.001
  4. Kim, Sun-Ho, Lee, Jin-Woo, & Lee, Chang-Soo (2017). Activity capability level-based maturity evaluation model for public data quality management. Informatization Policy, 24(1), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2017.24.1.030
  5. Kim, Jong-Up (2013). Local Informatization Magazine (82). KLID.
  6. Kim, Je-Wan, Lee, Dong-Hwan, & Bae, Seoung-Hoon (2014). A study on the current legal issues of the re-useof the public sector data in Korea. Korean Laywers Association Journal, 63(4), 5-45.
  7. Kim, Hak-Rae (2020). Quality evaluation of the open standard data. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 20(9), 439-447. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.09.439
  8. Kim, Hyun-Cheol & Kim, Gwang-Yong (2015). A study on public data quality factors affecting the confidence of the public data open policy. Journal of Information Technology Services, 14(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.9716/KITS.2015.14.1.053
  9. Korea. The Presidential Committee on the 4th Industrial Revolution (2018). Strategy for Data Industry.
  10. Korea. Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2019). The 3rd('20~'22) Plan on the Provision and Use of Open Data.
  11. Korea. Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2020). Report on the Results of the E-government Service Usage.
  12. Korea. Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2021). Report on Companies Using Public Data.
  13. Bae, Seoung-Hun, Lee, Jong-Yong, Song, Seok-Hyeon, Jang, Ju-Byung, Kang, Sang-Kyu, Yoon, Jin-Seon, Lee, Dong-Hwan, & Kim, Je-Wan (2013). A study on the necessity of the law for enlargement in private open of the public sector data. Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 16(3), 67-86.
  14. Seo, Hyung-Jun & Myeong, Seung-Hwan (2014). Policy alternatives for user-oriented public data utilization: focusing on ICT managers' perception in private sector. Journal of Korean Association For Regional Information Society, 16(3), 67-86.
  15. Song, Hyo-Jin & Hwang, Sung-Soo (2014). Seeking strategies for local governments to prepare for public data act. Journal of Korean Association For Regional Information Society, 17(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.22896/KARIS.2014.17.2.001
  16. Lee, Bo-Ok (2021). A study on legal improvement measures to utilize the re-use of public sector information: focusing on legal improvement measures through the enactment of the national data framework act. SungKyunKwan Law Review, 33(2), 623-688. https://doi.org/10.17008/SKKLR.2021.33.2.019
  17. Jung, Sung-Jin & Kim, Hak-Seon (2020). A study on the intention of mobile delivery apps: applying the technology acceptance model (TAM). Culinary Science & Hospitality Research, 26(12), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.20878/CSHR.2020.26.12.003
  18. Jung, Hai-Il (2022). An Empirical Study on the Satisfaction, Management Performance, and Efficiency of Government-supported Management Consulting. Doctoral dissertation, Hanyang University Graduate School.
  19. Han, Yeong-Joo (2020). Factors influencing the intention to use the media platform with blockchain technology: focus on 'technology acceptance model(TAM)'. Media, Gender & Culture, 35(2), 139-188. https://doi.org/10.38196/mgc.2020.06.35.2.139
  20. Han, Jung-Hee (2019). Platform business and value creation: using public open data. Knowledge Management Review, 20(1), 155-174. https://doi.org/10.15813/KMR.2019.20.1.007
  21. Heo, Pil-Sun, Park, Gwang-Man, Park, Won-Joo, Cho, Gi-Sung, & Ryu, Won (2013). Domestic Market and Economic Impact of the Re-use of PSI(Public Sector Information). ETRI.
  22. Hong, Yeon-Woong (2014). A study on the invigorating strategies for open government data. Journal of the Korean Data And Information Science Society, 25(4), 769-777. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2014.25.4.769
  23. Cha, Young-Il, Choi, Sung-Kyou, & Han, Kyeong-Seok (2017). An empirical study on the influence on public data usage in private business sectors. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(6), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.6.9
  24. Belanche, D., Casalo, L. V., Flavian, C., & Schepers, J. (2014). Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services. Information & Management, 51(6), 627-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.05.016
  25. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS quarterly, 25(3), 351-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
  26. Bichard, J. A. & Knight, G. (2012). Improving public services through open data: public toilets. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer, 165(3), 157-165. https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.12.00017
  27. Campos, M. S., Fernandez-Montes, A., Gavilan, J. M., & Velasco, F. (2016). Public resource usage in health systems: a data envelopment analysis of the efficiency of health systems of autonomous communities in Spain. Public health, 138, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2016.03.003
  28. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Sandiego: Harcourt.
  29. Howard, J. A. (1974). The Structure of Buyer Behavior, Consumer Behavior; Theory and Application. Bostone: Allyn & Bacon.
  30. Hsu, M. H., Chang, C. M., & Chuang, L. W. (2015). Understanding the determinants of online repeat purchase intention and moderating role of habit: the case of online group-buying in Taiwan. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.09.002
  31. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information systems research, 2(3), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.173
  32. Ma, Z. & Zhao, J. (2012). Evidence on e-banking customer satisfaction in the China commercial bank sector, Journal of Software, 7(4), 927-933.
  33. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of marketing research, 17(4), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499
  34. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. M. (2005), E-S-QUAL: a multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality, Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156
  35. Pinem, A. A., Immanuella, I. M., Hidayanto, A. N., & Phusavat, K. (2018). Trust and its impact towards continuance of use in government-to-business online service. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 12(3), 265-285. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-02-2018-0008
  36. Santos, J. (2003). E-service quality: a model of virtual service quality dimensions, Managing Service Quality, 13(3), 233-246. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604520310476490
  37. Taylor, S. & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience. MIS quarterly, 19(4), 561-570. https://doi.org/10.2307/249633
  38. Van Riel, A. C. R., Liljander, V., & Jurriens, P. (2001). Exploring consumer evaluations of e-services: a portal site. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(4), 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230110405280
  39. Wang, R. Y. & Strong, D. M. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of management information systems, 12(4), 5-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099
  40. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. (2000). A conceptual framwork for understanding E-service quality. Massachusetts: Marketing Science Institute.