한국문헌정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science)

한국문헌정보학회 (Korean Society For Library And Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학도서관의 디지털 인문학 연구지원 가이드에 관한 연구 - 미국 대학도서관 사례를 중심으로 -

A Study on Digital Humanities Research Guides of Academic Libraries in the U.S.

  • 이지수 (숙명여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2022.01.22
  • 심사 : 2022.02.16
  • 발행 : 2022.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 미국의 연구중심 대학도서관에서 최근 증가하고 있는 디지털 인문학(Digital Humanities: DH) 연구지원 가이드 서비스를 각 기관의 웹사이트에서 제공되는 내용을 중심으로 조사하고, 현황을 분석하였다. 2018-2019년도 연구도서관협회(Association of Research Libraries: ARL) 통계를 기준으로 북미에서 가장 많은 양의 책을 보유한 연구중심 대학도서관의 순위를 근거로 DH 연구지원 가이드 서비스를 제공하고 있는 30개 기관의 서비스 내용을 분석하였다. 분석은 선행연구에서 제시된 서비스의 구성요소 8가지의 기준, (1) 도구 및 기술, (2) 펀딩, (3) 커뮤니티, (4) 교수법, (5) 프로젝트, (6) 정보원, (7) 출판 및 상담, (8) 워크숍 및 훈련 등으로 하였다. 분석 결과, DH 연구지원 가이드 서비스를 운영하는 기관 중 대다수는 'DH 정보원'을 제공하고 있고, 절반 이상의 기관에서 'DH 도구 및 기술'과 'DH 커뮤니티' 관련 정보 제공 서비스를 하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 대부분의 기관은 DH 출판 및 프로젝트의 상담을 위해 도서관 자체적, 도서관과 교내 연구소 및 센터, 또는 기타 학과와 연계하는 방식으로 DH 연구지원 가이드 서비스를 운영하며, 도서관 실무진 및 연구 전문 인력이 협력하여 컨설팅을 통한 연구지원 가이드 서비스에 초점을 맞추고 있음을 확인할 수 있다. 향후 국내 도서관의 DH 연구지원 가이드의 서비스 운영 방안과 서비스 담당자의 역량에 대한 논의가 지속되어야 할 것이다.

In this study, the current status of digital humanities(DH) research support guide service, which is increasing recently in research-oriented academic libraries in the United States, was analyzed by comparing the contents provided by each institution's Website. Based on the ranking of research-focused academic libraries with the largest volume of books in North America as of 2018-19 in Association of Research Libraries(ARL) statistics, the service contents of 30 institutions providing DH research support guide service were analyzed. The criteria for analysis are 8 components of services presented in previous studies: (1) tools and technology, (2) funding, (3) community, (4) pedagogy, (5) projects, (6) resources, (7) publications and consultations, and (8) workshops and training. As a result of the analysis, it was found that most of the institutions operating the DH research support guide service provided 'DH resources', and more than half of the institutions were providing 'DH tools and technology' and 'DH community' information. In addition, most institutions are operating the DH research support guide service in cooperation with the library itself, on-campus research institutes and centers, or other departments for DH publication and project consultation, so they focused on research support information services through consulting. In the future, discussions on the DH research support guide service operation plan of domestic academic libraries and the competency of service personnel should be continued.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Lee, Jisu & Lee, Hye-Eun (2019). A study on digital humanities education programs at American universities. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 36(4), 107-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2019.36.4.107
  2. Chung, EunKyung (2020). Research on the Development of Digital Scholarship Information Service of the National Library of Korea. National Library of Korea. Available: http://www.oak.go.kr/nl-ir/handle/2020.oak/373
  3. Adam, C. (2021). Technology and the Historian. Topics in the Digital Humanities. Champaign: University_of_Illinois_Press.
  4. Berry, D. M. & Fagerjord, A. (2017). Digital Humanities: Knowledge and Critique in a Digital Age. UK: Polity.
  5. Bryson, T., Varner, S., Pierre, A. S., & Posner, M. (2011, November). SPEC Kit 326, Digital Humanities. Association of Research Libraries. Available: http://www.arl.org/news/pr/spec326-6dec11.shtml
  6. Burdick, A., Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, P., Presner, T., & Schnapp, J. (2012). Digital Humanities. Open Access eBook: MIT Press.
  7. Case, M. M. (2008). Partners in knowledge creation: an expanded role for research libraries in the digital future. Journal of Library Administration, 48, 141-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930820802231336
  8. Corrall, S., Kennan, M. A., & Afzal, W. (2013). Bibliometrics and research data management services: emerging trends in library support for research. Library Trends, 61(3), 636-674. Available: https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2013.0005
  9. Council on Library and Information Resources (CLIR) (2012, June). Computationally Intensive Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Available: https://www.clir.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/pub151.pdf
  10. Dalbello, M. (2011). A genealogy of digital humanities. Journal of Documentation, 67(3), 480-506. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111124550
  11. Dalmau, M. & Hawkins, K. (2015). Reports of my death are greatly exaggerated: findings from the TEI in libraries survey. Journal of the Text Encoding Initiative. December 2014 - December 2015. Available: http://journals.openedition.org/jtei/1322
  12. Drucker, J. (2013, September). Introduction to digital humanities. Available: http://dh101.humanities.ucla.edu/?page_id=13
  13. Gavin, M. & Smith, K. M. (2012). An Interview with Brett Bobley. In M. K. Gold (ed.) Debates in the Digital Humanities. London: University of Minnesota Press, 61-66.
  14. Gibson, K., Ladd, M., & Presnell, J. (2015). Traversing the Gap: Subject Specialists Connecting Humanities Researchers and Digital Scholarship Centers. In Digital Humanities in the Library: Challenges and Opportunities for Subject Specialists. Arianne Hartsell-Gundy, Laura Braunstein, and Liorah Golomb (eds.). Chicago: Literatures in English Section, Association of College and Research Libraries, 3-18.
  15. Green, H. E. (2014). Facilitating communities of practice in digital humanities: librarian collaborations for research and training in text encoding. Library Quarterly, 84(2), 219-234. Available: https://doi.org/10.1086/675332.
  16. Greenhall, M. (2019). Digital scholarship and the role of the research library, RLUK Report. Research Libraries UK. Available: https://www.rluk.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/RLUK-Digital-Scholarship-report-July-2019.pdf
  17. Isuster, M. Y. & Greene, D. R. (2020). Survey of digital humanities online guides in Canadian academic research libraries. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 20(4), 733-748. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/766318 https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2020.0035
  18. Kamada, H. (2010). Digital humanities. Role for libraries? College and Research Libraries News, 71(9), 484-485. Accessible: http://crln.acrl.org/content/71/9/484.full https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.71.9.8441
  19. Lippincott, J., Hemmasi, H., & Lewis, V. M. (2014). Trends in digital scholarship centers. Educause Review, 16. Available: http://er.educause.edu/articles/2014/6/trends-in-digital-scholarship-centers
  20. Logsdon, A., Mars, A., & Tompkins, H. (2017). Claiming expertise from betwixt and between: Digital humanities librarians, emotional labor, and genre theory. College and Undergraduate Libraries, 24(2-4), 155-170. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2017.1326862
  21. Lorang, E. & Johnson, K. A. (2015). A checklist for digital humanities scholarship. digital, 83-102.
  22. Mitchem, P. & Rice, D. M. (2017). Creating digital scholarship services at Appalachian State university. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 17(4), 827-841. Available: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2017.0048.
  23. Mourer, M. (2017). A subject librarian's pedagogical path in the digital humanities. College and Undergraduate Libraries, 24(2-4), 501-515. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2017.1336506
  24. Pawlicka-Deger, U. (2020). The laboratory turn: exploring discourses, landscapes, and models of humanities labs. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 14(3).
  25. Rumsey, A. S. (2011, July). New-model scholarly communication: road map for change. Scholarly Communication Institute, 9. University of Virginia Library. Available: http://www.uvasci.org/institutes-2003-2011/SCI-9-Road-Map-for-Change.pdf
  26. Sula, C. A. (2013). Digital humanities and libraries: A conceptual model. Journal of Library Administration, 53(1), 10-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2013.756680
  27. Wilms, L. (2021). Digital humanities in European research libraries: beyond offering digital collections. LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 31(1), 1-23. Available: https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10351
  28. Vandegrift, M. & Varner, S. (2013). Evolving in common: creative mutually supportive relationships between libraries and the digital humanities. Journal of Library Administration, 53(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2013.756699
  29. Varner, S. (2016). Library Instruction for Digital Humanities Pedagogy in Undergraduate Classes. In Laying the foundation: Digital humanities in academic libraries. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press, 205-222.
  30. Varner, S. & Hwse, P. (2016). Special report: digital humanities in libraries. American libraries, January. Available: https://americanlibrariesmagazine.org/2016/01/04/special-report-digitalhumanities-libraries/