Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Opinion Analysis of Potential Residents and Residents for the Planning and Operation on the University-Affiliated Happy Housing - Focused on the case of Cheongju Kaishin Happy Housing -

대학협력형 행복주택의 계획 및 운영을 위한 잠재수요자와 거주자의 의견 분석 - 청주개신 행복주택 사례를 중심으로 -

  • Hwang, Ji-Hyoun (Dept. of Housing and Interior Design, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Lim, Haewon (Dept. of Interior Architecture and Built Environment, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2022.09.02
  • Accepted : 2022.11.23
  • Published : 2022.12.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present implications for the future plan and operation of university-affiliated Happy Housing by analyzing the opinions of potential residents and residents about the university-affiliated public rental housing. To this end, a survey (residential preference) was conducted with potential residents and the focus group interview (residential satisfaction) with residents was conducted. Descriptive statistical analysis of frequency and percentage were used for the collected opinions of potential residents, and qualitative content analysis methods were used for opinions of residents. Based on the content derived through the two research methods, the opinions of potential residents and residents were comprehensively analyzed. First, overall preference and residence satisfaction were high, such as low rent, security, residential location and convenient surrounding environment. When selecting a location for housing in the future, not only the accessibility to the campus but also the convenient surrounding environment should be considered. Second, it is necessary to improve the use of parking lots, inconvenient entrances, and movement lines. This suggests that parking lot use should be improved in the future and sufficient entrances should be installed if the main hall corridor is long. Third, among the negative factors, small-sized houses were found to be the most important factor, and this can be suggested as a method of supplying houses with a slightly larger size than the present by reflecting the opinions of preferred potential residents. Fourth, satisfaction with separate collection and food waste treatment facilities was high for community facilities, but the rest of the facilities are expected to need improvement. If the function of the space is clearly defined and it is planned as a space preferred by college students (health club, study room, etc.), the utilization will be higher than now. Fifth, in terms of operation, it is necessary to improve the system that can extend the period of residence and to discover the operation programs needed by university students.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임. (NRF-2021R1A6A3A01088440, 2022R1G1A1010844)

References

  1. Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse education today, 24(2), 105-112.
  2. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 4th ed., SAGE Publications, 129.
  3. Kim, M. H., & Kim, S. K. (2015a). Future residents' opinions about architectural features and development strategies for the university based retirement community, Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 26(6), 181-190. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2015.26.6.181
  4. Kim, M. H., & Km, S. K. (2015b). Future residents' opinions about the services and programs in the university-based retirement community -focusing on the opinion differences depending on residents' intention to live in the ubrc-, Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 26(6), 199-206. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2015.26.6.199
  5. Korea Land and Housing Corporation. (n.d.). Happy Housing, LH Homepage Retrieved May 19, 2022 from https://www.lh.or.kr/contents/cont.do, 2022.05.19.
  6. Kwon, H. S., Choi, S. H., Park, J. K., Park, S. J., & Ryu, I. S. (2018). A study on the supply plan for public rental housing in cooperation with universities, Daejun, Korea Land & Housing Corporation(LH).
  7. Lee, S. Y., & Eom, S. C. (2018). Analysis on the housing needs for young adults living alone, Korean Institute of Interior Design Journal, 27(2), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2018.27.6.077
  8. Lim, J. H., Choi, I. Y., & Park, H. K. (2019). A study on the residential environment preference and needs of the multi-academic young single family based on life style, KOREA SCIENCE & ART FORUM, 37, 249-260.
  9. LH apply. (n.d.). Sales and rental information, LH Apply Homepage Retrieved June 1, 2022 from https://apply.lh.or.kr/
  10. Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus Groups as Qualitative research, SAGE Publications, 12-25.
  11. Park, C. H., Ahn, J. G., & Bae, M. C. (2017). A study on characteristics of Happy Housing site planning in longterm public rental housing, Residential Environment Institute of Korea, 15(4), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.22313/reik.2017.15.4.123
  12. Shin, K. R., Cho, M. O., & Yang, J. H. (2004). Qualitative Research Methodology, Ewha Womans University Press, 31-35.
  13. Special Public Housing Enforcement Decree. (n.d.). Happy Housing, National Statute Information Center Homepage Retrieved July 26, 2022 from https://www.law.go.kr/