대한소아치과학회지 (Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry)

  • 제49권3호
  • /
  • Pages.329-339
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1226-8496(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-3819(eISSN)
대한소아치과학회 (Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국 인구집단에서 부정교합 환아의 구개의 크기 및 용적에 관한 연구

A Study on Various Sizes and Volumes of the Palate among the Korean Population in Mixed Dentition

  • 최지명 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 신지선 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 한미란 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이준행 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김종수 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김종빈 (단국대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Jimyung, Choi (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Jisun, Shin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Miran, Han (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Junhaeng, Lee (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Jongsoo, Kim (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Jongbin, Kim (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2022.05.06
  • 심사 : 2022.08.09
  • 발행 : 2022.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 혼합치열기의 골격성 I, II, Ⅲ급 부정교합의 구개용적, 폭경, 장경, 고경을 비교하는 것이다. 이 연구는 단국대학교 치과대학병원 소아치과에 내원하여 교정을 목적으로 인상채득한 진단모형 1400개 중 30개를 선별하여 분석하였다. 모형은 Hellman's dental age ⅢA의 골격성 I, II, Ⅲ급 부정교합으로 구성되었다. 3차원 스캐너로 모형을 스캔한 후 여러 구개 수치들을 측정하였다. SPSS에서 Kruskal-Wallis test를 이용하여 비교 분석하였고, Mann-Whitney test로 사후검정하였다. 혼합치열기의 II급 부정교합에서 I급, Ⅲ급 부정교합에 비해 구개폭경이 유의하게 작았고, 구개장경이 유의하게 길었다. 혼합치열기의 Ⅲ급 부정교합에서 구개고경이 유의하게 가장 컸으며, 그 다음으로는 II급, I급 순이었다. 구개용적은 Ⅲ급, II급, I급 순으로 컸으나, 통계적으로 유의할 만한 차이는 보이지 않았다. 각 교합 양식에 따른 구개 형태의 차이를 이해하는 것은 임상적으로 매우 중요하다. 이 번 연구를 바탕으로 구개의 형태와 골격 패턴과의 관계에 대해 이해하였고, 이는 교정 치료 계획, 부정교합 조기 진단 및 구개 형태의 통합 메커니즘을 이해하는 데에 유용한 정보를 제공한다.

The purpose of this study was to compare the palatal dimensions (volume, width, length, and height) in different malocclusions (Class I, II, and III) in mixed dentition using a three-dimensional digital scanner. The study was performed on 30 selected casts from 1400 casts that were taken at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at Dankook University. Casts consisted of Class I, II, and III malocclusion groups in Hellman's dental age IIIA. The mean age was 8 years and 6 months ± 11 months. Each cast was scanned by three-dimensional digital scanner, Medit T710 (Medit, Seoul, Korea), and shaped into the three-dimensional image and calculated palatal dimensions using the Plan T program (SMD solution, Seoul, Korea). The values were statistically compared and evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis followed by the Mann-Whitney test. According to our results, subjects with Class II malocclusion showed lower palatal width and longer palatal length compared to those with Class I and Class III. For palatal height, Class III malocclusion subjects in mixed dentition exhibited a larger number than Class II and Class I. Lastly, for palatal volume, compared to other malocclusions, Class III showed higher results; however, there were no significant differences. The form of the palate differs in types of malocclusions and understanding of these differences is important in clinical significance. Based on this study, the understanding of the relationship between the shape of the palate and the skeletal pattern provides useful information about orthodontic treatment plans, early diagnosis of malocclusion, and morphological integration mechanisms. Orthopedic treatment in the maxilla should be performed during early and intermediate mixed dentition to enhance treatment efficiency.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Uysal T, Memili B, Usumez S, Sari Z : Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion, class II division 1 and class II division 2. Angle Orthod, 75:941-947, 2005.
  2. Yang JH, Lee SH, Hahn SH, Kim CC : The palatal morphology of the children with class II div.1 malocclusion in mixed dentition: a study using three-dimensional laser scanner. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 32: 270-277, 2005.
  3. Sanin C, Savara BS, Clarkson QC, Thomas DR : Prediction of occlusion by measurements of the deciduous dentition. Am J Orthod, 57:561-572, 1970. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(70)90184-3
  4. Terry AD, Douglas AG : Oral Cavity Reconstruction, 1st ed. Taylor and Francis Group, New York, 275-280, 2006.
  5. Riquelme A, Green LJ : Palatal width, height, and length in human twins. Angle Orthod, 40:71-79, 1970.
  6. Baik BJ, Kim MR, Kim JG, Yang YM : A study on the size and volume of the palate. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 29:397-406,
  7. Lione R, Franchi L, Huanca Ghislanzoni LT, Primozic J, Buongiorno M, Cozza P : Palatal surface and volume in mouth-breathing subjects evaluated with three-dimensional analysis of digital dental casts-a controlled study. Eur J Orthod, 37:101-104, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cju018
  8. Tamari K, Shimizu K, Ichinose M, Nakata S, Takahama Y : Relationship between tongue volume and lower dental arch sizes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 100:453-458, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(91)70085-B
  9. Dellavia C, Sforza C, Orlando F, Ottolina P, Pregliasco F, Ferrario VF : Three-dimensional hard tissue palatal size and shape in Down syndrome subjects. Eur J Orthod, 29:417-422, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm026
  10. Yang YM, Baik BJ, Kim JG : A study on the volumes and forms of the palate for deciduous and permanent dentition. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 30:696-706, 2003.
  11. Staab AE : The relative form of the palate in class I and class II malocclusions. J Dent Res, 40:1242-1247, 1961. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345610400061801
  12. Paoloni V, Gastaldi G, Franchi L, De Razza FC, Cozza P : Evaluation Of The Morphometric Covariation Between Palatal And Craniofacial Skeletal Morphology In Class III Malocclusion Growing Subjects. BMC Oral Health, 20:152, 2020.
  13. Johnson R, Baghdady VS : Maximum palatal height in patients with Turner's syndrome. J Dent Res, 48:473- 476, 1969. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345690480032501
  14. Westerman GH, Johnson R, Cohen MM : Variations of palatal dimensions in patients with Down's syndrome. J Dent Res, 54:767-771, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345750540041201
  15. Heiser W, Niederwanger A, Bancher B, Bittermann G, Neunteufel N, Kulmer S : Three-dimensional dental arch and palatal form changes after extraction and nonextraction treatment. Part 2. Palatal volume and height. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126:82-90, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.05.016
  16. Abdulmawjood AA, Ahmed MK, Al-Saleem NR : Palatal Depth and Arch Parameter in Class I Open Bite, Deep Bite and Normal Occlusion. Iraqi Orthod J, 1:26- 31, 2005.
  17. Younes S, el Angbawi MF, al Dosari AM : A comparative study of palatal height in a Saudi and Egyptian population. J Oral Rehabil, 22:391-395, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00790.x
  18. Bhatia S, Leighton B : Manual of facial growth: a computer analysis of longitudinal cephalometric growth data, 1st ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 510-521, 1993.
  19. Redman RS, Shapiro BL, Gorlin RJ : Measurement of normal and reportedly malformed palatal vaults. II. Normal juvenile measurements. J Dent Res, 45:266- 269, 1966. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345660450020801
  20. Cakan DG, Ulkur F, Taner TU : The genetic basis of facial skeletal characteristics and its relation with orthodontics. Eur J Dent, 6:340-345, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1698971
  21. Al-Zubair NM, Al-Labani MA, Al-Motareb FL : Yemeni palatal morphology. Soudi J Health Sci, 4:88-91, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-0521.157866
  22. Jyoti S, Pavanalakshmi GP : Nutritive and non-nutritive sucking habits - effect on the developing oro-facial complex; a review. Dentistry, 4:203, 2014.
  23. Graber TM : Orthodontics: principles and practice, 2nd ed. Saunders, Philadelphia, 29-30, 1972.
  24. Kim CB : A study on the maxillary dental arch and palatal vault with malocclusions. Korean J Orthod, 10: 45-53, 1980.
  25. Alarashi M, Franchi L, Marinelli A, Defraia E : Morphometric analysis of the transverse dentoskeletal features of class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition. Angle Orthod, 73:21-25, 2003.
  26. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, Tollaro I : Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 111:502-509, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70287-7
  27. Kim DY, Park HW : Characteristics of the palatal morphology of the children with crossbite in mixed dentition by 3-dimensional laser scanner. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 30:132-142, 2003.
  28. Zarringhalam M : Measuring Palatal Height in Normal Occlusion and Malocclusions. J Dent Tehran Univ Med Sci, 1:39-42, 2004.
  29. Park HW : Morphological characteristics of the palate of the children with crossbite in primary dentition. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 22:165-170, 1995.
  30. Sakai M : A study on the volume of palate during deciduous dentition by moire topography. Shigaku, 69:1183-1184, 1982.
  31. Kim YJ, Hong JS, Hwang YI, Park YH : Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway in preadolescent children with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137:306.E1- 11, 2010.
  32. Oh KM, Hong JS, Kim YJ, Cevidanes LS, Park YH : Three-dimensional analysis of pharyngeal airway form in children with anteroposterior facial patterns. Angle Orthod, 81:1075-1082, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2319/010711-8.1
  33. Kim S, Ko M, Nam O, Kim M, Lee H, Kim K, Choi S : Evaluation of Upper Airway Depth with Different Anteroposterior Skeletal Patterns in Children. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 45:307-313, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2018.45.3.307
  34. Balters W : Extrait de technique du Bionator. Rev Franc Odontostomat, 11:191-212, 1964.
  35. Primozic J, Farcnik F, Perinetti G, Richmond S, Ovsenik M : The association of tongue posture with the dentoalveolar maxillary and mandibular morphology in Class III malocclusion: a controlled study. Eur J Orthod, 35:388-393, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjs015
  36. Moss ML, Salentijn L : The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth. Am J Orthod, 55:566-577, 1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(69)90034-7
  37. Kim MH, Lee JW, Cha KS, Chung DH : The three dimensional analysis on nasal airway morphology in class III malocclusion. J Dent Rehabili Appl Sci, 24: 389-403, 2008.
  38. Ohmura T : A study on the forms and the volume of the palate for deciduous dental arch period (IIA) and permanent dental arch period (IIIC) with the same person - An application of Moire topography. Nihon Univ Dent J, 65:740-751, 1991.
  39. Jacobson A : Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121:99-100, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(02)70228-X
  40. Tollaro I, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Tanasescu CD : Role of posterior transverse interarch discrepancy in Class II, Division 1 malocclusion during the mixed dentition phase. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 110:417- 422, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70045-8
  41. Marinelli A, Mariotti M, Defraia E : Transverse dimensions of dental arches in subjects with Class II malocclusion in the early mixed dentition. Prog Orthod, 12:31-37, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pio.2011.02.006
  42. Staley RN, Stuntz WR, Peterson LC : A comparison of arch widths in adults with normal occlusion and adults with class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod, 88:163-169, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90241-6
  43. Wendling LK, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L, Baccetti T : A prospective study of the short-term treatment effects of the acrylic-splint rapid maxillary expander combined with the lower Schwarz appliance. Angle Orthod, 75:7-14, 2005.
  44. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cameron CG, McNamara JA Jr : Treatment timing for rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthod, 71:343-350, 2001.
  45. Franchi L, Baccetti T : Transverse maxillary deficiency in Class II and Class III malocclusions: a cephalometric and morphometric study on postero-anterior films. Orthod Craniofac Res, 8:21-28, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2004.00312.x
  46. Dellinger EL : A preliminary study of anterior maxillary displacement. Am J Orthod, 63:509-516, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(73)90163-2
  47. de Freitas FCN, Bastos EP, Primo LS, de Freitas VL : Evaluation of the palate dimensions of patients with perennial allergic rhinitis. Int J Paediatr Dent, 11:365- 371, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7439.2001.00292.x
  48. Thilander B : Dentoalveolar development in subjects with normal occlusion. A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years. Eur J Orthod, 31:109-120, 2009.
  49. Bourdiol P, Mishellany-Dutour A, Abou-El-Karam S, Nicolas E, Woda A : Is the tongue position influenced by the palatal vault dimensions? J Oral Rehabil, 37: 100-106, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02024.x
  50. Sakai M : Changes in palatal forms following correction of anterior crossbite of deciduous dentition by moire topography. Odontology, 69:988-996, 1981.
  51. Okumura H, Chen LH, Tsutsumi S, Oka M : Three-dimensional virtual imaging of facial skeleton and dental morphologic condition for treatment planning in orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 116:126-131, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70208-8
  52. Proffit WR, Tulloch JF : Preadolescent Class II problems: treat now or wait? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 121:560-562, 2002.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2002.124684