DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

High-Throughput Screening Technique for Microbiome using MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry: A Review

  • Mojumdar, Abhik (Biochemical analysis team, center for research equipment, Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI), Ochang Center) ;
  • Yoo, Hee-Jin (Biochemical analysis team, center for research equipment, Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI), Ochang Center) ;
  • Kim, Duck-Hyun (Biochemical analysis team, center for research equipment, Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI), Ochang Center) ;
  • Cho, Kun (Biochemical analysis team, center for research equipment, Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI), Ochang Center)
  • Received : 2022.11.29
  • Accepted : 2022.12.15
  • Published : 2022.12.31

Abstract

A rapid and reliable approach to the identification of microorganisms is a critical requirement for large-scale culturomics analysis. MALDI-TOF MS is a suitable technique that can be a better alternative to conventional biochemical and gene sequencing methods as it is economical both in terms of cost and labor. In this review, the applications of MALDI-TOF MS for the comprehensive identification of microorganisms and bacterial strain typing for culturomics-based approaches for various environmental studies including bioremediation, plant sciences, agriculture and food microbiology have been widely explored. However, the restriction of this technique is attributed to insufficient coverage of the mass spectral database. To improve the applications of this technique for the identification of novel isolates, the spectral database should be updated with the peptide mass fingerprint (PMF) of type strains with not only microbes with clinical relevance but also from various environmental sources. Further, the development of enhanced sample processing methods and new algorithms for automation and de-replication of isolates will increase its application in microbial ecology studies.

Keywords

Introduction

Microorganisms are present throughout the environment and are crucial to a wide range of natural processes. They play a crucial role in the biodegradation of organic matter, detoxification of various pollutants and hence recycling of nutrients in the ecosystem through the biogeochemical cycles which are fundamental to the environment and for the survival of animals, plants and human life. Pathogenic microbes cause diseases in plants and animals, however, there are other groups of beneficial microbes that can prevent the growth of various harmful microbes. Certain microbes participate in the fermentation and production of various food products whereas the presence of certain other microbes in food causes spoilage. Moreover, the human body is home to various complex communities of bacteria that plays a significant role in various physical and biochemical activities. In conclusion, microorganisms are present throughout the environment and are significant to a wide range of natural processes. Thus, the identification and classification of microorganisms are crucial and cannot be ignored.

Conventional techniques for bacterial identification are culture-dependent morphological, physiological and biochemical assays which are labor-intensive and time-consuming.1 Although molecular techniques such as 16S rRNA, DNA-DNA hybridization, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods and fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) are popular, again, they require high expertise and are expensive and time-consuming.2 Thus, rapid and unequivocal identification of microbes in real samples is a current important area of focus.

Mass spectrometry is an analytical technique in which compounds are ionized into charged molecules and the mass-to-charge (m/z) ratio is determined. With the development of soft ionization techniques such as electrospray ionization (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI), the scope for the analysis of large biomolecules such as proteins has expanded. When compared to ESI-MS, MALDI-TOF-MS has a few advantages such as it creates singly charged ions, making data interpretation simpler and it does not require prior chromatographic separation.3 Consequently, MALDI-TOF MS has emerged as a clear choice for large-scale proteomics work due to the high throughput and speed associated with complete automation.4

For the first time in 1996, the spectral fingerprints from whole bacteria were obtained by using three strains of Pseudomonas5 and in the same year, spectral fingerprints of various Bacillus species were also acquired by using MALDI-TOF-MS.6 Since then, a lot of focus has been placed on using MALDI-TOF to identify not only bacteria but also yeast and mold.7 However, since the last decade, the technology has been utilized for routine analysis of microbes as it is rapid, reliable, cost-effective and has various other advantages over conventional techniques.8 Some of the advantages and disadvantages of various microbial detection techniques have been shown in Table 1. Further, the technology has the potential to replace current identification methods in microbiology labs because it can identify a wide variety of microorganisms.9 Thus, this review focuses on the comprehensive illustration of the use of MALDI-TOF-MS for microbial identification in various environmental fields.

Table 1. Microbial detection techniques. Adapted and modified from Singhal et al. 2015.10

E1MPSV_2022_v13n4_106_t0001.png 이미지

To comprehend the microbial population, monitor the environment, and find potential pathogenic bacteria, it is essential to identify microorganisms from environmental sources. The ability to identify each microbe by its unique protein fingerprint has made MALDI-TOF-MS a significant advancement in the field of environmental proteomics. The identification of unknown microbe is carried out either by matching the abundance of the biomarkers with the proteome database or by comparing the PMF with the PMFs present in the database. Several conserved signals under various experimental conditions that can be used as potential biomarkers were observed by Wang et al.11 Several other studies also reveal the specific conserved biomarkers which are unaffected by environmental factors can be used for bacterial identification as shown in the work by Ruelle et al.12 (Figure 1). Although several in-house databases have been created,13 however, the currently the two major databases are the MALDI BioTyper library by Bruker Daltonics, Inc. which uses Bruker Main Spectrum analysis (MSP) and the SARAMIS by bioMérieux which uses the bioMérieux SuperSpectrum approaches.14, 15 The accuracy of identification of unknown microbes using MALDI-TOF MS depends on the database. Generally, the identification accuracy up to the species level is 90%,16 however, the database should be regularly updated in order to enhance the identification of novel microbes.17 Additionally, the sample culture, preparation, storage, and the type of matrix used affect the reproducibility of MS spectra obtained with MALDI.8

E1MPSV_2022_v13n4_106_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. MALDI spectra of (A) Salmonella 2B5, (B) Acinetobacter 14B5 and (C) Escherichia coli 1B1 showing the potential genus- (•) and strain- (*) specific biomarkers. Reprinted with permission from Ruelle et al.12 (2004). Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons.

MALDI-TOF MS in microbial identification

Ecological and environmental studies

Commonly used methods for identification and classification involve 16S rRNA sequencing, gel electrophoresis techniques, rep-PCR and multilocus sequence typing (MLST).18 However, such techniques are expensive, time taking and laborious. As an alternative, MALDI-TOF MS has been utilized for exploring the biodiversity of microorganisms by identifying and characterizing novel strains in different environments. For taxonomic classification, microorganisms are separated into genera, species and strains. MALDI-TOF MS has been proven to resolve intra- and inter-species classifications and distinguish very closely related species with high reliability. Dieckmann et al.19 reported the difference in 1 bp out of 400 bp or 3-4 bp out of 1500 bp of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of Pseudoalteromonas sp. by their MALDI-TOF-MS spectra. Investigating the variety and composition of microbes requires careful observation of various habitats, diets, and surfaces. It is carried out sometimes to constantly check on the spread of harmful pathogens or occasionally to find the source of bacterial contamination. MALDI-TOF MS has proven that it can be used to continuously monitor these settings and offer insightful data on the richness and composition of bacterial species. Zeng et al.20 utilized a culturomics technique involving MALDI-TOF MS-based high-throughput colony screening technique and genome sequencing to identify one novel strain of Gemmati-monadetes out of 330 isolates from the streams in Northern Greenland. Another study reported that 8 biosurfactant-producing bacteria out of 234 isolates were characterized by MALDI-TOF MS and identified as Proteus mirabilis, Alcaligenes faecalis, and Providencia alcalifaciens.21 Environmental water isolates of Aeromonas were also isolated and identified using MALDI-TOF MS by comparing m/z signatures with known strains. It was suggested in the work that this technique is useful for environmental monitoring due to its speed and capacity to handle a large number of samples.22

Some researchers are interested in learning more about the microbiota connected to distinct metal ores since bacteria play a significant role in the biogeochemical cycle of various elements. Nosalova et al.23 conducted one such study to look at the microbiota of gold ore. Colony-forming units (CFU) within the range of 2.18×105 to 3.16×105 bacteria per 1 g of dry ore material were detected in cultivation studies. Results revealed that 89% of the 473 isolates from gold ore belonged to the genus Acinetobacter, Microbacterium, Pseudomonas, and Rhizobium. Another study conducted in the Rozalia gold mine in Hodrusa-Hamre revealed that the gold ores mainly consisted of bacteria from 18 different species including Aerococcus, Pseudomonas, Rhizobium, Acinetobacter, Microbacterium, Acidovorax, Staphylococcus and others.24

Environmental biotechnology and bioremediation

Environmental pollution is a major problem, and today eco-friendly remedial methods are a necessity. A potential strategy is a bioremediation, which uses microorganisms to decrease or remove toxic substances from the environment.25 As a high-throughput method, MALDI-TOF MS is a useful tool for bioremediation research. With the use of this approach, site-specific microorganisms found in polluted settings may be quickly identified. A study conducted by Garcia Lara et al.26, identified 25 bacterial strains using Bruker BioTyper (Bruker Daltonics) from DDT-contaminated sites. Among 25 strains, 4 were identified at the genus level whereas rest 21 strains were identified at the species level.

A category of environmental contaminants is hydrocarbons, and for successful biodegradation, it is crucial to isolate and characterize novel microorganisms with the capability to break down these pollutants. The diversity of the bacterial population in highly weathered oil-contaminated sites was studied using MALDI-TOF MS (Figure 2) and differentiation of the isolates was done by principal component analysis (PCA) and dendrogram analysis (Figure 3).27 Microorganisms belonging to Bacillus species were identified with high extracellular biosurfactant activities capable of biodegrading weather hydrocarbons. Silva et al.28 reported isolation and identification of 44 bacteria were isolated from compost and identified using the 16S rRNA gene sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS techniques. 36 bacteria were discovered using MALDI-TOF MS at the species level such as Bacillus shackletonii and Klebsiella pneumoniae or genus levels such as Gordonia, Acinetobacter, Stenotrophomonas and Pseudomonas. SilvaJimenez et al.29 also studied the bacterial diversity of seawater, surface water and marine sediments and identified 52 bacteria using Bruker BioTyper (Bruker Daltoics) that has a high potential to degrade and utilize pyrene as the sole energy source. The bacteria identified belonged to Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes.

E1MPSV_2022_v13n4_106_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. MALDI-TOF MS spectra of A) Bacillus subtilis (SA28), B) Bacillus cereus (SA17), C) Bacillus licheniformis (S33) and D) Lysinibacillus boronitolerans (SA3). Reprinted with from Alsayegh et al.27 (2021).

E1MPSV_2022_v13n4_106_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 3. (A) Classification of studied strains using PCA plot (B) PCA dendrogram of the studied strains. Reprinted from Alsayegh et al.27 (2021).

Additionally, without the necessity for culture, it is also feasible to identify the enzymes responsible for the degradation of chemical hazards. In research published in 2015, Lovecka et al.30 gathered isolates from polluted areas in the Czech Republic where they were able to break down lindane, hexachlorobenzene, and DDT (dichlorodiphenyl-trichloroethane). The amplification of the pesticide degradation genes linA and bphA1 allowed researchers to analyze the degradation processes carried out by microorganisms. MALDI-TOF MS was used to identify six out of seven isolates which were Rhodococcus sp., Aeromonas sp., Stenotrophomonas sp. and three Bacillus sp. which was also cross-checked with 16S rRNA sequencing results. Furthermore, the in-situ monitoring of the bioremediation approach may also be done using MALDI-TOF MS. Undoubtedly, this technique can be utilized for more exploration.

Agriculture and plant pathology

In order to protect crops and boost agricultural productivity, several researchers have used MALDI-TOF MS to identify plant growth-promoting bacteria and pathogenic fungi. Researchers at the Federal University of Lavras, Brazil, have identified endophytic bacteria from garlic roots as potential plant growth promoters for commercial use.31 MALDI-TOF MS was used to analyze the microbial activities of 48 microorganisms, which included nitrogen fixation, phosphate production and siderophores production. The garlic roots contained Burkholderia cepacian and Enterobacter cloacae. Whereas Muthuri et al.32 isolated a total of 43 endophytic bacteria with potential plant growth-promoting activities from bananas and analyzed them using MALDI-TOF MS. The identified isolates belong to Bacillus, Enterobacter, Ewingella, Klebsiella Pseudomonas, Rahnella, Raoultella, Serratia, Yersinia and Yokenella.

MALDI-TOF MS has been utilized to isolate and identify plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in order to reduce heavy metal stress in plants. Pramanik et al.33 reported the identification of Klebsiella pneumoniae K5 which has been reported to be highly resistant to cadmium stress with a value of 4 mg/ml. An easy MALDI-TOF MS-based novel method to identify and characterize zinc-solubilizing bacteria was also proposed by Costerousse et al.34 Further salt-tolerant PGPR have been identified using MALDI-TOF MS for their use in agriculture to reduce stress in plants and promote growth.35

The identification of plant pathogens using MALDI-TOF MS technology has been established in several research. Plant pathogens infecting rice seedlings such as Burkholderia gladioli pv. Gladioli, B glumae and Erwinia chrysanthemi pv. Zeae have been identified using MALDI-TOF MS directly from sample extracts. Despite small spectral changes, MALDI-TOF MS analysis revealed that the extracts of infected rice seedlings generated peaks considerably high scores.36 A novel strain Pseudomonas grimontii, which is potential pathogenic bacteria causing rot disease was identified using MALDI-TOF MS.37 Wang et al.38 differentiated two closely related plant pathogens which is even more difficult using the carbon source utilization process and ELISA. The two strains were identified as Acidovorax citrulli and A. oryzae using MALDI-TOF MS (Figure 4). Similarly, two closely related pathovars of Xanthomonas oryzae have also been identified in the same process.39 These citations from the literature highlight the potential and broad application of MALDI-TOF MS in the study of plant growth-promoting and growth-inhibiting bacteria.

E1MPSV_2022_v13n4_106_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 4. PMF obtains using MALDI-TOF MS for A. oryzae and Acidovorax citrulli. Reprinted from Wang et al.38 (2012).

Food microbiology and water treatment

It is crucial to rapidly detect pathogenic microorganisms in order to maintain the safety and quality of food and drink items. There are several different ways that microorganisms are connected to food. They may be included in the production of food items, they might cause food to spoil, and they might even spread through food. By recognizing and separating distinct lactic acid bacteria, fermentative bacteria and foodborne pathogenic bacteria, MALDI-TOF MS technology can contribute to the study of food microbiology. Brochothrix thermosphacta is one of the major strains responsible for seafood and meat spoilage and has been characterized using MALDI-TOF MS.40 The quality of raw milk has a significant role in influencing the quality of dairy products that are made. In order to understand the impact of protracted refrigeration on the changes in raw milk microbial ecology, Zhang et al.41 investigated the quantities and kinds of psychrotrophic in raw milk with and without refrigerated enrichment (5 days at 7℃). Pseudomonas was observed to have the highest abundance among 119 isolates from fresh raw milk belonging to 12 genera and 23 species. Whereas, after refrigeration for 5 days, 127 isolates classified as 9 genera and 20 species were identified. This technique has further been used for the characterization of bacteria present in milk, yogurt and probiotics and bacteria responsible for the spoilage of milk and pork, biogenic amine-producing bacteria, and causative agents for seafood-borne bacteria.10

MALDI-TOF MS has been applied to the bacterial examination of drinking water, wastewater, and natural waterways for environmental monitoring. In a recent study, bacterial components in tap water and mineral water were identified. A total of 10 samples of mineral water from various brands and 11 samples of tap water from various localities were acquired.42 Alphaproteobacteria were more prevalent in tap water than Gammaproteobacteria, which were often isolated from mineral water, resulting in differences in the bacterial diversity found in the two distinct forms of drinking water. Additionally, because some of the bacteria were only found during one season, the season in which the water was bottled also had an impact on the variety and abundance of bacteria. The study demonstrated that the MALDI-TOF MS is an effective approach for frequently checking the quality of water in the water business and may be used to determine the variety of bacteria in the water meant for human consumption.

Challenges and future perspectives

Although MALDI-TOF MS has been shown for its potential and applicability in routine analysis for microbial identification, however, till date it possesses certain limitations. Bacteroides fragilis group (BFG) isolated from various environmental samples including human and rat fecal matter, sewage from wastewater treatment plants, etc. were investigated by MALDI-TOF MS. The results showed variation in accuracy for hospital and untreated wastewater (20%), wastewater (40%)and human and rat fecal samples (100%). This could be due to the similarity of strains from various samples for which the MS database was optimized.43 A study was conducted to explore the accuracy of identification by MALDI-TOF MS for 21 globally distributed species of Burkholderia cepacia. However, the accuracy for detection and characterization has been reported to be affected due to the high similarity between the species. Based on various studies for clinical as well as environmental samples related to the identification of the B. cepacian complex, the accuracy is significantly low for environmental strains as compared to clinical strains.44-46

The most essential step in identifying a species is comparing the PMF of an unknown isolate to reference mass fingerprints in a database, which necessitates a database to contain mass fingerprints of different strains of each species as well as reference mass fingerprints of all species of relevance. To enhance the spectrum depiction of the bacterial species, the sample preparation guidelines and spectral profile analysis (baseline subtraction, normalization, and others) need to be standardized. Insufficient spectral data in the public database is a major challenge today. However, the establishment of a drinking water library by Pinar-Mendez et al. is the most current and top-notch illustration of an internal database which is used as the alternative solution for the insufficient database. The incorporation of in-house databases into the public open-access databases and the development of user-friendly and cheaper software for analyses will further boost the credibility of the technology in near future.

Conclusions

MALDI-TOF MS has been demonstrated to be a workhorse in proteomics and can be a powerful tool in the investigation of environmental microbiology and bioremediation. Through comparison with molecular methods, several studies have proven the effectiveness of MALDI-TOF for the identification of environmental bacteria and concluded that this is an efficient and appropriate approach for environmental bacteria. With future advancements in reference bacteria database libraries, frequent implementation in environmental investigations should be promoted owing to time savings and cost-effectiveness. The method has been used with great accuracy and precision to identify a variety of bacteria, including those that are important for the environment and biotechnology such as those that degrade pollutants, biomineralize, fermentative, food- and water-borne diseases, produce coliforms and lactic acid, and relate to and promote plant development. Additionally, it also monitors environmental routines that improved in quick identification of bacteria present in water, air, and other surfaces.

There are still unexplored potential uses for MALDI-TOF MS technology. These applications may include the proteins and enzymes detection synthesized by bacteria for a particular environmental purpose, such as the synthesis of biosurfactants, minerals, or pollutants. The approach may be used to identify the relevant proteins/genes utilizing advanced bioinformatics techniques. Ultimately, there is a discrepancy between the taxonomic identity of bacteria and their prospective environmental functions. This gap must be closed through more research and development in order to maximize the technology's potential for environmental investigations and assure quick research breakthroughs through time and money savings.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), Korean Government, (grant no. 2021-DD-RD-0012; P0020819; C230222).

References

  1. Franco-Duarte, R., Cernakova, L., Kadam, S., S. Kaushik, K., Salehi, B., Bevilacqua, A., Corbo, M.R., Antolak, H., Dybka-Stepien, K., Leszczewicz, M., Relison Tintino, S. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 130. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7050130
  2. Sauer, S., Kliem, M. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2010, 8, 74. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2243
  3. Everley, R.A.; Mott, T.M.; Wyatt, S.A.; Toney, D.M.; Croley, T.R. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2008, 19, 1621. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.07.003
  4. Ekstrom, S.; Onnerfjord, P.; Nilsson, J.; Bengtsson, M.; Laurell, T.; Marko-Varga, G. Analytical chemistry 2000, 72, 286. DOI: 10.1021/ac990731l
  5. Holland, R.; Wilkes, J.; Rafii, F.; Sutherland, J.; Persons, C.; Voorhees, K.; Lay Jr, J. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 1996, 10, 1227. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19960731)10:10<1227::AID-RCM659>3.0.CO;2-6
  6. Krishnamurthy, T.; Rajamani, U.; Ross, P. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 1996, 10, 883. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19960610)10:8<883::AID-RCM594>3.0.CO;2-V
  7. Kostrzewa, M.; Sparbier, K.; Maier, T.; Schubert, S. PROTEOMICS-Clinical Applications 2013, 7, 767. DOI: 10.1002/prca.201300042
  8. Fenselau, C.C. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2013, 24, 1161. DOI: 10.1007/s13361-013-0660-7
  9. Biswas, S.; Rolain, J.-M. Journal of microbiological methods 2013, 92, 14. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.10.014
  10. Singhal, N.; Kumar, M.; Kanaujia, P.K.; Virdi, J.S. Frontiers in microbiology 2015, 6, 791. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00791
  11. Wang, Z.; Russon, L.; Li, L.; Roser, D.C.; Long, S.R. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 1998, 12, 456. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19980430)12:8<456::AID-RCM177>3.0.CO;2-U
  12. Ruelle, V.; Moualij, B.E.; Zorzi, W.; Ledent, P.; Pauw, E.D. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry 2004, 18, 2013. DOI: 10.1002/rcm.1584
  13. Ashfaq, M.Y.; Da'na, D.A.; Al-Ghouti, M.A. Journal of Environmental Management 2022, 305, 114359. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114359
  14. Havlicek, V.; Lemr, K.; Schug, K.A. Analytical chemistry 2013, 85, 790. DOI: 10.1021/ac3031866
  15. Dingle, T.C.; Butler-Wu, S.M. Clinics in laboratory medicine 2013, 33, 589. DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2013.03.001
  16. Martiny, D.; Busson, L.; Wybo, I.; El Haj, R.A.; Dediste, A.; Vandenberg, O. Journal of clinical microbiology 2012, 50, 1313. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.05971-11
  17. De Carolis, E.; Vella, A.; Vaccaro, L.; Torelli, R.; Spanu, T.; Fiori, B.; Posteraro, B.; Sanguinetti, M. The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries 2014, 8, 1081. DOI: 10.3855/jidc.3623
  18. Sandrin, T.R.; Goldstein, J.E.; Schumaker, S. Mass spectrometry reviews 2013, 32, 188. DOI: 10.1002/mas.21359
  19. Dieckmann, R.; Graeber, I.; Kaesler, I.; Szewzyk, U.; Von Dohren, H. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 2005, 67, 539. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-004-1812-2
  20. Zeng, Y.; Wu, N.; Madsen, A.M.; Chen, X.; Gardiner, A.T.; Koblizek, M. Frontiers in microbiology 2021, 11, 606612. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.606612
  21. Powthong, P.; Suntornthiticharoen, P. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 2018, 24, 623.
  22. Donohue, M.J.; Best, J.M.; Smallwood, A.W.; Kostich, M.; Rodgers, M.; Shoemaker, J.A. Analytical chemistry 2007, 79, 1939. DOI: 10.1021/ac0611420
  23. Nosalova, L.; Malinicova, L.; Kiskova, J.; Timkova, I.; Sedlakova-Kadukova, J.; Pristas, P. Geomicrobiology Journal 2021, 38, 415. DOI: 10.1080/01490451.2021.1871685
  24. Malinicova, L.; Nosal'ova, L.; Timkova, I.; Pristas, P.; Sedlakova-Kadukova, J. Inzynieria Mineralna 2020. . DOI: 10.29227/IM-2020-01-47
  25. Vidali, M. Pure and applied chemistry 2001, 73, 1163. DOI: 10.1351/pac200173071163
  26. Garcia Lara, B.; Wrobel, K.; Corrales Escobosa, A.R.; Serrano Torres, O.; Enciso Donis, I.; Wrobel, K. Folia Microbiologica 2021, 66, 355. DOI: 10.1007/s12223-020-00848-8
  27. Alsayegh, S.Y.; Al Disi, Z.; Al-Ghouti, M.A.; Zouari, N. Biotechnology Reports 2021, 31, e00660. DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2021.e00660
  28. Silva, N.M.; de Oliveira, A.M.S.A.; Pegorin, S.; Giusti, C.E.; Ferrari, V.B.; Barbosa, D.; Martins, L.F.; Morais, C.; Setubal, J.C.; Vasconcellos, S.P. PLoS One 2019, 14, e0215396. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215396
  29. Silva-Jimenez, H.; Araujo-Palomares, C.L.; MaciasZamora, J.V.; Ramirez-Alvarez, N.; Garcia-Lara, B.; Corrales-Escobosa, A.R. Journal of the Mexican Chemical Society 2018, 62, 214. DOI: 10.29356/jmcs.v62i2.411
  30. Lovecka, P.; Pacovska, I.; Stursa, P.; Vrchotova, B.; Kochankova, L.; Demnerova, K. New biotechnology 2015, 32, 26. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2014.07.003
  31. Junior, P.S.P.C.; Cardoso, F.P.; Martins, A.D.; Buttros, V.H.T.; Pasqual, M.; Dias, D.R.; Schwan, R.F.; Doria, J. Microbiological research 2020, 241, 126585. DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2020.126585
  32. Muthuri, C.; Nyambura, N.; Njeri, V.; Tani, A.; Wangari, M. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res 2012, 6, 6414. DOI: 10.5897/AJMR12.1112
  33. Pramanik, K.; Mitra, S.; Sarkar, A.; Soren, T.; Maiti, T.K. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2017, 24, 24419. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0033-z
  34. Costerousse, B.; Schonholzer-Mauclaire, L.; Frossard, E.; Thonar, C. Applied and environmental microbiology 2018, 84, e01715. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01715-17
  35. Sarkar, A.; Pramanik, K.; Mitra, S.; Soren, T.; Maiti, T.K. Journal of plant physiology 2018, 231, 434. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2018.10.010
  36. Kajiwara, H. Journal of microbiological methods 2016, 120, 1. DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.08.014
  37. Sawada, H.; Horita, H.; Misawa, T.; Takikawa, Y. Journal of general plant pathology 2019, 85, 413. DOI: 10.1007/s10327-019-00869-3
  38. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Li, B.; Liu, B.; Wu, G.; Ibrahim, M.; Xie, G.; Li, H.; Sun, G. BMC microbiology 2012, 12, 1. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-182
  39. Ge, M.; Li, B.; Wang, L.; Tao, Z.; Mao, S.; Wang, Y.; Xie, G.; Sun, G. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 2014, 133, 730. DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.06.056
  40. Illikoud, N.; Rossero, A.; Chauvet, R.; Courcoux, P.; Pilet, M.-F.; Charrier, T.; Jaffres, E.; Zagorec, M. Food microbiology 2019, 81, 22. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2018.01.015
  41. Zhang, D.; Palmer, J.; Teh, K.H.; Flint, S. Lwt 2020, 134, 110165. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110165
  42. Sala-Comorera, L.; Caudet-Segarra, L.; Galofre, B.; Lucena, F.; Blanch, A.R.; Garcia-Aljaro, C. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2020, 334, 108850. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108850
  43. Niestepski, S.; Harnisz, M.; Korzeniewska, E.; Osinska, A. 2019. Isolation of anaerobic bacteria of the Bacteroides fragilis group from environmental samples. In E3S Web of Conferences: EDP Sciences. 00058. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201910000058
  44. Furlan, J.P.R.; Pitondo-Silva, A.; Braz, V.S.; Gallo, I.F.L.; Stehling, E.G. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2019, 35, 1. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-019-2614-0
  45. Vicenzi, F.J.; Pillonetto, M.; Souza, H.A.P.H.d.M.d.; Palmeiro, J.K.; Riedi, C.A.; Rosario-Filho, N.A.; DallaCosta, L.M. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 2016, 111, 37. DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760150314
  46. Fehlberg, L.C.C.; Andrade, L.H.S.; Assis, D.M.; Pereira, R.H.V.; Gales, A.C.; Marques, E.A. Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease 2013, 77, 126. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.06.011
  47. Pinar-Mendez, A.; Fernandez, S.; Baquero, D.; Vilaro, C.; Galofre, B.; Gonzalez, S.; Rodrigo-Torres, L.; Arahal, D.R.; Macian, M.C.; Ruvira, M.A. Water Research 2021, 203, 117543. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117543