Ocean and Polar Research

Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology (한국해양과학기술원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Current Status and Evaluation of Fisheries By-products: Major Options to Marine Bioindustrial Application

수산부산물의 발생·이용 실태 평가 및 해양바이오 산업화 방안

  • Ahn, Soeon (Jeju Marine Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology) ;
  • Lee, Won-Kyu (Jeju Marine Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology) ;
  • Jang, Duckhee (Research Project Strategy Affairs Section, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology) ;
  • Kang, Do-Hyung (Jeju Marine Research Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology)
  • 안소언 (한국해양과학기술원 제주특성연구센터) ;
  • 이원규 (한국해양과학기술원 제주특성연구센터) ;
  • 장덕희 (한국해양과학기술원 연구전략실) ;
  • 강도형 (한국해양과학기술원 제주특성연구센터)
  • Received : 2021.06.09
  • Accepted : 2021.07.26
  • Published : 2021.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since the existing mass production and consumption systems are no longer sustainable, countries are pushing for policies to make fisheries by-products as resources in an eco-friendly manner, and international standards are also being strengthened to increase the value of by-products. In Korea, economic and environmental perceptions of the by-products are rapidly changing, such as realizing carbon neutrality and enhancing circular resources by Korean Sustainable Development Goals. Raw materials derived from the by-products have been steadily imported from 2018. In particular, the number of imports of fish collagen peptides was only 16 number of times in 2017, but was rapidly increased to 483 number of times in 2020. Simultaneously, the demand for raw materials and nutrients for health functional food derived from fish by-products, which did not exist statistically until 2017, started to arise from 2018, and in 2019, consumption of high-value-added raw materials for fish by-products increased by 45% compared to the previous year. However, limitations are in legal and biotechnical industry aspects while its value as a biomaterial is recognized in the by-products-related industry. In this study, therefore, the status of by-products for upcycling biomaterials was reported and provided a scientific basis for supporting governmental strategies. In order to fulfill with the principles of a sustainable circular economy, the factors on hinder the marine bio-industrialization of the by-products were derived and suggested directions and plans for development into a high-value added the by-products as the marine bio-industry by substituting imported raw materials to support the development.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 해양수산부와 국립해양생물자원관의 '해양수산부산물의 바이오 소재화 방안 연구 용역(PG2020)'과 KIOST 기본과제(PE99922)의 연구비로 수행되었고, 이에 대한 지원에 감사를 표합니다. 또한 KIOST 제주연구소와 관련 분야 연구자들의 노력과 도움에 깊이 감사드립니다.

References

  1. Asian Economy (2018) Young fish in the coastal waters disappearing as raw feed from farms. https://www.asiae.co.kr/article/2018101114531236174 Accessed 10 Mar 2021
  2. aT (2019) Agricultural and marine products wholesale market survey. Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation, 11-1543000-001762-10, 250 p
  3. aT (2020) Food industry raw material consumption survey. Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation. https://www.atfis.or.kr/ Accessed 10 Mar 2021
  4. aT (2021) Agri-food export information Monthly seafood import and export data. Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation. https://www. kati.net/index.do Accessed 10 Mar 2021
  5. Blanco M, Sotelo CG, Perez-Martin RIP (2019) New stragy to cope with common fishery policy landing obiligation: collagen Extraction from skins and bones of Undersized Hake (Merluccius merluccius). Polymers 11:1485-1501 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11091485
  6. Bruno SF, Kudre TG, Bhaskar N (2019) Impact of pretreatment-assisted enzymatic extraction on recovery, physicochemical and rheological properties of oil from Labeo rohita head. J Food Process Eng 2:1-11 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.1978.tb00193.x
  7. Caruso G, Floris R, Serangeli C, Paola LD (2020) Fishery wastes as a yet undiscovered treasure from the Sea: biomolecules sources, extraction methods and valorization. Mar Drugs 18:622. doi:10.3390/md18120622
  8. Circular Resources Information Center (2021) https://www.re.or.kr/main.do Accessed 12 Apr 2021
  9. FAO (1995) Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. http://www.fao.org/fishery/code/en Accessed 11 May 2021
  10. FAO (2011) International guidelines on bycatch management and reduction of discards. FAO, Rome, 73 p
  11. FAO (2020) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action. FAO, Rome, 206 p
  12. GIA (2013) Marine biotechnology a global strategic business report. Global Indu stry Analysts, New York, 22 p
  13. Gyeongsangnam-do (2019) Reinforcement of eco-friendliness by turning aquaculture by-products into resources in Gyeongsangnam-do. https://www.gyeongnam.go.kr/seed/index.gyeong Accessed 3 May 2021
  14. Han KW (2019) Current status of Korea's marine bio industry and plan. Chungcheongnam-do Marine Bio Industry Fostering Forum, Asan, 24 Jun 2019
  15. Han KW, Jwa MR (2018) Policy directions of national research & development program for the promotion of marine biotechnology industry. Korea Maritime Institute, 2018-13, 115 p
  16. Inarra B, Larsen E, Vidarsson JR (2019) D6.5 DiscardLess: validation of final solution(s) for best use of unavoidable unwanted catches. EU, http://discardless.eu Accessed 11 May 2021
  17. Jang D, Doh S (2018) Trends in the Korean government support for marine biotechnology R&D investment and its implication. Ocean Polar Res 39(3):177-190
  18. Jang D, Kang Y, Oh C, Doh S (2017) Analysis of biotechnology companies' needs related to supporting their entry into the marine biotechnology industry. Ocean Polar Res 39(3):233-244 https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2017.39.3.233
  19. Jung WJ, Jo GH, Kuk JH, Kim YJ, Oh KT, Park RD (2007) Production of chitin from red crab shell waste by successive fermentation with Lactobacillus paracasei KCTC-3074 and serratia marcescens FS-3. Carbohydr Polym 68(4): 746-750 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.08.011
  20. Kang JH, Kim WS (2019) Study on industrialization strategy for efficient reuse of seaweed by-products. J fish Bus Adm 50(4):1-9 https://doi.org/10.12939/FBA.2019.50.4.001
  21. Kang NL, Lee WW, Ko JY, Kim HS, Kim JS, Ahn YS, Ko CI, Jeong JB, Jeon YJ (2014) Development of bioactive substances from fishery processing by-products in Jeju. J Mar Biosci Biotechnol 6(2):62-67 https://doi.org/10.15433/KSMB.2014.6.2.062
  22. K-eco (2020) Information on companies that produce general industrial waste at the Allbaro System. Korea Environment Corporation. http://www.data.go.kr Accessed 16 Apr 2021
  23. Keledjian A, Brogan G, Lowell B, Warrenchuk J, Enticknap B, Shester G, Hirshfield M, Cano-Stocco D (2014) Wasted catch: unsolved problems in U.S. fisheries. Oceana, Washington DC, 44p
  24. KFRI (2015) Report on value-added processed commercialization of red snow crab (aka: red crab). Korea Food Research Institute, Wanju, 264 p
  25. Kim BS, Park KS, Joo OS, Suh MG, Hur JW (2001) Preparation and physicochemical properties of Chitosan from red crab waste-shell. Kor J Env Hith Soc 27(1):36-43
  26. Kim DR (2020) A comparative study on the legislative policy of fishery by-products in Korea and Japan. Korea Pub Land Law Rev 90(1):251-271
  27. Kim DY, Lee JS (2015) Directions for eco-friendly utilization and industriali zation of fishery by-products. J Fish Mar Sci Edu 27(2):566-575 https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2015.27.2.566
  28. Kim KS, Lee YJ, Kim YS (2018) A study on resources circulation for marine debris of aquaculture farm. Korea Maritime Institute, 2018-04, 224 p
  29. Kim SK, Mendis E (2006) Bioactive compounds from marine processing byproducts - A review. Food Res Int 39:383-393 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2005.10.010
  30. Kim SM, Lee JH, Jo JA, Lee SC, Lee SK (2005) Development of a bioactive cellulose membrane from sea squirt skin for bone regeneration - a preliminary research. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 31:440-453
  31. KIOST (2019) Planning for cyclic utilization of aquacultural dead flounder. Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, BSPE99787-12142-7, 131 p
  32. KIOST (2020) Strategies for converting marine by-products into biomaterials. Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology, BSPG52020-12418-3, 424 p
  33. Lee SM, Lee YR, Cho KS, Cho YM, Lee HA, Hwang DY, Jung YJ, Son HJ (2015) Stalked sea squirt (Styela clava) tunic waste as a valuable bioresources: cosmetic and antioxidant activities. Process Biochem 50(11):1977-1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2015.07.018
  34. MABIK (2018) Analysis on the domestic & foreign marine biology trend and provision of the information. National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korea, 2018M01400, 17 p
  35. Marinetechno (2019) Report on commercialization of bio food using marine collagen. Korea Institute of Marine Science Technology Promotion, R&D 2017-0113, 77 p
  36. ME (2008) Industrial waste inquiry and answer casebook. Ministry of Environment. http://www.me.go.kr/ Accessed 21 Apr 2021
  37. MFDS (2021) Imported food information maru. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. https://impfood.mfds.go.kr/CFCCC01F01 Accessed 10 Mar 2021
  38. MIFAFF (2012) A study on the establishment of the domestic implementation system for international fisheries standards. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 11-1541000-001461-01, 171 p
  39. MOF (2019) First plan for the management of marine, fisheries, life and resources (2019-2023). Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries. https://www.mof.go.kr Accessed 03 May 2021
  40. MOF (2021) First plan for the promotion of the fisheries food industry (2021-2025). Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries. https://www.mof.go.kr Accessed 3 May 2021
  41. Morris JP, Backeljau T, Chapelle G (2019) Shells from aquaculture: a valuable biomaterial, not a nuisance waste product. Rev Aquac 11:42-57 https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12225
  42. Mozuraityte R, Perote A, Kumari A, Kaushik N, Thakur M (2020) Regulations on the use of rest raw materials from seafood processing in EU and India: revalue project deliverable 4.2. SINTEF ocean. https://www.sintef.no/en/publications/publication/1811594/ Accessed 3 May 2021
  43. Musthofa AA, Bahtiar MZA, Saputra E, Sahidu AM, Abdillah AA (2020) Addition of by product from industrial seaweed waste as sand mixed material on manufacture of cellular lightweight concrete. Poll Res 39(2):283-286
  44. Naik A, Hayes M (2019) Bioprocessing of mussel by-products for value added ingredients. Trends Food Sci Tech 92:111-121 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.08.013
  45. Nam G, Lee N, Ahn JW (2018) Sustainable management of oyster shell by-products and recent research techniques. J Energ Eng-ASCE 27(1):1-11
  46. Nguyen TT, Neri TA, Choi BD (2020) Characterization of hyaluronic acid extracted from Liparis tessellatus eggs grafted with phenolic acids and nisin. Int J Biol Marcromol 157:45-50 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.137
  47. Park YG, Kang SG, Jeong ST, Kim DH, Kim SJ, Park JI, Kim CH, Im JH, Kim JM (2007) Development of valueadded products using seaweeds. J Mar Biosci Biotechnol 2(3):133-141
  48. Penven A, Galvez RP, Berge JP (2013) By-products from fish processing: focus on french industry. Utilization of fish waste. CRC Press, Boca Ration, 26 p
  49. Roda MAP, Gilman E, Huntington T, Kennelly SJ, Suuronen P, Chaloupka M, Medley P (2019) A third assessment of global marine fisheries discards. FAO, Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 633, 78 p
  50. Shin WS, Yoon YK (2018) Research on the promotion of recycling of seafood by-products in Chungcheongnam-do. ChungNam Institute, 29 p
  51. Smith VJ, Desbois AP, Dyrynda EA (2010) Conventional and unconventional antimicrobials from fish, marine invertebrates and micro-algae. Mar Drugs 8:1213-1262 https://doi.org/10.3390/md8041213
  52. SNU (2016) Production and industrialization of well-being source meat through development of environment-friendly functional feed additive. Seoul National University, Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 11-1543000-001234-01, 171 p
  53. Statistic Korea (2019) Mining & manufacturing survey. http://kostat.go.kr/ Accessed 21 Apr 2021
  54. Stevens JR, Newton RW, Tlu sty M, Little DC (2018) The rise of aquaculture by-products: increasing food production, value, and sustainability through strategic utilisation. Mar Policy 90:115-124 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.12.027
  55. UN (2015) Sustainable development goals: 17 goals to transform our world. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ Accessed 17 Feb 2021
  56. Wando-gun (2020) Military government major business plan report. http://www.wando.go.kr/administration Accessed 16 Mar 2021
  57. Wu TH, Nigg JD, Stine JJ, Bechtel PJ (2011) Nutritional and chemical composition of by-product fractions produced from wet reduction of individual red salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) heads and viscera. J Aquat Food Prod Technol 20: 183-195 https://doi.org/10.1080/10498850.2011.557524
  58. Yoo G, Pan CH, Ahn SJ (2019) A strategy for establishment of marine biotechnology digital innovation ecosystem. Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning, Seoul, 29 p
  59. Yoo JB, Kim KM (2020) Problems related to the generation and treatment of fishery by-products and directions for improvement. National Assembly Research Service, No. 118, 20 p
  60. Younes I, Hajji S, Frachet V, Rinaudo M, Jellouli K, Nasri M (2014) Chitin extraction from shrimp shell using enzymatic treatment. antitumor, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of chitosan. Int J Biol Macromol 69:489-498 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.06.013
  61. Zeller D, Cashion T, Palomares M, Pauly D (2017) Global marine fisheries discards: a synthesis of reconstructed data. Fish Fish 19:30-39 https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12233