DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Diagnostic Reference Level in Interventional Procedures

인터벤션시술 진단참고수준 평가

  • Received : 2021.08.12
  • Accepted : 2021.10.04
  • Published : 2021.10.31

Abstract

Recently, the number of interventional procedures has increased dramatically as an alternative of invasive surgical procedure and patient radiation exposure is also increasing accordingly. In this study, we evaluated the patient dose of major interventional procedures nationwide and we established our Korean database. With these results, we tried to suggest the reference dose level for major interventional procedures. We evaluated patent dose data in the field of interventional radiology from foreign countries. Measurement of radiation dose exposure for 11 major interventional procedures was conducted using embedded DAP meters in 10,006 patients from 47 hospitals, and reference level of each interventional procedure was suggested. The DRLs of each intervenional procedure are as follows: TACE 206(Gy·cm2), AVF 12(Gy·cm2), LE intervention 43(Gy·cm2), TFCA 122(Gy·cm2), Cerebral aneurysm coil embolization 214(Gy·cm2), PTBD 22(Gy·cm2), Biliary stent 60(Gy·cm2), PCN 7(Gy·cm2), Hickman catheter 2.1(Gy·cm2), Chemoport 1.4(Gy·cm2), BAE 104(Gy·cm2). Compared with the previously established DRL in 2012, the radiation dose decreased in all 10 interventional procedures. In the future, continuous publicity and education on the radiation dose reduction will be needed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the shingu college, Industry academy cooperration foundation.

References

  1. Balter S, Schueler BA, Miller DL. Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: The RAD-IR study. Part III: Dosimetric performance of the interventional fluoroscopy units. JVIR. 2014;15(9): 919-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000130864.68139.08
  2. Lee W. Current status of medical radiation exposure and regulation efforts. J Korean Med Assoc. 2011; 54:1248-52. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2011.54.12.1248
  3. Miller DL, Balter S, Schueler BA. Clinical radiation management for fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. Radiology. 2010;257(2):321-32. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10091269
  4. Robert N, Watt KN, Rochette S. Clinical apparatus for the reduction of dose area product for patients undergoing x-ray catheterization. Med Phys. 2015; 42(1):521-30. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4903898
  5. Rosch J, Keller FS, Kaufman JA. The birth, early years and future of interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiodol. 2003;14:841-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000083840.97061.5b
  6. Han MC, Chung KB, Ha SH. Active radiological science. Journal of the Korean Radiological Society. 1978;14:398-405. https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.1978.14.2.398
  7. Bakal CW. Advances in imaging technology and the growth of vascular and interventional radiology: A brief history. J Vasc Interv Radiodol. 2003;14: 855-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000082831.75926.22
  8. Miller DL, Kwon D, Bonavia GH. Reference levels for patient radiation doses in interventional radiology: Proposed initial values for U.S. practice. Radiology. 2009;253(3):753-64. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2533090354
  9. Sharp C, Faulkner K, Nakamura H. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. ICRP Pub. 2000;30(2):7-22.
  10. Park HS, Lim CH, Kang BS, et al. A Study on the Evaluation of Patient Dose in Interventional Radiology. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2012;35(4):299-308.
  11. Kang BS, Yoon YS. Evaluation of Patient Radiation Doses Using DAP Meter in Interventional Radiology Procedures. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2017;40(1):27-34. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2017.40.1.05
  12. Chung JW, Jae HJ, Kang BS, et al. Evaluation of Patient Doses in Interventional Radiology. KFDA Research Report; 2007.
  13. NRPB. Dose to patients from medical x-ray examinations in the UK-2000 Review. Chilton, UK: National Radiological Protection Board; NRPB-W14; 2002.
  14. Vano E. Patient dose reference levels for interventional radiology: A national approach. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32(1):19-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-008-9439-9
  15. Miller DL, Vano E, Balter S, et al. Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: A joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiodol. 2010;21:607-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2010.01.007
  16. Etard C. Patient dose in interventional radiology: A multicenter study of the most frequent procedures in France. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(10):4281-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4780-5