Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on the Improvement of Core Competencies in the Operation of Competency-Based Liberal Arts Curriculum - Focusing on the Case of A University

역량기반 교양교육과정 운영에 따른 핵심역량 향상 분석 - A대학 사례를 중심으로

  • Lee, Hye-Ju (University Innovation Support Project, Silla University)
  • 이혜주 (신라대학교 대학혁신지원사업단)
  • Received : 2021.08.30
  • Accepted : 2021.10.20
  • Published : 2021.10.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is to analyze the performance of the reformed liberal arts curriculum based on the core competencies of A University and use it as basic data for evaluation and feedback. To this end, students who took courses opened in the second semester of 2020 were surveyed using the liberal arts curriculum competency diagnosis tool developed by A University. Depending on the purpose of the study, descriptive statistics and t-test were performed to analyze the results. As a result of the study, communication (t=-9.839, p<.01), learning (t=-4.707, p<.01), thinking (t=-9.992, p<.01), cooperation (t=-2.061, p<.01) was significantly improved, and sharing (t=-.550) was improved, but it was not significant. These results are meaningful in providing the basis for examining and judging the operation of subjects by competency.

본 연구는 A대학 핵심역량을 기반으로 개편한 교양교육과정을 역량 향상도로 분석하여 평가 및 환류의 기초자료로 활용하기 위함이다. 2020년도 2학기에 개설된 교과목을 수강한 학생을 대상으로 A대학에서 개발한 교양교육과정 역량 진단도구를 사용하여 역량별 대표 교과목을 수강한 학생에게 2회에 걸쳐 설문조사를 하였으며, 분석은 기술통계, t-검정을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 소통역량(t=-9.839, p<.01), 학습역량(t=-4.707, p<.01), 사고역량(t=-9.992, p<.01), 협력역량(t=-2.061, p<.01)은 유의미하게 향상된 것으로 나타났으며, 나눔역량(t=-.550)은 향상되었으나, 유의미하지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 역량별 교과목 운영을 점검하고 판단할 수 있는 근거를 마련하는데 의의가 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by Silla University Research Grant in 2020.

References

  1. S. S. Paek. (2020). A Study on the Problem and Improvement of Core Competency-Based Liberal Arts Education. Korean Journal of General Education, 14(3), 11-23. DOI : 10.46392/JDC.2020.14.3.11
  2. S. N. Son & I. Y. Kim & H. S. Song & J. S. Lee & Y. J. Choi. (2021). Competency-Based Education and Core Competencies in Higher Education. Korean Journal of General Education, 15(1), 11-30. DOI : 10.46392/JDC.2021.15.1.11
  3. Y. K. Chung & Y. J. Jeong & K. S. Chung. (2019). Development and Validation of a Liberal Arts Competence Scale of I University for Balanced Liberal Arts Education. Korean Journal of General Education, 13(2), 397-417. DOI : 10.46392/JDC.2019.13.2.397
  4. Ministry of Education, Korea Educational Development Institute. Center for Colleges Evaluation and Consulting. https://uce.kedi.re.kr/boardList.do
  5. M. H. Yeom. (2015). Devising a Model of Developing Education Program for the First Year Students of University. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 33(4), 359-388. DOI : 10.22553/JDC.2015.33.4.359
  6. K. M. Chung & H. J. Yang & S. Y. Kim & E. J. Kim & H. K. Hong & B. H. Han. (2017). Competences, Satisfaction, and the Grade Point Average of the First-year College Students Influenced by Changes Made in the General Education System. Korean Journal of Educational Administration, 11(2), 585-614. DOI : 10.46392/JDC.2017.11.2.585
  7. S. Y. Lee & Y. H. Lee & H. B. Lee & K. E. Kim & N. R. Kim & S. Y. Byoun & J. Y. Shin & S. W. Oh & J. I. Lee. & T. H. Lee & J. M. Jung. (2020). Performance management in higher education for student success. Seoul : Hakjusa Publishing. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=M15683189
  8. H. J. Park. (2018). A general education program planning model for university students based on the core competencies - The case of K university. Korean Journal of General Education 12(2), 65-87. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105294462
  9. E. J. Im. (2007). Characteristics of the Decision-Making Process for the University Curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(3), 81-107. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A35501955 https://doi.org/10.15708/KSCS.25.3.200709.004004
  10. H. G. Yoon & Y. H. Kim. (2019). A Case Study on the Education Curriculum by Changing Educational Environment : Focusing on the Operation Cases of Education in D University. Journal of Liberal Arts Education Studies, 4(1), 63-98. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106437746
  11. E. J. Kim. (2019). Analysis of Core Competency Change and Class Satisfaction by Undergraduate Curriculum Based on Core Competency. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 9(4), 69-78. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106172700
  12. S. S. Paek. (2017). Search for Direction of Liberal Arts Education in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Korean Journal of General Education, 11(2), 13-51. DOI : 10.46392/JDC.2017.11.2.13
  13. K. H. So. (2018). Understanding curriculum. Paju : Kyoyookbook Publishing. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=M14482198
  14. J. P. Woo. (2012). Structural Equation Model Concept and Understanding. Seoul : Hannarae Publishing. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=M12642031
  15. J. H. Kang & B. K. Lee & S. A. Kwon. (2019). A Exploratory of Design Strategies for Competency-Based Curriculum of the Educational Objective- Curriculum-Assessment Consortion in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 527-549. http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106288773 https://doi.org/10.17232/kset.35.2.527
  16. S. H. Bae & J. H. Park & S. I. Han & S. J. Hwang & G. R. Lee. (2017). The Model for Effective Implementation of General Education in College. Korean Journal of General Education, 11(1), 407-442. https://www.earticle.net/Article/A299940