The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Wear evaluation of CAD-CAM dental ceramic materials by chewing simulation

  • Turker, Izim (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Bahcesehir University) ;
  • Kursoglu, Pinar (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University)
  • Received : 2021.05.23
  • Accepted : 2021.09.24
  • Published : 2021.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. To evaluate the wear of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) dental ceramic materials opposed by enamel as a function of increased chewing forces. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The enamel cusps of healthy human third molar teeth (n = 40) opposed by materials from CAD-CAM dental ceramic groups (n = 10), including Vita Enamic® (ENA), a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN); GC Cerasmart® (CERA), a resin nanoceramic; Celtra® Duo (DUO), a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) ceramic; and IPS e.max ZirCAD (ZIR), a polycrystalline zirconia, were exposed to chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles; 120 N load; 1 Hz frequency; 0.7 mm lateral and 2 mm vertical motion). The wear of both enamel cusps and materials was quantified using a 3D laser scanner, and the wear mechanisms were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results were analysed using Welch ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test (α = .05). RESULTS. ZIR showed lower volume loss (0.02 ± 0.01 mm3) than ENA, CERA and DUO (P = .001, P = .018 and P = .005, respectively). The wear of cusp/DUO [0.59 mm3 (0.50-1.63 mm3)] was higher than cusp/CERA [0.17 mm3 (0.04-0.41 mm3)] (P = .007). ZIR showed completely different wear mechanism in SEM. CONCLUSION. Composite structured materials such as PICN and ZLS ceramic exhibit more abrasive effect on opposing enamel due to their loss against wear, compared to uniform structured zirconia. The resin nano-ceramic causes the lowest enamel wear thanks to its flexible nano-ceramic microstructure. While zirconia appears to be an enamel-friendly material in wear volume loss, it can cause microstructural defects of enamel.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgements are due to the Istanbul Aydin University R&D laboratory for the access to chewing simulator test device facilities.

References

  1. Datla SR, Alla RK, Alluri VR, PJB, Konakanchi A. Dental ceramics: part II - recent advances in dental ceramics. Am J Mater Eng Technol 2015;3:19-26.
  2. van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
  3. Grau A, Stawarczyk B, Roos M, Theelke B, Hampe R. Reliability of wear measurements of CAD-CAM restorative materials after artificial aging in a mastication simulator. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018;86:185-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.06.030
  4. Rekow D, Thompson VP. Near-surface damage-a persistent problem in crowns obtained by computer-aided design and manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2005;219:233-43. https://doi.org/10.1243/095441105X9363
  5. Quinn GD. On edge chipping testing and some personal perspectives on the state of the art of mechanical testing. Dent Mater 2015;31:26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.378
  6. American Dental Association. Code on dental procedures and nomenclature (CDT). American Dental Association. Published 2017. https://www.ada.org/en/publications/cdt
  7. Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater 2014;30:564-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.019
  8. Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 2016;32:908-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.013
  9. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007;35:819-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008
  10. Vardhaman S, Borba M, Kaizer MR, Kim D, Zhang Y. Wear behavior and microstructural characterization of translucent multilayer zirconia. Dent Mater 2020;36:1407-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.015
  11. Holand W, Schweiger M, Watzke R, Peschke A, Kappert H. Ceramics as biomaterials for dental restoration. Expert Rev Med Devices 2008;5:729-45. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.5.6.729
  12. Zhou ZR, Zheng J. Tribology of dental materials: a review. J Phys D Appl Phys 2008;41:113001 https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/41/11/113001
  13. Xu Z, Yu P, Arola DD, Min J, Gao S. A comparative study on the wear behavior of a polymer infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) material and tooth enamel. Dent Mater 2017;33:1351-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.08.190
  14. Zheng J, Zeng Y, Wen J, Zheng L, Zhou Z. Impact wear behavior of human tooth enamel under simulated chewing conditions. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;62:119-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.04.039
  15. Zhang Z, Yi Y, Wang X, Guo J, Li D, He L, Zhang S. A comparative study of progressive wear of four dental monolithic, veneered glass-ceramics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2017;74:111-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.05.035
  16. Shenoy A, Shenoy N. Dental ceramics: an update. J Conserv Dent 2010;13:195-203. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.73379
  17. Barbour ME, Rees GD. The role of erosion, abrasion and attrition in tooth wear. J Clin Dent 2006;17:88-93.
  18. Oh WS, Delong R, Anusavice KJ. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:451-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.123851
  19. Nishigawa K, Bando E, Nakano M. Quantitative study of bite force during sleep associated bruxism. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:485-91. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00692.x
  20. Fathy SM, Swain MV. In-vitro wear of natural tooth surface opposed with zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic after accelerated ageing. Dent Mater 2018;34:551-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.12.010
  21. Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Dieng FY, Clark AE, Neal D, Anusavice KJ. Surface degradation of dental ceramics as a function of environmental pH. J Dent Res 2013;92:467-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513484332
  22. Lobbezoo F, van der Zaag J, Visscher CM, Naeije M. Oral kinesiology. A new postgraduate programme in the Netherlands. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:192-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01244.x
  23. Lobbezoo F, Van Der Zaag J, Naeije M. Bruxism: its multiple causes and its effects on dental implants - an updated review. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:293-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01609.x
  24. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V. Wear of ceramic and antagonist-a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro. Dent Mater. 2008;24:433-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.016
  25. Koc D, Dogan A, Bek B. Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: a literature review. Eur J Dent 2010;4:223-32. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697833
  26. Cosme DC, Baldisserotto SM, Canabarro Sde A, Shinkai RS. Bruxism and voluntary maximal bite force in young dentate adults. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:328-32.
  27. Kim MJ, Oh SH, Kim JH, Ju SW, Seo DG, Jun SH, Ahn JS, Ryu JJ. Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains. J Dent 2012;40:979-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.004
  28. Choi JW, Bae IH, Noh TH, Ju SW, Lee TK, Ahn JS, Jeong TS, Huh JB. Wear of primary teeth caused by opposed all-ceramic or stainless steel crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:43-52. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.43
  29. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps. J Dent Res 1992;71:1525-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710081201
  30. ISO/TS 11405. Dentistry-Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 2015. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/62898.html
  31. Rosentritt M, Steiger D, Behr M, Handel G, Kolbeck C. Influence of substructure design and spacer settings on the in vitro performance of molar zirconia crowns. J Dent 2009;37:978-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.08.003
  32. Henriques B, Goncalves S, Soares D, Silva FS. Shear bond strength comparison between conventional porcelain fused to metal and new functionally graded dental restorations after thermal-mechanical cycling. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012;13:194-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.06.002
  33. Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Lundeen HC, Brehnan K, Walsh EK, Holbrook WB. Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:443-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90455-8
  34. Santos F, Branco A, Polido M, Serro AP, Figueiredo-Pina CG. Comparative study of the wear of the pair human teeth/Vita Enamic ® vs commonly used dental ceramics through chewing simulation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018;88:251-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.029
  35. Heintze SD. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater 2006;22:712-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.002
  36. Kaizer MR, Bano S, Borba M, Garg V, Dos Santos MBF, Zhang Y. Wear Behavior of Graded Glass/Zirconia Crowns and Their Antagonists. J Dent Res 2019;98:437-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518820918
  37. Zhang F, Spies BC, Vleugels J, Reveron H, Wesemann C, Muller WD, van Meerbeek B, Chevalier J. High-translucent yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics are wear-resistant and antagonist-friendly. Dent Mater 2019;35:1776-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.10.009
  38. Borrero-Lopez O, Guiberteau F, Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Wear of ceramic-based dental materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019;92:144-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.01.009
  39. Mitov G, Heintze SD, Walz S, Woll K, Muecklich F, Pospiech P. Wear behavior of dental Y-TZP ceramic against natural enamel after different finishing procedures. Dent Mater 2012;28:909-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.010
  40. Zandparsa R, El Huni RM, Hirayama H, Johnson MI. Effect of different dental ceramic systems on the wear of human enamel: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:230-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.005
  41. Nakashima J, Taira Y, Sawase T. In vitro wear of four ceramic materials and human enamel on enamel antagonist. Eur J Oral Sci 2016;124:295-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12272
  42. Jung YS, Lee JW, Choi YJ, Ahn JS, Shin SW, Huh JB. A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:111-5. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2010.2.3.111
  43. Albashaireh ZS, Ghazal M, Kern M. Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:105-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60102-3
  44. Lohbauer U, Reich S. Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:1165-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1872-6
  45. Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Kim MJ, Hsu SM, Abdulhameed N, Jenkins R, Neal D, Ren F, Clark AE. Randomized clinical study of wear of enamel antagonists against polished monolithic zirconia crowns. J Dent 2018;68:19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.005
  46. Field J, Waterhouse P, German M. Quantifying and qualifying surface changes on dental hard tissues in vitro. J Dent 2010;38:182-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.01.002
  47. Leinfelder KF. Indirect posterior composite resins. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005;26:495-503; quiz 504, 527.
  48. Furtado de Mendonca A, Shahmoradi M, Gouvea CVD, De Souza GM, Ellakwa A. Microstructural and mechanical characterization of CAD/CAM materials for monolithic dental restorations. J Prosthodont 2019;28:e587-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12964
  49. Lambert H, Durand JC, Jacquot B, Fages M. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:486-95. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.6.486
  50. Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1141-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.006