Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.5.281

Wear evaluation of CAD-CAM dental ceramic materials by chewing simulation  

Turker, Izim (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, Bahcesehir University)
Kursoglu, Pinar (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics / v.13, no.5, 2021 , pp. 281-291 More about this Journal
Abstract
PURPOSE. To evaluate the wear of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) dental ceramic materials opposed by enamel as a function of increased chewing forces. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The enamel cusps of healthy human third molar teeth (n = 40) opposed by materials from CAD-CAM dental ceramic groups (n = 10), including Vita Enamic® (ENA), a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN); GC Cerasmart® (CERA), a resin nanoceramic; Celtra® Duo (DUO), a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) ceramic; and IPS e.max ZirCAD (ZIR), a polycrystalline zirconia, were exposed to chewing simulation (1,200,000 cycles; 120 N load; 1 Hz frequency; 0.7 mm lateral and 2 mm vertical motion). The wear of both enamel cusps and materials was quantified using a 3D laser scanner, and the wear mechanisms were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results were analysed using Welch ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test (α = .05). RESULTS. ZIR showed lower volume loss (0.02 ± 0.01 mm3) than ENA, CERA and DUO (P = .001, P = .018 and P = .005, respectively). The wear of cusp/DUO [0.59 mm3 (0.50-1.63 mm3)] was higher than cusp/CERA [0.17 mm3 (0.04-0.41 mm3)] (P = .007). ZIR showed completely different wear mechanism in SEM. CONCLUSION. Composite structured materials such as PICN and ZLS ceramic exhibit more abrasive effect on opposing enamel due to their loss against wear, compared to uniform structured zirconia. The resin nano-ceramic causes the lowest enamel wear thanks to its flexible nano-ceramic microstructure. While zirconia appears to be an enamel-friendly material in wear volume loss, it can cause microstructural defects of enamel.
Keywords
Restoration wear; Dental wear; Dental enamel; Chewing;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Holand W, Schweiger M, Watzke R, Peschke A, Kappert H. Ceramics as biomaterials for dental restoration. Expert Rev Med Devices 2008;5:729-45.   DOI
2 Zhou ZR, Zheng J. Tribology of dental materials: a review. J Phys D Appl Phys 2008;41:113001   DOI
3 Xu Z, Yu P, Arola DD, Min J, Gao S. A comparative study on the wear behavior of a polymer infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) material and tooth enamel. Dent Mater 2017;33:1351-61.   DOI
4 Zheng J, Zeng Y, Wen J, Zheng L, Zhou Z. Impact wear behavior of human tooth enamel under simulated chewing conditions. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;62:119-27.   DOI
5 Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 2016;32:908-14.   DOI
6 Zhang Z, Yi Y, Wang X, Guo J, Li D, He L, Zhang S. A comparative study of progressive wear of four dental monolithic, veneered glass-ceramics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2017;74:111-7.   DOI
7 Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007;35:819-26.   DOI
8 Datla SR, Alla RK, Alluri VR, PJB, Konakanchi A. Dental ceramics: part II - recent advances in dental ceramics. Am J Mater Eng Technol 2015;3:19-26.
9 van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12.   DOI
10 Barbour ME, Rees GD. The role of erosion, abrasion and attrition in tooth wear. J Clin Dent 2006;17:88-93.
11 Oh WS, Delong R, Anusavice KJ. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:451-9.   DOI
12 Rekow D, Thompson VP. Near-surface damage-a persistent problem in crowns obtained by computer-aided design and manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2005;219:233-43.   DOI
13 Grau A, Stawarczyk B, Roos M, Theelke B, Hampe R. Reliability of wear measurements of CAD-CAM restorative materials after artificial aging in a mastication simulator. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018;86:185-90.   DOI
14 Furtado de Mendonca A, Shahmoradi M, Gouvea CVD, De Souza GM, Ellakwa A. Microstructural and mechanical characterization of CAD/CAM materials for monolithic dental restorations. J Prosthodont 2019;28:e587-94.   DOI
15 Kim MJ, Oh SH, Kim JH, Ju SW, Seo DG, Jun SH, Ahn JS, Ryu JJ. Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains. J Dent 2012;40:979-88.   DOI
16 Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater 2014;30:564-9.   DOI
17 Vardhaman S, Borba M, Kaizer MR, Kim D, Zhang Y. Wear behavior and microstructural characterization of translucent multilayer zirconia. Dent Mater 2020;36:1407-17.   DOI
18 Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V. Wear of ceramic and antagonist-a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro. Dent Mater. 2008;24:433-49.   DOI
19 ISO/TS 11405. Dentistry-Testing of adhesion to tooth structure. International Standards Organization (ISO); Geneva; Switzerland, 2015. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/62898.html
20 Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Lundeen HC, Brehnan K, Walsh EK, Holbrook WB. Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:443-9.   DOI
21 Kaizer MR, Bano S, Borba M, Garg V, Dos Santos MBF, Zhang Y. Wear Behavior of Graded Glass/Zirconia Crowns and Their Antagonists. J Dent Res 2019;98:437-42.   DOI
22 Lobbezoo F, van der Zaag J, Visscher CM, Naeije M. Oral kinesiology. A new postgraduate programme in the Netherlands. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:192-8.   DOI
23 Jung YS, Lee JW, Choi YJ, Ahn JS, Shin SW, Huh JB. A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:111-5.   DOI
24 Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Kim MJ, Hsu SM, Abdulhameed N, Jenkins R, Neal D, Ren F, Clark AE. Randomized clinical study of wear of enamel antagonists against polished monolithic zirconia crowns. J Dent 2018;68:19-27.   DOI
25 Nishigawa K, Bando E, Nakano M. Quantitative study of bite force during sleep associated bruxism. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:485-91.   DOI
26 Fathy SM, Swain MV. In-vitro wear of natural tooth surface opposed with zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic after accelerated ageing. Dent Mater 2018;34:551-9.   DOI
27 Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Dieng FY, Clark AE, Neal D, Anusavice KJ. Surface degradation of dental ceramics as a function of environmental pH. J Dent Res 2013;92:467-71.   DOI
28 Lobbezoo F, Van Der Zaag J, Naeije M. Bruxism: its multiple causes and its effects on dental implants - an updated review. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:293-300.   DOI
29 Koc D, Dogan A, Bek B. Bite force and influential factors on bite force measurements: a literature review. Eur J Dent 2010;4:223-32.   DOI
30 Cosme DC, Baldisserotto SM, Canabarro Sde A, Shinkai RS. Bruxism and voluntary maximal bite force in young dentate adults. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:328-32.
31 Mitov G, Heintze SD, Walz S, Woll K, Muecklich F, Pospiech P. Wear behavior of dental Y-TZP ceramic against natural enamel after different finishing procedures. Dent Mater 2012;28:909-18.   DOI
32 Lambert H, Durand JC, Jacquot B, Fages M. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9:486-95.   DOI
33 Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1141-50.   DOI
34 Shenoy A, Shenoy N. Dental ceramics: an update. J Conserv Dent 2010;13:195-203.   DOI
35 Choi JW, Bae IH, Noh TH, Ju SW, Lee TK, Ahn JS, Jeong TS, Huh JB. Wear of primary teeth caused by opposed all-ceramic or stainless steel crowns. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:43-52.   DOI
36 Zhang F, Spies BC, Vleugels J, Reveron H, Wesemann C, Muller WD, van Meerbeek B, Chevalier J. High-translucent yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics are wear-resistant and antagonist-friendly. Dent Mater 2019;35:1776-90.   DOI
37 Field J, Waterhouse P, German M. Quantifying and qualifying surface changes on dental hard tissues in vitro. J Dent 2010;38:182-90.   DOI
38 Henriques B, Goncalves S, Soares D, Silva FS. Shear bond strength comparison between conventional porcelain fused to metal and new functionally graded dental restorations after thermal-mechanical cycling. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012;13:194-205.   DOI
39 Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Chewing pressure vs. wear of composites and opposing enamel cusps. J Dent Res 1992;71:1525-9.   DOI
40 Rosentritt M, Steiger D, Behr M, Handel G, Kolbeck C. Influence of substructure design and spacer settings on the in vitro performance of molar zirconia crowns. J Dent 2009;37:978-83.   DOI
41 Santos F, Branco A, Polido M, Serro AP, Figueiredo-Pina CG. Comparative study of the wear of the pair human teeth/Vita Enamic ® vs commonly used dental ceramics through chewing simulation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2018;88:251-60.   DOI
42 Heintze SD. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater 2006;22:712-34.   DOI
43 Borrero-Lopez O, Guiberteau F, Zhang Y, Lawn BR. Wear of ceramic-based dental materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019;92:144-51.   DOI
44 Quinn GD. On edge chipping testing and some personal perspectives on the state of the art of mechanical testing. Dent Mater 2015;31:26-36.   DOI
45 American Dental Association. Code on dental procedures and nomenclature (CDT). American Dental Association. Published 2017. https://www.ada.org/en/publications/cdt
46 Zandparsa R, El Huni RM, Hirayama H, Johnson MI. Effect of different dental ceramic systems on the wear of human enamel: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:230-7.   DOI
47 Nakashima J, Taira Y, Sawase T. In vitro wear of four ceramic materials and human enamel on enamel antagonist. Eur J Oral Sci 2016;124:295-300.   DOI
48 Lohbauer U, Reich S. Antagonist wear of monolithic zirconia crowns after 2 years. Clin Oral Investig 2017;21:1165-72.   DOI
49 Leinfelder KF. Indirect posterior composite resins. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005;26:495-503; quiz 504, 527.
50 Albashaireh ZS, Ghazal M, Kern M. Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:105-13.   DOI