한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제41권4호
  • /
  • Pages.311-324
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CHAT을 이용한 사회문화적 관점에서 교육실습에 참여하는 예비과학교사의 수업 설계 및 실행 과정 분석

The Process of Pre-service Science Teachers' Designing and Implementation of Lessons in Teaching Practice from Sociocultural Perspective Using CHAT

  • 투고 : 2021.06.24
  • 심사 : 2021.08.03
  • 발행 : 2021.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 예비과학교사가 교육실습에서 수업을 설계하고 실행하는 과정을 CHAT을 활용하여 심층적으로 분석하였다. 서울특별시에 소재한 사범대학의 화학교육과에 재학 중인 예비교사 5명이 연구에 참여하였다. 예비교사들의 교육실습을 참관하며 문서 자료를 수집하였고, 심층 면담을 실시하였다. 근거이론에 기반한 지속적 비교 방법으로 자료를 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 예비교사들은 수업 설계를 위한 결정 권한이 부족하여 어려움을 겪었고 지도교사와 직접적인 갈등을 겪기도 하였다. 또한 예비교사들은 교과 오리엔테이션과 수업 참관으로도 수업 설계를 위한 맥락적 정보를 충분히 얻기 어려웠으며 이는 예비교사들의 수업 설계에도 어려움을 가져왔다. 연속된 차시의 수업을 여러 명의 예비교사가 나누어 맡을 경우, 수업의 연속성이 떨어지는 등의 여러 문제점이 나타났다. 예비교사들이 학생들을 평가할 수 있는 권한은 제한적으로 주어져 예비교사들은 추가적인 평가를 실시하였다. 예비교사들이 평가를 실시할 때 전문성이 부족한 모습이 나타났는데, 이에 대한 원인은 사범대학의 교육과정에서 찾을 수 있었다. 이상의 연구 결과가 갖는 의미와 이 결과를 바탕으로 더 나은 교육실습을 제공하기 위한 방향을 논의하였다.

In this study, we analyzed the process of pre-service science teachers' designing and implementation of lessons in teaching practice from the perspective of CHAT. Five pre-service teachers attending the Department of Chemistry Education at the College of Education in Seoul participated in this study. We observed their teaching practice, collected documentary data, and conducted in-depth interviews. The data were analyzed using the constant comparative method based on grounded theory. The analyses of the results reveal that, due to the lack of authority to make decisions for lesson design, pre-service teachers faced difficulties and had direct conflict with teachers. In addition, it was difficult for them to obtain sufficient contextual information for lesson design even through subject orientation and classroom observation, which made it difficult for them to design lessons. When consecutive lessons were taken by several pre-service teachers, there were many problems such as poor continuity of lessons. Given limited authority to assess students, they conducted additional assessments. They showed a lack of professionalism when conducting assessments. The cause of this could be found in the curriculum of the College of Education. Some ways to provide better teaching practice based on the results are discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea?. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405-1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187041
  2. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative research in (validation) and qualitative (inquiry) studies. It is a method-appropriate education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  3. Brickhouse, N. W. (1993). What counts as successful instruction? An account of a teacher's self-assessment. Science Education, 77(2), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770203
  4. Choi, S., Kim, M., & Noh, T. (2015). An understanding of secondary science teachers' performance on STEAM lessons in the perspective of the CHAT. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(6), 951-961.
  5. Chung, A., Maeng, S.-H., Lee, S.-K., & Kim, C.-J. (2007). Pre-service science teachers areas of practice concern and reflections on the science classes in student-teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(9), 893-906.
  6. Cuban, L. (1992). Managing dilemmas while building professional communities. Educational Researcher, 21, 4-11.
  7. Darwin, S. (2011). Learning in activity: Exploring the methodological potential of action research in activity theorising of social practice. Educational Action Research, 19(2), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2011.569230
  8. Elliott, J. (1985). Facilitating action research in schools: Some dilemmas. In R. Burgess (Ed), Field methods in the study of education (pp. 235-262). London, UK: Falmer Press.
  9. Eom, M. R., & Uhm, J. Y. (2009). A survey on change of competency for pre-service teachers before and after teaching practicum. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 26(3), 491-508. https://doi.org/10.24211/TJKTE.2009.26.3.491
  10. Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
  11. Engestrom, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-30). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Engestrom, Y. (2000). Activity theory and the social construction of knowledge: A story of four umpires. Organization, 7(2), 301-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072006
  13. Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
  14. Feldman, A., & Weiss, T. (2010). Understanding change in teachers' ways of being through collaborative action research: A cultural-historical activity theory analysis. Educational Action Research, 18(1), 29-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790903484517
  15. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: An introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 3-17). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
  16. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.
  17. Han, M., Yang, C., & Noh, T. (2014). An understanding of the performance of teaching in a science museum: A case study using the CHAT. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2014.34.1.1.0033
  18. Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching, 11(3), 273-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/13450600500105502
  19. Hwang, S., & Kim, N. (2014). Analyzing practicum activity from the perspective of cultural historical activity theory. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 31(1), 141-170. https://doi.org/10.24211/tjkte.2014.31.1.141
  20. Jeon, J. S. (2018). Educational practice and directions for improvement of elementary education institutions. The Journal of Education Studies, 55(1), 1-21.
  21. Jeong, H. (2014). A study on the relationships between student teacher and students in pre-service internship course. The Korea Educational Review, 20(1), 5-39.
  22. Jung, J., & Lee, B. (2016). Analysis on the mismatch between instructional design and teaching practice of pre-service science teachers in teaching practicum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(2), 435-443. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0435
  23. Kang, K. H., & Lee, S. K. (2004). Science education students' concerns regarding science classrooms in student teaching. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 21(1), 105-131.
  24. Kang, K. (2019). Study on the exploration of the educational authority of the practice teacher in the teaching practice course of secondary schools based on Luhmann's system theory. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(10), 221-250. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2019.19.10.221
  25. Kim, B.-C. (2005). A study on the meaning of student teaching of student-teachers in the secondary schools. The Journal of Educational Administration, 23(4), 49-76.
  26. Kim, H., & Lee, B. (2016). The types and coping methods of dilemmas of pre-service science teachers during student teaching. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(4), 657-668. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.4.0657
  27. Kim, P. (2014). Teachers' participation in decision-making and professional development for the implementation of the national curriculum: Focusing on the policy for school curriculum autonomy. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(3), 95-122. https://doi.org/10.15708/KSCS.32.3.201409.005005
  28. Kwon, S. (2011). An investigation on the teaching activities of guidance teachers in planning mathematics lesson in teaching practicum by students. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 15(2), 333-359.
  29. Lee, D.-S., & Song, D.-S. (2015). Elements which inform teacher's authority. Teacher Education Research, 54(4), 726-739. https://doi.org/10.15812/TER.54.4.201512.726
  30. Lee, H., & Chung, K. (2013). Understanding science teacher's teaching of socioscientific issues: Using cultural-historical activity theory as an analytical lens. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 13(5), 413-433.
  31. Lampert, M. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 55(2), 178-194. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.55.2.56142234616x4352
  32. Lim, S.-M. (2017). What did pre-service earth science teachers feel through teaching practice? -Focusing on the relationship between university curriculum and teaching practice-. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 10(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2017.10.1.38
  33. Lompscher, J. (2006). The cultural-historical activity theory. In Critical perspectives on activity: Explorations across education, work, and everyday life. In P. Sawchuk, N. Duarte, & M. Elhammoumi (Eds.), Critical perspectives on activity: Explorations across education, work, and everyday life (pp. 35-51). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  34. McNicholl, J. (2013). Relational agency and teacher development: A CHAT analysis of a collaborative professional inquiry project with biology teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 218-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2012.686992
  35. Ok, I.-N. (2009). Narrative inquiry on practicum experience of social studies student teacher in a middle school. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 41(1), 73-106. https://doi.org/10.35557/trce.41.1.200903.004
  36. Park, K. (2010). Development of descriptive instructional design model based on the expert teacher's instructional planning. Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 21-52. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.26.3.21
  37. Patchen, T., & Smithenry, D. W. (2014). Diversifying instruction and shifting authority: A cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) analysis of classroom participant structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 606-634. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21140
  38. Roth, W.-M., Lee, Y., & Hsu, P. (2009). A tool for changing the world: Possibilities of cultural-historical activity theory to reinvigorate science education. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 131-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142269
  39. Ryu, B. (2001). School education crisis and teachers authority. Sociology of Education, 11(3), 57-79.
  40. Seo, J. (2010). A study on the perception and self evaluation scale of educational practice of secondary practice teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 43-65.
  41. Shin, S., Park, C., Lee, C., & Hong, H.-G. (2018). A case study on the practice of 'Science Inquiry Experiment' in the 2015 revised national curriculum: An understanding in the perspective of cultural-historical activity theory(CHAT). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(6), 885-899. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.6.885
  42. Son, J. (2017). A study on educational policies that enables sustainable 'Teacher-Responsible Education'. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 25(4), 101-124.
  43. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage publications.
  44. Volkmann, M. J., & Anderson, M. A. (1998). Creating professional identity: Dilemmas and metaphors of a first-year chemistry teacher. Science Education, 82(3), 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<293::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-7
  45. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  46. Yang, C., Lee, J., & Noh, T. (2014). The characterisitcs of lesson planning of pre-service secondary science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 187-195. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2014.34.2.0187
  47. Yoon, H.-G. (2005). An use of dilemma episodes in science teacher education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 25(2), 98-10.
  48. Yoon, H.-G., & Han, M. (2020). Which types of dilemmas do elementary school teachers experience and how do they cope with in science classes?. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 39(2), 268-283. https://doi.org/10.15267/KESES.2020.39.2.268