한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제41권4호
  • /
  • Pages.325-338
  • /
  • 2021
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

예비교사의 TPACK 평가틀 개발과 TPACK 발달 저해 요인 분석

Development of Pre-Service Teachers' TPACK Evaluation Framework and Analysis of Hindrance Factors of TPACK Development

  • 투고 : 2021.04.29
  • 심사 : 2021.08.31
  • 발행 : 2021.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 한 교사 양성대학에서 40명의 예비교사를 대상으로 TPACK 발달을 위한 15주 교육프로그램을 개발하고, 예비교사의 TPACK의 실천적 역량을 평가하기 위한 TPACK 발달 평가틀을 개발하였다. 개발된 TPACK(Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) 발달 평가틀은 TPK(Technological Pedagogical Knowledge), TCK(Technological Content Knowledge), TPACK이 각각 0단계부터 4단계까지 5단계로 구성되었다. 이를 토대로 예비교사의 TPK, TCK, TPACK 수준을 평가한 결과, 대부분의 예비교사의 TPK, TCK, TPACK 수준은 일치하였으나, 일부 예비교사의 경우 TPK와 TCK가 일치하지 않았다. 이때 TPACK 수준은 TPK와 TCK 가운데 낮은 수준을 따르는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 TPACK 수준이 낮은 예비교사가 갖고 있는 TPACK 발달 저해요인을 조사한 결과, 학생의 자율적 학습 능력에 대한 불신, 학생의 상호작용 역량에 대한 불신, 학교 현장의 현실적 제약에 대한 인식 등이 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과를 토대로 실천적인 TPACK 발달을 위해서는 예비교사에게 균형잡힌 TPK와 TCK의 발달을 돕고, 예비교사가 갖고 있는 TPACK 발달 저해요인을 제거하는 교육 프로그램을 제공할 필요가 있다고 주장하였다.

In this study, we developed a 15-week educational program for TPACK(Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge) development of 40 pre-service teachers in a university for teacher training. We also developed a TPACK evaluation framework to evaluate the practical competency of TPACK of pre-service teachers. The developed evaluation framework consisted of 5 levels, from 0 to 4, TPK(Technological Pedagogical Knowledge), TCK(Technological Content Knowledge), and TPACK, respectively. As a result of the evlauation, the levels of TPK, TCK, and TPACK development stages of most pre-service teachers were consistent, but some pre-service teachers' TPK and TCK did not match. It was found that the TPACK stages follow the lower level between TPK and TCK. In addition, as a result of an investigation into the hindrance factors of the TPACK development of pre-service teachers with low TPACK stages in the use of technology, they have distrust of students' ability to learn with self-regulation, distrust of students' ability to interact, and recognition of practical limitations in the school field. Based on these findings, we argued that it was necessary to provide an educational program to help pre-service teachers develop balanced TPK and TCK and eliminate the hindrance factors of the TPACK development of pre-service teachers about technology-using classes.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2019년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2019S1A5C2A04081191/NRF-2019R1A2B5B01069840)

참고문헌

  1. Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782573
  2. Allsopp, M., Hohlfeld, T. & Kemker, K. (2007). The technology integration matrix: The development of field-test of an Internet based multimedia assessment tool for the implementation of instructional technology in the classroom. Proceeding of Florida Educational Research Association 2007 Conference: Tampa, FL.
  3. Anderson, R. M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D., & Hollingsworth, T. D. (2020). How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? The Lancet, 395(10228), 931-934. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30567-5
  4. Angeli, C. (2005). Transforming a teacher education method course through technology: Effects on preservice teachers' technology competency. Computers & Education, 45(4), 383-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.06.002
  5. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2005). Preservice teachers as ICT designers: An instructional design model based on an expanded view of pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 21(4), 292-302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00135.x
  6. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52(1), 154-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006
  7. Archambault, L. (2016). Exploring the Use of Qualitative Methods to Examine TPACK. In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for Educators (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  8. Archambault, L., & Barnett, J. H. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656-1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009
  9. Baxter J. A., & Lederman N. G. (1999) Assessment and Measurement of Pedagogical Content Knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds) Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 6 (pp. 147-161). Springer.
  10. Booker, S. (2017). The evolution of pre-service teachers TPACK after completing an undergraduate technology integration course [Doctoral dissertation, Kennesaw State University].
  11. Borg, M. (2004). The apprenticeship of observation. ELT Journal, 58(3), 274-276. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.3.274
  12. Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2009). Strategies for preparing preservice social studies teachers to effectively integrate technology: Models and practices. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 46-59.
  13. Chai, C. S. (2010). The relationships among Singaporean preservice teachers' ICT competencies, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs on the espoused use of ICT. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 387-400.
  14. Chai, C. S., Hong, H.-Y., & Teo, T. K. G. (2009). Singaporean and Taiwanese pre-service teachers' beliefs and their attitude towards ICT use: A comparative study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), 117-128.
  15. Chai, C. S., & Koh, J. H. L. (2017). Changing teachers' TPACK and design beliefs through the Scaffolded TPACK Lesson Design Model (STLDM). Learning: Research and Practice, 3(2), 114-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2017.1360506
  16. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). A review of the quantitative measures of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators. Routledge.
  17. Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C.-C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education, 57(1), 1184-1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007
  18. Choi, E.-S., Lee, Y.-J., & Paik, S.-H. (2017). The Effects of Programming-Based Lessons on Science Teachers' Perceptions Related to TPACK. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(4), 693-703. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.4.693
  19. Choi, K., & Paik, S.-H. (2020a). The difference of measurement results between the questionnaire and performance assessment of Pre-service teacher's TPACK competency. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(4), 437-449. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2020.40.4.437
  20. Choi, K., & Paik, S.-H. (2020b). The effect of lessons considering the TPACK development stage on the self-efficacy and development level of pre-service teachers. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(22), 1371-1391. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.22.1371
  21. Cianciolo, A. T., & Sternberg, R. J. (2018). Practical intelligence and tacit knowledge: An ecological view of expertise. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Cambridge handbooks in psychology. The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 770-792). Cambridge University Press.
  22. Copur-Gencturk, Y., & Thacker, I. (2021). A Comparison of Perceived and Observed Learning From Professional Development: Relationships Among Self-Reports, Direct Assessments, and Teacher Characteristics. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(2), 138-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119899101
  23. Cox, S. M. (2008). A Conceptual Analysis of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge [Doctoral dissertation]. Brigham Young University.
  24. Cox, S. M., & Graham, C. R. (2009). Diagramming TPACK in Practice: Using an Elaborated Model of the TPACK Framework to Analyze and Depict Teacher Knowledge. TechTrends, 53(5), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0327-1
  25. Crompton, H. (2015). Pre-service Teachers' Developing Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) and Beliefs on the Use of Technology in the K-12 Mathematics Classroom: A Review of the Literature. In C. Angeli & N. Valanides (Eds.), Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (pp. 239-250). Springer US.
  26. Curaoglu, O., Bu, L., Dickey, L., Kim, H. & Cakir, R. (2010). A Case Study of Investigating Preservice Mathematics Teachers' Initial Use of the Next-Generation TI-Nspire Graphing Calculators with Regard to TPACK. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3803-3810). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  27. Demetriou, C., Ozer, B. U., & Essau, C. A. (2014). Self-report questionnaires. The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology, 1-6.
  28. Deng, F., Chai, C. S., Tsai, C.-C., & Lee, M.-H. (2014). The relationships among Chinese practicing teachers' epistemic beliefs, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs about the use of ICT. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 245-256.
  29. Duke, N. K., & Mallette, M. H. (2011). Literacy research methodologies. Guilford Press.
  30. Dunning, D. (2011). Chapter five: The Dunning-Kruger Effect: On Being Ignorant of One's Own Ignorance. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol 44, pp. 247-296). Academic Press.
  31. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
  32. Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504683
  33. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
  34. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Teachers' beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st-century teaching and learning. International Handbook of Research on Teacher Beliefs, 403.
  35. Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
  36. Gilbert, J. K., & Justi, R. (2016). Modelling-based Teaching in Science Education (Vol. 9). Springer International Publishing.
  37. Glazer, E. M., Hannafin, M. J., Polly, D., & Rich, P. (2009). Factors and interactions influencing technology integration during situated professional development in an elementary school. Computers in the Schools, 26(1), 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560802688257
  38. Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953-1960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010
  39. Graham, C. R., Borup, J., & Smith, N. B. (2012). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates' technology integration decisions: TPACK decision making. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(6), 530-546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00472.x
  40. Graham, C. R., Burgoyne, N., Cantrell, P., Smith, L., St Clair, L., & Harris, R. (2009). Measuring the TPACK confidence of inservice science teachers. TechTrends, 53(5), 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-009-0328-0
  41. Graham, C., Cox, S. & Velasquez, A. (2009). Teaching and Measuring TPACK Development in Two Preservice Teacher Preparation Programs. In I. Gibson, R. Weber, K. McFerrin, R. Carlsen & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2009-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4081-4086). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  42. Harris, J. B., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. J. (2010). Testing a TPACK-based technology integration assessment rubric. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3833-3840). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  43. Harris, J. B., Grandgenett, N., & Hofer, M. J. (2012). Testing an Instrument Using Structured Interviews to Assess Experienced Teachers' TPACK. In C. Maddux & D. Gibbons (Eds.), Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2012 (pp. 15-22). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  44. Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers' curriculum-based, technology-related instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 211-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782570
  45. Hazzan, O. (2002). Prospective high school mathematics teachers' attitudes toward integrating computers in their future teaching. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 35(2), 213-225.
  46. Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers' educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499-1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.001
  47. Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., Blunk, M., Goffney, I. M., & Rowan, B. (2007). Validating the ecological assumption: The relationship of measure scores to classroom teaching and student learning. Measurement, 5(2-3), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/15366360701487138
  48. Hofer, M. J. & Harris, J. B. (2012). TPACK Research with Inservice Teachers: Where's the TCK?. In P. Resta (Ed.), Proceedings of SITE 2012--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 4704-4709). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  49. Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D. H., & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful Learning with Technology: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson Higher Ed.
  50. Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y
  51. Jacobson, M. J., So, H.-J., Teo, T., Lee, J., Pathak, S., & Lossman, H. (2010). Epistemology and learning: Impact on pedagogical practices and technology use in Singapore schools. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1694-1706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.014
  52. Jang, S.-J., & Tsai, M.-F. (2012). Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Computers & Education, 59(2), 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003
  53. Jen, T.-H., Yeh, Y.-F., Hsu, Y.-S., Wu, H.-K., & Chen, K.-M. (2016). Science teachers' TPACK-Practical: Standard-setting using an evidence-based approach. Computers & Education, 95, 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.009
  54. Judson, E. (2006). How teachers integrate technology and their beliefs about learning: Is there a connection? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(3), 581-597.
  55. Jung, J., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2020). Course-level modeling of preservice teacher learning of technology integration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 555-571. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12840
  56. Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2010). The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. E-Learning and Digital Media, 7(3), 200-222. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2010.7.3.200
  57. Kang, S., & Jang, M. (2016). On secondary mathematics teachers' technology integration self-efficacy. J. Korean Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. A: The Mathematical Education, 55(4), 523-538.
  58. Kaplon-Schilis, A., & Lyublinskaya, I. (2020). Analysis of Relationship Between Five Domains of TPACK Framework: TK, PK, CK Math, CK Science, and TPACK of Pre-service Special Education Teachers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09404-x
  59. Kereluik, K., Casperson, G. & Akcaoglu, M. (2010). Coding Pre-Service Teacher Lesson Plans for TPACK. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2010-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3889-3891). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  60. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Hershey, K., & Peruski, L. (2004). With a little help from your students: A new model for faculty development and online course design. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 25-55.
  61. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Computers & Education, 49(3), 740-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012
  62. Koehler, M. J., Shin, T. S., & Mishra, P. (2012). How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways. In R. N. Ronau, C. R. Rakes & M. L. Niess (Eds.), Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches (pp. 16-31). IGI Global.
  63. Koh, J. H. L. (2013). A rubric for assessing teachers' lesson activities with respect to TPACK for meaningful learning with ICT. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(6).
  64. Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2015). Towards a Web 2.0 TPACK lesson design framework: Applications of a Web 2.0 TPACK survey of Singapore preservice teachers. In T. B. Lin, V. Chen, & C. S. Chai (Eds.), New media and learning in the 21st century (pp. 161-180). Springer.
  65. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
  66. Landry, G. A. (2010). Creating and validating an instrument to measure middle school mathematics teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Tennessee.
  67. Lee, Y., Ryu, J., & Han, K.-S. (2020). Direction of Post-Corona Era Education Seen through Media Articles: The Role of "Creativity Education" in Crisis. The Journal of Creativity Education, 20(4), 65-85.
  68. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. University of Chicago Press.
  69. LoTi(2011). LoTi Digital-Age Framework. Retrieved from http://ts.prn.bc.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2012/01/LoTi_Framework_Sniff_Test.pdf.
  70. Lyublinskaya, I., & Tournaki, N. (2012). The effects of teacher content authoring on TPACK and on student achievement in algebra: Research on instruction with the TI-Nspire handheld In R. N. Ronau, C. R. Rakes & M. L. Niess (Eds.), Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches (pp. 295-322). IGI Global.
  71. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006a). Designing learning from day one: A first day activity to foster design thinking about educational technology. Teachers College Record.
  72. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006b). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  73. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1-16.
  74. Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring classroom technology use. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23, 40-42.
  75. Moersch, C. (2011). Digital Age Best Practices: Teaching and Learning Refocused. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.800.5887&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  76. Niess, M. L. (2008). Knowledge needed for teaching with technologies-Call it TPACK. AMTE Connections, 17(2), 9-10.
  77. Niess, M. L. (2011). Investigating TPACK: Knowledge Growth in Teaching with Technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(3), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.44.3.c
  78. Niess, M. L., Ronau, R. N., Shafer, K. G., Driskell, S. O., Harper, S. R., Johnston, C., Browning, C., Ozgun-Koca, S. A., & Kersaint, G. (2009). Mathematics teacher TPACK standards and development model. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 9(1). https://citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/mathematics/mathematics-teacher-tpack-standards-and-development-model.
  79. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321-1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
  80. Ozgun-Koca, S. A., Meagher, M., & Edwards, M. T. (2010). Preservice teachers' emerging TPACK in a technology-rich methods class. The Mathematics Educator, 19(2), 10-20.
  81. Palak, D., & Walls, R. T. (2009). Teachers' Beliefs and Technology Practices: A Mixed-methods Approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 417-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782537
  82. Papanastasiou, E. C., Zembylas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2003). Can Computer Use Hurt Science Achievement? The USA Results from PISA. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12, 325-332. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025093225753
  83. Papanikolaou, K. (2017). Learning design as a vehicle for developing TPACK in blended teacher training on technology enhanced learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0072-z
  84. Paulhus, D. L., & Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology, 1(2007), 224-239.
  85. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Doubleday.
  86. Polly, D. (2011). Examining teachers' enactment of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) in their mathematics teaching after technology integration professional development. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 30(1), 37-59.
  87. Polly, D., & Hannafin, M. J. (2011). Examining how learner-centered professional development influences teachers' espoused and enacted practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(2), 120-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671003636737
  88. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029001004
  89. Ravitz, J. L., Becker, H. J., & Wong, Y. (2000). Constructivist-Compatible Beliefs and Practices among U.S. Teachers. Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey Report #4. (NSF-REC-9600614). Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
  90. Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., Khan, K. A., & Salam, J. (2020). Social Isolation and Acceptance of the Learning Management System (LMS) in the time of COVID-19 Pandemic: An Expansion of the UTAUT Model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(2), 183-208.
  91. Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., & Kern, A. (2007). Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 883-907. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20180
  92. Sang, G., Valcke, M., Van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010
  93. Scherer, R., Tondeur, J., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2018). The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers' technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge: Comparing structural equation modeling approaches. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.003
  94. Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2021). Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586
  95. Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544
  96. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  97. Speer, N. M. (2008). Connecting beliefs and practices: A fine-grained analysis of a college mathematics teacher's collections of beliefs and their relationship to his instructional practices. Cognition and Instruction, 26(2), 218-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000801980944
  98. Stoilescu, D. (2015). A Critical Examination of the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework: Secondary School Mathematics Teachers Integrating Technology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(4), 514-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115572285
  99. Suharwoto, G. (2006). Developing and Implementing a Technology Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Teaching Mathematics with Technology. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2006-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3824-3828). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  100. Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2006). Preparing preservice elementary teachers to teach science through computer models. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 87-98.
  101. Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2008a). Learning and teaching about scientific models with a computer-modeling tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 220-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.005
  102. Valanides, N., & Angeli, C. (2008b). Professional development for computer-enhanced learning: A case study with science teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701847397
  103. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological pedagogical content knowledge - a review of the literature: Technological pedagogical content. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
  104. Walen, S. B., Williams, S. R., & Garner, B. E. (2003). Pre-service teachers learning mathematics using calculators: A failure to connect current and future practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(4), 445-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00028-3
  105. Welsh, J., Harmes, J. C., & Winkelman, R. (2011). Florida's Technology Integration Matrix. Principal Leadership, 12(2), 69-71.
  106. Willermark, S. (2018). Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge: A Review of Empirical Studies Published From 2011 to 2016. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), 315-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117713114
  107. Yoder, A. J. (2000). The Relationship between Graphing Calculator Use and Teachers' Beliefs about Learning Algebra. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, 25-28.