DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중·소규모 건설현장 재해예방 기술지도 대가 개선에 관한 연구

A Study on the Improvement of Technical Guidance Fee for Preventing Accidents at Small-Medium Construction Sites

  • Lim, Se-Jong (Construction Industrial Accident Prevention Policy Division, Ministry of Employment and Labor) ;
  • Shin, Seung-Hyeon (Department of Big Data, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Won, Jeong-Hun (Department of Safety Engineering & Department of Big Data, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Yoon, Young-Cheol (Department of Civil Engineering, Myongji College)
  • 투고 : 2021.08.16
  • 심사 : 2021.09.28
  • 발행 : 2021.10.20

초록

공사금액 1억이상 120억 미만 중·소규모 건설현장은 전문지도기관의 기술지도를 받아야 한다. 최근 기술지도의 계약 주체가 시공자에서 발주자로 변경됨에 따라 예상되는 기술지도 부실을 방지하기 위해 기술지도 대가를 산정하는 방법을 제안하였다. 대상 건설공사를 공사금액에 따라 4개 구간으로 단순화하고, 구간별 기술지도 담당자의 일 지도횟수와 기술지도 담당자의 최소 기술 등급을 제한하고 엔지니어링사업대가를 적용하여 기술지도 1회당 대가를 산정하는 방법을 제안하였으며, 제안 방법은 설문에서 도출된 현재 형성된 일반적인 대가와 K2B 분석 결과 등을 잘 반영하므로 기술지도 대가 가인드라인 수립에 적용될 수 있다고 판단된다.

Under Korean law, small-to-medium-sized construction projects with budgets of more than 100 million won and less than 12 billion won must receive technical guidance by a visiting technician belonging to a specialized institution. This study proposed a method for calculating the technical guidance fee to prevent the potential inadequacy of technical guidance when the responsibility providing the technical guidance fee is changed from a contractor to a client. The method simplified the construction works which should receive technical guidance into four sections according to the construction amount. For each section, the number of instances of technical guidance per day provided by the visiting technician and the minimum technical grade of the visiting technician were limited, and the guideline for estimating engineering services fees was applied to calculate the fee per instance of technical guidance. The results show that the proposed method can be applied to the establishment of a technical guidance fee guideline since it well reflects the current fee distribution and K2B analysis results.

키워드

과제정보

This work was supported by the Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency in 2019. In addition, this work was partially supported by the National Research Foundation(NRF), Korea, under project BK21 FOUR.

참고문헌

  1. Ha SG, Kim TH, Son KY, Kim JM. Quantification model development of human accidents based on the insurance claim payout on construction site. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2018 Dec;18(2):151-9. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2018.18.2.151
  2. Park JY, Kim GH. Importance analysis of major factors in formwork collapse accident. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2021 Apr;21(3):249-56. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2021.21.3.249
  3. Lim SJ, Oh AR, Won JH, Chon JJ. Improvement of inspection system for reduction of small-scale construction site accident in Korea. Industrial Health. 2018 Nov;56(6):466-74. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2018-0033
  4. Kim BC, Lee DW. Policy Study on Appropriateness of safety check costs in construction projects - focusing on industrial safety and health act -. KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research. 2017 Aug;37(4):747-57. https://doi.org/10.12652/KSCE.2017.37.4.0747
  5. Kim TW, Han HS. A study on the change of safety consciousness in small construction sites. Korean Review of Corporation Management. 2018 Oct;9(3):233-50. https://doi.org/10.20434/KRICM.2018.10.9.3.233
  6. Roh TW, Kang KS. A study on problems and improvement of disaster prevention technology guidance(focused on construction disaster). Journal of the Korea Safety Management and Science. 2016 Dec;18(4):47-55. https://doi.org/10.12812/ksms.2016.18.4.47
  7. Park HC, Park JH, Kim HW, Park JS, Kim HS. A study on effectiveness of technical consulting system for accident prevention in construction work. Journal of the Korea Safety Management and Science. 2006 Feb;8(1):65-83.
  8. Lee MG, Jeong MJ. Consciousness of the disaster prevention agencies' experts for technical guidance. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety. 2013 Dec;28(8):40-5. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2013.28.1.040