DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Systematic Review of an Intervention Program for the Improved Reading Comprehension of Elementary School Students

초등학생의 읽기이해력 향상 중재프로그램에 대한 체계적 문헌고찰

  • 주소현 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 이수상 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2021.08.26
  • Accepted : 2021.09.10
  • Published : 2021.09.30

Abstract

This study analyzed experimental studies of intervention programs provided to improve reading comprehension of elementary school students using a systematic review research method. Cochrane's handbook was applied, and key questions were formulated according to the PICOTS-SD. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to 1,610 papers searched in KCI, and the final 18 cases were selected for analysis. The risk of bias was evaluated using the 'RevMan5' tool provided by Cochrane. As a result of the evaluation, the risk of bias was low in most areas. And for the qualitative analysis of these papers, a data summary table was prepared. As a result, the types of intervention programs were diverse, and in many cases, upper grade students were applied. The size of the experimental group ranged from 6 to 29, and there were more QED-based studies than RCT-based studies. The most mediation time was 40 minutes, and the number of mediation sessions was 8 to 24. And in all studies, the intervention programs were found to be effective in improving reading comprehension.

이 연구는 체계적 문헌고찰(systematic review) 연구방법을 활용하여 초등학생의 읽기이해력 향상을 위해 제공된 중재프로그램 실험연구들을 분석한 것이다. Cochrane의 핸드북을 적용하였으며, PICOTS-SD에 따라 핵심질문을 구성하였다. KCI에서 검색된 1,610건의 논문에서 포함기준과 배제기준을 적용하여, 최종 18건을 분석대상으로 선별하였다. Cochrane에서 제공하는 'RevMan5' 도구를 사용하여 비뚤림 위험을 평가하였다. 평가결과 대부분의 영역에서 비뚤림 위험도가 낮게 나타났다. 그리고 이들 논문들에 대한 정성적인 분석을 위해 자료요약표를 정리하였다. 이 결과, 중재프로그램의 유형은 다양하였으며, 고학년생을 적용대상으로 하는 경우가 많았다. 실험집단의 크기는 6명에서 29명이며, RCT 기반 연구보다 QED 기반 연구가 더 많았다. 중재시간은 40분이 가장 많았으며, 중재회기는 8회에서 24회로 나타났다. 그리고 모든 연구에서 중재프로그램은 읽기이해력 향상에 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 과제는 부산대학교 기본연구지원사업(2년)에 의하여 연구되었음.

References

  1. Ahn, Hyung-Sik & Kim, Hyun-Jung (2014). An introduction to systematic review. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 57(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2014.57.1.49
  2. Jeong, Da-I, Choi, Eun-Kyung, Kim, Min-Seo, & Son, Seung-Hyun (2020). Single subject research trends meta-analysis and analysis based on quality indicators in learning achievement areas of students with learning disabilities. The Korea Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(1), 1-41.
  3. Kil, Han-Ah, Son, Seung-Hyun, Ko, Seo-Yeon, Paek, Young-Sun, Jin, Meiling, & Yusuke, Sakura (2018). Meta-analysis of single subject researches for students with difficulty in reading: comparisons on students with intellectual disabilities, learning disabilities, and low achievement. The Korea Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15(3), 1-27.
  4. Kim, Dong-Il & Lim, Jin-Hyung (2021). The effects of spelling instructions on low achieving students and students with learning disabilities: a meta-analysis on single case studies in Korea. The Journal of Special Children Education, 23(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.21075/KACSN.2021.23.1.1
  5. Kim, Dong-Il, Lee, Jae-Ho, Jang, Se-young, An, Ye-Ji, Ahn, Su-Jin, & Hwang, Ji-Young (2017). Characteristic analysis on reading comprehension related assessments in South Korea. Asian Journal of Education, 18(1), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2017.03.18.1.121
  6. Kim, Soo-Young, Park, Ji-Eun, Seo, Hyun-Joo, Lee, Yun-Jae, Son, Hee-Jeong, Jang, Bo-Hyeong, Seo, Hye-sun, & Shin Chae-Min (2011). NECA Sytematic Review Manual. Seoul: Korea Health and Medical Research Institute.
  7. Lee, Hyo-Jin, Oh, Hee-Hwa, & Choi, Kyoung-Ho (2012). Meta analysis on the effect of reading development program on reading comprehension. Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society, 23(3), 447-455. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2012.23.3.447
  8. Ahn, EunJin & Kang, Hyun (2018). Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 71(2), 103-112. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2018.71.2.103
  9. Bethel, A, C., Rogers, M., & Abbott, R. (2021). Use of a search summary table to improve systematic review search methods, results, and efficiency. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(1), 97-106.
  10. Choi, W., Wang, S., Lee, Y., Oh, H., & Zheng, Z. (2020). A systematic review of mobile health technologies to support self-management of concurrent diabetes and hypertension. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(6), 939-945. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa029
  11. Cochrane (2021). Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Available: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
  12. Cochrane Library (2020-2021). About Cochrane Review. Available: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/about/about-cochrane-reviews/
  13. Dalton, M. (2019). How individual consultations with a librarian can support systematic reviews in the social sciences. Journal of Information Literacy, 13(2), 163-172. https://doi.org/10.11645/13.2.2621
  14. EPPI-Centre (2019). About the EPPI-Centre. Available: https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=63
  15. Fatemeh, B. A., Reza, P., Mohammad, G. R., Fatemeh, A., Farzaneh, Z., & Narges, M. (2021). Effect of prone position on respiratory parameters, intubation and death rate in COVID-19 patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79139-8
  16. Grabowsky, A. & Weisbrod, L. (2020). The effectiveness of library instruction for graduate/professional students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice, 15(2), 100-137. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29657
  17. IES. WWC. What Works Clearinghouse (2020). About. What We do. Available: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/WhatWeDo/
  18. IES. WWC. What Works Clearinghouse (2020). What Works Clearinghouse Standards Handbook. ver4.0 7/25/2017 Draft. Available: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks
  19. Mark, P. & Helen, R. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell Pub.
  20. Petticrew, M. & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  21. PRISMA. PRISMA Flow Diagram (2020). Available: http://prisma-statement.org/prismastatement/flowdiagram.aspx
  22. Ramezani, A., Ghazimirsaeed, S. J., Fereydoon, A., Bandboni, M. E., & YektaKooshali, M. H. (2018). A meta-analysis of service quality of Iranian university libraries based on the LibQUAL model. Performance Measurement and Metri, 19(3), 186-202. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-05-2017-0014
  23. Robert, E. & Owens, J. R. (2012). Language Development. 이승복, 이희란 옮김(2013). 언어발달. 서울: (주)시그마프레스.
  24. Sanches-Ferreira, M., Alves, S., Silveira-Maia, M., Santos, M., Tosto, C., Chifari, A., McGee, C., Lo Savio, N., Bilanin, S., & Merlo, G. (2021). A systematic review of behavioral interventions for elementary school children with social, emotional and behavioral difficulties: contributions from single-case research studies. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 241-259. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.241
  25. Sorensen, K. M. (2020). The values of public libraries: a systematic review of empirical studies of stakeholder perceptions. Journal of Documentation, 76(4), 909-927. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-10-2019-0201
  26. Stentiford, L., Koutsouris, G., & Norwich, B. (2018). A systematic literature review of the organisational arrangements of primary school-based reading interventions for struggling readers. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN READING, 41, 197-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12119
  27. Tarraga-Minguez, R., Gomez-Mari, I., & Sanz-Cervera, P. (2020). Interventions for improving reading comprehension in children with ASD: a systematic review. Behavioral Sciences, 11(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11010003
  28. Wolf, M. (2007). Proust And The Squid. 이희수 옮김(2009). 책 읽는 뇌. 파주: 살림.