Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies (한국지리정보학회지)

The Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies (한국지리정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measuring and Describing Seoul's Mixed-Use Phenomenon

서울시 용도복합 현상의 측정 및 기술에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2021.06.28
  • Accepted : 2021.08.03
  • Published : 2021.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The mixed-use concept definition, this study reveals, is that the mixing three or more major types of urban uses implements for economical, social and environmental values in our urban space. With this definition the study explores Seoul's mixed-use phenomenon. The quantification method, the study uses, is the relative entropy which calculate the balance of each urban use in a certain area. The relative entropy method, also known as the LUM(land-use mix score), uses three urban-use categories which is derived from the mixed-use concept definition. Hundreds of building-use types in the building regulations are categorized and calculate the LUM of Seoul's legal-status neighborhoods. The result interpreted as the criteria of Seoul's mixed-use phenomenon and categorize mixed land-use status in a certain value: 'non mixed-use' category has a value 0.631 and below, 'unbalanced mixed-use' category has a value between 0.631 and 0.884, 'balanced mixed-use' category has a value between 0.884 and 0.991 and 'complete mixed-use' category has a value 0.991 and over.

본 연구를 통해 정의된 용도복합 개념은 세 가지 이상의 주요 도시기능의 복합을 의미하며 도시공간의 경제적, 사회적, 환경적 가치를 동시에 실현하기 위한 수단을 의미한다. 이러한 정의 하에서 서울의 용도복합 현상을 탐구하였다. 상대적 엔트로피 개념을 사용하여 단위 지역인 법정동을 기준으로 복합도(R.E.)를 측정하였으며 도시기능의 유형은 용도복합의 정의에서 도출한 개념을 통해 건축물 층별 용도를 유형화하여 계량화하였다. 서울의 용도복합 현상은 복합도(R.E.) 0.631 이하를 '복합아님', 복합도(R.E.) 0.631 초과 0.884 미만을 '불균형 복합', 복합도(R.E.) 0.884 이상 0.991 미만을 '균형복합', 복합도(R.E.) 0.991 이상을 '완전균형복합'의 단계로 구분하여 용도복합 현상을 해석하는 기준으로 지표화하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Alan Rowley. 1996. Mixed-use development: Ambiguous concept, simplistic analysis and wishful thinking. Planning Practice and Research 11(1):85-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459650036477
  2. Choi. S.S., 2012, A study on architectural methods corresponding with rigid land use plan and limits. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 28(11):151-158. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2012.28.11.151
  3. Chung. S.S., and Ha. C.H. 2014. Classification of the urban characteristics using land use index and status analysis on the land use planning, Residential environment : Journal of the Residential Environment Institute of Korea 12(2):67-84.
  4. Coupland, A. 1997. Reclaiming the city; Mixed Use Development. London: E & FN SPON. pp.31-62.
  5. Eric Hoppenbrouwer and Erik Louw. 2005. Mixed-use development: Theory and practice in Amsterdam's Eastern Docklands, European Planning Studies 13(7):967-983. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500242048
  6. Eric Paul Mumford. 2000. The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism, 1928-1960. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp.73-91.
  7. Florida R.L. 2002. The rise of the creative class: And how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life, New York, NY: Basic Books, pp.1-6.
  8. Forni, F.H., Freytes Frey, A. and Quaranta, G. (1998), "Frederic Le Play: a forefather of social economics", International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 25 No. 9, pp. 1380-1397. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068299810213981
  9. Han. H.S., and Kim. Y.H. 2009. A study on the land use and selection of mixed-use development by the location - Focused on Seoul metropolitan area -. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 25(7):211-218.
  10. Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great american cities. New York: Random House, pp.152-177.
  11. Jill Grant. 2002. Mixed use in theory and practice, Canadian Experience with Implementing a Planning Principle, APA Journal 68(1):71-84.
  12. Joost W. van den Hoek. 2008. The MXI (Mixed-use Index), 44th ISOCARP Congress, pp.66-85.
  13. Jurgis Zagorskas. 2016. GIS-based Modelling and Estimation of Land Use Mix in Urban Environment, International Journal of Environmental Science, pp.284-293.
  14. Kim, H.C,. and Chung, J.Y. 2007. The study on the relationship between mixed use development and urban space, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 27(1):659-662.
  15. Kim, O.Y., and Lee, J.H. 2009. An analysis on the status of 'Mixed-Use Development' and a study on introduction of 'Mixed-Use Zoning', Space and Environment 32:138-167.
  16. Krizek, K. J. 2003. "Operationalizing Neighborhood Accessibility for Land Use - Travel Behavior Research and Regional Modeling." Journal of Planning Education and Research 22:270-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X02250315
  17. Kim, Y.H. 2010. Study of structural improvement plan of mixed-use development - focused on seoul metropolitan area. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 26(2):213- 220.
  18. Lee, W.G., Kim, Y.C., and Lee, B.H. 2010. Astudy on the characteristics analysis of location-allocation for the mixed-use districts, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 26(4):253-262.
  19. Lee. G.H., and Kim. K.Y. 2013. A study on the Spatial Mismatch between the Assessed Land Value and Housing Market Price: Exploring the Scale Effect of the MAUP. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society 48(6): 879-896.
  20. Nathan W.D. Jurey. 2012. The Live-Work-Play District: From Vision to Implementation, Kansas State University, pp.4-6.
  21. Oldenburg, R. 1989. The great good place: cafes, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. New York: Paragon House, pp.14-19.
  22. Robinson, W.S. 1950. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals, American Sociological Review 15(3):351-357. https://doi.org/10.2307/2087176
  23. Sangchoon Min. 2010. A study on spatial organization guidelines and application for the mixed use housing, Journal of the regional association of architectural institute of Korea 12(2): 109-118.
  24. The 3rd phase New Town Projects Homepage. 2021. https://www.3기신도시.kr/kor/Main.do. (Accessed June 27, 2021).
  25. Yanqing Xu, Lei Wang, Cong Fu and Tim Kosmyna. 2017. A fishnet-constrained land use mix index derived from remotely sensed data. Annals of GIS 23(4):303-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2017.1382570