Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2021.24.3.010

Measuring and Describing Seoul's Mixed-Use Phenomenon  

KIM, Hyun-Moo (SITELab. Co., Ltd.)
LEE, Woo-Jin (SITELab. Co., Ltd.)
KWON, Tae-Jung (Dept. of Urban Planning and Engineering, Dong-A University)
YEON, Jeong-Min (SITELab. Co., Ltd.)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies / v.24, no.3, 2021 , pp. 10-31 More about this Journal
Abstract
The mixed-use concept definition, this study reveals, is that the mixing three or more major types of urban uses implements for economical, social and environmental values in our urban space. With this definition the study explores Seoul's mixed-use phenomenon. The quantification method, the study uses, is the relative entropy which calculate the balance of each urban use in a certain area. The relative entropy method, also known as the LUM(land-use mix score), uses three urban-use categories which is derived from the mixed-use concept definition. Hundreds of building-use types in the building regulations are categorized and calculate the LUM of Seoul's legal-status neighborhoods. The result interpreted as the criteria of Seoul's mixed-use phenomenon and categorize mixed land-use status in a certain value: 'non mixed-use' category has a value 0.631 and below, 'unbalanced mixed-use' category has a value between 0.631 and 0.884, 'balanced mixed-use' category has a value between 0.884 and 0.991 and 'complete mixed-use' category has a value 0.991 and over.
Keywords
Seoul; Mixed land use; Mixed-use Development; Shannon's Entropy; LUM; Live-Work-Play;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Alan Rowley. 1996. Mixed-use development: Ambiguous concept, simplistic analysis and wishful thinking. Planning Practice and Research 11(1):85-98.   DOI
2 Choi. S.S., 2012, A study on architectural methods corresponding with rigid land use plan and limits. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 28(11):151-158.   DOI
3 Eric Hoppenbrouwer and Erik Louw. 2005. Mixed-use development: Theory and practice in Amsterdam's Eastern Docklands, European Planning Studies 13(7):967-983.   DOI
4 Nathan W.D. Jurey. 2012. The Live-Work-Play District: From Vision to Implementation, Kansas State University, pp.4-6.
5 Jill Grant. 2002. Mixed use in theory and practice, Canadian Experience with Implementing a Planning Principle, APA Journal 68(1):71-84.
6 Kim, H.C,. and Chung, J.Y. 2007. The study on the relationship between mixed use development and urban space, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 27(1):659-662.
7 Kim, Y.H. 2010. Study of structural improvement plan of mixed-use development - focused on seoul metropolitan area. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 26(2):213- 220.
8 Forni, F.H., Freytes Frey, A. and Quaranta, G. (1998), "Frederic Le Play: a forefather of social economics", International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 25 No. 9, pp. 1380-1397.   DOI
9 Coupland, A. 1997. Reclaiming the city; Mixed Use Development. London: E & FN SPON. pp.31-62.
10 Chung. S.S., and Ha. C.H. 2014. Classification of the urban characteristics using land use index and status analysis on the land use planning, Residential environment : Journal of the Residential Environment Institute of Korea 12(2):67-84.
11 Eric Paul Mumford. 2000. The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism, 1928-1960. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp.73-91.
12 Florida R.L. 2002. The rise of the creative class: And how it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life, New York, NY: Basic Books, pp.1-6.
13 Han. H.S., and Kim. Y.H. 2009. A study on the land use and selection of mixed-use development by the location - Focused on Seoul metropolitan area -. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 25(7):211-218.
14 Jacobs, J. 1961. The death and life of great american cities. New York: Random House, pp.152-177.
15 Joost W. van den Hoek. 2008. The MXI (Mixed-use Index), 44th ISOCARP Congress, pp.66-85.
16 Jurgis Zagorskas. 2016. GIS-based Modelling and Estimation of Land Use Mix in Urban Environment, International Journal of Environmental Science, pp.284-293.
17 Robinson, W.S. 1950. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals, American Sociological Review 15(3):351-357.   DOI
18 Kim, O.Y., and Lee, J.H. 2009. An analysis on the status of 'Mixed-Use Development' and a study on introduction of 'Mixed-Use Zoning', Space and Environment 32:138-167.
19 Lee, W.G., Kim, Y.C., and Lee, B.H. 2010. Astudy on the characteristics analysis of location-allocation for the mixed-use districts, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 26(4):253-262.
20 Lee. G.H., and Kim. K.Y. 2013. A study on the Spatial Mismatch between the Assessed Land Value and Housing Market Price: Exploring the Scale Effect of the MAUP. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society 48(6): 879-896.
21 Sangchoon Min. 2010. A study on spatial organization guidelines and application for the mixed use housing, Journal of the regional association of architectural institute of Korea 12(2): 109-118.
22 The 3rd phase New Town Projects Homepage. 2021. https://www.3기신도시.kr/kor/Main.do. (Accessed June 27, 2021).
23 Yanqing Xu, Lei Wang, Cong Fu and Tim Kosmyna. 2017. A fishnet-constrained land use mix index derived from remotely sensed data. Annals of GIS 23(4):303-313.   DOI
24 Krizek, K. J. 2003. "Operationalizing Neighborhood Accessibility for Land Use - Travel Behavior Research and Regional Modeling." Journal of Planning Education and Research 22:270-287.   DOI
25 Oldenburg, R. 1989. The great good place: cafes, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. New York: Paragon House, pp.14-19.