The Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pre-service teachers' motivation in group activities for developing knowledge for teaching and practical competency: The case of the task value

교수 지식과 실천적 역량을 위한 그룹 활동에서 예비교사들의 동기: 과제 가치 사례

  • Received : 2021.08.08
  • Accepted : 2021.08.19
  • Published : 2021.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the qualitative characteristics of pre-service teachers' motivation while they are participating in group activities for developing mathematical essay assessment problem and revising it. For this purpose, we analyzed individual factors about group learning activities as well as contextual factors about practical competency (in developing and revising mathematical essay assessment problem through collecting data of student responses to the problem). As results of data analyses, autonomy, among individual factors regarding group learning activities, was one of the main characteristics in attainment value, utility value, and intrinsic value, whereas task, authority, and grouping, among contextual factors regarding practical competency, appeared to have a positive impact on task value. These results suggest how to think of specific ideas and articulate them in designing a curriculum to develop student-evaluation expertise for pre-service teachers.

본 연구의 목적은 예비교사들이 수리논술 평가문항 개발을 위한 그룹 활동에서 참여하는 동기의 질적 특징을 탐구하는 데 있다. 이에 예비교사들을 대상으로 그룹 학습 활동에 관한 개인적 요인과 실천적 역량(수리논술 평가문항의 개발, 자료 수집, 수정, 보완)에 관한 맥락적 요인을 분석하였다. 그 결과, 그룹 학습 활동에 관한 개인적 요인은 달성 가치, 유용 가치, 내재 가치에 관한 자율성이 주요 특징으로 나타난 반면, 실천적 역량에 관한 맥락적 요인은 과제, 권위, 그룹 편성이 과제 가치에 긍정적 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 이를 통해 예비교사의 학생평가 전문성을 함양하기 위한 교육 과정 설계에 있어 구체적 아이디어를 제안할 수 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 2021학년도 고려대학교 사범대학 특별연구비 지원을 받아 수행되었음

References

  1. Barron, K. E. & Hulleman, C. S. (2015). Expectancy-value-cost model of motivation. In J. S. Eccles & K. Salmelo-Aro (Eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences: Motivational psychology. NY: Elsevier.
  2. Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshell, B. & Serret, N. (2011). Can teachers' summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 451-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.557020
  3. Cho, Y. (2020). Teacher motivation research: trends and future directions. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(5), 1439-1462. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.5.1439
  4. Choi, Y. & Jeon, H. (2017). Constructing teacher identity among preservice teachers: introspective process from experiences in public schooling and private tutoring. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 55(2), 77-115.
  5. Deci, E. L. (1980). The psychology of self-determination. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
  6. Esptein, J. (1988). Effective schools or effective students? Dealing with diversity. In R Hakins & B. MacRae (Eds.), Policies for America's public schools (pp. 89-126). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  7. Esptein, J. (1989). Family structures and student motivation: a development perspective. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (pp. 259-295), San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  8. Hwang, H. J. (2020). The development of the items on mathematical instructional evaluation based on the teacher's practical knowledge. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(4), 507-523. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2020.34.4.507
  9. Jansen, A. (2011). Listening to Mathematics students' voices to assess and build on their motivation: learning in groups. In D. J. Brahier & W. R. Speer (Eds.), Motivation and disposition: pathways to learning mathematics (pp. 201-213). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  10. Kang, H. (2019). A case study on the development of a task with emphasis on mathematical connectivity in pre-teacher education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 33(2), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2019.33.2.85
  11. Kang, K. (2020). A study on the explorations of the motivations of secondary school pre-service teachers in the teaching completion course of teaching profession: focusing on the expectation-value theory. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 37(4), 283-312. https://doi.org/10.24211/TJKTE.2020.37.4.283
  12. Kim, A. Y. (2010). Academic motivation: theory, research, and application. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  13. Kim, D., Choi, S. & Lee, Ju. (2020). An analysis of pre-service teachers' cognition in curriculum for developing their discursive competency. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(2), 41-68.
  14. Kim, H. J. & Koh, S. S. (2018). Development of instructional model for school mathematics based on the democratic learning community to enhance the character education. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 21(4), 377-400. https://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2018.21.4.004
  15. Kim, H. Y. & Lee, M. (2018). A study on the ability of mathematics pre-service teacher's core subject competency assessment. School Mathematics, 20(2), 319-335. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2018.06.20.2.319
  16. Kim, N. R. (2019). 'Early algebra' learning task design enhancing intrinsic motivation based on executable expression. Master's thesis. The Graduate School Seoul National University, Seoul.
  17. Kim, R. Y. & Lee, M. H. (2013). Middle school mathematics teachers' perceptions of constructed-response assessments. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 23(4), 533-551.
  18. Kim, S. & Yoon, M. (2004). Designing a learning environment to enhance learner's interests and intrinsic motivation to learn. The Korean Journal of Education Methodology Studies, 16(1), 39-66.
  19. Kim, S. H. (2006). Suggestion of implementing 「Assessment of Mathematics Learning」 class for educating prospective teachers. School Mathematics, 8(3), 301-326.
  20. Kim, S. H. (2012). Improving mathematics pre-service teachers' assessment competence through practice and reflection. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 22(2), 277-292.
  21. Kim, Y., Kim, S. & Han, S. (2019). Changing in perception of pre-mathematics teachers about project-based learning. Communications of Mathematical Education, 33(3), 231-354.
  22. Kwon, S. K., Bong, M. & Kim, S. (2016). Teacher efficacy for positive teacher-student relations as a predictor of student achievement, motivation, and classroom engagement. The Korea Educational Review, 22(3), 265-299.
  23. Lee, J. & Kim, H. (2020). Analysis of pre-service mathematics teachers' experience on design thinking based teaching practicum. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(3), 235-256. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEE.2020.34.3.235
  24. Lee, J. E. (2007). Motivation for achievement in mathematics. The Mathematical Education, 46(1), 1-18.
  25. Merriam, S. B. (2010). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (Y. Kang, S. S. Koh, O. N. Kwon, H. C. Lew, M. Park, J. S. Pang, ..., W. H. Whang Trans.). Seoul: Kyowoosa.
  26. Middleton, J. A. & Jansen, A. (2011). Motivation matters and interest counts: fostering engagement in mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  27. National Institute of Korean Language Ed. (2020). Standard Korean Dictionary(web version). National Institute of Korean Language.
  28. NCTM (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  29. NCTM (2000). Principles and standard for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  30. Pang, J. & Sunwoo, J. (2016). The change of prospective teachers' comments on elementary mathematics instruction by teaching practicum and discussion about lessons. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea, 20(2), 259-281.
  31. Reeve, J. (2009). Understanding motivation and emotion (5th ed.). NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  32. Rim, H. (2009). Study on the effectiveness of team project to improve TPACK of preservice mathematics teachers, Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 19(4), 545-564.
  33. Ross, D. & Bergin, D. (2011). Recommendations from self-determination theory for enhancing motivation for mathematics. In D. J. Brahier & W. R. Speer (Eds.), Motivation and disposition: Pathways to learning mathematics (pp. 55-68). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  34. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  35. Ryu, H. (2017). Performing and effects team-based learning program for improving of teaching competencies of pre-service elementary school teachers. East Asian Mathematical Journal, 33(2), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.7858/eamj.2017.016
  36. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2013). Motivation in Education: theory, research, and applications (Center for Learning Science and Creative Talent Development Trans.). Seoul: Hakjisa. (Origin published in 2008)
  37. Schunk, D. & Richardson, K. (2011). Motivation and self-efficacy in mathematics education. In J. B. Daniel & R. S. William (Eds.), Motivation and disposition: pathways to learning mathematics (pp. 13-30). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  38. Shim, S. K. (2015). A study on pre-service mathematics teachers' teaching behaviors and changes about motivation in microteaching. Communications of Mathematical Education, 29(4), 643-660. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2015.29.4.643
  39. Shin, H., Kim, E., Min, H. & Jeong, C. (2009). Educational psychology for motivation of learner. Seoul: Shinjeong.
  40. So, Y. (2007). Does choice improve motivation to learn? current issues in research on the effects of choice and its implications. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 19(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.17927/TKJEMS.2007.19.1.77
  41. Um, T. & Yoon, M. (2020). Review of cost in the expectancy-value model. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 34(2), 233-257. https://doi.org/10.17286/KJEP.2020.34.2.01
  42. Watson, M. & Benson, K.(2008). Creating a culture for character In M. J. Schwartz (Ed.), Effective character education: A guidebook for future educators (pp. 48-91). NY: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
  43. Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: a theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90011-P
  44. Yu, J. (2015). The relationships among parents-, teacher-, student-related variables and student engagement in middle and high school. Korean J ournal of Educational Research, 53(3), 1-30.
  45. Zollman, A., Smith, M. C. & Reisdorf, P. (2011). Identity development: critical component for learning in mathematics. In D. J. Brahier & W. R. Speer (Eds.), Motivation and disposition: pathways to learning mathematics (pp. 43-53). Reston, VA: NCTM.