Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reliability and Validity of the Korean version of autonomy preference index among patients with chronic disease

만성질환자 대상 한국어판 자율성 선호도 도구(K-Autonomy Preference Index)의 신뢰도 및 타당도 검증

  • Lee, Jihae (College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • An, Bomi (College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University)
  • 이지애 (이화여자대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 안보미 (이화여자대학교 간호대학)
  • Received : 2021.05.24
  • Accepted : 2021.08.20
  • Published : 2021.08.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of autonomy preference index (K-API) for chronic patients. Participants were 569 chronic patients. Construct validity and reliability of K-API were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and Cronbach's α test. Original API was translated to Korean, and we conducted contents validity test, and pilot test. The K-API consisted of 10 items divided into two domains: (i) Decision making preference (DMP); (ii) Information seeking preference (ISP). K-API explained 53.4% of autonomy preference; the two-factor structure showed an acceptance fit. Cronbach's α was. 77 for DMP, and. 75 for ISP. Validity and reliability of the K-API were established, and this study provides additional evidence for the usage of the API in Asian region.

본 연구의 목적은 만성질환자를 대상으로 한국어판 자율성 선호도 측정 도구(K-API)의 타당도와 신뢰도를 검증하는 것이다. 총 569명의 만성질환자가 참여하였다. 구성타당도를 검증하기 위하여 탐색적, 확인적 요인분석을 시행하고, 신뢰도는 Cronbach's α 값으로 확인하였다. 원도구를 한국어로 번역한 후 내용 타당도 검증, 예비 조사를 시행하였다. 연구결과, K-API는 두 총 10개의 문항으로 구성되며 (i) 의사결정 선호도, (ii) 정보추구 선호도의 두 영역으로 구성되었다. K-API는 자율성 선호도의 53.4%를 설명하며, 2개 요인으로 구성된 도구의 적합도 지수가 충족되었다. Cronbach's α는 의사결정 선호도는 .77, 정보추구 선호도는 .75로 나타났다. 본 연구를 통하여 K-API의 타당도가 신뢰도가 확인되었으며, 이는 아시아 지역에서의 API 도구의 적용 가능성에 대한 추가적인 근거를 제공한다.

Keywords

References

  1. D. D. Carr. (2017). Motivational interviewing supports patient centered-care and communication. Journal of New York Nurse Association, 45(1), 39-43. DOI: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000184
  2. N. Zizzo, E. Bell, A. Lafontaine & E. Racine. (2016). Examining chronic care patient preferences for involvement in health-care decision making: the case of parkinson's disease patients in a patient-centered clinic. Health Expectation, 2(4), 655-664. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12497.
  3. L. Ambrosio, J. M. S. Garcia, M. R. Fernandez, S. A. Bravo, D. D. C. Ayesa, M. E. U. Sesma, N. Caparros & M. C. Portillo. (2015). Living with chronic illness in adults: A concept analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24, 2357-2367. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12827.
  4. P. A. Grady & L. L. Gough. (2014). Self-management: A comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions. American Journal of Public Health, 104(8), 25-31. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302041r.
  5. J. A. Sakalys. (2010). Patient autonomy: Patient voices and perspectives in illness narratives. International Journal of Human Caring, 14(1), 15-20. DOI: 10.20467/1091-5710.14.1.15
  6. H. Ebrahimi, E. Sadeghian, N. Seyedfatemi & E. Mohammadi. (2016). Chronic patients' autonomy in Iranian hospitals: A qualitative study. Ethics & Behavior, 27(1), 74-87. DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2015.1126525
  7. C. Lindberg, C. Fagerstrom, B. Sivberg & A. Willman. (2014). Concept analysis: Patient autonomy in a caring context. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(10), 2208-2221. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12412.
  8. J. Ende, L. Kazis, A. Ash & M. A. Moskowitz. (1989). Measuring patients' desire for autonomy. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 4(1), 23-30. DOI: 10.1007/bf02596485.
  9. K. A. Bonfils, E. L. Adams, L. T. Mueser, J. L. Wright-Berryman & M. P. Salyers. (2015). Factor structure of the autonomy preference index in people with severe mental illness. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 228(3), 526-530. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.06.004.
  10. S. Morandi, P. Golay, M. Vazquez-Montes, J. Rugkasa, A. Molodynski, K. Yeeles K & T. Burns. (2017). Factorial structure and long-term stability of the autonomy preference index. Psychological Assessment, 29(1), 110-115. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000327.
  11. I. Colombet, L. Rigal, M. Urtizberea, P. Vinant & A. Rouquette. (2020). Validity of the French version of the autonomy preference index and its adaptation for patients with advanced cancer. PLoS One, 15(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227802
  12. H. Hashimoto & S. Fukuhara. (2004). The influence of locus of control on preferences for information and decision making. Patient Education and Counseling, 55(2), 236-240. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.09.010
  13. K. Nomura, M. Ohno, Y. Fujinuma & H. Ishikawa. (2007). Patient autonomy preferences among hypertensive outpatients in a primary care setting in Japan. Internal Medicine, 46(17), 1403-1408. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.46.0141
  14. S. Y. Jang & K. J. Lee. (2005). Information seeking by older people and their desire for participation in decision-making regarding treatment of disease. Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing, 7(1), 54-64. DOI: 10.5762/KAIS.2020.21.6.127
  15. J. C. Nunnally. (1978). Psychometrics theory, New York : McGraw-Hill Publising.
  16. E. L. O'Neal, J. R. Adams, G. J. McHugo, A. D. Van Citters, R. E. Drake & S. J. Bartels. (2008). Preferences of older and younger adults with serious mental illness for involvement in decision-making in medical and psychiatric settings. American Journal of Hematology, 16, 826-833. DOI: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318181f992.
  17. D. Simon, L. Kriston, A. Loh, C. Spies, F. Scheibler, C. Wills C & M. Harter. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis and recommendations for improvement of the Autonomy-Preference-Index (API). Health Expectation, 13(3), 234-243 DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00584.x.
  18. E. Goden & S. Taylor. (1988). Self-as-carer: A preliminary evaluation. University of Missouri-Columbia School of Nursing Seventh Annual Nursing Research Conference. Columbia (MO).
  19. H. S. So. (1992). Testing construct validity of Self-As-Carer Inventory and its predictors. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 4(2), 147-161.
  20. D. F. Polit & C. T. Beck. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20147.
  21. B. Thompson. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications, Washington DC : American Psychological Association.
  22. J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson & R. L. Tatham. (2006). Multivariate data analysis 7th ed, Upper Saddle River (NJ) : Pearson Prentice Hall.
  23. M. A. Pett, N. R. Lackey & J. J. Sullivan. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research, Thousand Oaks (CA) : Sage publication,
  24. K. S. Noh. (2014). Statistical analysis of the thesis: SPSS & AMOS 21, Seoul : Hanbit Academy Inc.
  25. W. P. Kim. (2017). Rewriting statistical analysis: Advanced regression analysis. Seoul : Wise in Company.
  26. J. C. Anderson & D. W. Gerbing. (1992). Assumptions and comparative strengths of the two-step approach: Commenton Fornell and Yi. Sociological Methods & Research, 20(1), 321-333. DOI: 10.1177/0049124192020003002.
  27. T. A. Brown. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research 2nd ed, New York : The Gilford Press.
  28. S. M. Lee. (2007). A cross-cultural approach to biomedical ethics: Medical decision making. Korean Journal of Medical Ethics Education, 10(1), 23-32. DOI: 10.35301/ksme.2007.10.1.23.
  29. R. F. DeVellis. (2017). Scale development: theory and application 4th ed, Thousand Oaks (CA) : Sage Publication.
  30. N. Yoon. (2018). Patients' participation in treatment decision makings and health status. Korean Society for Quality in Health Care, 24(1), 40-52. DOI: 10.14371/QIH.2018.24.1.40
  31. M. S. Litwin. (1995). How to measure survey reliability and validity, Thousand Oaks (CA) : Sage Publication.
  32. Statistics Korea (2019). National Health Statistics 2019. K-indicator, 2021 from http://index.go.kr/smart/mbl/chart_view.do?idx_cd=1438