Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2021.12.8.381

Reliability and Validity of the Korean version of autonomy preference index among patients with chronic disease  

Lee, Jihae (College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University)
An, Bomi (College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Convergence Society / v.12, no.8, 2021 , pp. 381-391 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of autonomy preference index (K-API) for chronic patients. Participants were 569 chronic patients. Construct validity and reliability of K-API were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and Cronbach's α test. Original API was translated to Korean, and we conducted contents validity test, and pilot test. The K-API consisted of 10 items divided into two domains: (i) Decision making preference (DMP); (ii) Information seeking preference (ISP). K-API explained 53.4% of autonomy preference; the two-factor structure showed an acceptance fit. Cronbach's α was. 77 for DMP, and. 75 for ISP. Validity and reliability of the K-API were established, and this study provides additional evidence for the usage of the API in Asian region.
Keywords
Patient preferences; Decision making; Chronic disease; Relational autonomy; Patient-centered care;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 K. Nomura, M. Ohno, Y. Fujinuma & H. Ishikawa. (2007). Patient autonomy preferences among hypertensive outpatients in a primary care setting in Japan. Internal Medicine, 46(17), 1403-1408. DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.46.0141   DOI
2 R. F. DeVellis. (2017). Scale development: theory and application 4th ed, Thousand Oaks (CA) : Sage Publication.
3 D. D. Carr. (2017). Motivational interviewing supports patient centered-care and communication. Journal of New York Nurse Association, 45(1), 39-43. DOI: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000184   DOI
4 N. Zizzo, E. Bell, A. Lafontaine & E. Racine. (2016). Examining chronic care patient preferences for involvement in health-care decision making: the case of parkinson's disease patients in a patient-centered clinic. Health Expectation, 2(4), 655-664. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12497.   DOI
5 L. Ambrosio, J. M. S. Garcia, M. R. Fernandez, S. A. Bravo, D. D. C. Ayesa, M. E. U. Sesma, N. Caparros & M. C. Portillo. (2015). Living with chronic illness in adults: A concept analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24, 2357-2367. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12827.   DOI
6 P. A. Grady & L. L. Gough. (2014). Self-management: A comprehensive approach to management of chronic conditions. American Journal of Public Health, 104(8), 25-31. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302041r.   DOI
7 J. A. Sakalys. (2010). Patient autonomy: Patient voices and perspectives in illness narratives. International Journal of Human Caring, 14(1), 15-20. DOI: 10.20467/1091-5710.14.1.15   DOI
8 H. Ebrahimi, E. Sadeghian, N. Seyedfatemi & E. Mohammadi. (2016). Chronic patients' autonomy in Iranian hospitals: A qualitative study. Ethics & Behavior, 27(1), 74-87. DOI: 10.1080/10508422.2015.1126525   DOI
9 T. A. Brown. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research 2nd ed, New York : The Gilford Press.
10 Statistics Korea (2019). National Health Statistics 2019. K-indicator, 2021 from http://index.go.kr/smart/mbl/chart_view.do?idx_cd=1438
11 C. Lindberg, C. Fagerstrom, B. Sivberg & A. Willman. (2014). Concept analysis: Patient autonomy in a caring context. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(10), 2208-2221. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12412.   DOI
12 S. Y. Jang & K. J. Lee. (2005). Information seeking by older people and their desire for participation in decision-making regarding treatment of disease. Journal of Korean Gerontological Nursing, 7(1), 54-64. DOI: 10.5762/KAIS.2020.21.6.127   DOI
13 J. Ende, L. Kazis, A. Ash & M. A. Moskowitz. (1989). Measuring patients' desire for autonomy. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 4(1), 23-30. DOI: 10.1007/bf02596485.   DOI
14 K. A. Bonfils, E. L. Adams, L. T. Mueser, J. L. Wright-Berryman & M. P. Salyers. (2015). Factor structure of the autonomy preference index in people with severe mental illness. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 228(3), 526-530. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.06.004.   DOI
15 S. Morandi, P. Golay, M. Vazquez-Montes, J. Rugkasa, A. Molodynski, K. Yeeles K & T. Burns. (2017). Factorial structure and long-term stability of the autonomy preference index. Psychological Assessment, 29(1), 110-115. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000327.   DOI
16 E. Goden & S. Taylor. (1988). Self-as-carer: A preliminary evaluation. University of Missouri-Columbia School of Nursing Seventh Annual Nursing Research Conference. Columbia (MO).
17 H. S. So. (1992). Testing construct validity of Self-As-Carer Inventory and its predictors. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 4(2), 147-161.
18 J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson & R. L. Tatham. (2006). Multivariate data analysis 7th ed, Upper Saddle River (NJ) : Pearson Prentice Hall.
19 M. A. Pett, N. R. Lackey & J. J. Sullivan. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research, Thousand Oaks (CA) : Sage publication,
20 I. Colombet, L. Rigal, M. Urtizberea, P. Vinant & A. Rouquette. (2020). Validity of the French version of the autonomy preference index and its adaptation for patients with advanced cancer. PLoS One, 15(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227802   DOI
21 H. Hashimoto & S. Fukuhara. (2004). The influence of locus of control on preferences for information and decision making. Patient Education and Counseling, 55(2), 236-240. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2003.09.010   DOI
22 J. C. Nunnally. (1978). Psychometrics theory, New York : McGraw-Hill Publising.
23 E. L. O'Neal, J. R. Adams, G. J. McHugo, A. D. Van Citters, R. E. Drake & S. J. Bartels. (2008). Preferences of older and younger adults with serious mental illness for involvement in decision-making in medical and psychiatric settings. American Journal of Hematology, 16, 826-833. DOI: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318181f992.   DOI
24 K. S. Noh. (2014). Statistical analysis of the thesis: SPSS & AMOS 21, Seoul : Hanbit Academy Inc.
25 W. P. Kim. (2017). Rewriting statistical analysis: Advanced regression analysis. Seoul : Wise in Company.
26 J. C. Anderson & D. W. Gerbing. (1992). Assumptions and comparative strengths of the two-step approach: Commenton Fornell and Yi. Sociological Methods & Research, 20(1), 321-333. DOI: 10.1177/0049124192020003002.   DOI
27 S. M. Lee. (2007). A cross-cultural approach to biomedical ethics: Medical decision making. Korean Journal of Medical Ethics Education, 10(1), 23-32. DOI: 10.35301/ksme.2007.10.1.23.   DOI
28 N. Yoon. (2018). Patients' participation in treatment decision makings and health status. Korean Society for Quality in Health Care, 24(1), 40-52. DOI: 10.14371/QIH.2018.24.1.40   DOI
29 D. F. Polit & C. T. Beck. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20147.   DOI
30 M. S. Litwin. (1995). How to measure survey reliability and validity, Thousand Oaks (CA) : Sage Publication.
31 D. Simon, L. Kriston, A. Loh, C. Spies, F. Scheibler, C. Wills C & M. Harter. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis and recommendations for improvement of the Autonomy-Preference-Index (API). Health Expectation, 13(3), 234-243 DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00584.x.   DOI
32 B. Thompson. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications, Washington DC : American Psychological Association.