Journal of the Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회논문지)

Korea Convergence Society (한국융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Influencing Innovation Performance through Industry-Research Institute Cooperation of Researchers at Government-Funded Research Institutes in Daedeok Innopolis: An fsQCA Approach

대덕연구개발특구 정부출연연연구기관 연구자의 산연협력 혁신성과 결정요인 분석: 퍼지집합 질적 비교분석 접근

  • Hwang, Kyung-Yun (Science & Technology Knowledge Research Institute, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Sung, Eul-Hyun (Science & Technology Knowledge Research Institute, Chungnam National University)
  • 황경연 (충남대학교 과학기술지식연구소) ;
  • 성을현 (충남대학교 과학기술지식연구소)
  • Received : 2021.04.06
  • Accepted : 2021.07.20
  • Published : 2021.07.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of determinants of innovation performance on innovation performance in industry-research institute(IR) cooperation for researchers of government-funded research institutes in Daedeok Innopolis. We reviewed the existing literature on the determinants of innovation performance through cooperation, and established a conceptual framework to analyze the combinatorial effect of the determinants of innovation performance on innovation performance in IR cooperation. Data for empirical analysis were collected through a questionnaire survey targeting researchers at a government-funded research institute in Daedeok Innopolis. The fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was used to analyze the combined effect of determinants of innovation performance. The fsQCA results show that the configuration of high motivation, high trust, high commitment and high satisfaction of researchers of government-funded research institutes improve innovation performance. On the other hand, it shows that the configuration of high motivation, high trust, low commitment and low satisfaction of the researcher improves innovation performance.

본 연구는 대덕연구개발특구 정부출연연구기관 연구자를 대상으로 산연협력에서 혁신성과 결정요인의 결합효과를 분석하는 데 목적이 있다. 기존 문헌검토를 통해 협력에 의한 혁신성과에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 고찰하고, 이들 요인의 조합이 산연협력 혁신성과에 영향을 미치는 결합효과를 분석하기 위한 개념적 연구모형을 설정하였다. 실증분석 위한 자료는 대덕연구개발특구 정부출연연구기관 연구자를 대상으로 수행한 설문조사를 통해 수집되었다. 산연협력 혁신성과 결정요인의 결합효과 분석에는 퍼지집합 질적 비교분석(fsQCA)이 사용되었다. fsQCA 결과에서는 높은 산연협력 동기부여, 높은 산연협력 신뢰, 높은 산연협력 몰입 및 높은 산연협력 만족도의 구성이 연구자의 산연협력 혁신성과를 향상시키는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 높은 산연협력 동기부여, 높은 산연협력 신뢰, 낮은 산연협력 몰입, 낮은 산학협력기업 의존성 및 낮은 산연협력 만족도의 구성이 정부출연연구기관 연구자의 산연협력 혁신성과를 높이는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2019S1A5C2A03081332)

References

  1. D. R. de Moraes Silva, A. T. Furtado & N. S. Vonortas. (2018). University-industry R&D cooperation in Brazil: a sectoral approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 285-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9566-z
  2. I. Freitas, R. Marques & R., E. Silva. (2013). "University industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy, 42, 443-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.006
  3. STEPI. (2020), The Policy Path for Technology Commercialization on the Past 20 Years and for the Next, Sejong : Science and Technology Policy Institute. https://www.stepi.re.kr/
  4. R. Fontana, A Geuna & M. Matt. (2006). Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35, 309-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.12.001
  5. H. Merritt. (2015). The role of human capital in university-business cooperation: The case of Mexico. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(3), 568-588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0258-3
  6. P. Paille, N. Amara & N. Halilem. (2018). Greening the workplace through social sustainability among co-workers. Journal of Business Research, 89, 305-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.044
  7. C. C. Ragin & B. Rihoux. (2004). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): State of the art and prospects. Qualitative Methods, 2(2), 3-13.
  8. M. Zareen, K. Razzaq & B. G. Mujtaba. (2015). Impact of transactional, transformational and laissez-faire leadership styles on motivation: A quantitative Study of Banking Employees in Pakistan. Public Organization Review, 15, 531-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-014-0287-6
  9. R. Kanfer, M. Frese & R. E. Johnson. (2017). Motivation related to work: a century of progress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 338-355. DOI: 10.1037/apl0000133
  10. G. Chen, J. L. Farh, E. M. Campbell-Bush, Z. Wu & X. Wu. (2013). Teams as innovative systems: Multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1018-1027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032663
  11. R. Eisenberger & L. Shanock. (2003). Rewards, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ152&3_02
  12. E. A. Saether. (2019). Motivational antecedents to high-tech R&D employees' innovative work behavior: Self-determined motivation, person-organization fit, organization support of creativity, and pay justice. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 30(2), 100350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2019.100350
  13. M. Thompson & P. Heron. (2006). Relational quality and innovative performance in R&D based science and technology firms. Human Resource Management Journal, 16(1), 28-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2006.00003.x
  14. F. C. Tseng, M. H. Huang & D. Z. Chen. (2020). Factors of university-industry collaboration affecting university innovation performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45, 560-577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9656-6
  15. Y. Zhu, D. G. Gardner & H. Chen. (2018). Relationships between work team climate, individual motivation, and creativity. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2094-2115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316638161
  16. E. S. O. Escobar, J. Berbegal-Mirabent, I. Alegre & O. G. Velasco. (2017). Researchers' willingness to engage in knowledge and technology transfer activities: an exploration of the underlying motivations. R&D Management, 47(5), 715-726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12263
  17. M. Khadhraoui, M. Plaisent, L. Lakhal & B. Prosper. (2016). Factors inhibiting university-industry technology transfer. Journal of Information Technology and Economic Development, 7(2), 1-11.
  18. K. Shahzad, P. Arenius, A. Muller, M.A. Rasheed & S. U. Bajwa. (2019). Unpacking the relationship between high-performance work systems and innovation performance in SMEs. Personnel Review, 48(4), 977-1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2016-0271
  19. Q. Huang. (2021). Can curious employees be more innovative? exploring the mechanism of intrinsic motivation and job autonomy. Psychology, 12(3), 425-440. DOI: 10.4236/psych.2021.123027
  20. E. Kyriazis, P. Couchman & L. W. Johnson. (2012). Psychosocial antecedents of communication, trust, relationship effectiveness in new product development projects: a functional manager perspective. R&D Management, 42(3), 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00679.x
  21. M. Williams. (2001). In whom we trust: group membership as an affective context for trust development. Academy of Management Review, 26, 377-396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845794
  22. J. C. Anderson & B. Weitz. (1989). Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Science, 8, 310-323. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.8.4.310
  23. A. L. Oliver, K. Montgomery & S. Barda. (2020). The multi-level process of trust and learning in university-industry innovation collaborations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45, 758-779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09721-4,
  24. E. Bellini, G. Piroli & L. Pennacchio. (2019). Collaborative know-how and trust in university-industry collaborations: empirical evidence from ICT firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1939-1963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9655-7
  25. H. Lei, T. T. Nguyen & P. B. Le. (2019). How knowledge sharing connects interpersonal trust and innovation capability: The moderating effect of leadership support. Chinese Management Studies, 13(2), 276-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-06-2018-0554
  26. W. U. Hameed & F. Naveed. (2019). Coopetition-Based Open-Innovation and Innovation Performance: Role of Trust and Dependency Evidence from Malaysian High-Tech SMEs. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 13(1), 209-230. DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/196194
  27. V. Nestle, F. A. Taube, S. Heidenreich & M. Bogers. (2019). Establishing open innovation culture in cluster initiatives: The role of trust and information asymmetry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 563-572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.022
  28. L. Wang, J. L. Jin, D. Yang & K. Z. Zhou. (2020). Inter-partner control, trust, and radical innovation of IJVs in China: A contingent governance perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 70-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.018
  29. C. Moorman, G. Zaltman & R. Deshpande. (1992). Relationship between providers and user of marketing research. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 314-329. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379202900303
  30. Z. S. Dimitriades. (2006). Customer satisfaction, loyalty and commitment in service organizations: some evidence from Greece. Management Research News, 29(12), 782-800. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170610717817
  31. L. Owen, C. Goldwasser, K. Choate & A. Blitz. (2008). Collaborative innovation throughout the extended enterprise. Strategy & Leadership, 36(1), 39-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570810840689
  32. R. M. Ham & D. C. Mowery. (1998). Improving the effectiveness of public-private R&D collaboration: case studies at a US weapons laboratory. Research Policy, 26(6), 661-675. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00041-3
  33. H. Okamuro & J. Nishimura. (2018) Whose business is your project? A comparative study of different subsidy policy schemes for collaborative R&D. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 85-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.017
  34. M. J. Sanzo, L. I. Alvarez, M. Rey & N. Garcia. (2015). Business-nonprofit partnerships: a new form of collaboration in a corporate responsibility and social innovation context. Service Business, 9, 611-636. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-014-0242-1
  35. A. S. Patrucco, A. Moretto, D. Luzzini & A. H. Glas. (2020). Obtaining supplier commitment: antecedents and performance outcomes. International Journal of Production Economics, 220, 107449. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.022
  36. J. Nishimura & H. Okamuro. (2018). Internal and external discipline: The effect of project leadership and government monitoring on the performance of publicly funded R&D consortia. Research Policy, 47(5), 840-853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.007
  37. S. Castellano, K. Chandavimol, I. Khelladi & M. A. Orhand. (2021). Impact of self-leadership and shared leadership on the performance of virtual R&D teams. Journal of Business Research, 128, 578-586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.030
  38. N. Yang, Y. Song, Y. Zhang & J. Wang. (2020). Dark side of joint R&D collaborations: dependence asymmetry and opportunism. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(4), 741-755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-11-2018-0354
  39. R. B. Bouncken & V. Fredrich. (2012). Coopetition: performance implications and management antecedents. International Journal of Innovation Management, 16(5), 1-28.
  40. L. Raymond & J. St-Pierre. (2004). Customer dependency in manufacturing SMEs: implications for R&D and performance. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000410519074
  41. R. Jacob, P. A. Julien & L. Raymond. (1997). Developing the network enterprise: foundations, technologies and experiences. Proceedings of the 7th International Forum on Technology Management, 3-7, 178-183.
  42. J. Zhang, J. Guo, J. Jiang, X. Wu & R. Jiang. (2021). Moderating effect of requirements uncertainty on task interdependence and NPD performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(2), 456-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2020-0490
  43. T. W. H. Ng & D. C. Feldman. (2010). The impact of job embeddedness on innovation-related behaviors. Human Resource Management, 49(6), 1067-1087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20390
  44. J. A. Antoncic & B. Antoncic. (2011). Employee satisfaction, intrapreneurship and firm growth: A model. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(4), 589-607. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111133560
  45. H. J. Niu. (2014). Is innovation behavior congenital? Enhancing job satisfaction as a moderator. Personnel Review, 43(2), 288-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2012-0200
  46. L. Lee, P. K. Wong, M. D. Foo, A. Leung. (2011). Entrepreneurial intentions: the influence of organizational and individual factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(1), 124-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.04.003
  47. S. Tsai. (2018). Using the DEMATEL model to explore the job satisfaction of research and development professionals in china's photovoltaic cell industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 62-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.014
  48. J. Wei, Y. Chen, Y. Zhang & J. Zhang. (2020). How does entrepreneurial self-efficacy influence innovation behavior? Exploring the mechanism of job satisfaction and Zhongyong thinking, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 708. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00708
  49. D. M. Martins, A. C. de Faria, L. C. Prearo & A. G. S. Arruda. (2017). The level of influence of trust, commitment, cooperation, and power in the interorganizational relationships of Brazilian credit cooperatives. Revista de Administracao, 52(1), 47-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.09.003
  50. L. K. Scheer, F. C. Miao & R. W. Palmatier. (2015). Dependence and Interdependence in Marketing Relationships: Meta-Analytic Insights. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 694-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0418-1
  51. J. R. Brown, J. L. Crosno & P. Y. Tong. (2019). Is the Theory of Trust and Commitment in Marketing Relationships Incomplete?. Industrial Marketing Management, 77, 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.10.005
  52. N. Hogevold, G. Svensson & C. Otero-Neira. (2020). Trust and commitment as mediators between economic and non-economic satisfaction in business relationships: A sales perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(11), 1685-1700. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-03-2019-0118
  53. S. Lowik, J. Kraaijenbrink & A. J. Groen. (2017). Antecedents and effects of individual absorptive capacity: a micro-foundational perspective on open innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1319-1341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0410
  54. C. C. Ragin. (2007). Fuzzy sets: Calibration versus measurement. Methodology Volume of Oxford Handbooks of Political Science, 2, 1-31.
  55. C. C. Ragin. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
  56. C. C. Ragin & S. Davey. (2014). Fuzzy-set/ qualitative comparative analysis 2.5. Irvine, California : Department of Sociology, University of California.
  57. C. M. Ringle, S. Wende & J. M. Becker. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt : SmartPLS GmbH. DOI: http://www.smartpls.com.
  58. J. F. Hair Jr, M. C. Howard & C. Nitz. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
  59. C. Fornell & D. F. Larcker. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  60. A. G. Woodside & M. Zhang. (2012). Identifying x-consumers using causal recipes: "Whales" and "jumbo shrimps" casino gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-011-9241-5
  61. P. C. Fiss. (2011). "Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393- 420. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263120
  62. B. Rihoux & C. C. Ragin. (2008). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks CA : Sage Publications.
  63. J. Dul. (2016). Identifying single necessary conditions with NCA and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1516-1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.134
  64. A. G. Woodside. (2013). Moving beyond multiple regression analysis to algorithms: Calling for adoption of a paradigm shift from symmetric to asymmetric thinking in data analysis and crafting theory. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.021
  65. A. G. Woodside. (2014). Embrace.perform.model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2495-2503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.07.006
  66. C. Q. Schneider & C. Wagemann. (2010). Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397-418. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793