Genomics & Informatics

Korea Genome Organization (한국유전체학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of genome variants in dwarf soybean lines obtained in F6 derived from cross of normal parents (cultivated and wild soybean)

  • Roy, Neha Samir (Department of Agriculture and Life Industry, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Ban, Yong-Wook (Department of Forest Environmental System, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Yoo, Hana (Department of Agriculture and Life Industry, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Ramekar, Rahul Vasudeo (Department of Agriculture and Life Industry, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Cheong, Eun Ju (Department of Forest Environmental System, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Park, Nam-Il (Department of Plant Science, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Na, Jong Kuk (Department of Controlled Agriculture, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Park, Kyong-Cheul (Department of Agriculture and Life Industry, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Choi, Ik-Young (Department of Agriculture and Life Industry, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2021.04.08
  • Accepted : 2021.04.21
  • Published : 2021.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Plant height is an important component of plant architecture and significantly affects crop breeding practices and yield. We studied DNA variations derived from F5 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) with 96.8% homozygous genotypes. Here, we report DNA variations between the normal and dwarf members of four lines harvested from a single seed parent in an F6 RIL population derived from a cross between Glycine max var. Peking and Glycine soja IT182936. Whole genome sequencing was carried out, and the DNA variations in the whole genome were compared between the normal and dwarf samples. We found a large number of DNA variations in both the dwarf and semi-dwarf lines, with one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) per at least 3.68 kb in the dwarf lines and 1 SNP per 11.13 kb of the whole genome. This value is 2.18 times higher than the expected DNA variation in the F6 population. A total of 186 SNPs and 241 SNPs were discovered in the coding regions of the dwarf lines 1282 and 1303, respectively, and we discovered 33 homogeneous nonsynonymous SNPs that occurred at the same loci in each set of dwarf and normal soybean. Of them, five SNPs were in the same positions between lines 1282 and 1303. Our results provide important information for improving our understanding of the genetics of soybean plant height and crop breeding. These polymorphisms could be useful genetic resources for plant breeders, geneticists, and biologists for future molecular biology and breeding projects.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2017R1A2B4011198)

References

  1. Fried HG, Narayanan S, Fallen B. Evaluation of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes for yield, water use efficiency, and root traits. PLoS One 2019;14:e0212700. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212700
  2. Shin DH. Utilization of soybean as food stuffs in Korea. In: El-Shemy H, ed. Soybean and Nutrition. London: IntechOpen, 2011. pp. 81-110.
  3. Zhang Y, Yu C, Lin J, Liu J, Liu B, Wang J, et al. OsMPH1 regulates plant height and improves grain yield in rice. PLoS One 2017;12:e0180825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180825
  4. Milach SC, Federizzi LC. Dwarfing genes in plant improvement. Adv Agron 2001;73:35-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(01)73004-0
  5. Kuraparthy V, Sood S, Gill BS. Genomic targeting and mapping of tiller inhibition gene (tin3) of wheat using ESTs and synteny with rice. Funct Integr Genomics 2008;8:33-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-007-0057-4
  6. Ku L, Wei X, Zhang S, Zhang J, Guo S, Chen Y. Cloning and characterization of a putative TAC1 ortholog associated with leaf angle in maize (Zea mays L.). PLoS One 2011;6:e20621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020621
  7. Dardick C, Callahan A, Horn R, Ruiz KB, Zhebentyayeva T, Hollender C, et al. PpeTAC1 promotes the horizontal growth of branches in peach trees and is a member of a functionally conserved gene family found in diverse plants species. Plant J 2013; 75:618-630. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12234
  8. Cooper RL, Martin RJ, Walker AK, Schmitthenner AF. Registration of 'Hobbit' soybean. Crop Sci 1991;31:231. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100010057x
  9. Egan AN, Schlueter J, Spooner DM. Applications of next-generation sequencing in plant biology. Am J Bot 2012;99:175-185. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1200020
  10. Brautigam A, Gowik U. What can next generation sequencing do for you? Next generation sequencing as a valuable tool in plant research. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2010;12:831-841. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00373.x
  11. Qi J, Liu X, Shen D, Miao H, Xie B, Li X, et al. A genomic variation map provides insights into the genetic basis of cucumber domestication and diversity. Nat Genet 2013;45:1510-1515. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2801
  12. Li H, Peng Z, Yang X, Wang W, Fu J, Wang J, et al. Genome-wide association study dissects the genetic architecture of oil biosynthesis in maize kernels. Nat Genet 2013;45:43-50. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2484
  13. Ossowski S, Schneeberger K, Clark RM, Lanz C, Warthmann N, Weigel D. Sequencing of natural strains of Arabidopsis thaliana with short reads. Genome Res 2008;18:2024-2033. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.080200.108
  14. Kim MY, Lee S, Van K, Kim TH, Jeong SC, Choi IY, et al. Whole-genome sequencing and intensive analysis of the undomesticated soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. and Zucc.) genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:22032-22037. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009526107
  15. Kumar S, Banks TW, Cloutier S. SNP discovery through next-generation sequencing and its applications. Int J Plant Genomics 2012;2012:831460. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/831460
  16. Tang W, Wu T, Ye J, Sun J, Jiang Y, Yu J, et al. SNP-based analysis of genetic diversity reveals important alleles associated with seed size in rice. BMC Plant Biol 2016;16:93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0779-3
  17. Xu X, Liu X, Ge S, Jensen JD, Hu F, Li X, et al. Resequencing 50 accessions of cultivated and wild rice yields markers for identifying agronomically important genes. Nat Biotechnol 2011;30: 105-111. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2050
  18. Barbazuk WB, Emrich SJ, Chen HD, Li L, Schnable PS. SNP discovery via 454 transcriptome sequencing. Plant J 2007;51:910-918. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03193.x
  19. Mace ES, Tai S, Gilding EK, Li Y, Prentis PJ, Bian L, et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals untapped genetic potential in Africa's indigenous cereal crop sorghum. Nat Commun 2013;4: 2320. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3320
  20. Lam HM, Xu X, Liu X, Chen W, Yang G, Wong FL, et al. Resequencing of 31 wild and cultivated soybean genomes identifies patterns of genetic diversity and selection. Nat Genet 2010;42: 1053-1059. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.715
  21. Chung WH, Jeong N, Kim J, Lee WK, Lee YG, Lee SH, et al. Population structure and domestication revealed by high-depth resequencing of Korean cultivated and wild soybean genomes. DNA Res 2014;21:153-167. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dst047
  22. Maldonado dos Santos JV, Valliyodan B, Joshi T, Khan SM, Liu Y, Wang J, et al. Evaluation of genetic variation among Brazilian soybean cultivars through genome resequencing. BMC Genomics 2016;17:110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2431-x
  23. Zheng LY, Guo XS, He B, Sun LJ, Peng Y, Dong SS, et al. Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation in sweet and grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Genome Biol 2011;12:R114. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-11-r114
  24. Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, Nelson W, et al. Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature 2010;463:178-183. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08670
  25. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 2012;9:357-359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1923
  26. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 2010;20:1297-1303. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.107524.110
  27. De Summa S, Malerba G, Pinto R, Mori A, Mijatovic V, Tommasi S. GATK hard filtering: tunable parameters to improve variant calling for next generation sequencing targeted gene panel data. BMC Bioinformatics 2017;18:119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1537-8
  28. Cingolani P, Platts A, Wang le L, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin) 2012;6:80-92. https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.19695
  29. Lamesch P, Berardini TZ, Li D, Swarbreck D, Wilks C, Sasidharan R, et al. The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:D1202-D1210. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1090
  30. Ramakrishna G, Kaur P, Nigam D, Chaduvula PK, Yadav S, Talukdar A, et al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of InDels and SNPs in Glycine max and Glycine soja for contrasting seed permeability traits. BMC Plant Biol 2018;18:141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1341-2
  31. Singh BD. Principles of Genetics. New Delhi: Kalyani Publishers, 1992.
  32. Liu Y, Du H, Li P, Shen Y, Peng H, Liu S, et al. Pan-genome of wild and cultivated soybeans. Cell 2020;182:162-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.023
  33. Xie M, Chung CY, Li MW, Wong FL, Wang X, Liu A, et al. A reference-grade wild soybean genome. Nat Commun 2019;10: 1216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09142-9
  34. Hawkins C, Caruana J, Schiksnis E, Liu Z. Genome-scale DNA variant analysis and functional validation of a SNP underlying yellow fruit color in wild strawberry. Sci Rep 2016;6:29017. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29017
  35. Robert F, Pelletier J. Exploring the impact of single-nucleotide polymorphisms on translation. Front Genet 2018;9:507. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00507
  36. Shirano Y, Kachroo P, Shah J, Klessig DF. A gain-of-function mutation in an Arabidopsis Toll Interleukin1 receptor-nucleotide binding site-leucine-rich repeat type R gene triggers defense responses and results in enhanced disease resistance. Plant Cell 2002;14:3149-3162. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.005348
  37. van Wersch R, Li X, Zhang Y. Mighty dwarfs: Arabidopsis autoimmune mutants and their usages in genetic dissection of plant immunity. Front Plant Sci 2016;7:1717.
  38. Gao M, Wang X, Wang D, Xu F, Ding X, Zhang Z, et al. Regulation of cell death and innate immunity by two receptor-like kinases in Arabidopsis. Cell Host Microbe 2009;6:34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2009.05.019
  39. Bi D, Cheng YT, Li X, Zhang Y. Activation of plant immune responses by a gain-of-function mutation in an atypical receptor-like kinase. Plant Physiol 2010;153:1771-1779. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.158501
  40. Noutoshi Y, Ito T, Seki M, Nakashita H, Yoshida S, Marco Y, et al. A single amino acid insertion in the WRKY domain of the Arabidopsis TIR-NBS-LRR-WRKY-type disease resistance protein SLH1 (sensitive to low humidity 1) causes activation of defense responses and hypersensitive cell death. Plant J 2005;43:873-888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02500.x
  41. Yoshioka K, Kachroo P, Tsui F, Sharma SB, Shah J, Klessig DF. Environmentally sensitive, SA-dependent defense responses in the cpr22 mutant of Arabidopsis. Plant J 2001;26:447-459. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.2641039.x
  42. Zhou F, Menke FL, Yoshioka K, Moder W, Shirano Y, Klessig DF. High humidity suppresses ssi4-mediated cell death and disease resistance upstream of MAP kinase activation, H2O2 production and defense gene expression. Plant J 2004;39:920-932. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02180.x
  43. Marino G, Funk C. Matrix metalloproteinases in plants: a brief overview. Physiol Plant 2012;145:196-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01544.x
  44. Audonnet L, Shen Y, Zhou DX. JMJ24 antagonizes histone H3K9 demethylase IBM1/JMJ25 function and interacts with RNAi pathways for gene silencing. Gene Expr Patterns 2017;25-26:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gep.2017.04.001
  45. Luttgeharm KD, Chen M, Mehra A, Cahoon RE, Markham JE, Cahoon EB. Overexpression of Arabidopsis ceramide synthases differentially affects growth, sphingolipid metabolism, programmed cell death, and mycotoxin resistance. Plant Physiol 2015;169:1108-1117. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00987
  46. Miao Y, Jiang J, Ren Y, Zhao Z. The single-stranded DNA-binding protein WHIRLY1 represses WRKY53 expression and delays leaf senescence in a developmental stage-dependent manner in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2013;163:746-756. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.223412
  47. Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Hanada K. An evolutionary view of functional diversity in family 1 glycosyltransferases. Plant J 2011; 66:182-193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04493.x